Abstract

Background

To further reduce the maternal mortality ratio, India needs to narrow down the social inequity in the use of maternal healthcare services. This study quantifies the contribution of factors explaining the average gap in the use of full antenatal care, medical assistance at delivery and postnatal check-ups between scheduled castes/scheduled tribes (SCs/STs) and the remaining population in India.

Methods

Using the most recent round of the National Family Health Survey conducted during 2005–06, this study quantifies the contribution of selected predictors explaining the gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population.

Results

Coverage of all three services is considerably lower among women of SCs/STs than the remaining population. Differences in household wealth contribute ∼37–55% of the gap in the use of the services between the social groups. A considerable part of the gap in coverage of medical assistance at delivery and postnatal check-ups is contributed by differences in the coverage of antenatal care.

Conclusions

The Indian constitution provides reservation for SCs/STs in enrolment in government educational institutions and jobs. There is a need for special policy in a similar way, to increase the coverage of maternal healthcare services among SC/ST women of the country.

Introduction

Scheduled castes (SCs) and scheduled tribes (SCs) are historically marginalized and disadvantaged social groups officially recognized and listed by the Constitution of India.1 According to the Census of India (2011), together they constitute 25.2% (∼300 million) of the total population of India—SCs contribute 16.6% and STs contribute 8.6%.2 The Constitution of India has accorded them special status and provided reservation in politics, education and jobs; and various other arrangements such as laws that abolish the practices that perpetuate social inequities, and development programs specially designed to cater their needs.3 Nevertheless, they continue to face multiple disadvantages compared with the rest of the population.46 SCs/STs have worse social and economic development indicators than rest of the population.7 The same is true for their demographic and health indicators as well. SCs/STs have substantially lower wealth than other social groups in the country.8 Their life expectancy is relatively low and child and adult mortality relatively high.911 They contribute ∼50% of all maternal deaths in the country, and their children are relatively more undernourished.12,13

One of the reasons behind such a dismal health situation prevailing among SCs/STs is poor utilization of healthcare services. The same is true with regard to the utilization of maternal healthcare services.14 Previous studies conducted at national and sub-national levels have shown that the coverage of both antenatal care and institutional delivery is worse among SCs/STs compared with the rest of the population.1517 They find that low income, low education, remote location and lack of awareness are the main factors responsible for low coverage of maternity services among SCs/STs. These studies further suggest that social and cultural reasons as well as social discrimination by healthcare providers are also responsible for low coverage of the services among SCs/STs.

Although existing studies have documented the factors associated with low coverage of maternal healthcare services among different social groups, none of them, however, has quantified the contribution of factors explaining the average gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population. Since SCs/STs constitute about a quarter of the total population, raising the level of healthcare utilization among them may lead to a further reduction in maternal mortality and improvement in maternal health in India as a whole. The present study, therefore, aims to understand the respective contributions of the factors that explain the average gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population.

For this purpose, we use cross-sectional data from the National Family Health Survey conducted during 2005–06 and use the modified Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition method that is useful in explaining the gap in a non-linear (binary) outcome between two population groups.18 This decomposition technique explains the average gap in an outcome between groups through endowment and unobserved endowment. The endowment component explains the gap due to differences in the distribution of the determinants between the groups, while the coefficient component is the portion of the gap due to group differences in immeasurable or unobserved endowments. An advantage of the decomposition analysis over regression analysis is that it quantifies the contribution of factors that explain the average gap in an outcome between two groups. Understanding the contribution of the determinants that explain the gap in the use of maternal healthcare services is extremely important to design appropriate, context-relevant program and policy responses.

Methods

Data source

This study used the third round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) conducted in India during 2005–06. The NFHS-3 is a large-scale, household-based survey and collected information spanning across the states and union territories of India. The main purpose of the survey was to provide reliable estimates of fertility and family planning, infant and childhood mortality, utilization of maternal healthcare services, maternal and childhood nutritional status, etc. The survey adopted a multistage sampling design—two-stage sampling design in most of the urban areas and three-stage design in most of the rural areas. The survey collected information using household schedules, individual/women's schedule and men schedule. The household and individual response rates were >95%. The details about the sampling design, sample size, response rate and content of the schedules are given in the national report of NFHS-3.19

Outcome variables

We used full antenatal care, medical assistance at delivery and postnatal check-ups as indicators of maternal healthcare services. These variables are defined as follows.

Full antenatal care

Those women who have visited for at least three antenatal check-ups and taken at least two tetanus injections and consumed iron folic tables/syrups for at least 90 days during their pregnancy are considered as having full antenatal care.20

Medical assistance at delivery

It is defined as any home or institutional delivery assisted by medical professionals, such as a doctor, an Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANM)/Lady Health Visitor (LHV) or other health personnel. In the NFHS-3, the questions on birth attended by medical professionals are regarding the last three births with a reference period of 5 years.

Postnatal check-ups

Postnatal check-up is defined as postnatal care within 42 days after childbirth.21,22 In NFHS-3, this was estimated for the most recent live birth in 5 years preceding the survey date.

All three indicators were estimated for the most recent live birth with a reference period of 5 years preceding the survey date to minimize the recall bias. Hence, the final analytical sample size was 36 850 women (women with the most recent live births). Detail of sample profile could be referred to in Appendix 1.

Predictors

The affiliation to a social group is the main predictor used in the analysis. Caste/tribe is defined based on the respondent's self-report as belonging to STs, SCs, other backward classes (OBCs) and others. In the NFHS-3, information on caste/tribe was collected under four categories—SCs, STs, OBCs and others. In the present analysis, we combine SCs and STs and refer to them as SCs/STs. The other two groups (OBC and others) are referred to as the ‘remaining population’.

The low use of health services in a population may be attributed to an array of supply and demand factors.2325 Hence, looking into data availability and context, the present study includes a number of socioeconomic and demographic factors to assess their contribution in explaining the gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population. These variables are found to be significantly associated with the use of maternal healthcare services in India. The variables used in the analysis are place of residence (urban, rural), age of women at birth of the child (≤19 years, 20–24 years, 25–29 years, ≥30 years), household wealth (poorest, poor, middle, rich, richest), women's education (no schooling, 1–5 years of schooling, 6–12 years of schooling, >12 years of schooling), husband's education (no schooling, 1–5 years of schooling, 6–12 years of schooling, >12 years of schooling), women's exposure to media (unexposed, exposed), current working status of the women (no, yes), birth order and interval (first order birth, higher order birth with <24 months intervals, higher order birth with 24–47 months intervals, higher order birth with ≥48 months intervals), women's autonomy (low, medium, high) and geographic region of residence within India (north, east, central, northeast, west, south). The geographic regions have been included to adjust state-level variations in the progress of health and development indicators.

