Abstract
Synthetic and non-synthetic microfibers are found in habitats and wildlife globally. Yet, it remains unclear whether different microfiber types affect fish or increase bioaccumulation of sorbed persistent organic pollutants (POPs). To better understand microfiber effects in fish, we tested different microfiber types (cotton and polyester), and to examine microfibers as a vector of chemicals we tested them with and without chemical mixtures (clean microfibers and microfibers exposed to treated wastewater effluent). The effects on survival, growth, condition indices, and fatty acids, along with bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), were assessed in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish were exposed through their diet to ∼100 microfibers/d for 28 d. Fatty acid contents varied between fish exposed to cotton and polyester microfibers (p < 0.05), but the magnitude of these differences were small and not different when compared to control fish. However, fish that were exposed to microfibers with treated wastewater had significantly lower n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratios compared to fish exposed to microfibers without wastewater (regardless of material type), suggesting higher inflammation and stress levels in treatments with microfibers exposed to wastewater. Finally, fish fed cotton microfibers showed higher concentrations of nona-BDEs. Our research suggests that environmentally relevant concentrations of microfibers cause minimal differences in PBDE concentrations and essential fatty acids, although material type may play a role in chemical bioavailability, especially for cotton. Further, our findings confirm that non-synthetic microfibers (e.g., cotton), show impacts in biota. We thus conclude that microfibers broadly, should be considered as potentially carrying having their own unique suites of contaminants, instead of purely focusing on plastic microfibers in research and policy.
Accepted manuscripts
