ABSTRACT

We confirmed the existence of a massive protocluster in G23.43−0.18 from our Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) 1.3 mm continuum and molecular line observations. We resolved the region into one main massive protostellar object, G23.43−0.18 A, one intermediate mass protostellar object, G23.43−0.18 B, and three low mass objects, G23.43−0.18 C1, G23.43–0.18 C2, and G23.43−0.18 C3. A spiral arm structure is observed in G23.43−0.18 B. G23.43−0.18 A 1.3 mm dust continuum emission showed a ‘butterfly’ morphology with clear evidence of the existence of a cavity and bipolar outflow with an inclination angle of 50|$^\circ$|⁠. G23.43−0.18 B presents a compact rotating structure, and possibly an inner Keplerian disc, traced with methanol lines and powers a jet revealed by multiple compact emission peaks in CO, indicating episodic ejections every 300 yr. The presence of 6.7 GHz methanol masers in G23.43−0.18 A and G23.43−0.18 B are strong indications that both objects host massive protostars and are good sites to test some theories of the early evolutionary phases of massive stars.

1 INTRODUCTION

The impacts of high-mass stars to their natal environment are enormous. Radiation pressure (Tanaka, Tan & Zhang 2017), accretion bursts (Caratti o Garatti et al. 2017; Hunter et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2018; Brogan et al. 2019; Burns et al. 2020), jets (Torrelles et al. 1996), outflows (Chibueze et al. 2012), and supernovae (Rogers & Pittard 2013) are some of the way massive stars feedback into their surroundings. Recent observational studies of the evolution of massive stars have provided additional clues into the rather mysterious processes leading to the birth of massive stars.

Accretion bursts (Caratti o Garatti et al. 2017; Burns et al. 2020), spiraling accretion flow, and disc fragmentation (Liu et al. 2015, 2019; Ilee et al. 2018; Johnston et al. 2020) are some of the newly unveiled mechanisms associated with the formation of high-mass stars. Substructures and fragments are becoming common features of discs of massive protostars, some of which have been confirmed to be in Keplerian motions (Johnston et al. 2015, 2020; Ilee et al. 2016; Beuther et al. 2017; Maud et al. 2019). The range of separation between the protostars and disc fragments reported so far is |$\sim$|1000 to |$\sim$|2000 au. Accretion of fragments has been used to explain accretion bursts in massive protostars like G358.93–0.03 (Sugiyama et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2020; Meyer et al. 2017, 2018). André Oliva & Kuiper (2020) investigated the early evolution of a fragmented disc around a massive protostellar object using a high-resolution self-gravity-radiation hydrodynamical simulation. Their simulation showed, among other things, that a massive young stellar object (MYSO) is formed in the centre of its collapsed cloud surrounded by a fragmenting Keplerian-like accretion disc with spiral arms. Gravitational instabilities caused the formation of spiral arms and fragments inside the disc.

Rotating outflows such as those observed in Orion source I (Hirota et al. 2017) help expel angular momentum from the MYSO into its environment and could create a cavity along their paths. Kuiper, Yorke & Turner (2015) and Kuiper, Turner & Yorke (2016) described the three main effects of a protostellar outflow, namely; (i) decrease in accretion flow towards the protostar due to the redirection of some of the accretion flow; (ii) contribution of outward directed momentum that impedes infall on to the forming protostar; and (iii) production of low-density bipolar cavity plowed by the outflowing material. Outflows play a significant role in the formation of massive stars and also drive their feedback into their surroundings. Two kinds of outflows are typically associated with YSOs, a fast |$v \sim$| 100–1000 km s|$^{-1}$| collimated jet as well as a slower wide-angle molecular outflow |$v \sim$| 1–30 km s|$^{-1}$| (Frank et al. 2014).

G23.43–0.18  is a massive star-forming region located at a parallax distance of 5.88|$^{+1.37}_{-0.93}$| kpc (Brunthaler et al. 2009). It is associated with 6.7 GHz methanol masers which are known to be exclusively associated with massive star-forming regions (Fujisawa et al. 2014; Hu et al. 2016). The dust clump hosting this massive star-forming region is reported in the APEX (Atacama Pathfinder Experiment) Telescope Large Area Survey of the Galaxy (ATLASGAL) survey to have a dust temperature of 24.6 |$\pm$| 0.6 K, a luminosity, |$L_{\mathrm{ bol}}$| of 1235.6 L|$_{\odot }$|⁠, an envelope mass of 63 M|$_{\odot }$| (Contreras et al. 2013), and is associated to molecular line emission like |$^{13}$|CO (⁠|$J=1-0$|⁠) and CS (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) (Kim & Koo 2003; Walsh et al. 1998, 2003). Wood & Churchwell (1989) reported the detection of an ultra-compact H ii (UCHII) region at 6 cm with the very large array (VLA) near G23.43–0.18 , although the UCHII is 7 arcmin to the north–east of the region, outside of the field of view of our observations. G23.43–0.18 is associated with a number of maser species including Class I and II CH|$_3$|OH, H|$_2$|O, and OH masers (Palagi et al. 1993; Caswell et al. 1995; Slysh et al. 1999; Kang et al. 2016; Beuther et al. 2019). Dempsey, Thomas & Currie (2013) reported the |$V_{\mbox{LSR}}$|  of G23.43–0.18  to be 104.5  km s|$^{-1}$| based on their |$^{12}$|CO (3–2) James Clark Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) observations. However, Shirley et al. (2013) measured the |$V_{\mbox{LSR}}$|  as 101.9  km s|$^{-1}$| with N|$_2$|H|$^+$|(3–2) observed with the Heinrich Hertz Submillimeter Telescope. Using ALMA 216.946 GHz CH|$_3$|OH line observations, we derived the |$V_{\mbox{LSR}}$|   to be 102.1  km s|$^{-1}$|⁠. This value is adopted in this paper.

In this paper, we will report the results of our high-resolution Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of G23.43–0.18. A spiral arm, rotating structures, outflows and their associated cavity, and possible jet systems observed inside the cores of the region are discussed. This study forms part of our Korean VLBI (very long baseline interferometry) Network (KVN) and VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry (VERA) array, KVN and VERA Array (KaVA), star formation large programme1 to study massive protostellar objects associated with masers (Kim et al. 2018, 2020).

2 OBSERVATIONS, DATA CALIBRATION, AND IMAGING

Our ALMA band 6 observations of G23.43–0.18 were carried out on 2016 August 15, 19, and 22 (project 2015.1.0171.S: P.I. M.-K. Kim) as part of the KaVA star formation large project. We report on the observations of August 15 in this work. We set five spectral windows (spws) to cover the |$^{12}$|CO, SiO (5–4), and multiple transitions of CH|$_3$|OH lines as well as 1.3 mm continuum emission. The data calibration was carried out using the ALMA pipeline in the casa version 4.7 package (McMullin et al. 2007). The half-power beam-width (HPBW) of the primary beam is approximately 27 arcsec at the observing frequencies; the synthesized beam size of the continuum data was 0.27 arcsec |$\times$| 0.24 arcsec, while for the line images it ranges from 0.25 arcsec |$\times$| 0.26 arcsec to 0.30 arcsec |$\times$| 0.26 arcsec using a robust weighting of 0.5. More details of the observations are presented in Table 1, see also Kim et al. (2020).

Table 1.

ALMA observation details.

