Figure 3.
Upper panel: fractional stellar mass growth of satellite galaxies in the TNG100 simulation as a function of time from their infall, for satellites selected in different stellar mass bins at $z=0$. The solid lines and dashed areas show the mean mass growth histories and their standard deviation, respectively. Lower panel: satellites stellar mass function from the TNG100 simulation (purple dashed–dotted line), compared to that predicted by decode using the simulation’s SMHM relation in input for the frozen, star-forming, and stripped satellites models (blue solid, orange dotted, and green dashed lines, respectively), along with the logarithmic difference between decode’s and TNG’s satellite stellar mass functions.

Upper panel: fractional stellar mass growth of satellite galaxies in the TNG100 simulation as a function of time from their infall, for satellites selected in different stellar mass bins at |$z=0$|⁠. The solid lines and dashed areas show the mean mass growth histories and their standard deviation, respectively. Lower panel: satellites stellar mass function from the TNG100 simulation (purple dashed–dotted line), compared to that predicted by decode using the simulation’s SMHM relation in input for the frozen, star-forming, and stripped satellites models (blue solid, orange dotted, and green dashed lines, respectively), along with the logarithmic difference between decode’s and TNG’s satellite stellar mass functions.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close