Previous studies have measured women's autonomy based on indicators of women's mobility (freedom to visit places unescorted) and decision-making authority.26,27 The NFHS-3 provides sufficient information on all these indicators to compute a women's autonomy index. Five decision-making indicators are used: (i) decision on own health care, (ii) decision on large household purchases, (iii) decision on purchase of daily household needs, (iv) decision on visits to family and relatives and (v) decision on spending husband's earnings. Three mobility indicators are used: (i) allowed to go to market, (ii) allowed to go to a health facility and (iii) allowed to go outside the village. Based on these indicators, a composite index is computed using principal component analysis termed as women's autonomy and divided into three categories: relatively low, medium and high autonomy. The geographic regions are formulated based on the regional classification of the NFHS-3.19

Statistical analysis

Bivariate analysis is used to examine the differences in the use of full antenatal care, medical assistance at delivery and postnatal check-ups between SCs/STs and the remaining population. We applied χ2 test to understand the nature of association before putting the exposure variables into the multivariate analysis. Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition technique is a commonly used approach to identify and quantify the factors associated with inter-group differences in mean level of outcome.28,29 In the present study, this reveals how the differences in the use of the maternal healthcare services between the SCs/STs and remaining population can be explained by differences in socioeconomic status between the groups. This technique however is not appropriate if the outcome is binary (as in our case) in nature.18 Hence, we used the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition technique modified for binary outcomes to decompose the gap between social groups in use of maternal healthcare services.18 For the decomposition analysis, we used the ‘fairlie’ command available in Stata 10. The decomposition method proposed by Fairlie18 is described in detail in Appendix 3. The exposure variables were tested for possible multicollinearity before entering them into the analysis. As the NFHS-3 used multistage sampling design, standard errors were adjusted for weighting and clustering in all estimations. The details of the sampling weight are given in the report of NFHS-3.19

Results

Table 1 shows the differences in the selected socioeconomic indicators among the women of SCs/STs and the remaining population. Marriage and child bearing starts early among SCs/STs compared with the remaining population. Individual and husband's schooling is lower among SCs/STs than the remaining population. For instance, only 5% of SC/ST women have completed education up to high school; the corresponding figure is 18% among the women of remaining population. About 40% SC/ST women belong to the poorest wealth quintile compared with only 14% women of the remaining population. Current use of contraceptive is 40 versus 50% among the women of SCs/STs and remaining population, respectively. About 80% SC/ST women live in rural area, whereas ∼60% women of the remaining population are rural dwellers.

Table 1

Comparison of selected characteristics of married women by social groups in India, 2005–06

SCs/STsRemaining population
Mean age at marriage17.718.9
Mean age at first birth19.420.9
% of women attended high school and above4.718.2
% of husbands attended high school and above20.443.4
% of women belonging to poorest wealth quintile40.113.6
% of women with no media exposure38.824.1
% of women living in rural area81.663.6
% of women currently not using any contraceptive60.149.6
% of stunted children48.635.5
SCs/STsRemaining population
Mean age at marriage17.718.9
Mean age at first birth19.420.9
% of women attended high school and above4.718.2
% of husbands attended high school and above20.443.4
% of women belonging to poorest wealth quintile40.113.6
% of women with no media exposure38.824.1
% of women living in rural area81.663.6
% of women currently not using any contraceptive60.149.6
% of stunted children48.635.5
Table 1

Comparison of selected characteristics of married women by social groups in India, 2005–06

SCs/STsRemaining population
Mean age at marriage17.718.9
Mean age at first birth19.420.9
% of women attended high school and above4.718.2
% of husbands attended high school and above20.443.4
% of women belonging to poorest wealth quintile40.113.6
% of women with no media exposure38.824.1
% of women living in rural area81.663.6
% of women currently not using any contraceptive60.149.6
% of stunted children48.635.5
SCs/STsRemaining population
Mean age at marriage17.718.9
Mean age at first birth19.420.9
% of women attended high school and above4.718.2
% of husbands attended high school and above20.443.4
% of women belonging to poorest wealth quintile40.113.6
% of women with no media exposure38.824.1
% of women living in rural area81.663.6
% of women currently not using any contraceptive60.149.6
% of stunted children48.635.5

Differences in use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and remaining population

Figure 1 presents differences in the utilization of maternal healthcare services among women belonging to SCs/STs and the remaining population. The utilization of all three services is lower among SCs/STs than among the remaining population. The coverage of full antenatal care is 15% among SCs/STs compared with ∼25% among the remaining population. A similar gap can be observed for medical assistance at delivery—38% among the SCs/STs compared with 55% among the remaining population—and postnatal check-ups—34% among SCs/STs compared with 45% among the remaining population.
Percentage of women using maternal health services across social groups in India, 2005–06.
Fig. 1

Percentage of women using maternal health services across social groups in India, 2005–06.

We have also carried out binary logistic regression analysis to examine the determinants of full antenatal care, medical assistance at delivery and postnatal check-ups across three population sub-groups—SC/ST population, non-SC/ST population and the overall population (combining them together). Our findings suggest significant influence of the membership of a social group on the use of the maternal healthcare services—SC/ST women are significantly less likely to use the maternal healthcare services than the women in the remaining population. Regression results are not discussed in detail and can be referred to in Appendix 2.

Result of the decomposition analysis

We used Fairlie decomposition analysis to quantify the contribution of different socioeconomic and demographic predictors explaining the gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population. Summary results of the decomposition analysis are presented in Table 2. Results indicate that after controlling other factors, the coverage of all three services is lower among SCs/STs than among the remaining population. For instance, the probability of full antenatal care is 0.172 among SCs/STs compared with 0.311 among remaining population. Similarly, the probability of medical assistance at delivery is 0.435 and 0.624, and the probability of postnatal check-ups is 0.378 and 0.525 among women of SCs/STs and the remaining population, respectively. Results further indicate that >70% of such differences are explained by the factors included in the analysis. Even among the explained gap, 70–80% of the gap is explained by the differences in the distribution of only some selected predictors such as household wealth, woman and her husband's education. The unexplained gap (∼20–30%) might be associated with the other supply-side or structural factors that are not covered by the data set.

