
Contents
-
-
-
-
-
Autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance Autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance
-
Examples of AD conditions Examples of AD conditions
-
Aspects of AD inheritance Aspects of AD inheritance
-
Genetic advice (
see Figs. and ) Genetic advice (
see Figs. and )
-
Typical family tree Typical family tree
-
Autosomal dominant inheritance Autosomal dominant inheritance
-
-
-
Autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance Autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance
-
Examples of AR conditions Examples of AR conditions
-
Aspects of AR inheritance Aspects of AR inheritance
-
Genetic advice (
see Figs. and ) Genetic advice (
see Figs. and )
-
Typical family tree Typical family tree
-
Autosomal recessive inheritance Autosomal recessive inheritance
-
-
-
Mitochondrial inheritance Mitochondrial inheritance
-
Examples of mitochondrially inherited conditions Examples of mitochondrially inherited conditions
-
Aspects of mitochondrial inheritance Aspects of mitochondrial inheritance
-
Genetic advice (
see Figs. and ) Genetic advice (
see Figs. and )
-
Typical family tree Typical family tree
-
Mitochondrial inheritance Mitochondrial inheritance
-
-
-
Mosaicism Mosaicism
-
Somatic mosaicism Somatic mosaicism
-
Germline mosaicism Germline mosaicism
-
-
Multifactorial inheritance Multifactorial inheritance
-
Introduction Introduction
-
Examples of multifactorial inheritance Examples of multifactorial inheritance
-
Congenital or childhood Congenital or childhood
-
Later life Later life
-
-
Aspects of multifactorial inheritance Aspects of multifactorial inheritance
-
Complex traits Complex traits
-
Falconer’s polygenic threshold model Falconer’s polygenic threshold model
-
-
Typical family tree Typical family tree
-
Multifactorial inheritance Multifactorial inheritance
-
-
Genetic advice Genetic advice
-
-
Taking a family history Taking a family history
-
Genetic nomenclature Genetic nomenclature
-
Useful resources Useful resources
-
-
X-linked (XL) inheritance X-linked (XL) inheritance
-
X-inactivation X-inactivation
-
Examples of XL recessive conditions Examples of XL recessive conditions
-
Aspects of XL recessive inheritance Aspects of XL recessive inheritance
-
Typical family tree Typical family tree
-
X-linked recessive inheritance X-linked recessive inheritance
-
X-linked recessive inheritance X-linked recessive inheritance
-
-
Genetic advice (
see Figs. and ) Genetic advice (
see Figs. and )
-
X-linked dominant inheritance (XLD) (
see Fig. ) X-linked dominant inheritance (XLD) (
see Fig. )
-
Typical family tree Typical family tree
-
X-linked dominant inheritance X-linked dominant inheritance
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cite
Autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance
AD disorders are encoded on the autosomes (i.e. not the X or Y chromosome) and the disorder manifests in heterozygotes, i.e. when a single copy of the mutant allele is present. AD disorders are characterized by inter- and intrafamilial variability. Factors influencing this variability may include modifier genes (the expression of which can influence a phenotype resulting from a mutation at another locus) and environmental exposure.
Examples of AD conditions
Huntington disease (HD)
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)
Myotonic dystrophy (MD)
Adult dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)
Aspects of AD inheritance
Penetrance is the percentage of individuals with a mutation who express the disorder to any degree, from the most trivial to the most severe. Many dominant disorders show age-dependent penetrance, e.g. hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies (HMSN), hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP), Huntington disease (HD). Features of these conditions are not present at birth, but become evident over time. Some conditions show incomplete penetrance, i.e. not all mutation carriers will manifest the disorder during a natural lifespan, e.g. some individuals who inherit hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) do not develop cancer.
Expressivity is the variation in the severity of a disorder in individuals who have inherited the same disease allele. Many AD conditions show quite striking variation in severity between families (interfamilial variation) and also within families carrying the same mutation (intrafamilial variation). A mildly affected parent can have a severely affected child and vice versa. For example, in tuberous sclerosis a parent with normal development and minimal cutaneous signs may have a child who develops infantile spasms and severe developmental delay.
Somatic mosaicism: A new mutation arising at an early stage in embryogenesis can give rise to a partial phenotype, often present in a dermatomal distribution, e.g. segmental neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). If the mutation is also present in the ovary or testis (germline mosaicism) it can be transmitted to future generations (who will inherit it in its non-mosaic form) ( see Mosaicism, p. 46).
Germline mosaicism (gonadal mosaicism): A new mutation arising during oogenesis or spermatogenesis may cause no phenotype in the parent unless the somatic cells are involved as well (gonosomal mosaicism), but can be transmitted to the offspring. If a population of germ cells harbours the mutation there may be a significant recurrence risk, e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta ( see Mosaicism, p. 46).
Reproductive fitness: Some AD disorders have a reproductive fitness of zero, i.e. mutation carriers do not reproduce. Such a condition is maintained in the population entirely by new mutation. Many other AD disorders have only modest effects on reproductive fitness.
New mutation rate: The de novo mutation rate varies considerably between different AD conditions. It is high in NF1, with as many as 50% of cases representing new mutations; for other conditions, e.g. HD, new mutation is unusual.
Paternal age effect: For a few AD disorders the chance of a new mutation increases with advancing paternal age, e.g. achondroplasia, Apert syndrome.
Anticipation is worsening of disease severity in successive generations. This is a feature of a few AD conditions and characteristically occurs in triplet repeat disorders where there is expansion of the triplet repeat in the maternal or paternal germline, e.g. myotonic dystrophy (maternal), Huntingdon disease (HD) (paternal). In addition to variable expressivity, the mutation itself is unstably transmitted and varies in size between different generations (dynamic mutation).
Some conditions show incomplete and age-dependent penetrance and these factors can make it difficult to give accurate genetic advice where the familial mutation is unknown.
Males and females are affected equally.
Males and females can both transmit the disorder.
There is a 50% risk to offspring in any pregnancy that they will inherit the mutation (NB depending on penetrance and expressivity, the risk of becoming symptomatic may be less than this).
The severity of the disorder in the offspring may vary, being similar, more severe, or less severe than in the parent.
Examine parents very carefully before concluding that they are unaffected. For disorders with incomplete or age-dependent penetrance, apparently unaffected individuals may still be at some risk of transmitting the disorder (see above).
Some AD disorders, particularly cancer susceptibility disorders such as retinoblastoma and von Hippel–Landau disease (VHL) ( see Chapter 7, Retinoblastoma and von Hippel–Landau disease, pp. 284 and 288) are recessive at the cellular level. The mutation confers increased susceptibility to tumours because of a heritable mutation in one allele, but cell behaviour appears normal in the heterozygous state. Tumorigenesis requires inactivation of the second allele (‘second-hit’).
Typical family tree
Autosomal dominant inheritance