ParameterCycle 3
Project code2015.1.01571.S
Date2016 August 15, 19, and 22
Number of antennas38, 39, 40 (12 m array)
Baseline length15.1 m–1.5 km
Amplitude calibratorJ1733–1304 or J1924–2914
Bandpass calibratorJ1751|$+$|0939
Phase calibratorJ1851|$+$|0035
SPW0212.88 GHz–213.81 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW1216.55 GHz–217.49 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW2229.44 GHz–229.91 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW3230.22 GHz–230.68 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW4231.34 GHz–232.28 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
Velocity resolution1.27–1.38  km s|$^{-1}$|
Typical rms1.5 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (line), 0.1 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (continuum)
Continuum beam-size0.27 arcsec |$\times$| 0.24 arcsec [P.A. −86.5|$^{\circ }$|] (at 222.58 GHz centre frequency)
|$^{12}$|CO|$_{v=0}(J=2-1$|⁠)230.53800 GHz
SiO|$_{v=0}(J=5-4$|⁠)217.10498 GHz
CH|$_3$|OH transitions213.427 (⁠|$1_{1, 0} - 0_{0, 0}$|⁠), 216.946 (⁠|$5_{-1, 4} - 4_{-2, 3}$|⁠), 217.299 (⁠|$6_{1, 5} - 7_{2, 5}$|⁠), 229.589 (⁠|$15_{-4, 11} - 16_{-3, 14}$|⁠), 229.758 (⁠|$8_{1, 8} - 7_{-0, 7}$|⁠), 230.368 GHz (⁠|$22_{4, 18} - 21_{5, 17}$|⁠)
ParameterCycle 3
Project code2015.1.01571.S
Date2016 August 15, 19, and 22
Number of antennas38, 39, 40 (12 m array)
Baseline length15.1 m–1.5 km
Amplitude calibratorJ1733–1304 or J1924–2914
Bandpass calibratorJ1751|$+$|0939
Phase calibratorJ1851|$+$|0035
SPW0212.88 GHz–213.81 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW1216.55 GHz–217.49 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW2229.44 GHz–229.91 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW3230.22 GHz–230.68 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW4231.34 GHz–232.28 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
Velocity resolution1.27–1.38  km s|$^{-1}$|
Typical rms1.5 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (line), 0.1 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (continuum)
Continuum beam-size0.27 arcsec |$\times$| 0.24 arcsec [P.A. −86.5|$^{\circ }$|] (at 222.58 GHz centre frequency)
|$^{12}$|CO|$_{v=0}(J=2-1$|⁠)230.53800 GHz
SiO|$_{v=0}(J=5-4$|⁠)217.10498 GHz
CH|$_3$|OH transitions213.427 (⁠|$1_{1, 0} - 0_{0, 0}$|⁠), 216.946 (⁠|$5_{-1, 4} - 4_{-2, 3}$|⁠), 217.299 (⁠|$6_{1, 5} - 7_{2, 5}$|⁠), 229.589 (⁠|$15_{-4, 11} - 16_{-3, 14}$|⁠), 229.758 (⁠|$8_{1, 8} - 7_{-0, 7}$|⁠), 230.368 GHz (⁠|$22_{4, 18} - 21_{5, 17}$|⁠)
Table 1.

ALMA observation details.

ParameterCycle 3
Project code2015.1.01571.S
Date2016 August 15, 19, and 22
Number of antennas38, 39, 40 (12 m array)
Baseline length15.1 m–1.5 km
Amplitude calibratorJ1733–1304 or J1924–2914
Bandpass calibratorJ1751|$+$|0939
Phase calibratorJ1851|$+$|0035
SPW0212.88 GHz–213.81 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW1216.55 GHz–217.49 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW2229.44 GHz–229.91 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW3230.22 GHz–230.68 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW4231.34 GHz–232.28 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
Velocity resolution1.27–1.38  km s|$^{-1}$|
Typical rms1.5 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (line), 0.1 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (continuum)
Continuum beam-size0.27 arcsec |$\times$| 0.24 arcsec [P.A. −86.5|$^{\circ }$|] (at 222.58 GHz centre frequency)
|$^{12}$|CO|$_{v=0}(J=2-1$|⁠)230.53800 GHz
SiO|$_{v=0}(J=5-4$|⁠)217.10498 GHz
CH|$_3$|OH transitions213.427 (⁠|$1_{1, 0} - 0_{0, 0}$|⁠), 216.946 (⁠|$5_{-1, 4} - 4_{-2, 3}$|⁠), 217.299 (⁠|$6_{1, 5} - 7_{2, 5}$|⁠), 229.589 (⁠|$15_{-4, 11} - 16_{-3, 14}$|⁠), 229.758 (⁠|$8_{1, 8} - 7_{-0, 7}$|⁠), 230.368 GHz (⁠|$22_{4, 18} - 21_{5, 17}$|⁠)
ParameterCycle 3
Project code2015.1.01571.S
Date2016 August 15, 19, and 22
Number of antennas38, 39, 40 (12 m array)
Baseline length15.1 m–1.5 km
Amplitude calibratorJ1733–1304 or J1924–2914
Bandpass calibratorJ1751|$+$|0939
Phase calibratorJ1851|$+$|0035
SPW0212.88 GHz–213.81 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW1216.55 GHz–217.49 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW2229.44 GHz–229.91 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW3230.22 GHz–230.68 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
SPW4231.34 GHz–232.28 GHz (969.24 kHz spectral resolution)
Velocity resolution1.27–1.38  km s|$^{-1}$|
Typical rms1.5 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (line), 0.1 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| (continuum)
Continuum beam-size0.27 arcsec |$\times$| 0.24 arcsec [P.A. −86.5|$^{\circ }$|] (at 222.58 GHz centre frequency)
|$^{12}$|CO|$_{v=0}(J=2-1$|⁠)230.53800 GHz
SiO|$_{v=0}(J=5-4$|⁠)217.10498 GHz
CH|$_3$|OH transitions213.427 (⁠|$1_{1, 0} - 0_{0, 0}$|⁠), 216.946 (⁠|$5_{-1, 4} - 4_{-2, 3}$|⁠), 217.299 (⁠|$6_{1, 5} - 7_{2, 5}$|⁠), 229.589 (⁠|$15_{-4, 11} - 16_{-3, 14}$|⁠), 229.758 (⁠|$8_{1, 8} - 7_{-0, 7}$|⁠), 230.368 GHz (⁠|$22_{4, 18} - 21_{5, 17}$|⁠)

3 RESULTS

3.1 G23.43–0.18 1.3 mm continuum emission

Sources of dust continuum emission at 1.3 mm were detected in the centre (labelled as A in Figs 1 and 2), to the north (labelled as B in Figs 1 and 3) and to the south-west (labelled as C in Figs 1 and 4) of the phase tracking centre of G23.43–0.18. Figs 1, 2, 3, and 4 show the dust continuum emission (with zoom-ins) of the core in G23.43–0.18.

Primary beam corrected 1.3 mm dust continuum image of G23.43–0.18. The contour levels are [0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4] mJy beam$^{-1}$ with an rms of 0.12 mJy beam$^{-1}$. The positions of the 6.7 GHz CH$_{3}$OH masers are indicated by stars, while crosses indicate the positions of the 22 GHz H$_{2}$O masers. As shown in the bottom right of this figure, 1 arcsec corresponds to a linear scale of 5880 au at 5.88 kpc.
Figure 1.

Primary beam corrected 1.3 mm dust continuum image of G23.43–0.18. The contour levels are [0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4] mJy beam|$^{-1}$| with an rms of 0.12 mJy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠. The positions of the 6.7 GHz CH|$_{3}$|OH masers are indicated by stars, while crosses indicate the positions of the 22 GHz H|$_{2}$|O masers. As shown in the bottom right of this figure, 1 arcsec corresponds to a linear scale of 5880 au at 5.88 kpc.

Zoom-in of the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission of G23.43–0.18 A. The contour levels, stars, and crosses are the same as in Fig. 1. White ellipse at the bottom left is the ALMA synthesized beam.
Figure 2.

Zoom-in of the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission of G23.43–0.18 A. The contour levels, stars, and crosses are the same as in Fig. 1. White ellipse at the bottom left is the ALMA synthesized beam.

Zoom-in of the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission of G23.43–0.18 B. The contour levels, stars, and crosses are the same as in Fig. 1. White ellipse is the same as in Fig. 2.
Figure 3.

Zoom-in of the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission of G23.43–0.18 B. The contour levels, stars, and crosses are the same as in Fig. 1. White ellipse is the same as in Fig. 2.

Zoom-in of the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission from C1, C2, and C3 cores. The contour levels, star, and cross are the same as in Fig. 1. White ellipse is the same as in Fig. 2.
Figure 4.

Zoom-in of the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission from C1, C2, and C3 cores. The contour levels, star, and cross are the same as in Fig. 1. White ellipse is the same as in Fig. 2.