Table 2

Summary result of Fairlie decomposition analysis showing the mean differences in the use of maternal healthcare services between social groups in India, 2005–06

Full antenatal careMedical assistance at deliveryPostnatal check-ups
Mean prediction among SCs/STs0.1720.4350.378
Mean prediction among remaining population0.3110.6240.525
Raw differentials0.1390.1890.147
Total explained0.1000.1320.119
% Explained71.870.180.9
% Unexplained28.229.919.1
Full antenatal careMedical assistance at deliveryPostnatal check-ups
Mean prediction among SCs/STs0.1720.4350.378
Mean prediction among remaining population0.3110.6240.525
Raw differentials0.1390.1890.147
Total explained0.1000.1320.119
% Explained71.870.180.9
% Unexplained28.229.919.1
Table 2

Summary result of Fairlie decomposition analysis showing the mean differences in the use of maternal healthcare services between social groups in India, 2005–06

Full antenatal careMedical assistance at deliveryPostnatal check-ups
Mean prediction among SCs/STs0.1720.4350.378
Mean prediction among remaining population0.3110.6240.525
Raw differentials0.1390.1890.147
Total explained0.1000.1320.119
% Explained71.870.180.9
% Unexplained28.229.919.1
Full antenatal careMedical assistance at deliveryPostnatal check-ups
Mean prediction among SCs/STs0.1720.4350.378
Mean prediction among remaining population0.3110.6240.525
Raw differentials0.1390.1890.147
Total explained0.1000.1320.119
% Explained71.870.180.9
% Unexplained28.229.919.1

Table 3 presents the details of decomposition analysis of the social gap in the use of the maternal healthcare services in India. To make our result more convenient, we present the coefficient in terms of percentage (Fig. 2). A positive contribution indicates that particular variable is widening the gap in the use of the services between SCs/STs and the remaining population. The converse holds true for a negative contribution. Household wealth is the main contributor explaining 37–55% of the gap in the use of the maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population. Woman's education is another important contributor explaining 19–29% of the gap in the use of the maternal healthcare services. Importantly, antenatal care visit has a greater contribution in explaining the gap in medical assistance at delivery (32%) and postnatal check-ups (38%) between women of SCs/STs and the remaining population. Husband's education and the place of residence are two other contributors widening the social gap within the use of all three maternal healthcare services. Woman's age at birth of the child narrowed the gap, though its contribution is negligible. Surprisingly, exposure to media and woman's autonomy plays a negligible role in widening the social gap in the use of the maternal healthcare services.
Table 3

Fairlie decomposition of average gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between social groups in India, 2005–06

Full antenatal care
Medical assistance at delivery
Postnatal check-ups
CoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-value
Place of residence0.0020.060.0090.000.0070.00
Women's age at birth of the child−0.0010.00−0.0020.00−0.0010.00
Household wealth0.0490.000.0500.000.0430.00
Women's education0.0300.000.0260.000.0220.00
Husband's education0.0040.000.0090.000.0030.04
Women's exposure to media0.0020.000.0010.070.0020.01
Current working status of women0.0000.650.0010.53−0.0040.00
Women's autonomy0.0000.990.0000.900.0010.14
Birth order and interval0.0020.000.0030.000.0020.00
Wanted last child0.0030.000.0010.000.0020.00
Region0.0080.000.0420.000.0450.00
Antenatal check-upsNANA−0.0070.00−0.0030.00
Full antenatal care
Medical assistance at delivery
Postnatal check-ups
CoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-value
Place of residence0.0020.060.0090.000.0070.00
Women's age at birth of the child−0.0010.00−0.0020.00−0.0010.00
Household wealth0.0490.000.0500.000.0430.00
Women's education0.0300.000.0260.000.0220.00
Husband's education0.0040.000.0090.000.0030.04
Women's exposure to media0.0020.000.0010.070.0020.01
Current working status of women0.0000.650.0010.53−0.0040.00
Women's autonomy0.0000.990.0000.900.0010.14
Birth order and interval0.0020.000.0030.000.0020.00
Wanted last child0.0030.000.0010.000.0020.00
Region0.0080.000.0420.000.0450.00
Antenatal check-upsNANA−0.0070.00−0.0030.00

NA, not applicable for full antenatal care.

Table 3

Fairlie decomposition of average gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between social groups in India, 2005–06

Full antenatal care
Medical assistance at delivery
Postnatal check-ups
CoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-value
Place of residence0.0020.060.0090.000.0070.00
Women's age at birth of the child−0.0010.00−0.0020.00−0.0010.00
Household wealth0.0490.000.0500.000.0430.00
Women's education0.0300.000.0260.000.0220.00
Husband's education0.0040.000.0090.000.0030.04
Women's exposure to media0.0020.000.0010.070.0020.01
Current working status of women0.0000.650.0010.53−0.0040.00
Women's autonomy0.0000.990.0000.900.0010.14
Birth order and interval0.0020.000.0030.000.0020.00
Wanted last child0.0030.000.0010.000.0020.00
Region0.0080.000.0420.000.0450.00
Antenatal check-upsNANA−0.0070.00−0.0030.00
Full antenatal care
Medical assistance at delivery
Postnatal check-ups
CoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-valueCoefficientP-value
Place of residence0.0020.060.0090.000.0070.00
Women's age at birth of the child−0.0010.00−0.0020.00−0.0010.00
Household wealth0.0490.000.0500.000.0430.00
Women's education0.0300.000.0260.000.0220.00
Husband's education0.0040.000.0090.000.0030.04
Women's exposure to media0.0020.000.0010.070.0020.01
Current working status of women0.0000.650.0010.53−0.0040.00
Women's autonomy0.0000.990.0000.900.0010.14
Birth order and interval0.0020.000.0030.000.0020.00
Wanted last child0.0030.000.0010.000.0020.00
Region0.0080.000.0420.000.0450.00
Antenatal check-upsNANA−0.0070.00−0.0030.00

NA, not applicable for full antenatal care.

Result of Fairlie decomposition analysis showing contribution (%) of each covariate to gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between social groups, 2005–06.
Fig. 2

Result of Fairlie decomposition analysis showing contribution (%) of each covariate to gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between social groups, 2005–06.

Discussion

Main findings of this study

Identification of the determinants that are responsible for the poor use of maternal healthcare services among socially deprived groups is vital from policy perspectives. Our findings show lower use of the maternal healthcare services among the women of SCs/STs than the remaining population. This finding is consistent with the findings of previous national and sub-national studies from the country.15,30,31 Lower use of the healthcare services among these socially deprived groups is mainly because they are at a disadvantage across nearly all determinants that affect maternal healthcare utilization. This study further provides an understating of the respective contributions of the factors—household wealth, woman's education, place of residence, etc.—which explain the disparity between SCs/STs and the remaining population in the use of the maternal healthcare services. To accomplish this, the study uses Fairlie's decomposition method and decomposes the average gap in the use of the maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population of India. This method allows quantifying the proportion of the gap that is due to differences in the distribution of determinants and also the part due to differences in the effects of determinants.

The results reveal that the majority of the gap is attributed to differences in the distribution of household wealth, individual education, antenatal check-ups and place of residence. Given the fact that ∼40% SC/ST women belong to the poorest of the poor economic groups, it is not surprising that household economic status turns out to be the largest contributor widening the social gap in the use of healthcare services. The effect of household economic status on the use of maternal healthcare services is well documented.3234 It is argued that poor SC/ST households do not have enough resources to pay for healthcare expenses. In contrast, the remaining population is wealthier and better educated, may have a more modern world view, greater acquaintance with the modern healthcare system, greater confidence in dealing with health officials and workers and greater ability and willingness to travel outside the community for their health needs,35 all of which may facilitate the use of the maternity care.