Family trees showing AD inheritance. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)

Autosomal dominant inheritance. (Reproduced with permission from Oxford University Press, Firth, Hurst and Hall, Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, 2005).
Autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance
AR disorders are encoded on the autosomes (i.e. not the X or Y chromosome) and the disorder manifests in homozygotes (two identical mutations) and compound heterozygotes (two different mutations), i.e. when both alleles at a given locus are mutated. Heterozygotes (single mutation) do not manifest a phenotype (e.g. cystic fibrosis (CF)), or if they do, this is very mild in comparison with the disease state (e.g. sickle cell trait vs. sickle cell disease). Affected siblings often follow a broadly similar clinical course which is more similar than for many autosomal dominant (AD) disorders.
Examples of AR conditions
Cystic fibrosis (CF)
Sickle cell disease
Hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) type 1
Phenylketonuria (PKU)
Aspects of AR inheritance
Heterozygote advantage: for common recessive conditions, heterozygote advantage is usually more important than recurrent mutation for maintaining the disease gene at high frequency, e.g. sickle cell disease where heterozygotes are less susceptible than normal individuals to malaria.
Founder effect is a high prevalence of a genetic disorder in an isolated or inbred population due to the fact that many members of the population are derived from a common ancestor who harboured a disease-causing mutation. The affected individuals in a given population are all homozygous for the same mutation (founder mutation). An example of this is congenital Finnish nephropathy, which occurs with disproportionately high incidence in Finland compared with other European populations.
Carrier determination: for a relative of the proband is reasonably straightforward if the mutations in the proband are defined. Determining whether an unrelated partner is a carrier is usually more problematic. Unless the partner has a family history of the disorder, he/she will be at population risk for carrier status. If the disorder is rare, the risk of affected offspring will be low and equivalent to half the carrier risk in the general population. Carrier testing for those at population risk is possible for a few diseases, e.g. CF, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), sickle cell disease, thalassaemia, in certain circumstances eg. where one parent is a known carrier. Whereas inborn errors of metabolism often show a marked distinction in enzyme activity (or other biochemical markers) between normal and affected, there is often considerable overlap in levels between heterozygotes (carriers) and normals, making assignment of carrier status problematic. Tay–Sachs disease is a notable exception.
Population risk for carrier status from disease frequency can be calculated by geneticists using the Hardy–Weinberg equation.
Disease expressed only in homozygotes and compound heterozygotes.
Parents are obligate carriers (spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an exception to this rule as there is a significant new mutation rate of 1.7%).
Risk to carrier parents for an affected child is 25% (1 in 4).
Healthy siblings of affected individuals have a two-thirds risk of carrier status.
Risk of carrier status diminishes by one-half with every degree of relationship distanced from parents of affected individual, e.g. second-degree relatives (grandparents and aunts/uncles) and third-degree relatives (first cousins, great-grandparents, great-aunts, and great-uncles).
All offspring of an affected individual whose partner is a non-carrier are obligate carriers.
Typical family tree
Autosomal recessive inheritance