G23.43–0.18 A: This central dust continuum source (see Fig. 2) showed a bright 1.3 mm emission extending over 7.5 arcsec (corresponding to 44 000 au) from the north-eastern tip of the emission to the south-western tip. The integrated flux of G23.43–0.18 A is 0.2 Jy, and the peak intensity is 12.1 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| at (⁠|$\alpha$|⁠, |$\delta$|⁠) = (18|$^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}$|39|$.\!\!^{{\mathrm{s}}}$|249, |$-08^{\circ }$|31|$^\prime$|39|${_{.}^{\prime\prime}}$|34). The most prominent feature of the morphology of G23.43–0.18 A is the ‘butterfly’ shape structure with a slightly inclined north–south cavity near the peak of the continuum emission. Excluding the weak north-east spur of G23.43–0.18 A, the butterfly shape covers 4.6 arcsec or 27 000 au. The central cavity splits the main continuum core into east and west components. G23.43–0.18 A is associated with a number of 6.7 GHz CH|$_{3}$|OH and 22 GHz H|$_{2}$|O masers. The 6.7 GHz CH|$_{3}$|OH masers were observed with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (Caswell 2009; Breen et al. 2015), Parkes Observatory 64-m telescope (Caswell et al. 1995; Breen et al. 2015), Hartebeesthoek 26-m telescope (Goedhart, Gaylard & van der Walt 2004), Hitachi and Takahagi 32-m telescopes (Yonekura et al. 2016), Green Bank Telescope (Menten 1991), Torun 32-m telescope (Szymczak et al. 2002, 2012), Effelsberg 100-m telescope (Vlemmings, Torres & Dodson 2011), and Shanghai Tianma 65-m Telescope (Yang et al. 2019). The 22 GHz H|$_{2}$|O masers observations were carried out with the Very Large Array (Forster & Caswell 1989, 1999), Australia Telescope Compact Array (Cesaroni et al. 1988; Breen & Ellingsen 2011), Medicina 32-m telescope (Palagi et al. 1993; Valdettaro et al. 2001), Effelsberg 100-m telescope (Szymczak, Pillai & Menten 2005), Green Bank Telescope (Hogge et al. 2018), and Nanshan 25-m telescope (Xi et al. 2015).

G23.43–0.18 A also shows some blobby structures. In molecular line emission, we see a clear NW–SE molecular outflow, both in SiO, Fig. 5 as well as in |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) (Figs 6, 7 and 8). Fig. 5 shows the SiO (⁠|$J=5-4$|⁠) channel maps superimposed on 1.3 mm contours of G23.43–0.18 A. The SiO emission centred on the continuum cavity is clear, as well as an ‘X’ shape in the last few channel maps (106.7–99.9 km s|$^{-1}$|⁠). Figs 6 and 7 show the blue and redshifted channel maps, respectively of the |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) emission. The ‘X’ shape traced in SiO on a smaller scale can clearly be seen in both figures on a larger scale. Fig. 8 shows the blue and red lobes of the molecular outflow traced in |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠). The cavity seen in the moment maps is clear, as well as an ‘S’ shape passing through the continuum core. Fig. 8 also contains a zoomed image of the centre of G23.43–0.18 A. The |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) emission moment 0 map shows two bow shapes, separated by a distance of 26000 au.

Primary beam corrected SiO ($J=5-4$) line integrated emission showing the shocked gas of G23.43–0.18 A due to the bipolar outflow along the axis of the observed dust cavity, with a typical rms of 2.2 mJybeam$^{-1}$. The white contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels and white ellipse are the same as in Fig. 2.
Figure 5.

Primary beam corrected SiO (⁠|$J=5-4$|⁠) line integrated emission showing the shocked gas of G23.43–0.18 A due to the bipolar outflow along the axis of the observed dust cavity, with a typical rms of 2.2 mJybeam|$^{-1}$|⁠. The white contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels and white ellipse are the same as in Fig. 2.

$^{12}$CO ($J=2-1$) integrated blueshifted emission. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.
Figure 6.

|$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) integrated blueshifted emission. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.

$^{12}$CO ($J=2-1$) integrated redshifted emission. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.
Figure 7.

|$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) integrated redshifted emission. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.

$^{12}$CO ($J=2-1$) integrated intensities of outflow originating in G23-A. (a) Blueshifted and redshifted outflow lobes with contour levels 175 mJy$\cdot {}$km s$^{-1}$  $\times [1,2]$ superimposed on $^{12}$CO ($J=2-1$) moment 0 map integrated over $\lbrace 85-88,100-140\rbrace$ km s$^{-1}$ (greyscale). (b) Zoomed in on G23-A. The greyscale is the same as (a), the magenta contours show the moment zero contours with levels of 1 Jy$\cdot {}$km s$^{-1}\times [1,2,2.5,3,3.5]$, the black contours is the 1.3 mm continuum emission at levels  = [1, 2, 3, 4] mJy beam$^{-1}$ with an rms of 0.12 mJy beam$^{-1}$. The black dotted line and text shows the extent of the bow structure. The linear scale of (a) and (b) are on the top left and bottom right, respectively.
Figure 8.

|$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) integrated intensities of outflow originating in G23-A. (a) Blueshifted and redshifted outflow lobes with contour levels 175 mJy|$\cdot {}$|km s|$^{-1}$|  |$\times [1,2]$| superimposed on |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) moment 0 map integrated over |$\lbrace 85-88,100-140\rbrace$| km s|$^{-1}$| (greyscale). (b) Zoomed in on G23-A. The greyscale is the same as (a), the magenta contours show the moment zero contours with levels of 1 Jy|$\cdot {}$|km s|$^{-1}\times [1,2,2.5,3,3.5]$|⁠, the black contours is the 1.3 mm continuum emission at levels  = [1, 2, 3, 4] mJy beam|$^{-1}$| with an rms of 0.12 mJy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠. The black dotted line and text shows the extent of the bow structure. The linear scale of (a) and (b) are on the top left and bottom right, respectively.

G23.43–0.18 B: The northern dust continuum emission comprise of a 1600 au compact continuum core (see Fig. 3) with a peak intensity of 23.5 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| at (⁠|$\alpha$|⁠, |$\delta$|⁠) = (18|$^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}$|39|$.\!\!^{{\mathrm{s}}}$|189, |$-08^{\circ }$|31|$^\prime$|25|${_{.}^{\prime\prime}}$|41), and an integrated flux of 26.3 mJy. G23.43–0.18 B is only 6 arcsec from the edge of the ALMA primary beam. However, we achieved enough sensitivity to detect faint structures of continuum emission around the main core. A clear spiral arm structure extending southward from the main G23.43–0.18 B core is detected. This spiral arm structure is stretched out through an angular scale of 1.6 arcsec from the continuum peak to the end of the spiral, corresponding to 9400 au. Some of the 6.7 GHz CH|$_{3}$|OH masers are located near the continuum peak emission of G23.43–0.18 B, which could be an indication that the protostar is massive.

G23.43–0.18 C: There are three other compact continuum cores labelled as C1, C2, and C3 (see Fig. 4) detected in the south-western region of G23.43–0.18. C1 is the faintest of the three with an integrated flux of 1.6 mJy, and a peak intensity of 0.8 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| at (⁠|$\alpha$|⁠, |$\delta$|⁠) = (18|$^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}$|38|$.\!\!^{{\mathrm{s}}}$|647, |$-08^{\circ }$|31|$^\prime$|39|${_{.}^{\prime\prime}}$|14). C2 is marginally resolved in our observations with an integrated flux of 3.2 mJy, and a peak intensity of 1.8 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| at (⁠|$\alpha$|⁠, |$\delta$|⁠) = (18|$^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}$|38|$.\!\!^{{\mathrm{s}}}$|815, |$-08^{\circ }$|31|$^\prime$|44|${_{.}^{\prime\prime}}$|17). C3 is 5.5 arcsec south of C2 and has an integrated flux of 10.4 mJy, and a peak intensity of 1.7 mJy beam|$^{-1}$| at (⁠|$\alpha$|⁠, |$\delta$|⁠) = (18|$^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}$|38|$.\!\!^{{\mathrm{s}}}$|801, |$-08^{\circ }$|31|$^\prime$|49|${_{.}^{\prime\prime}}$|62). The |$^{12}$|CO emission, particularly at the redshifted velocities, reveals outflows emerging from C1 and C3 cores (see Fig. 7 and also Fig. 8a). This is an indication that the cores are actively undergoing star formation, though in earliest stage, as evident from lack of complex molecule line emission.

4 DISCUSSIONS

4.1 Estimates of the gas masses and column densities of the dust cores

We took advantage of the sensitivity of millimeter observation to the circum-(proto)stellar material to estimate the gas masses of the cores of G23.43–0.18 following the methods in Brogan et al. (2009).

(1)

where |$S_{\nu }$| is the integrated flux density of the core, R is the ratio of gas to dust (100), |$J(\nu ,T_{\textrm {dust}}) = 1/(exp(h\nu /T_{\mathrm{ dust}}k) - 1)$|⁠, k and h are the Boltzmann and Planck’s constants, respectively, and |$C_{\tau _{\textrm {dust}}} = \tau _{\textrm {dust}}/(1 - e^{-\tau _{\textrm {dust}}})$| is the correction factor for the dust opacity. We adopted a dust opacity, |$\kappa _{\nu }$| of 1 cm|$^2$| g|$^{-1}$| (Ossenkopf & Henning 1994) up to a maximum of 50 K. The excitation temperatures (see Fig. 9a and b) of CH|$_3$|OH in G23.43–0.18 A and G23.43–0.18 B were calculated under the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium (Goldsmith & Langer 1999) and used as the dust temperatures, |$T_{\text{dust}}$|⁠.