Education of the women is another important contributor to the gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population. A lower level of education among SCs/STs is characterized with low awareness of health services, less knowledge of the benefits of preventive health care, poor communication with the husband and family members on health-related issues and poor decision-making power within the family, low self-confidence, poor coping abilities and negotiating skills to reduce power differential towards healthcare providers and hence low ability to demand adequate services.36

Rural residence of SCs/STs also appears as an important contributor explaining gap in the use of healthcare services. Previous studies have found that the geographical access to health facilities has a greater effect on utilization of healthcare services,37,38 particularly in rural areas with limited service provision.39 In addition to accessibility, deep-rooted traditional beliefs and perceptions—‘lay-health culture’—regarding childbearing and health-seeking behaviour among the rural SCs/STs might be another possible reason for their low use of maternity services. In rural India, pregnancy is still considered a natural state of being for a woman rather than a condition requiring medical care and women often do not avail preventive and curative medical services intended to safeguard their own health and well-being.40

The antenatal check-up has an important contribution in explaining the gap in the use of the medical assistance at delivery and postnatal check-up between SCs/STs and the remaining population. Such influence of the antenatal care could be understood by the fact that beyond the role of detecting malformation problems and other risk factors during pregnancy, antenatal check-up also acts as a means of educating women on the advantages of giving birth in medically controlled conditions and having proper care after delivery.

What is already known on the topic

Influence of caste/tribe on the use of healthcare services has already been articulated in India. However, there is a lack of evidence on the relative contribution of the factors explaining the average gap in the use of maternity services between social groups. A few studies have examined the factors affecting maternal healthcare utilization in India. Caste, along with wealth of the household, education of the women and her husband's, place of residence, has been found to be significantly associated with maternal healthcare use.14 SCs/STs have always lagged behind and are less likely to use maternal healthcare compared with rest of the population.1517

What this study adds

To our knowledge, this is the first study in India that has systematically investigated the factors that underlie and explain the gap in the use of maternal healthcare services between SCs/STs and the remaining population of India. The results obtained from the decomposition analysis clearly point out that the differences in the level of household wealth and women's education between SCs/STs and the remaining population contribute significantly to the gap in the use of the maternal healthcare services. The differences in the level of antenatal care also contribute considerably to the observed gap in the level of medical assistance at delivery and postnatal check-ups.

Our findings suggest that low use of maternal healthcare services among socially deprived groups should be addressed to increase the average level of service coverage in India. Although, the Government of India has made significant progress in increasing the coverage of antenatal care and institutional delivery under National Rural Health Mission41—a major policy initiative to serve economically marginalized groups, a further success in lowering maternal mortality will be achieved by focusing on underserved social groups. As our findings indicate, this could be done by improving the level of education as well as economic status of SC/ST women; however, this is possible only in the long term. In the short term, information dissemination and awareness generation can improve the use of subsidized maternal healthcare services. Moreover, there is also a need to ensure quality care and elimination of social discrimination against the SCs/STs at the health facilities. This argument is backed by the evidence that lower caste women often elect home deliveries with traditional birth attendance from their community out of fear of being stigmatized and discriminated at health facilities.17 The other possible initiative may be to involve the SCs/STs in health-related interventions and programs. This study emphasizes that the health needs of the socially deprived groups be exclusively articulated in the proposed ‘National Health Packages’ to ensure greater health equity, bridge gaps and reduce differentials among social groups in the country.42

Limitations of this study

The methodological approach used in the study does not account for the contribution of the different effects of characteristics or ‘coefficients’ of the groups. Due to data limitations, this study does not examine the influence of social discrimination on lower use of maternal healthcare services among the SC/ST population as outlined by previous studies.4,15 The data limitations also prevented from accounting for the contribution of the supply-side factors in social disparity in the use of healthcare services. Another limitation is that there may be possibility of endogeneity between antenatal care and medical assistance at delivery (when antenatal care is considered as a predictor of medical assistance at delivery), which has not been taken into account.

References

1

Louis
D.
Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications
.
London
:
Weidenfeld & Nicholson
,
1970
.

2

Census of India 2011, Primary Census Abstract Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner
,
New Delhi, India
,
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India
.

3

Parikh
S
.
Politics of Preference
.
Michigan
:
University of Michigan Press
,
1997
.

4

Borooah
VK
.
Caste, inequality and poverty in India
.
Rev Dev Econ
2005
;
9
(3)
:
399
414
.

5

Mitra
A
,
Singh
P
.
Trends in Literacy Rates and Schooling among the Scheduled Tribe Women in India
,
2005
. .

6

Van De Poel
E
,
Speybroeck
N
.
Decomposing malnutrition inequalities between Scheduled Castes and Tribes and the remaining Indian population
.
Ethn Health
2010
;
14
(3)
:
271
87
.

7

Planning Commission, Government of India
.
Tenth Five Year Plan (2002_2007) of the Government of India [online]
,
2002
. .

8

Zacharias
A
,
Vakulabharanam
V
.
Caste stratification and wealth inequality in India
.
World Dev
2011
;
39
(10)
:
1820
33
.

9

Iyengar
K
,
Iyengar
SD
,
Suhalka
V
et al. .
Pregnancy-related deaths in rural Rajasthan, India: exploring causes, context, and care-seeking through verbal autopsy
.
J Health Popul Nutr
2009
;
27
(2)
:
293
302
.

10

Government of Karnataka: Status of Scheduled Castes in Karnataka
,
2005
. .

11

Subramanian
SV
,
Ackerson
LK
,
Subramanyam
MA
et al. .
The mortality divide in India: the differential contributions of gender, caste and standard of living across the life course
.
Am J Public Health
2006
;
96
:
818
25
.

12

Wax
E.
Lure of cash aids India's efforts to reduce number of women dying in childbirth
.
Washington, DC
:
The Washington Post
,
2010
.

13

UNICEF
.
Maternal and Perinatal Death Inquiry and Response,
2008
. .

14

Navaneetham
K
,
Dharmalingam
A
.
Utilization of maternal health care services in Southern India
.
Soc Sci Med
2002
;
55
(10)
:
1849
69
.

15

Adamson
PC
,
Krupp
K
,
Niranjankumar
B
et al. .
Are marginalized women being left behind? A population-based study of institutional deliveries in Karnataka, India
.
BMC Public Health
2012
;
12
:
30
.

16

Bhardwaj
S
,
Tungdim
MG
.
Reproductive health profile of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe women of Rajasthan, India
.
Open Anthropol J
2010
;
3
:
181
7
.

17

Saroha
E
,
Altarac
M
,
Sibley
LM
.
Caste and maternal health care service use among rural Hindu women in Maitha, Uttar Pradesh, India
.
J Midwifery Women Health
2008
;
53
(5)
:
41
7
.

18

Fairlie
RW
.
An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models
.
J Econ Soc Measur
2005
;
30
:
305
16
.

