Skip to Main Content
Book cover for Oxford Handbook of Geriatric Medicine (2 edn) Oxford Handbook of Geriatric Medicine (2 edn)
Lesley Bowker et al.

A newer edition of this book is available.

Close

Contents

Book cover for Oxford Handbook of Geriatric Medicine (2 edn) Oxford Handbook of Geriatric Medicine (2 edn)
Lesley Bowker et al.
Disclaimer
Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always … More Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Appendix

Dermatomes 686

Geriatric Depression Scale 687

Barthel Index 688

The abbreviated mental test score 690

Mini-Mental State Examination 691

Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) 692

Clock-drawing and the Mini-CogTM  693

Clock-drawing test interpretation 694

Malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) 695

Glasgow Coma Scale 696

 Overview of the dermatomes, myotomes, and associated reflexes. Reproduced from Ward et al. (2009) Oxford Handbook of Clinical Rehabilitation, 2nd edn, Figure 20.1, p.317, with permission from OUP.
Fig. A.1

Overview of the dermatomes, myotomes, and associated reflexes. Reproduced from Ward et al. (2009) Oxford Handbook of Clinical Rehabilitation, 2nd edn, Figure 20.1, p.317, with permission from OUP.

Suitable as a screening test for depressive symptoms in the elderly. Ideal for evaluating the clinical severity of depression, and therefore for monitoring treatment. It is easy to administer, needs no prior psychiatric knowledge and has been well validated in many environments—home and clinical.

The original GDS was a 30-item questionnaire—time consuming and challenging for some patients (and staff). Later versions retain only the most discriminating questions; their validity approaches that of the original form. The most common version in general geriatric practice is the 15-item version.

The test (Table A.1) is undertaken orally. Ask the patient to reply indicating how they have felt over the past week. Obtain a clear yes or no reply. If necessary, repeat the question. Each depressive answer (bold) scores 1.

Table A.1
The Geriatric Depression Scale

1

Are you basically satisfied with your life?

Yes/No

2

Have you dropped many of your activities and interests?

Yes/No

3

Do you feel that your life is empty?

Yes/No

4

Do you often get bored?

Yes/No

5

Are you in good spirits most of the time?

Yes/No

6

Are you afraid that something bad is going to happen to you?

Yes/No

7

Do you feel happy most of the time?

Yes/No

8

Do you often feel helpless?

Yes/No

9

Do you prefer to stay at home, rather than going out and doing new things?

Yes/No

10

Do you feel you have more problems with memory than most?

Yes/No

11

Do you think it is wonderful to be alive now?

Yes/No

12

Do you feel pretty worthless the way you are now?

Yes/No

13

Do you feel full of energy?

Yes/No

14

Do you feel that your situation is hopeless?

Yes/No

15

Do you think that most people are better off than you are?

Yes/No

1

Are you basically satisfied with your life?

Yes/No

2

Have you dropped many of your activities and interests?

Yes/No

3

Do you feel that your life is empty?

Yes/No

4

Do you often get bored?

Yes/No

5

Are you in good spirits most of the time?

Yes/No

6

Are you afraid that something bad is going to happen to you?

Yes/No

7

Do you feel happy most of the time?

Yes/No

8

Do you often feel helpless?

Yes/No

9

Do you prefer to stay at home, rather than going out and doing new things?

Yes/No

10

Do you feel you have more problems with memory than most?

Yes/No

11

Do you think it is wonderful to be alive now?

Yes/No

12

Do you feel pretty worthless the way you are now?

Yes/No

13

Do you feel full of energy?

Yes/No

14

Do you feel that your situation is hopeless?

Yes/No

15

Do you think that most people are better off than you are?