Rotational temperature diagram of CH$_3$OH in (a) G23.43–0.18 A and (b) G23.43–0.18 B. The excitation temperature (in units of K), column density (in units of cm$^{-2}$) and correlation coefficient derived from the analysis are quoted in the upper right corner.
Figure 9.

Rotational temperature diagram of CH|$_3$|OH in (a) G23.43–0.18 A and (b) G23.43–0.18 B. The excitation temperature (in units of K), column density (in units of cm|$^{-2}$|⁠) and correlation coefficient derived from the analysis are quoted in the upper right corner.

Goldsmith & Langer (1999) rotation diagram method employs different transitions of the same molecule that span over a range of energies in estimating the temperatures, which can be inferred from this relations

(2)

and

(3)

where k is Boltzmann’s constant, |$\nu$| is the frequency, |$g_I$| and |$g_K$| are the degeneracies associated with the nuclear spin, and k quantum number, respectively, |$\mu ^2$| is the square of the dipole matrix element, S is the statistical line strength, |$\int S_{\nu }\mathrm{ d}\nu$| is the observed integrated intensity of the transition, |$N_{\text{tot}}$| is the total column density, |$Q(T_{\text{rot}})$| is the partition function evaluated at the rotation temperature |$T_{\text{rot}}$|⁠, and |$E_u$| is the upper state energy of the transition. Here, we used CH|$_3$|OH transitions J = |$1_{(1, 0)} - 0_{(0, 0)}$| at 213.427 GHz, |$5_{(-1, 4)} - 4_{(-2, 3)}$| at 216.946 GHz, |$6_{(1, 5)} - 7_{(2, 5)}$| at 217.299 GHz, |$15_{(-4, 11)} - 16_{(-3, 14)}$| at 229.589 GHz, |$8_{(1, 8)} - 7_{(-0, 7)}$| at 229.758 GHz, and |$22_{(4, 18)} - 21_{(5, 17)}$| at 230.368 GHz. The integrated intensity for each transition was calculated from Gaussian fits to the line emission at the continuum peaks of G23.43–0.18 A and G23.43–0.18 B. We iteratively solved for the rotation temperature, column density, and optical depth that gives the best |$\chi ^2$| fit to the data.

The estimated excitation temperature, column density (log N) and average optical depth of CH|$_3$|OH lines in G23.43–0.18 A are |$\sim$|122.73 K, 17.13 cm|$^{-2}$|⁠, and 0.03, respectively, while those of G23.43–0.18 B are |$\sim$|115.67 K, 17.06 cm|$^{-2}$|⁠, and 0.16, respectively. Due to lack of multiple transitions of CH|$_3$|OH in G23.43–0.18 C (C1, C2, and C3) to compute the excitation temperatures, we assumed that of G23.43–0.18 B for their masses and column densities estimation.

The column densities were derived from

(4)

where |$\Omega$| is the solid angle of the beam calculated by |$\Omega = 1.13 \times \Theta ^2$|⁠, where |$\Theta$| is the geometric mean of the beam major and minor axes, |$\mu _{\rm{H_2}}$| is the mean molecular weight per hydrogen molecule = 2.8 and |$m_{\text{H}}$| is the mass of a hydrogen atom. See Table 2 for derived values of the core gas masses and column densities.

Table 2.

Properties of the G23.43–0.18 dust continuum cores extracted from the primary beam corrected image.

Object nameR.A. (J2000)Dec. (J2000)Peak fluxIntegrated fluxSize|$T_{\text{dust}}$||$M_{\text{gas}}$||${N_{\rm{H_2}}}$|
 (⁠|$^{\rm h}$|  |$^{\rm m}$|  |$^{\rm s}$|⁠)(⁠|$^{\circ }$|  |$^{\prime }$|  |$^{\prime \prime }$|⁠)(mJy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)(mJy)(arcsec × arcsec [P.A.] |$^{\circ }$|⁠)(K)(M|$_{\odot }$|⁠)(cm|$^{-2}$|⁠)
G23.43–0.18 A18 34 39.249–08 31 39.3412.1 |$\pm$| 0.1203.2 |$\pm$| 15.02.4 |$\times$| 1.0 [70]122.718.62.8 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 B18 34 39.189–08 31 25.4123.5 |$\pm$| 2.526.3 |$\pm$| 2.50.3 |$\times$| 0.3 [76]115.72.71.3 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|
G23.43–0.18 C118 34 38.647–08 31 39.140.8 |$\pm$| 0.011.6 |$\pm$| 0.010.5 |$\times$| 0.2 [141]115.70.25.6 |$\times$| 10|$^{22}$|
G23.43–0.18 C218 34 38.815–08 31 44.171.8 |$\pm$| 0.023.2 |$\pm$| 0.020.4 |$\times$| 0.3 [21]115.70.31.1 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 C318 34 38.801–08 31 49.621.7 |$\pm$| 0.0210.4 |$\pm$| 0.30.6 |$\times$| 0.4 [140]115.71.14.0 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|
Object nameR.A. (J2000)Dec. (J2000)Peak fluxIntegrated fluxSize|$T_{\text{dust}}$||$M_{\text{gas}}$||${N_{\rm{H_2}}}$|
 (⁠|$^{\rm h}$|  |$^{\rm m}$|  |$^{\rm s}$|⁠)(⁠|$^{\circ }$|  |$^{\prime }$|  |$^{\prime \prime }$|⁠)(mJy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)(mJy)(arcsec × arcsec [P.A.] |$^{\circ }$|⁠)(K)(M|$_{\odot }$|⁠)(cm|$^{-2}$|⁠)
G23.43–0.18 A18 34 39.249–08 31 39.3412.1 |$\pm$| 0.1203.2 |$\pm$| 15.02.4 |$\times$| 1.0 [70]122.718.62.8 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 B18 34 39.189–08 31 25.4123.5 |$\pm$| 2.526.3 |$\pm$| 2.50.3 |$\times$| 0.3 [76]115.72.71.3 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|
G23.43–0.18 C118 34 38.647–08 31 39.140.8 |$\pm$| 0.011.6 |$\pm$| 0.010.5 |$\times$| 0.2 [141]115.70.25.6 |$\times$| 10|$^{22}$|
G23.43–0.18 C218 34 38.815–08 31 44.171.8 |$\pm$| 0.023.2 |$\pm$| 0.020.4 |$\times$| 0.3 [21]115.70.31.1 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 C318 34 38.801–08 31 49.621.7 |$\pm$| 0.0210.4 |$\pm$| 0.30.6 |$\times$| 0.4 [140]115.71.14.0 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|
Table 2.

Properties of the G23.43–0.18 dust continuum cores extracted from the primary beam corrected image.