19

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06, Volume-I
.
Mumbai, India
:
IIPS
,
2007
.

20

World Health Organization
.
Provision of Effective Antenatal Care: Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Child Birth (IMPAC). Standards for Maternal and Neonatal Care (1.6)
.
Geneva, Switzerland:
Department of Making Pregnancy Safer
,
2006
. .

21

World Health Organization
.
Postpartum Care of the Mother and Newborn: A Practical Guide
.
Geneva, Switzerland
:
Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit, Division of Reproductive Health (Technical Support)
,
1998
.

22

Tuddenham
SA
,
Rahman
MH
,
Singh
S
et al. .
Care seeking for postpartum morbidities in Murshidabad, rural India
.
Int J Gynecol Obstet
2010
;
109
(3)
:
245
54
.

23

Fedler
JL
.
A review of literature on access and utilisation of medical care with special emphasis on rural primary care
.
Soc Sci Med
1981
;
15
:
129
42
.

24

Kroeger
A
.
Anthropological and socio-medical health care research in developing countries
.
Soc Sci Med
1983
;
17
(3)
:
147
61
.

25

Ensor
T
,
Stephanie
C
.
Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side
.
Health Policy Plann
2004
;
19
(2)
:
69
79
.

26

Kumar
A
,
Ram
F
.
Influence of family structure on child health: evidence from India
.
J Biosoc Sci
2013
;
45
:
577
99
.

27

Saikia
N
,
Singh
A
.
Does type of household affect maternal health? Evidence from India
.
J Biosoc Sci
2009
;
41
:
329
53
.

28

Blinder
AS
.
Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural covariates
.
J Hum Resour
1973
;
8
(4)
:
436
55
.

29

Oaxaca
R
.
Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets
.
Int Econ Rev
1973
;
14
(3)
:
693
709
.

30

Maiti
S
,
Unisa
S
,
Agrawal
PK
.
Health care and health among tribal women in Jharkhand: a situational analysis
.
Stud Tribes Tribals
2005
;
3
(1)
:
37
46
.

31

Susuman
S
.
Correlates of antenatal and postnatal care among tribal women in India
.
Ethno Med
2012
;
6
(1)
:
55
62
.

32

Mohanty
SK
,
Pathak
PK
.
Rich-poor gap in utilization of reproductive and child health services in India, 1992–2005
.
J Biosoc Sci
2009
;
41
(3)
:
381
98
.

33

Pathak
PK
,
Singh
A
,
Subramanian
SV
.
Economic inequalities in maternal health care: prenatal care and skilled birth attendance in India, 1992–2006
.
PLoS One
2010
;
5
(10)
:
e13593
.

34

Boutayeb
A
,
Helmert
U
.
Social inequalities, regional disparities and health inequity in North African countries
.
Int J Equity Health
2011
;
10
:
23
.

35

Cleland
JG
,
Van Ginneken
JK
.
Maternal education and child survival in developing countries: the search for pathways of influence
.
Soc Sci Med
1998
;
27
:
1357
68
.

36

Burgard
S
.
Race and pregnancy-related care in Brazil and South Africa
.
Soc Sci Med
2004
;
59
(6)
:
1127
46
.

37

Sawhney
N
.
Management of family welfare programmes in Uttar Pradesh: infrastructure utilisation, quality of services, supervision and MIS
. In:
Premi
M
(ed).
Family Planning and MCH in Uttar Pradesh (A Review of Studies)
.
New Delhi
:
Indian Association for the Study of Population
,
1993
,
50
67
.

38

Elo
IT
.
Utilization of maternal health-care services in Peru: the role of women's education
.
Health Trans Rev
1992
;
2
(1)
:
49
69
.

39

Chowdhury
M
,
Ronsmans
C
,
Killewo
J
et al. .
Equity in use of homebased or facility-based skilled obstetric care in rural Bangladesh: an observational study
.
Lancet
2006
;
367
(9507)
:
327
32
.

40

Adjiwanou
V
,
LeGrand
T
.
Does antenatal care matter in the use of skilled birth attendance in rural Africa: a multi-country analysis
.
Soc Sci Med
2013
;
86
:
26
34
.

41

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) National Rural Health Mission (2005–12), Department of Family Welfare, MoHFW, New Delhi
,
2005
.

42

Planning Commission
.
High Level Expert Group Report on Universal Health Coverage for India
.
New Delhi, India
:
Planning Commission and Public Health Foundation of Inida (PHFI)
,
2011
.

Appendix 1

Table A1

Percentage of women with most recent live birth during the 5 years preceding the survey years by background characteristics in India, 2005–06

Background characteristics%n
Social group
 SCs/STs30.412 064
 Remaining population69.623 153
Place of residence
 Urban26.814 527
 Rural73.222 323
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years17.35324
 20–24 years39.914 091
 25–29 years26.410 557
 >29 years16.36878
Household wealth
 Poorest24.16154
 Poor21.76468
 Middle19.67418
 Rich18.38136
 Richest16.38674
Women's education
 No education47.514 142
 1–5 years of schooling13.95203
 6–12 years of schooling32.714 215
 >12 years of schooling6.03289
Husband's education
 No education28.08307
 1–5 years of schooling14.85213
 6–12 years of schooling46.017 904
 >12 years of schooling11.15007
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed30.98468
 Exposed69.228 364
Current working status of women
 Not working70.025 897
 Working30.110 872
Women's autonomy
 Low33.29689
 Medium33.111 436
 High33.814 825
Birth order and interval
 First order26.410 394
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months18.06487
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months40.113 778
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months15.46096
Wanted last child
 Not wanted12.64187
 Wanted but later9.53848
 Wanted then78.028 797
Antenatal check-ups
 No62.719 828
 Yes37.316 619
Region
 North32.211 201
 Central23.65870
 East6.92992
 Northeast12.08270
 West8.33089
 South16.95428
Total number of respondents36 850
Background characteristics%n
Social group
 SCs/STs30.412 064
 Remaining population69.623 153
Place of residence
 Urban26.814 527
 Rural73.222 323
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years17.35324
 20–24 years39.914 091
 25–29 years26.410 557
 >29 years16.36878
Household wealth
 Poorest24.16154
 Poor21.76468
 Middle19.67418
 Rich18.38136
 Richest16.38674
Women's education
 No education47.514 142
 1–5 years of schooling13.95203
 6–12 years of schooling32.714 215
 >12 years of schooling6.03289
Husband's education
 No education28.08307
 1–5 years of schooling14.85213
 6–12 years of schooling46.017 904
 >12 years of schooling11.15007
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed30.98468
 Exposed69.228 364
Current working status of women
 Not working70.025 897
 Working30.110 872
Women's autonomy
 Low33.29689
 Medium33.111 436
 High33.814 825
Birth order and interval
 First order26.410 394
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months18.06487
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months40.113 778
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months15.46096
Wanted last child
 Not wanted12.64187
 Wanted but later9.53848
 Wanted then78.028 797
Antenatal check-ups
 No62.719 828
 Yes37.316 619
Region
 North32.211 201
 Central23.65870
 East6.92992
 Northeast12.08270
 West8.33089
 South16.95428
Total number of respondents36 850
Table A1