Yes/No

0–4 No depression

5–10 Mild depression

11+ Severe depression

0 Incontinent

1 Occasional accident (once a week or less)

2 Continent

0 Incontinent, or catheterized and unable to manage

1 Occasional accident (maximum once in 24hr)

2 Continent (for more than 7 days)

0 Needs help with personal care (face, hands, teeth, shaving)

1 Independent (with equipment provided)

0 Dependent

1 Can do some tasks, needs assistance

2 Independent (on/off, wiping, dressing)

0 Dependent

1 Can do about half, needs help with cutting, etc.

2 Independent (food within reach)

0 Unable (no sitting balance)

1 Major help (eg two people)

2 Minor help, able to sit (eg one person verbal or physical)

3 Independent

0 Immobile

1 Wheelchair independent

2 Able to walk with the help of one person

3 Independent (can use walking aids if necessary)

0 Unable

1 Can do about half unaided, needs some help

2 Independent

0 Unable

1 Needs some help (including stair lift)

2 Independent up and down

0 Dependent

1 Independent

TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE = 20

Aim to record what the patient actually does do in daily life, not what he/she can do (ie a poorly motivated but capable patient may score poorly)

The score reflects the degree of independence from help provided by another person:

If supervision is required, the patient is not independent

If aids and devices are used but no help is required, the patient is independent

Use the best available evidence, asking the patient or relatives, carers, nurses and therapists, and using common sense. Observing the patient is helpful, but direct testing is not necessary

Middle categories imply that the patient supplies over 50% of the effort

It is useful to also ask about abilities before admission or acute illness, and to compare both the total Barthel score and elements of it to determine the magnitude and nature of the setback

Adapted from: Mahoney FI, Barthel D. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J  14: 56–61. Used with permission.

The AMTS is a widely applicable, well validated, brief screening test of cognitive function.

Derived by Hodkinson from a 26-item test, by dispensing with those questions which were poor discriminators of the cognitively sound and unsound (Table A.2)

Table A.2
The abbreviated mental test
AgeMust be correct (years)

Time

Without looking at timepiece; correct to nearest hour

Short term memory

Give the address ‘42 West Street’

 

Check registration

 

Check memory at end of test

Month

Exact

Year

Exact, except in January when the previous year is satisfactory. Replies ‘206’, ‘207’, etc in place of 2006, 2007 should be considered correct, as they confirm orientation

Name of place

If not in hospital ask type of place or area of town

Date of birth

Exact

Start of World War 1

Exact

Name of present monarch

Exact

Count from 20 to 1 (backwards)

Can prompt with 20–19–18, but no further prompts. Patient can hesitate and self correct but no other errors are permitted

AgeMust be correct (years)

Time

Without looking at timepiece; correct to nearest hour

Short term memory

Give the address ‘42 West Street’

 

Check registration

 

Check memory at end of test

Month

Exact

Year

Exact, except in January when the previous year is satisfactory. Replies ‘206’, ‘207’, etc in place of 2006, 2007 should be considered correct, as they confirm orientation

Name of place

If not in hospital ask type of place or area of town

Date of birth

Exact

Start of World War 1

Exact

Name of present monarch

Exact

Count from 20 to 1 (backwards)

Can prompt with 20–19–18, but no further prompts. Patient can hesitate and self correct but no other errors are permitted

8–10 Normal

7 Probably abnormal

<6 Abnormal

Reproduced from Hodkinson, HM. (1972). Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing  1: 233–8, with permission from OUP.reference

The MMSE is a widely applicable and well-validated test of cognitive function.

It is a 30-point test, takes 10–15min to complete, and covers a broader range of cognitive domains than the AMTS. It is therefore less useful as a brief screening test in general medical or geriatric practice, but is very useful in:

Confirming the nature and magnitude of deficits identified by clinical suspicion, or by the AMTS

Tracking change, for example following the introduction of cholinesterase inhibitors in dementia

The MMSE is widely used. Its copyright is now being robustly defended, and permission to publish it has not been granted. It is however widely available in older texts.

It is possible that the robust defence of copyright will result in a rapid decline in the use of what has been a useful clinical tool, to be replaced by other well-validated instruments such as the clock-drawing test.

A positive test requires the presence of items 1 and 2, and 3 or 4.