Object nameR.A. (J2000)Dec. (J2000)Peak fluxIntegrated fluxSize|$T_{\text{dust}}$||$M_{\text{gas}}$||${N_{\rm{H_2}}}$|
 (⁠|$^{\rm h}$|  |$^{\rm m}$|  |$^{\rm s}$|⁠)(⁠|$^{\circ }$|  |$^{\prime }$|  |$^{\prime \prime }$|⁠)(mJy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)(mJy)(arcsec × arcsec [P.A.] |$^{\circ }$|⁠)(K)(M|$_{\odot }$|⁠)(cm|$^{-2}$|⁠)
G23.43–0.18 A18 34 39.249–08 31 39.3412.1 |$\pm$| 0.1203.2 |$\pm$| 15.02.4 |$\times$| 1.0 [70]122.718.62.8 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 B18 34 39.189–08 31 25.4123.5 |$\pm$| 2.526.3 |$\pm$| 2.50.3 |$\times$| 0.3 [76]115.72.71.3 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|
G23.43–0.18 C118 34 38.647–08 31 39.140.8 |$\pm$| 0.011.6 |$\pm$| 0.010.5 |$\times$| 0.2 [141]115.70.25.6 |$\times$| 10|$^{22}$|
G23.43–0.18 C218 34 38.815–08 31 44.171.8 |$\pm$| 0.023.2 |$\pm$| 0.020.4 |$\times$| 0.3 [21]115.70.31.1 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 C318 34 38.801–08 31 49.621.7 |$\pm$| 0.0210.4 |$\pm$| 0.30.6 |$\times$| 0.4 [140]115.71.14.0 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|
Object nameR.A. (J2000)Dec. (J2000)Peak fluxIntegrated fluxSize|$T_{\text{dust}}$||$M_{\text{gas}}$||${N_{\rm{H_2}}}$|
 (⁠|$^{\rm h}$|  |$^{\rm m}$|  |$^{\rm s}$|⁠)(⁠|$^{\circ }$|  |$^{\prime }$|  |$^{\prime \prime }$|⁠)(mJy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)(mJy)(arcsec × arcsec [P.A.] |$^{\circ }$|⁠)(K)(M|$_{\odot }$|⁠)(cm|$^{-2}$|⁠)
G23.43–0.18 A18 34 39.249–08 31 39.3412.1 |$\pm$| 0.1203.2 |$\pm$| 15.02.4 |$\times$| 1.0 [70]122.718.62.8 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 B18 34 39.189–08 31 25.4123.5 |$\pm$| 2.526.3 |$\pm$| 2.50.3 |$\times$| 0.3 [76]115.72.71.3 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|
G23.43–0.18 C118 34 38.647–08 31 39.140.8 |$\pm$| 0.011.6 |$\pm$| 0.010.5 |$\times$| 0.2 [141]115.70.25.6 |$\times$| 10|$^{22}$|
G23.43–0.18 C218 34 38.815–08 31 44.171.8 |$\pm$| 0.023.2 |$\pm$| 0.020.4 |$\times$| 0.3 [21]115.70.31.1 |$\times$| 10|$^{23}$|
G23.43–0.18 C318 34 38.801–08 31 49.621.7 |$\pm$| 0.0210.4 |$\pm$| 0.30.6 |$\times$| 0.4 [140]115.71.14.0 |$\times$| 10|$^{24}$|

4.2 Cavity and |$^{12}$|CO (2-1) wide-opening angle bipolar outflow in G23.43–0.18 A

A prominent large |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) bipolar outflow with a wide (⁠|$\sim$|100|$^{\circ }$|⁠) opening angle and angular size of |$\ge$|20 arcsec was detected towards G23.43–0.18 A as is seen in Figs 6 and 7. The outflow aligns with the axis of the observed dust cavity. The east–west angular size of the north–south cavity observed in G23.43–0.18 A is |$\sim$|0.4 arcsec, a linear size of 2350 au. The north–south axis of the cavity aligns with the axes of the wide-opening angle |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) outflow and the collimated SiO bipolar outflow (see Fig. 5). We estimated the inclination angle |$\theta$| of the wide-angle molecular outflow by first convolving the redshifted and blueshifted |$^{12}$|CO (⁠|$J=2-1$|⁠) maps of Fig. 8 (a) with a 2 arcsec × 2 arcsec beam, and then using the method of Kong & Wu (2011) on the small scale bow structure in Fig. 8 (b). This method can only be used for a conical-like outflow in which the driving source is symmetrically centred along the outflow lobes. The method depends mainly on the accurate location of the driving source. In our calculation, we chose the continuum peak position of G23.43–0.18 A as the driving source and derived an inclination angle of |$50^\circ$| for the G23.43–0.18 A outflow, which is half-way between the sky and the line of sight. The inclination angle is determined with respect to the plane of the sky.

Rosen & Krumholz (2020) suggested momentum injection by outflows and radiation pressure as key drivers of excavation of cavities in protostars. According to Kuiper et al. (2016), the momentum of the outflows entrain and eject 20–50 per cent of gas in dense cores. Cunningham et al. (2011) found that there is a lower disc surface density threshold which determines how likely a protostellar clump is to form high-mass stars. Further, they found that an outflow raises the surface density threshold, further diminishing high mass star formation efficiency.

We used the method of Tanabe et al. (2019) to derive the parameters for the wide angle bipolar outflow: the |$^{12}$|CO outflow mass, outflow momentum, outflow energy, outflow dynamical time, mass outflow rate, outflow momentum flux, and energy ejection rate. The outflow mass, |$M_\text{outflow}$| is calculated from:

(5)

where |$m(v)$| is the mass of each velocity component expressed as:

(6)

In equation (6), |$\bar {\mu }$| is the mean molecular weight of 2.4, |$m_{\text{H}}$| is the atomic mass of hydrogen, |$\chi _{^{12}\text{CO}}$| is the CO abundance taken as 10|$^{-4}$| (Frerking, Langer & Wilson 1982), |$s(v)$| is the projected area above |$3\sigma$| level, |$f_\tau = \tau _{\text{CO}}/(1 - e^{-\tau _{\text{CO}}})$| is the |$^{12}$|CO correction factor for the optical depth, |$\tau _{\text{CO}} = -\text{ln}(1 - \overline{T}_{\text{B}}(v)/T_\text{ex})$|⁠, |$T_{\text{ex}}$| is the |$^{12}$|CO excitation temperature, |$\overline{T}_{\text{B}}(v)$| is the averaged brightness temperature of all pixels in |$s(v)$|⁠, and |$\Delta v$| is the |$^{12}$|CO linewidth. The peak intensity (in Kelvin) of |$^{12}$|CO profile was obtained from Gaussian fitting and adopted as the excitation temperature of |$^{12}$|CO. The projected area |$s(v)$| is defined as:

(7)

where |$n_{\text{pix}}$| is the number of pixels in |$s(v)$|⁠, D is the distance to the source, and |$\Delta \theta$| is the pixel size  = |$0{_{.}^{\prime\prime}} 05$|⁠. The outflow momentum (⁠|$P_{\text{outflow}}$|⁠) and outflow energy (⁠|$E_{\text{outflow}}$|⁠) are calculated from:

(8)

and

(9)

The outflow momentum varies with |$1/\sin \theta$|⁠. Hence, we effectively calculated |$P\sin \theta$|⁠. The dynamical time-scale of the outflow, |$t_\text{d}$| is derived from:

(10)

where |$R_{\text{max}}$| is the maximum size of the outflow measured in the integrated map and |$\Delta v_{\text{max}}$| is the maximum velocity of the outflow taken from |$|v_{\text{max}}-v_{\text{sys}}|$|⁠, where |$v_{\text{max}}$| is the highest velocity for emission above |$3\sigma$|⁠. The mass outflow rate (⁠|$\dot{M}_{\text{outflow}}$|⁠), outflow momentum flux (⁠|$\dot{P}_{\text{outflow}}$|⁠), and energy ejection rate (⁠|$\dot{E}_{\text{outflow}}$|⁠) are obtained from:

(11)
(12)

and

(13)

From these calculations, we found that the average values of the |$^{12}$|CO outflow mass, outflow momentum, outflow energy, outflow dynamical time, mass outflow rate, outflow momentum flux, and energy ejection rate are |$\sim$| 0.72 |$\mathrm{ M}_{\odot }$|⁠, 5.22 |$\mathrm{ M}_{\odot }$|  km s|$^{-1}$| , 6.46 |$\times$| 10|$^{44}$| erg, 1.54 |$\times$| 10|$^{4}$| yr, 4.23 |$\times$| 10|$^{-5}$||$\mathrm{ M}_{\odot }$| yr|$^{-1}$|⁠, 3.14 |$\times$| 10|$^{-4}$||$\mathrm{ M}_{\odot }$|  km s|$^{-1}$| yr|$^{-1}$| and 1.27 |$\times$| 10|$^{33}$| erg s|$^{-1}$|⁠, respectively.

The derived values are consistent with the largest values obtained in the Orion Molecular Cloud (OMC; Takahashi et al. 2008). Our derived outflow properties are consistent with large scale surveys (de Villiers et al. 2014; Maud et al. 2015) and simulations (Matsushita et al. 2017; Rosen & Krumholz 2020) of molecular outflows originating in high-mass star-forming regions. Our dynamical time-scale limit is in agreement with the |$t_d$| derived for most molecular outflows observed in the above-mentioned surveys, where |$t_d \sim 10^4 - 10^5$| yr. Our mass estimate should be treated as a lower limit, as the outflow was not fully enclosed within the primary beam which causes an uncertainty in the size of the outflow. Our findings suggest that the driving source of the outflow in G23.43–0.18 A is a massive protostar.

Photoionization have been shown to play a key role as a protostar reaches 10–20 M|$_{\odot }$|⁠. Accretion disc shields itself from the impact of photoionization. However, magnetically launched outflows become photoionized forming jet-like UCHII region within the protostar (Tanaka, Tan & Zhang 2016; Kuiper & Hosokawa 2018).