Family trees showing AR inheritance. If both parents are carriers, there is a 25% risk of an affected child in any pregnancy, independent of gender. The diagram on the right illustrates a consanguineous relationship between first cousins (

see Consanguinity, p. 12). A common ancestor is a carrier for a recessive mutation that may occur in homozygous form in a descendent as a consequence of consanguinity. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)


Autosomal recessive inheritance. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005) Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
Mitochondrial inheritance
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has unique genetic features that distinguish it from nuclear DNA. The mtDNA genome of humans is a double-stranded circular DNA, 16.6kb in length and encoding 13 proteins (all subunits of respiratory chain complexes involved in oxidative phosphorylation), two ribosomal RNAs, and 22 transfer RNAs. There are no introns and most of the mitochondrial genome is coding sequence. Mitochondria typically contain several copies of mtDNA and a typical human somatic cell can contain up to 1000 mitochondria (i.e. 5000–10 000 copies of mtDNA) representing >1% of the cell’s total DNA. Mature oocytes contain a staggering ~100 000 copies of mtDNA, whereas sperm contain only 7100 copies.
The organs most often affected in mitochondrial disorders are highly energy-demanding tissues, such as the central nervous system (CNS), skeletal and cardiac muscle, pancreatic islets, liver, and kidney.
Components of the mitochondria are encoded by both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Hence some mitochondrial disorders, e.g. Leigh’s disease are encoded by the nuclear genome, in which case they usually follow an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance.
Examples of mitochondrially inherited conditions
MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalopathy, Lactic Acidosis and Stroke-like episodes)
Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON)
Aspects of mitochondrial inheritance
Maternal inheritance. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is exclusively maternally inherited since paternal mitochondria enter the egg on fertilization (where they constitute 0.1% of the total mitochondria) and they and their mtDNA are rapidly eliminated early in embryogenesis. For the purposes of genetic counselling the risk of paternal inheritance is essentially zero.
Mutation rate. Human mtDNA has a mutation rate 10–20 times that of nuclear DNA, probably due to replication repair systems that are less stringent than those in the nucleus. This characteristic has been utilized by anthropologists to study human migration patterns.
Inheritance is matrilineal, i.e. the condition can only be transmitted by females in the maternal line.
Males do not transmit mitochondrially inherited disorders.
Typically a mitochondrially inherited condition can affect both sexes.
Correlation between phenotypic severity and level of mutant mtDNA is poor in many mitochondrial diseases.
Typical family tree
Mitochondrial inheritance

A typical family tree showing mitochondrial inheritance. Offspring of females in the maternal line are at risk; males do not transmit the condition. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)

Mitochondrial inheritance. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
Mosaicism
Many genetic disorders result in every cell in the body having the same mutation. However, it is possible, if a somatic mutation occurs early in embryogenesis, for one individual to have two, or more, cell lines that differ in their genetic constitution ( see Fig. 2.7). It occurs in two forms:

Somatic mosaicism
This would be suspected in either:
An individual with a de novo single-gene disorder who appears less severely affected than usual.
An individual with a segmental distribution of a genetic anomaly, e.g. segmental neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) where café au lait spots and/or cutaneous neurofibromas follow a dermatomal pattern.
Germline mosaicism
An adult with germline mosaicism may appear to be phenotypically normal, but has two or more children with an autosomal dominant disorder, such as tuberous sclerosis. This can be explained by the parent having germline mosaicism with a proportion of his/her sperm or egg cells carrying the gene mutation.
Multifactorial inheritance
Introduction
From a clinical perspective there is a continuous spectrum of disease from, at the one end, disorders that are strictly genetic and caused by fully penetrant mutations with minimal contribution from the environment to, at the other extreme, those caused predominantly by environmental factors (e.g. teratogens) with minimal contribution from genetic factors. Between these two extremes lie the incompletely penetrant and the polygenic disorders, creating a smooth transition from strictly genetic to multifactorial illnesses ( see Fig. 2.8).

The progression from strictly genetic to strictly environmental causation in the aetiology of disease. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
Examples of multifactorial inheritance
Congenital or childhood
Cleft lip/palate (isolated)
Congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH)
Congenital heart disease (most)
Neural tube defect (NTD)
Hirschsprung’s disease
Pyloric stenosis
Later life
Schizophrenia
Ischaemic heart disease (IHD)
Diabetes mellitus
Alzheimer disease
Inflammatory bowel disease
Aspects of multifactorial inheritance
The disease processes mentioned above do not generally follow a Mendelian pattern of inheritance, nevertheless they share a tendency to cluster in families, more than would be expected by chance. Many of these conditions probably depend on a mixture of major and minor genetic determinants, together with environmental factors: multifactorial inheritance. Diseases inherited in this manner are termed complex diseases. Multifactorial inheritance may involve a small number of loci (oligogenic), many loci (polygenic), or a single major locus with a polygenic background.
In multifactorial inheritance, disease occurrence is attributable to the interaction of the environment with alleles at many loci interspersed throughout the genome. The mapping and identification of these genes, though now a huge research area, is difficult because the disease-associated alleles occur almost as commonly in patients as in healthy individuals; even the highest-risk genotypes confer only modest risk of disease. Thus there are, currently, few susceptibility genes known to play a role in multifactorial diseases.
Complex traits
Traits such as intelligence, behavioural traits, height, and weight approximate to a normal distribution in the general population ( see Fig. 2.9). A large number of loci are involved in determining these characteristics, together with environmental factors. For example, factors influencing height include parental height, nutrition, and chronic illness, and in total >100 genetic loci contribute to height.

How a trait determined by a small number of loci, each with two different alleles, can assume a continuous distribution of 1:2:1, 1:4:6:4:1 and 1:6:15:20:15:6:1 respectively. (Adapted from McGuffin, P., Owen, M.J., and Gottesman, I.I. (2002). Psychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.)
Falconer’s polygenic threshold model
This is based on the assumption that liability to a condition is multifactorial and follows a normal distribution in the population, and that the disease occurs when a particular threshold value is exceeded. The normal distribution for liability is shifted in close relatives of an affected individual; hence a greater proportion of them will exceed the critical threshold value and be affected ( see Fig. 2.10). For first-degree relatives the expected incidence approximates to the square-root of the population incidence.

The distribution of liability to a multifactorial trait or disease. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
For a condition affecting 1/1000 individuals (0.1%), the risk to sibs, parents, and children is ~1/30 (3%), falling to 1/100 (1%) for second-degree relatives, and close to population risk for third-degree relatives. This is fairly close to the figures observed for neural tube defects and cleft palate.
Gender predisposition. For most multifactorial disorders males or females have a greater frequency. If the disorder does occur in the less likely gender then there is a greater recurrence risk implying more genes and/or environmental factors are present in that family.
Typical family tree
Multifactorial inheritance
Genetic advice
Several general principles affect the risk:
Relationship to the affected individual. The risk is greatest amongst close relatives and decreases rapidly with increasing distance of relationship ( see Fig. 2.11).
Severity of the disorder in the proband. The risks to relatives are greater if the proband is severely affected, than if the proband is only mildly affected. The average liability in the siblings of affected individuals will be greater (further right-shifted) in such families ( see Fig. 2.10).
The number of affected individuals in the family. If two or more close relatives are affected, then risks for other relatives are increased. If there are several affected close relatives, the possibility of an autosomal dominant (AD) disorder with incomplete penetrance should be considered carefully.
Gender. This may affect the risk for disorders such as pyloric stenosis and cleft lip.

