Fig. 11
Analysis of FIs from samples 03b and 04b. A. Comparison of mean homogenization temperature against the final melting temperature. Mixed CO2–He EOS calculations are used to convert the melting temperature of these inclusions into estimates of the possible He content of these FIs. B. Comparison of entrapment pressures (at the mean temperature determined by cpx–opx thermobarometry) for different XH2O values (EOS of Span & Wagner (1996) is used when XH2O = 0.0; Duan & Zhang (2006) mixed EOS is used for XH2O = 0.15). C. Example FIs from sample 03b, including the 2 larger inclusions that return anomalously high homogenization temperatures.

Analysis of FIs from samples 03b and 04b. A. Comparison of mean homogenization temperature against the final melting temperature. Mixed CO2–He EOS calculations are used to convert the melting temperature of these inclusions into estimates of the possible He content of these FIs. B. Comparison of entrapment pressures (at the mean temperature determined by cpx–opx thermobarometry) for different XH2O values (EOS of Span & Wagner (1996) is used when XH2O = 0.0; Duan & Zhang (2006) mixed EOS is used for XH2O = 0.15). C. Example FIs from sample 03b, including the 2 larger inclusions that return anomalously high homogenization temperatures.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close