It is important to note that the SiO emission in G23.43–0.18 A in some velocity intervals (Fig. 5) shows high collimation and aligns with the cavity wall pointing to the existence of shocks along the ploughed cavity and the edges of the wide opening angle of the |$^{12}$|CO outflow.

4.3 Possible jet system in G23.43–0.18 B

Fig. 10 shows the possible jet system in G23-B. We detected compact emission of 229.758 GHz CH|$_3$|OH thermal line northwest and southeast of G23.43–0.18 B. The northwestern emission is |$\sim$|5 arcsec (corresponding to 29400 au) offset from the continuum core, while the southwestern emission is located |$\sim$|6 arcsec (corresponding to 35280 au) off from the core. The axis of the two blobs cuts through the G23.43–0.18 B core, thus, confirming it as the driving source of the emission. The CH|$_3$|OH emission is only detected in the central region of G23.43–0.18 B and at the edges of the outflow, but not along the rest of the outflow. This is indicative of low column density of CH|$_3$|OH along the jet axis, which is suggestive of the existence of a ploughed cavity along the jet. We consider that these compact CH|$_3$|OH emissions are tracing shocked environment of a jet launched from the G23.43–0.18 B core, and derived the collimation angle of the jet to be |$\sim 19^o$|⁠. The presence of a jet confirms active star formation in the region. A highly collimated |$^{12}$|CO outflow is also detected towards G23.43–0.18 B. The presence of knots of emission could be an indication of episodic ejections. Five peaks are visible in CO, which are 1, 2.3, 3.6, 5.3, and 7.7 arcsec corresponding to 5900, 13500, 21700, 31800, and 45200 au from the driving source, respectively. Using the method outlined in Section 4.2, the dynamical time-scales for the knots are 185, 424, 682, 999, and 1420 yr, corresponding to an ejection roughly every 300 yr if these knots are separate ejections. The association of the CO knots with the jet is also witnessed by the fact that their |$V_{\mbox{LSR}}$|  are up to |$\sim$|50 km s|$^{-1}$| higher than the systemic velocity of the protostar. This suggests that the knots originate from high velocity episodic ejections/outflow. Knotted structure in protostellar jets and outflows are expected to be seen as a consequence of variable protostellar accretion rates. Examples of this is seen in the simulations by Rosen & Krumholz (2020) in outflows and André Oliva & Kuiper (2020) in discs. Therefore, the knotted structures we see in |$^{12}$|CO emission could indicate episodic accretion in G23.43–0.18 B.

The outflow originating in G23.43–0.18 B. The grey contours and colourscale represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission and the contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1. The green contours at levels of 300 mJy$\cdot {}$km s$^{-1} \times [1,2,3,4$] show integrated 229.758 GHz CH$_3$OH molecular line emission, over the velocity range shown in green at the top left. The magenta contours, representing the CO emission, integrated across the shown velocity range in the top left at levels of 25 mJy$\cdot {}$km s$^{-1}$  $\times [2,4,6,8]$. The yellow line shows the length and position angle of the jet.
Figure 10.

The outflow originating in G23.43–0.18 B. The grey contours and colourscale represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission and the contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1. The green contours at levels of 300 mJy|$\cdot {}$|km s|$^{-1} \times [1,2,3,4$|] show integrated 229.758 GHz CH|$_3$|OH molecular line emission, over the velocity range shown in green at the top left. The magenta contours, representing the CO emission, integrated across the shown velocity range in the top left at levels of 25 mJy|$\cdot {}$|km s|$^{-1}$|  |$\times [2,4,6,8]$|⁠. The yellow line shows the length and position angle of the jet.

4.4 CH|$_3$|OH Lines in G23.43–0.18 and presence of rotating structures

Multiple (213.427, 216.946, 217.299, 229.589, 229.759, and 230.368 GHz) CH|$_3$|OH transitions were detected towards G23.43–0.18 A and G23.43–0.18 B. Other transitions were also detected, but a discussion of the G23.43–0.18’s chemistry is outside the scope of this work. In G23.43–0.18 A, the CH|$_3$|OH lines trace the shocked gas along the walls of the conical wide-angle bipolar outflow. Fig. 11 shows the moment 0 map of the 213.427 GHz CH|$_3$|OH line revealing parabolic structures consistent with the X-shape cavity traced by the redshifted and blueshifted emission of |$^{12}$|CO. The 213.427 GHz CH|$_3$|OH emission lines up along the edges of the outflow cone walls. Similar structure has been reported in the Infrared Astronomical Satellite IRAS 16547–4247 protocluster in |$^{12}$| CO(⁠|$J=3-2$|⁠) and CH|$_3$|OH (⁠|$J=7-6$|⁠) (Higuchi et al. 2015).

213.427 GHz CH$_3$OH line in G23.43–0.18 A tracing the walls of the wide-angle bipolar outflow (indicated with red and blue parabolae) from the protostar. The black contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.
Figure 11.

213.427 GHz CH|$_3$|OH line in G23.43–0.18 A tracing the walls of the wide-angle bipolar outflow (indicated with red and blue parabolae) from the protostar. The black contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. The contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.

In G23.43–0.18 B, all the CH|$_3$|OH transitions trace a rotating structure/disc at the centre of the core (see Fig. 12). Not all the CH|$_3$|OH transitions in G23.43–0.18 A show clear rotating structure (see Fig. 13). Some of the CH|$_3$|OH transitions (Fig. 13 left panel) appear to be tracing shocks from the walls of the wide-angle bipolar outflow, while others reveal compact emission with clear evidence of rotation (Fig. 13 right panel). The velocity gradient in G23.43–0.18 A is much shallower than in G23.43–0.18 B. This velocity gradient traces the rotation of the clump/envelope along a direction approximately perpendicular to that of the jet/outflow. The highest excitation temperature 230.368 CH|$_3$|OH line traces the inner part of the G23.43–0.18 B disc. The presence of a rotating disc and the observed collimated jet in G23.43–0.18 B points to the presence of a driving source in the centre of the object.

Multiple transitions of CH$_3$OH lines showing the presence of a rotating structure/disk in G23.43–0.18 B. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission and the contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1. Dotted line indicates the line of the constructed PV diagram shown in Fig. 14.
Figure 12.

Multiple transitions of CH|$_3$|OH lines showing the presence of a rotating structure/disk in G23.43–0.18 B. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission and the contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1. Dotted line indicates the line of the constructed PV diagram shown in Fig. 14.

First moment maps of multiple transitions of CH$_3$OH lines in G23.43–0.18 A. $Left$: velocity field maps from 96 to 104 km s$^{-1}$. $Right$: velocity field maps from 101 to 103 km s$^{-1}$. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission and the contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.
Figure 13.

First moment maps of multiple transitions of CH|$_3$|OH lines in G23.43–0.18 A. |$Left$|⁠: velocity field maps from 96 to 104 km s|$^{-1}$|⁠. |$Right$|⁠: velocity field maps from 101 to 103 km s|$^{-1}$|⁠. The grey contours represent the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission and the contour levels are the same as in Fig. 1.

We tested for Keplerian rotation in G23.43–0.18 B by comparing position–velocity (PV) diagrams from our observations with synthetic Keplerian rotation models. The PV diagram was constructed for the three CH|$_3$|OH transitions (216.946, 217.299, and 229.589 GHz) along a line from (⁠|$18^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}39^{\rm s}.208$|⁠, |$-08^\circ 31$||$^\prime$|24|$^{\prime \prime }$|⁠.998) to (⁠|$18^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}39^{\rm s}.176$|⁠, |$-08^\circ 31$||$^\prime$|25|$^{\prime \prime }$|⁠.678). All three PV diagrams show an elongated, double-peaked structure. We generated synthetic models with the thindisk code (Maret 2019). The program generates a position–position–velocity (PPV) cube from which a PV diagram can be calculated. We used the model parameters shown in Table 3. We generated multiple models for different values of the stellar mass |$M_*$| and the inclination angle i. The least-squares difference between these models and our observations was then calculated. Fig. 14 shows the PV diagram for the three CH|$_3$|OH transitions and a well-fitting model where M|$_* = 5$| M|$_\odot$| and |$i = 60^\circ$|⁠. Fig. 15 shows the least-squares error for all the values of M|$_*$| and i. These models reproduce the data well for |$M_*\, \mathrm{sin}^{2}i = 4$| M|$_\odot$|⁠. The 216 and 217 GHz lines also seem to imply inclination angles between 50|$^\circ$| and 65|$^\circ$|⁠. We found a stellar mass of around 6 M|$_\odot$|⁠. The presence of 6.7 GHz methanol masers in G23.43–0.18 B agrees with our findings that this YSO is sufficiently massive to excite this maser emission.