The positive likelihood ratio is 5.06 and negative likelihood ratio is 0.23.

1.

Acute onset and fluctuating course. Evidence of acute change in mental status from baseline; behavior fluctuates during the day

2.

Inattention. Easily distracted, difficulty focusing attention and keeping track with conversation

3.

Disorganized thinking. Irrelevant conversation, unclear flow of ideas, unpredictable switching from subject to subject

4.

Any mental state, other than alert, is abnormal. Describe altered states as: (a) vigilant, (b) drowsy, (c) difficult or unable to arouse

Adapted from Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al. (1990). Clarifying confusion. The Confusion Assessment Method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med  113(12): 941–8. Confusion Assessment Method: Training Manual and Coding Guide, copyright 2003, Sharon K. Inouye, M.D., MPH.reference

Clock-drawing tests (CDT) are widely accepted and well validated screening tools for dementia. Their strength is in the brisk assessment of multiple cognitive domains including long-term memory, auditory and visual processing, motor planning and execution, etc. There are many test methods. All ask subjects to draw a clock face showing a specific time, but other details and vary. Despite these differences, most appear sensitive and specific and are well tolerated. There is also evidence that non-systematic assessment—simply asking a patient to draw a clock-face showing a named time and assessing it informally—has great value in ruling in or ruling out significant cognitive dysfunction.

One test that has found widespread favour is the Mini-Cog, which combines a 3-item recall test with a CDT. It takes 2–3 minutes to administer, is sensitive and specific, and largely uninfluenced by level of education, language or other cultural factors.

1. Get the patient's attention then say three unrelated words (eg banana, sunrise, chair). Ask the patient to repeat the words to confirm registration. If the patient is unable to repeat the words after three attempts move onto the next item

2. Ask the patient to draw a clock face on a blank sheet of paper. You should prompt with:

‘First draw a large circle’

‘Now put all the numbers in the circle’

‘Now set the hands to show ten past eleven (11.10)’

Instructions may be repeated, but no more detail/help given. If they have not completed the clock in three minutes move to the next item.

3. Ask the patient to repeat the three words

Give a point for each word correctly recalled after the CDT.

A normal clock scores 2, an abnormal clock scores 0 (see Fig. A.2).

Total score is therefore out of 5 points.

Positive screen for dementia is indicated by:

Score of 0, 1 or 2

Negative screen for dementia is indicated by:

Score of 3, 4 or 5

S Borson. Reprinted with permission of the author, solely for clinical and teaching use. May not be modified or used for research without permission of the author ([email protected]). All rights reserved.

Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, et al. (2000). The mini-cog: a cognitive vital signs measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry  15: 1021–7.reference
 Clock-drawing test.
Fig. A.2

Clock-drawing test.

 The malnutrition universal screening tool.
Fig. A.3

The malnutrition universal screening tool.

Reproduced here with the kind permission of BAPEN (British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition) from the 'MUST' Explanatory Booklet. For further information see M www.bapen.org.uk.

The GCS provides a framework with which to describe a patient's state in terms of three elements of responsiveness: eye opening, verbal, and motor.

The GCS score is an artificial index that is obtained by adding scores for each of the three responses. The range of scores is 3 to 15, 3 being the worst, and 15 the best.

4 Spontaneous opening

3 Open to speech

2 Open to pain

1 No eye opening

5 Orientated

4 Confused conversation

3 Inappropriate words

2 Incomprehensible sounds

1 None

6 Obey commands

5 Localize pain

4 Withdrawal from pain—pulls limb away

3 Abnormal flexion to pain (decorticate posture)

2 Extension to pain (decerebrate posture)

1 No motor response

Note that the term 'GCS 11' has limited meaning. It is important to state the components of the GCS, eg E2V2M4 = GCS 8.

Broadly, a GCS of:

≥13 suggests mild brain injury

9–12 suggests moderate injury

≤8 suggests severe brain injury (coma)

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close