Multifactorial inheritance. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
Taking a family history
A standard approach to all consultations in which there may be a genetic element, is to take a full family history, going back three generations, also referred to as a ‘pedigree’ (from the French pied á grue = crane’s foot). As genetic knowledge increases, the taking of such a history may be indicated in an increasing number of consultations, whether there is an obvious genetic component or not.
Some genetic specialists have access to sophisticated pedigree computer software which enables easy tabulation of the family history, and can be shared with relevant professionals. Despite this, nearly all consultants and genetic counsellors in the UK approach family history taking with pen in hand, and the great majority of genetic consultations in the UK are based on hand-drawn family trees. One approach is shown on the next page ( see Fig. 2.12).

How to draw a pedigree (a, b). Reproduced with kind permission of the National Genetics Education and Development Centre (NGEDC).
PCPs will need a pen and paper, and a working knowledge of both the basic symbols and the correct understanding of genetic nomenclature ( see inside back cover).
Genetic nomenclature
The first individual identified in a family tree (pedigree) who has been identified clinically as being affected by a genetic disorder, is known as the proband. The individual who is seeking advice is called the consultand.
Guidelines for PCPs (e.g. NICE) commonly require the reader to quantify the number of first- or second-degree relatives with the target condition:
First-degree relative: one who shares half the DNA and is a full sibling, child, or a parent of the individual. This can also be expressed as one meiosis difference.
Second-degree relative: one who is two meioses away from the individual, i.e. their grandparent, grandchild, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, half-sibling.
Such history-taking has attendant difficulties:
Evocation of painful memories/experiences, e.g. death of a close relative or pregnancy loss.
Possible disclosure of non-paternity, extramarital relationships, consanguinity, etc.
The need to be re-visited over time as medical histories change.
This will require empathic, but focused, responses from the history-taker who must be constantly diplomatic and gentle, and recognize the need for confidentiality.
Useful resources

X-linked (XL) inheritance
XL disorders are encoded on the X chromosome. An XL recessive (XLR) disorder manifests in males who have one X chromosome, but generally not in carrier females who have two X chromosomes (one normal and one mutated copy). Some X-linked disorders are almost never expressed in females. In some disorders females have symptoms infrequently, e.g. Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)/Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), whereas for others, e.g. X-linked hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (X-HMSN) and fragile X syndrome (FRAXA), manifestation in female carriers is fairly common but is usually less severe than in affected males. Disorders, in which heterozygotes commonly manifest, e.g. X-HMSN, may be said to follow X-linked semi-dominant inheritance.
X-inactivation
In order to fully understand sex chromosome inheritance patterns, it is important to divert briefly into epigenetics. This term means ‘on top of genetics’. Epigenetics studies processes, e.g. methylation that turn genes ‘on’ or ‘off’.
The sex chromosomes differ from the autosomes:
The Y chromosome has ~122 genes that code mainly for the processes necessary to turn the fetus into a male.
The X chromosome has >1000 genes, many of which are key to normal growth and development, including genes that:
code for dystrophin—a major protein in muscles
code for several of the proteins involved in the clotting sequence, e.g. haemophilia A (Factor VIII) and haemophilia B (Factor IX).
A normal male will have a single Y and a single X chromosome, whereas a normal female complement is two X chromosomes. In order to prevent overexpression of the X chromosome in a female, only one copy of the X chromosome is active in a female cell, the other being, mostly, inactivated. This process, X-inactivation, occurs in every cell in a developing female embryo 1–2 weeks after conception. It is also referred to as Lyonization in honour of its proposer, Dr Mary Lyon.
The early events in X-inactivation are under the control of the X-chromosome inactivation centre (Xic). The XIST gene (X Inactivation Specific Transcript), located at Xq13.3, plays an essential role in the initiation of X-inactivation by spreading an inactivation signal. Initiation of X-inactivation involves a counting step in which the number of X chromosomes in the cell is counted such that only a single X chromosome is functional per diploid adult cell, i.e. in a female with three X chromosomes (47,XXX), two X chromosomes are inactivated and in a male with two X chromosomes (47,XXY), one is inactivated.
A small region of the inactivated X chromosome remains unaffected by this process and is found at the tip of the short arm—the pseudoautosomal
region (PAR) ( see X-linked dominant inheritance, p. 57).
X-inactivation in the embryo is a random process, which should therefore result in ~50% of cells containing the maternal X inactive and ~50% of cells containing the paternal X inactive.
Significant deviation from a 50:50 inactivation pattern is a feature of some X-linked disorders, a phenomenon referred to as skewed X-inactivation. Skewing of X-inactivation is occasionally observed among normal females in the population.
Examples of XL recessive conditions
Duchenne (DMD) and Becker (BMD) muscular dystrophy
Haemophilia A and B
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
Red–green colour blindness
Aspects of XL recessive inheritance
Manifesting carriers. Unfavourable skewing of X-inactivation in key tissues may be a major factor in determining whether or not an XLR disorder is expressed in heterozygotes. As noted, the penetrance in heterozygotes shows wide variation between different XLR disorders.
Germline mosaicism. A number of XLR disorders—most notably DMD/BMD—have a substantial risk of germline mosaicism (i.e. oocytes or sperm with a mixture of chromosomal material). For the mother of an affected boy with a known mutation that is not present in the mother’s genomic DNA, there is a 1 in 5 (20%) risk to a future son who inherits the same X chromosome as his affected brother (i.e. there is an overall 5% risk to future pregnancies), hence prenatal diagnosis should be offered ( see Chapter 5, Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy, p. 112).
Typical family tree
X-linked recessive inheritance