Comparison of CH$_3$OH position–velocity diagrams in G23.43–0.18 B to Keplerian models. The colour scale is the PV diagram from three CH$_3$OH lines while the contours show the Keplerian model for M$_* = 5$ M$_\odot$ and $i = 60^\circ$.
Figure 14.

Comparison of CH|$_3$|OH position–velocity diagrams in G23.43–0.18 B to Keplerian models. The colour scale is the PV diagram from three CH|$_3$|OH lines while the contours show the Keplerian model for M|$_* = 5$| M|$_\odot$| and |$i = 60^\circ$|⁠.

Sum of least-squares between the CH$_3$OH position–velocity diagrams and synthetic Keplerian models generated from thindisk (Maret 2019). The dashed lines show values of constant $M_* \, \mathrm{sin}^2i$. The grey lines show where $M_* \, \mathrm{sin}^2i$ is 3 and 5.3, respectively, while the yellow line shows where $M_* \, \mathrm{sin}^2i = 4.0$.
Figure 15.

Sum of least-squares between the CH|$_3$|OH position–velocity diagrams and synthetic Keplerian models generated from thindisk (Maret 2019). The dashed lines show values of constant |$M_* \, \mathrm{sin}^2i$|⁠. The grey lines show where |$M_* \, \mathrm{sin}^2i$| is 3 and 5.3, respectively, while the yellow line shows where |$M_* \, \mathrm{sin}^2i = 4.0$|⁠.

Table 3.

Parameter values used to generate Keplerian models with thindisk (Maret 2019).

ParameterValue (Unit)
Distance d5880 (pc)
Disc intensity |$I_0$|135 (Jy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Disc FWHM0.6 (arcsec)
P.A.55 (deg)
System V|$_{\rm LSR}$|101 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Linewidth3.78 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Centrifugal radius |$r_{\rm c}$|10|$^5$| (au)
Outer radius |$r_0$|1000 (au)
Disc size10|$^5$| (au)
Stellar mass |$M_*$|variable (M|$_\odot$|⁠)
Inclination angle ivariable (deg)
ParameterValue (Unit)
Distance d5880 (pc)
Disc intensity |$I_0$|135 (Jy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Disc FWHM0.6 (arcsec)
P.A.55 (deg)
System V|$_{\rm LSR}$|101 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Linewidth3.78 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Centrifugal radius |$r_{\rm c}$|10|$^5$| (au)
Outer radius |$r_0$|1000 (au)
Disc size10|$^5$| (au)
Stellar mass |$M_*$|variable (M|$_\odot$|⁠)
Inclination angle ivariable (deg)
Table 3.

Parameter values used to generate Keplerian models with thindisk (Maret 2019).

ParameterValue (Unit)
Distance d5880 (pc)
Disc intensity |$I_0$|135 (Jy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Disc FWHM0.6 (arcsec)
P.A.55 (deg)
System V|$_{\rm LSR}$|101 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Linewidth3.78 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Centrifugal radius |$r_{\rm c}$|10|$^5$| (au)
Outer radius |$r_0$|1000 (au)
Disc size10|$^5$| (au)
Stellar mass |$M_*$|variable (M|$_\odot$|⁠)
Inclination angle ivariable (deg)
ParameterValue (Unit)
Distance d5880 (pc)
Disc intensity |$I_0$|135 (Jy beam|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Disc FWHM0.6 (arcsec)
P.A.55 (deg)
System V|$_{\rm LSR}$|101 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Linewidth3.78 (km s|$^{-1}$|⁠)
Centrifugal radius |$r_{\rm c}$|10|$^5$| (au)
Outer radius |$r_0$|1000 (au)
Disc size10|$^5$| (au)
Stellar mass |$M_*$|variable (M|$_\odot$|⁠)
Inclination angle ivariable (deg)

5 CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY

We reported the results of our ALMA 1.3 mm continuum and molecular line observations of G23.43–0.18. We detected five continuum cores G23.43–0.18 A, G23.43–0.18 B, G23.43–0.18 C1, G23.43–0.18 C2, and G23.43–0.18 C3. Blobs of dust continuum emission were seen around G23.43–0.18 A and spiral arm structure observed around G23.43–0.18 B. G23.43–0.18 A showed ‘butterfly’ morphology which is attributed to the existence of a cavity possibly ploughed by a wide-angle bipolar outflow. We resolved the wide angle outflow, as well as a bow structure |$\sim 13 000$| au from the driving source. With molecular line tracers such as |$^{12}$|CO and SiO, we traced the walls of an outflow cavity and calculated the outflow inclination angle to be |$50^\circ$|⁠. We also calculated the momentum flux to be 4.06 |$\times$| 10|$^{-4}$||$\mathrm{ M}_{\odot }$|  km s|$^{-1}$| yr|$^{-1}$|⁠, as well as other outflow parameters. We found the outflow parameters to be consistent with observations and simulations of HMYSOs. G23.43–0.18 B is associated with a jet, a rotating disc whose inner part exhibit Keplerian rotation. We traced compact CO emission along the jet axis, which may point to episodic ejections every |$\sim 300$| yr in the driving source.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

JOC acknowledges support from the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (MAECI Grant Number ZA18GR02) and the South African Department of Science and Technology’s National Research Foundation (DST-NRF Grant Number 113121) as part of the ISARP RADIOSKY2020 Joint Research Scheme. CJU is financially supported by the University of South Africa (Research Fund: 409000). AMS was supported by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education, No. FEUZ-2023-0019. C.W.L. acknowledges support from the Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF- 2019R1A2C1010851) and from the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT; project No. 2024-1-841-00). JMV acknowledges the National Research Foundation of South Africa grant number 134192 as well as the Research Council of Finland grant number 348342 for funding this research. TH is financially supported by the MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 17K05398, 18H05222, and 20H05845. Data analyses were in part carried out on common use data analysis computer system at the Astronomy Data Center, ADC, of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA|$\#$|2015.1.01571.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO, and NAOJ.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The raw data used in this paper can be obtained from the ALMA Science archive (ALMA|$\#$|2015.1.01571.S). The fits images of the ALMA observations will be made available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Footnotes