Percentage of women with most recent live birth during the 5 years preceding the survey years by background characteristics in India, 2005–06

Background characteristics%n
Social group
 SCs/STs30.412 064
 Remaining population69.623 153
Place of residence
 Urban26.814 527
 Rural73.222 323
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years17.35324
 20–24 years39.914 091
 25–29 years26.410 557
 >29 years16.36878
Household wealth
 Poorest24.16154
 Poor21.76468
 Middle19.67418
 Rich18.38136
 Richest16.38674
Women's education
 No education47.514 142
 1–5 years of schooling13.95203
 6–12 years of schooling32.714 215
 >12 years of schooling6.03289
Husband's education
 No education28.08307
 1–5 years of schooling14.85213
 6–12 years of schooling46.017 904
 >12 years of schooling11.15007
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed30.98468
 Exposed69.228 364
Current working status of women
 Not working70.025 897
 Working30.110 872
Women's autonomy
 Low33.29689
 Medium33.111 436
 High33.814 825
Birth order and interval
 First order26.410 394
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months18.06487
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months40.113 778
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months15.46096
Wanted last child
 Not wanted12.64187
 Wanted but later9.53848
 Wanted then78.028 797
Antenatal check-ups
 No62.719 828
 Yes37.316 619
Region
 North32.211 201
 Central23.65870
 East6.92992
 Northeast12.08270
 West8.33089
 South16.95428
Total number of respondents36 850
Background characteristics%n
Social group
 SCs/STs30.412 064
 Remaining population69.623 153
Place of residence
 Urban26.814 527
 Rural73.222 323
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years17.35324
 20–24 years39.914 091
 25–29 years26.410 557
 >29 years16.36878
Household wealth
 Poorest24.16154
 Poor21.76468
 Middle19.67418
 Rich18.38136
 Richest16.38674
Women's education
 No education47.514 142
 1–5 years of schooling13.95203
 6–12 years of schooling32.714 215
 >12 years of schooling6.03289
Husband's education
 No education28.08307
 1–5 years of schooling14.85213
 6–12 years of schooling46.017 904
 >12 years of schooling11.15007
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed30.98468
 Exposed69.228 364
Current working status of women
 Not working70.025 897
 Working30.110 872
Women's autonomy
 Low33.29689
 Medium33.111 436
 High33.814 825
Birth order and interval
 First order26.410 394
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months18.06487
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months40.113 778
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months15.46096
Wanted last child
 Not wanted12.64187
 Wanted but later9.53848
 Wanted then78.028 797
Antenatal check-ups
 No62.719 828
 Yes37.316 619
Region
 North32.211 201
 Central23.65870
 East6.92992
 Northeast12.08270
 West8.33089
 South16.95428
Total number of respondents36 850

Appendix 2

Table A2

Binary logistic regression (coefficient) showing the determinants of the use of maternal healthcare services in India, 2005–06

SCs/STs
Remaining population
Combined
Full ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNC
Social group
 SCs/STs®
 Remaining populationNANANANANANA0.18a0.23a–0.04
Place of residence
 Urban®
 Rural–0.23b–0.52a–0.27a–0.08–0.34a–0.26a–0.12a–0.41a–0.27a
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years®
 20–24 years0.18b0.100.130.26a0.14b0.19a0.24a0.11b0.16a
 25–29 years0.30b0.050.120.43a0.26a0.28a0.39a0.17a0.21a
 >29 years0.190.140.140.40a0.28a0.31a0.33a0.20a0.22a
Household wealth
 Poorest®
 Poor0.35b0.14b0.26a0.37a0.25a0.120.32a0.21a0.16b
 Middle0.48a0.59a0.58a0.69a0.58a0.49a0.56a0.58a0.51a
 Rich0.82a1.06a0.91a1.08a1.03a0.71a0.94a1.04a0.75a
 Richest1.38a1.64a1.19a1.65a1.69a1.18a1.50a1.66a1.16a
Women's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.32b0.27a0.24b0.50a0.29a0.22a0.43a0.28a0.15a
 6–12 years of schooling0.63a0.54a0.33a0.78a0.62a0.53a0.72a0.59a0.46a
 >12 years of schooling1.05a1.65a0.81a1.35a1.80a1.05a1.28a1.77a1.01a
Husband's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.22b0.16b0.080.31a0.18b0.19b0.27a0.18a0.15b
 6–12 years of schooling0.21b0.25a–0.060.22b0.27a0.090.22b0.26a0.03
 >12 years of schooling0.28b0.24a–0.100.37a0.50a0.24a0.35a0.43a0.14b
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed®
 Exposed0.32a0.23a0.24a0.35a0.16b0.19a0.34a0.19a0.22a
Current working status of women
 Not working®
 Working–0.02–0.05–0.060.03–0.060.15a0.01–0.07b0.06
Women's autonomy
 Low®
 Medium0.18b–0.02–0.100.050.12b–0.010.08b0.07c–0.04
 High0.14b0.04–0.080.060.070.050.070.04–0.02
Birth order and interval
 First order®
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months–0.50a–0.87a–0.78a–0.52a–0.79a–0.30a–0.53a–0.81a–0.37a
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months–0.45a–0.91a–0.42a–0.51a–0.82a–0.31a–0.50a–0.85a–0.35a
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months–0.16a–0.58a–0.23b–0.19a–0.48a–0.24a–0.18a–0.50a–0.22b
Wanted last child
 Not wanted®
 Wanted but later0.27b–0.080.20b0.40a0.150.24b0.35a0.080.23a
 Wanted then0.24b0.020.17b0.44a0.19b0.35a0.39a0.12b0.28a
Antenatal check-ups
 No®
 YesNA1.13a1.16aNA1.18a1.09aNA1.17a1.13a
Region
 North®
 Central0.30b0.27a0.40a0.25a0.66a0.42a0.26a0.54a0.40a
 East0.81b0.090.20a0.81a0.54a0.23a0.82a0.38a0.22a
 Northeast–0.170.06–0.29a0.13b0.44a0.09–0.080.29a–0.11b
 West0.56a0.81a0.83a0.62a1.08a0.73a0.60a0.99a0.74a
 South1.37a1.37a1.41a1.43a1.65a1.56a1.42a1.56a1.50a
Constant–3.34a–1.15a–1.67a–3.88a–1.70a–2.28a–3.76a–1.65a–2.04a
Pseudo R20.160.290.210.230.360.270.220.350.26
SCs/STs
Remaining population
Combined
Full ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNC
Social group
 SCs/STs®
 Remaining populationNANANANANANA0.18a0.23a–0.04
Place of residence
 Urban®
 Rural–0.23b–0.52a–0.27a–0.08–0.34a–0.26a–0.12a–0.41a–0.27a
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years®
 20–24 years0.18b0.100.130.26a0.14b0.19a0.24a0.11b0.16a
 25–29 years0.30b0.050.120.43a0.26a0.28a0.39a0.17a0.21a
 >29 years0.190.140.140.40a0.28a0.31a0.33a0.20a0.22a
Household wealth
 Poorest®
 Poor0.35b0.14b0.26a0.37a0.25a0.120.32a0.21a0.16b
 Middle0.48a0.59a0.58a0.69a0.58a0.49a0.56a0.58a0.51a
 Rich0.82a1.06a0.91a1.08a1.03a0.71a0.94a1.04a0.75a
 Richest1.38a1.64a1.19a1.65a1.69a1.18a1.50a1.66a1.16a
Women's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.32b0.27a0.24b0.50a0.29a0.22a0.43a0.28a0.15a
 6–12 years of schooling0.63a0.54a0.33a0.78a0.62a0.53a0.72a0.59a0.46a
 >12 years of schooling1.05a1.65a0.81a1.35a1.80a1.05a1.28a1.77a1.01a
Husband's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.22b0.16b0.080.31a0.18b0.19b0.27a0.18a0.15b
 6–12 years of schooling0.21b0.25a–0.060.22b0.27a0.090.22b0.26a0.03
 >12 years of schooling0.28b0.24a–0.100.37a0.50a0.24a0.35a0.43a0.14b
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed®
 Exposed0.32a0.23a0.24a0.35a0.16b0.19a0.34a0.19a0.22a
Current working status of women
 Not working®
 Working–0.02–0.05–0.060.03–0.060.15a0.01–0.07b0.06
Women's autonomy
 Low®
 Medium0.18b–0.02–0.100.050.12b–0.010.08b0.07c–0.04
 High0.14b0.04–0.080.060.070.050.070.04–0.02
Birth order and interval
 First order®
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months–0.50a–0.87a–0.78a–0.52a–0.79a–0.30a–0.53a–0.81a–0.37a
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months–0.45a–0.91a–0.42a–0.51a–0.82a–0.31a–0.50a–0.85a–0.35a
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months–0.16a–0.58a–0.23b–0.19a–0.48a–0.24a–0.18a–0.50a–0.22b
Wanted last child
 Not wanted®
 Wanted but later0.27b–0.080.20b0.40a0.150.24b0.35a0.080.23a
 Wanted then0.24b0.020.17b0.44a0.19b0.35a0.39a0.12b0.28a
Antenatal check-ups
 No®
 YesNA1.13a1.16aNA1.18a1.09aNA1.17a1.13a
Region
 North®
 Central0.30b0.27a0.40a0.25a0.66a0.42a0.26a0.54a0.40a
 East0.81b0.090.20a0.81a0.54a0.23a0.82a0.38a0.22a
 Northeast–0.170.06–0.29a0.13b0.44a0.09–0.080.29a–0.11b
 West0.56a0.81a0.83a0.62a1.08a0.73a0.60a0.99a0.74a
 South1.37a1.37a1.41a1.43a1.65a1.56a1.42a1.56a1.50a
Constant–3.34a–1.15a–1.67a–3.88a–1.70a–2.28a–3.76a–1.65a–2.04a
Pseudo R20.160.290.210.230.360.270.220.350.26

