Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the 2021 WHO Central Nervous System tumor classification, the Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype diagnosis has changed markedly. We compared the clinical backgrounds and prognoses of molecular glioblastoma (mGBM) and conventional glioblastoma (histological glioblastoma, hGBM) in a Japanese cohort.

METHODS

We included 274 patients with glioblastoma who were treated at five institutions from 2011 to 2023. Driver gene analysis was performed using a brain tumor-specific custom gene panel to verify the association between molecular and clinical information.

RESULTS

Patients with mGBM had a better preoperative KPS, lower Ki-67, and lower removal rates than did those who had hGBM. Overall survival was longer in patients with mGBM than in those with hGBM (1207 vs 598 days, p = 0.032). TP53 mutation (hazard ratio: 5.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.26 - 108.7, p = 0.012) and histological grade 3 (p = 0.045) were significant poor prognostic factors in mGBM.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mGBM had better preoperative KPS, worse removal rates, lower Ki-67 labeling index, and better overall survival than did those with hGBM. Additionally, histological grade of mGBM is potentially useful for estimating prognosis. Glioblastoma in the WHO CNS5 2021 remains a heterogeneous population, and prognostic stratification based on the patient’s clinical background and molecular information is desirable.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].