REFERENCES

André Oliva
 
G.
,
Kuiper
 
R.
,
2020
,
A&A
,
644
,
A41

Beuther
 
H.
 et al. ,
2017
,
A&A
,
603
,
A10
 

Beuther
 
H.
 et al. ,
2019a
,
A&A
,
621
,
A122
 

Beuther
 
H.
, et al. ,
2019b
,
A&A
,
628
,
A90
 

Breen
 
S. L.
,
Ellingsen
 
S. P.
,
2011
,
MNRAS
,
416
,
178
 

Breen
 
S. L.
 et al. ,
2015
,
MNRAS
,
450
,
4109
 

Brogan
 
C. L.
 et al. ,
2009
,
ApJ
,
707
,
1
 

Brogan
 
C. L.
 et al. ,
2019
,
ApJ
,
881
,
L39
 

Brunthaler
 
A.
,
Reid
 
M. J.
,
Menten
 
K. M.
,
Zheng
 
X. W.
,
Moscadelli
 
L.
,
Xu
 
Y.
,
2009
,
ApJ
,
693
,
424
 

Burns
 
R. A.
, et al. ,
2020
,
Nat. Astron.
,
4
,
506

Caratti o Garatti
 
A.
 et al. ,
2017
,
Nat. Phys.
,
13
,
276

Caswell
 
J. L.
,
2009
,
PASA
,
26
,
454
 

Caswell
 
J. L.
,
Vaile
 
R. A.
,
Ellingsen
 
S. P.
,
Whiteoak
 
J. B.
,
Norris
 
R. P.
,
1995
,
MNRAS
,
272
,
96
 

Cesaroni
 
R.
 et al. ,
1988
,
A&AS
,
76
,
445

Chen
 
X.
 et al. ,
2020
,
Nat. Astron.
,
4
,
1170

Chibueze
 
J. O.
 et al. ,
2012
,
ApJ
,
748
,
146
 

Contreras
 
Y.
 et al. ,
2013
,
A&A
,
549
,
A45
 

Cunningham
 
A. J.
,
Klein
 
R. I.
,
Krumholz
 
M. R.
,
McKee
 
C. F.
,
2011
,
ApJ
,
740
,
107
 

de Villiers
 
H. M.
 et al. ,
2014
,
MNRAS
,
444
,
566
 

Dempsey
 
J. T.
,
Thomas
 
H. S.
,
Currie
 
M. J.
,
2013
,
ApJS
,
209
,
8
 

Forster
 
J. R.
,
Caswell
 
J. L.
,
1989
,
A&A
,
213
,
339

Forster
 
J. R.
,
Caswell
 
J. L.
,
1999
,
A&AS
,
137
,
43
 

Frank
 
A.
 et al. ,
2014
, in
Beuther
 
H.
,
Klessen
 
R. S.
,
Dullemond
 
C. P.
,
Henning
 
T.
, eds,
Protostars and Planets VI
.
Univ. Arizona Press
,
Tucson
, p.
451
 

Frerking
 
M. A.
,
Langer
 
W. D.
,
Wilson
 
R. W.
,
1982
,
ApJ
,
262
,
590
 

Fujisawa
 
K.
 et al. ,
2014
,
PASJ
,
66
,
31
 

Goedhart
 
S.
,
Gaylard
 
M. J.
,
van der Walt
 
D. J.
,
2004
,
MNRAS
,
355
,
553
 

Goldsmith
 
P. F.
,
Langer
 
W. D.
,
1999
,
ApJ
,
517
,
209
 

Higuchi
 
A. E.
,
Saigo
 
K.
,
Chibueze
 
J. O.
,
Sanhueza
 
P.
,
Takakuwa
 
S.
,
Garay
 
G.
,
2015
,
ApJ
,
798
,
L33
 

Hirota
 
T.
 et al. ,
2017
,
Nat. Astron.
,
1
,
0146

Hogge
 
T.
 et al. ,
2018
,
ApJS
,
237
,
27
 

Hu
 
B.
 et al. ,
2016
,
ApJ
,
833
,
18
 

Hunter
 
T. R.
 et al. ,
2017
,
ApJ
,
837
,
L29
 

Ilee
 
J. D.
 et al. ,
2016
,
MNRAS
,
462
,
4386
 

Ilee
 
J. D.
 et al. ,
2018
,
ApJ
,
869
,
L24
 

Johnston
 
K. G.
 et al. ,
2015
,
ApJ
,
813
,
L19
 

Johnston
 
K. G.
 et al. ,
2020
,
A&A
,
634
,
L11
 

Kang
 
J.-. hyun.
,
Byun
 
D.-Y.
,
Kim
 
K.-T.
,
Kim
 
J.
,
Lyo
 
A. -Ran.
,
Vlemmings
 
W. H. T.
,
2016
,
ApJS
,
227
,
17
 

Kim
 
J.
 et al. ,
2020
,
ApJ
,
896
,
127
 

Kim
 
K.-T.
,
Koo
 
B.-C.
,
2003
,
ApJ
,
596
,
362
 

Kim
 
K.-T.
 et al. ,
2018
,
Proc. IAU Symp. 336, Astrophysical Masers: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe
,
Cambridge University Press
. p.
259
 

Kong
 
S.
,
Wu
 
Y.
,
2011
,
MNRAS
,
413
,
71
 

Kuiper
 
R.
,
Hosokawa
 
T.
,
2018
,
A&A
,
616
,
A101
 

Kuiper
 
R.
,
Yorke
 
H. W.
,
Turner
 
N. J.
,
2015
,
ApJ
,
800
,
86
 

Kuiper
 
R.
,
Turner
 
N. J.
,
Yorke
 
H. W.
,
2016
,
ApJ
,
832
,
40
 

Liu
 
H. B.
 et al. ,
2015
,
ApJ
,
804
,
37
 

Liu
 
H. B.
 et al. ,
2019
,
ApJ
,
871
,
185
 

Liu
 
S.-Y.
,
Su
 
Y.-N.
,
Zinchenko
 
I.
,
Wang
 
K-S.
,
Wang
 
Y.
,
2018
,
ApJ
,
863
,
L12
 

Maret
 
S.
,
2019
,
Zenodo
, Thindisk, doi:

Matsushita
 
Y.
,
Machida
 
M. N.
,
Sakurai
 
Y.
,
Hosokawa
 
T.
,
2017
,
MNRAS
,
470
,
1026
 

Maud
 
L. T.
,
Moore
 
T. J. T.
,
Lumsden
 
S. L.
,
Mottram
 
J.C.
,
Urquhart
 
J. S.
,
Hoare
 
M. G.
,
2015
,
MNRAS
,
453
,
645
 

Maud
 
L. T.
 et al. ,
2019
,
A&A
,
627
,
L6
 

McMullin
 
J. P.
,
Waters
 
B.
,
Schiebel
 
D.
,
Young
 
W.
,
Golap
 
K.
,
2007
, in
Shaw
 
R. A.
,
Hill
 
F.
,
Bell
 
D. J.
, eds,
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI
.
Astron. Soc. Pac
,
San Francisco
, p.
127

Menten
 
K. M.
,
1991
,
ApJ
,
380
,
L75
 

Meyer
 
D. M.-A.
,
Vorobyov
 
E. I.
,
Kuiper
 
R.
,
Kley
 
W.
,
2017
,
MNRAS
,
464
,
L90
 

Meyer
 
D. M.-A.
,
Kuiper
 
R.
,
Kley
 
W.
,
Johnston
 
K. G.
,
Vorobyov
 
E.
,
2018
,
MNRAS
,
473
,
3615
 

Ossenkopf
 
V.
,
Henning
 
T.
,
1994
,
A&A
,
291
,
943

Palagi
 
F.
,
Cesaroni
 
R.
,
Comoretto
 
G.
,
Felli
 
M.
,
Natale
 
V.
,
1993
,
A&AS
,
101
,
153

Rogers
 
H.
,
Pittard
 
J. M.
,
2013
,
MNRAS
,
431
,
1337
 

Rosen
 
A. L.
,
Krumholz
 
M. R.
,
2020
,
AJ
,
160
,
78
 

Shirley
 
Y. L.
 et al. ,
2013
,
ApJS
,
209
,
2
 

Slysh
 
V. I.
,
Kalenskii
 
S. V.
,
Val’TTS
 
I. E.
,
Golubev
 
V.
,
Mead
 
K.
,
1999
,
ApJS
,
123
,
515

Sugiyama
 
K.
,
Saito
 
Y.
,
Yonekura
 
Y.
,
Momose
 
M.
,
2019
,
Astron. Telegram
,
12446
,
1

Szymczak
 
M.
,
Kus
 
A. J.
,
Hrynek
 
G.
,
Kěpa
 
A.
,
Pazderski
 
E.
,
2002
,
A&A
,
392
,
277
 

Szymczak
 
M.
,
Pillai
 
T.
,
Menten
 
K. M.
,
2005
,
A&A
,
434
,
613
 

Szymczak
 
M.
,
Wolak
 
P.
,
Bartkiewicz
 
A.
,
Borkowski
 
K. M.
,
2012
,
Astron. Nachr.
,
333
,
634
 

Takahashi
 
S.
 et al. ,
2008
,
ApJ
,
688
,
344
 

Tanabe
 
Y.
 et al. ,
2019
,
PASJ
,
71
,
S8
 

Tanaka
 
K. E. I.
,
Tan
 
J. C.
,
Zhang
 
Y.
,
2016
,
ApJ
,
818
,
52
 

Tanaka
 
K. E. I.
,
Tan
 
J. C.
,
Zhang
 
Y.
,
2017
,
ApJ
,
835
,
32
 

Torrelles
 
J. M.
,
Gomez
 
J. F.
,
Rodriguez
 
L. F.
,
Curiel
 
S.
,
Ho
 
P. T.P.
,
Garay
 
G.
,
1996
,
ApJ
,
457
,
L107
 

Valdettaro
 
R.
 et al. ,
2001
,
A&A
,
368
,
845
 

Vlemmings
 
W. H. T.
,
Torres
 
R. M.
,
Dodson
 
R.
,
2011
,
A&A
,
529
,
A95
 

Walsh
 
A. J.
,
Burton
 
M. G.
,
Hyland
 
A. R.
,
Robinson
 
G.
,
1998
,
MNRAS
,
301
,
640
 

Walsh
 
A. J.
,
Macdonald
 
G. H.
,
Alvey
 
N. D. S.
,
Burton
 
M. G.
,
Lee
 
J. -K.
,
2003
,
A&A
,
410
,
597
 

Wood
 
D. O. S.
,
Churchwell
 
E.
,
1989
,
ApJS
,
69
,
831
 

Xi
 
H.
 et al. ,
2015
,
MNRAS
,
453
,
4203
 

Yang
 
K.
 et al. ,
2019
,
ApJS
,
241
,
18
 

Yonekura
 
Y.
 et al. ,
2016
,
PASJ
,
68
,
74
 

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.