Full ANC, full antenatal care; MAD, medical assistance at delivery; PNC, postnatal check-ups;

®, reference category;

NA, not applicable.

aP < 0.01.

bP < 0.05.

Table A2

Binary logistic regression (coefficient) showing the determinants of the use of maternal healthcare services in India, 2005–06

SCs/STs
Remaining population
Combined
Full ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNC
Social group
 SCs/STs®
 Remaining populationNANANANANANA0.18a0.23a–0.04
Place of residence
 Urban®
 Rural–0.23b–0.52a–0.27a–0.08–0.34a–0.26a–0.12a–0.41a–0.27a
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years®
 20–24 years0.18b0.100.130.26a0.14b0.19a0.24a0.11b0.16a
 25–29 years0.30b0.050.120.43a0.26a0.28a0.39a0.17a0.21a
 >29 years0.190.140.140.40a0.28a0.31a0.33a0.20a0.22a
Household wealth
 Poorest®
 Poor0.35b0.14b0.26a0.37a0.25a0.120.32a0.21a0.16b
 Middle0.48a0.59a0.58a0.69a0.58a0.49a0.56a0.58a0.51a
 Rich0.82a1.06a0.91a1.08a1.03a0.71a0.94a1.04a0.75a
 Richest1.38a1.64a1.19a1.65a1.69a1.18a1.50a1.66a1.16a
Women's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.32b0.27a0.24b0.50a0.29a0.22a0.43a0.28a0.15a
 6–12 years of schooling0.63a0.54a0.33a0.78a0.62a0.53a0.72a0.59a0.46a
 >12 years of schooling1.05a1.65a0.81a1.35a1.80a1.05a1.28a1.77a1.01a
Husband's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.22b0.16b0.080.31a0.18b0.19b0.27a0.18a0.15b
 6–12 years of schooling0.21b0.25a–0.060.22b0.27a0.090.22b0.26a0.03
 >12 years of schooling0.28b0.24a–0.100.37a0.50a0.24a0.35a0.43a0.14b
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed®
 Exposed0.32a0.23a0.24a0.35a0.16b0.19a0.34a0.19a0.22a
Current working status of women
 Not working®
 Working–0.02–0.05–0.060.03–0.060.15a0.01–0.07b0.06
Women's autonomy
 Low®
 Medium0.18b–0.02–0.100.050.12b–0.010.08b0.07c–0.04
 High0.14b0.04–0.080.060.070.050.070.04–0.02
Birth order and interval
 First order®
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months–0.50a–0.87a–0.78a–0.52a–0.79a–0.30a–0.53a–0.81a–0.37a
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months–0.45a–0.91a–0.42a–0.51a–0.82a–0.31a–0.50a–0.85a–0.35a
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months–0.16a–0.58a–0.23b–0.19a–0.48a–0.24a–0.18a–0.50a–0.22b
Wanted last child
 Not wanted®
 Wanted but later0.27b–0.080.20b0.40a0.150.24b0.35a0.080.23a
 Wanted then0.24b0.020.17b0.44a0.19b0.35a0.39a0.12b0.28a
Antenatal check-ups
 No®
 YesNA1.13a1.16aNA1.18a1.09aNA1.17a1.13a
Region
 North®
 Central0.30b0.27a0.40a0.25a0.66a0.42a0.26a0.54a0.40a
 East0.81b0.090.20a0.81a0.54a0.23a0.82a0.38a0.22a
 Northeast–0.170.06–0.29a0.13b0.44a0.09–0.080.29a–0.11b
 West0.56a0.81a0.83a0.62a1.08a0.73a0.60a0.99a0.74a
 South1.37a1.37a1.41a1.43a1.65a1.56a1.42a1.56a1.50a
Constant–3.34a–1.15a–1.67a–3.88a–1.70a–2.28a–3.76a–1.65a–2.04a
Pseudo R20.160.290.210.230.360.270.220.350.26
SCs/STs
Remaining population
Combined
Full ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNCFull ANCMADPNC
Social group
 SCs/STs®
 Remaining populationNANANANANANA0.18a0.23a–0.04
Place of residence
 Urban®
 Rural–0.23b–0.52a–0.27a–0.08–0.34a–0.26a–0.12a–0.41a–0.27a
Women's age at birth of the child
 <20 years®
 20–24 years0.18b0.100.130.26a0.14b0.19a0.24a0.11b0.16a
 25–29 years0.30b0.050.120.43a0.26a0.28a0.39a0.17a0.21a
 >29 years0.190.140.140.40a0.28a0.31a0.33a0.20a0.22a
Household wealth
 Poorest®
 Poor0.35b0.14b0.26a0.37a0.25a0.120.32a0.21a0.16b
 Middle0.48a0.59a0.58a0.69a0.58a0.49a0.56a0.58a0.51a
 Rich0.82a1.06a0.91a1.08a1.03a0.71a0.94a1.04a0.75a
 Richest1.38a1.64a1.19a1.65a1.69a1.18a1.50a1.66a1.16a
Women's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.32b0.27a0.24b0.50a0.29a0.22a0.43a0.28a0.15a
 6–12 years of schooling0.63a0.54a0.33a0.78a0.62a0.53a0.72a0.59a0.46a
 >12 years of schooling1.05a1.65a0.81a1.35a1.80a1.05a1.28a1.77a1.01a
Husband's education
 No education®
 1–5 years of schooling0.22b0.16b0.080.31a0.18b0.19b0.27a0.18a0.15b
 6–12 years of schooling0.21b0.25a–0.060.22b0.27a0.090.22b0.26a0.03
 >12 years of schooling0.28b0.24a–0.100.37a0.50a0.24a0.35a0.43a0.14b
Women's exposure to media
 Unexposed®
 Exposed0.32a0.23a0.24a0.35a0.16b0.19a0.34a0.19a0.22a
Current working status of women
 Not working®
 Working–0.02–0.05–0.060.03–0.060.15a0.01–0.07b0.06
Women's autonomy
 Low®
 Medium0.18b–0.02–0.100.050.12b–0.010.08b0.07c–0.04
 High0.14b0.04–0.080.060.070.050.070.04–0.02
Birth order and interval
 First order®
 Higher birth order and interval <24 months–0.50a–0.87a–0.78a–0.52a–0.79a–0.30a–0.53a–0.81a–0.37a
