Fig. 4.
Fluctuation exponent dependence on the clustering threshold l. Analogous to Fig. 3, A–D) show the fluctuation functions for Bulgaria, Germany, Spain, and Finland but here the curves for clustering thresholds l=400 m and l=600 m are also included. Colored solid lines represent respective slopes from regression; for comparison the solid lines indicates the uncorrelated case H=0.5. Asterisks in the background represent the values from all l∈{100,200,…,800} m. E) shows the estimated H(l) against CCA distance threshold l, error bars denote the standard deviation of the estimated values by fitting the fluctuation function in the range d/D∈[0.06,0.33]. Here, additionally the results for Czech Republic are included which indicate minor or absence of correlations. Overall, the influence of l is marginal and the correlations are mostly scale-independent.

Fluctuation exponent dependence on the clustering threshold l. Analogous to Fig. 3, A–D) show the fluctuation functions for Bulgaria, Germany, Spain, and Finland but here the curves for clustering thresholds l=400 m and l=600 m are also included. Colored solid lines represent respective slopes from regression; for comparison the solid lines indicates the uncorrelated case H=0.5. Asterisks in the background represent the values from all l{100,200,,800} m. E) shows the estimated H(l) against CCA distance threshold l, error bars denote the standard deviation of the estimated values by fitting the fluctuation function in the range d/D[0.06,0.33]. Here, additionally the results for Czech Republic are included which indicate minor or absence of correlations. Overall, the influence of l is marginal and the correlations are mostly scale-independent.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close