A typical family tree showing X-linked recessive inheritance. The condition is expressed in males, but not in females. For a carrier female, on average, 50% of her sons will be affected and 50% of her daughters will be carriers. All daughters of an affected male are obligate carriers and none of his sons inherit the condition. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005) Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
X-linked recessive inheritance

X-linked recessive inheritance. (a) Offspring of a carrier mother. (b) Offspring of an affected father. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005), Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
Males carrying the mutation are severely affected; females carrying the mutation are generally either unaffected or more mildly affected than males.
The degree to which females express the disorder is largely governed by X-inactivation patterns.
When a carrier female has a pregnancy there are four possible outcomes, each equally likely. These are:
a normal daughter
a carrier daughter
a normal son
an affected son
Another way of expressing this is that in a female pregnancy there is a 50% chance of a carrier daughter; in a male pregnancy there is a 50% chance of an affected son.
When an affected male fathers a pregnancy, all of his daughters will be carriers and none of his sons will be affected.
The family tree shows no male-to-male transmission.
Even if the proband is the only affected member, it is generally more likely that the mother is a carrier than that the proband has the condition as the result of a de novo mutation. For XLR conditions where reproductive fitness is zero, there is a two-thirds chance that the mother is a mutation carrier and a one-third chance that the mutation is de novo for an apparently sporadic case.
If the mother of a sporadic case with a presumed de novo mutation does not herself carry the mutation in her blood, female siblings of the proband should still be offered carrier testing by mutation detection because of the small possibility of germline mosaicism in the mother.
Females with unusually severe features of an XLR disorder may have this as a consequence of:
Highly unfavourably skewed X-inactivation.
Turner syndrome, where the girl has a single X chromosome.
X-autosome translocation.
Hence a karyotype is indicated in these circumstances.
X-linked dominant inheritance (XLD) (
see Fig. 2.15)
An XLD disorder manifests very severely in males, often leading to spontaneous loss or neonatal death of affected male pregnancies. Hence the disorder appears to affect females exclusively and there is often a history of miscarriage and a predominance of females in the pedigree. XLD disorders are uncommon and examples include the rare genetic disorder Rett syndrome.
Typical family tree
X-linked dominant inheritance

A family tree showing X-linked dominant inheritance. The condition is manifest in female heterozygotes and male hemizygotes. Many of these conditions cause spontaneous loss of affected male pregnancies. (Reproduced from Firth, Hurst and Hall (2005). Oxford Desk Reference—Clinical Genetics, with permission from Oxford University Press.)
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 2 |
December 2022 | 1 |
May 2023 | 1 |
September 2023 | 1 |
October 2023 | 1 |
November 2023 | 1 |
December 2023 | 2 |
March 2024 | 1 |
April 2024 | 5 |
May 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 3 |
July 2024 | 1 |
September 2024 | 2 |
October 2024 | 4 |
November 2024 | 2 |
December 2024 | 2 |
January 2025 | 15 |
February 2025 | 2 |
March 2025 | 5 |
April 2025 | 3 |