 Higher birth order and interval 24–47 months–0.45a–0.91a–0.42a–0.51a–0.82a–0.31a–0.50a–0.85a–0.35a
 Higher birth order and interval ≥48 months–0.16a–0.58a–0.23b–0.19a–0.48a–0.24a–0.18a–0.50a–0.22b
Wanted last child
 Not wanted®
 Wanted but later0.27b–0.080.20b0.40a0.150.24b0.35a0.080.23a
 Wanted then0.24b0.020.17b0.44a0.19b0.35a0.39a0.12b0.28a
Antenatal check-ups
 No®
 YesNA1.13a1.16aNA1.18a1.09aNA1.17a1.13a
Region
 North®
 Central0.30b0.27a0.40a0.25a0.66a0.42a0.26a0.54a0.40a
 East0.81b0.090.20a0.81a0.54a0.23a0.82a0.38a0.22a
 Northeast–0.170.06–0.29a0.13b0.44a0.09–0.080.29a–0.11b
 West0.56a0.81a0.83a0.62a1.08a0.73a0.60a0.99a0.74a
 South1.37a1.37a1.41a1.43a1.65a1.56a1.42a1.56a1.50a
Constant–3.34a–1.15a–1.67a–3.88a–1.70a–2.28a–3.76a–1.65a–2.04a
Pseudo R20.160.290.210.230.360.270.220.350.26

Full ANC, full antenatal care; MAD, medical assistance at delivery; PNC, postnatal check-ups;

®, reference category;

NA, not applicable.

aP < 0.01.

bP < 0.05.

Appendix 3

Fairlie decomposition (2005)

This technique decomposes inter-group difference in the mean level of an outcome into those due to different observable characteristics or endowments across groups and those due to differences in immeasurable or unobserved endowments of groups.

The decomposition for a non-linear equation y = F() can be written as17:
where Nj is the sample size for interest group j. yj is the average probability of the binary outcome of the interest group j and F is the cumulative distribution function from the logistic distribution. Here, superscripts O and S stand for ‘remaining population’ and ‘SCs/STs’. The first term in brackets in the equation above represents the part of the gap between social groups due to group differences in distributions of entire set of independent variables, and the second term represents the part due to differences in the group processes determining levels of y. The second term also captures the portion of the group gap due to group differences in immeasurable or unobserved endowments.

To find the total contribution, we need to calculate two sets of predicted probabilities by SCs/STs and the remaining population and take the difference between the average values of the two. However, obtaining the contribution of a specific covariate is not straightforward. As the sample sizes of the two groups are not the same, we need to carry out a regression for pooled data (SCs/STs and the remaining population together) and calculate the predicted probabilities, for each SCs/STs and the remaining population observation in the sample. Since the remaining population sample is bigger than SCs/STs sample, a random subsample of the remaining population equal in size to the full SCs/STs sample should be drawn. Each observation in the remaining population sample and full SCs/STs sample is then separately ranked by predicted probabilities and matched by their respective rankings. This procedure matches the SCs/STs mothers who have characteristics placing them at the bottom (top) of their distribution with mothers from remaining population who have characteristics placing them at the bottom (top) of their distribution. Now assume that N1 = N2 and a natural one-to-one matching of SCs/STs and remaining population observations exist. Also assume that there are two independent variables to explain the social gap in maternal care use.

Using coefficient estimates from a logit regression for a pooled sample, the independent contribution of x1 to the group gap can then be expressed as:
Similarly, the gap due to x2 can be expressed as:

The contribution of each variable to the gap is thus equal to the change in the average predicted probability from replacing SCs/STs distribution with remaining population distribution while holding the distributions of the other variables constant.

However, the assumption of equal sample size is rarely true in the real world. Since the remaining population sample is substantially larger, a large number of random subsamples of the mothers of the remaining population (equal size to total SCs/STs sample) are drawn to match each of them to the SCs/STs sample and calculate separate decomposition. Finally, the mean value of all these separate decomposition estimates is used as an approximate decomposition for the entire remaining population sample. We used 1000 replications of such decomposition and presented the average result. It must be noted here that increasing the number of replications increases the stability of the results.