Abstract

Glucosinolates are secondary metabolites found almost exclusively in the order Brassicales. They are synthesized from a variety of amino acids and can have numerous side chain modifications that control biological function. We investigated the biosynthesis of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, which has biological activities including toxicity to Caenorhabditis elegans, inhibition of seed germination, induction of goiter disease in mammals, and production of bitter flavors in Brassica vegetable crops. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) accessions contain three different patterns of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate accumulation (present in leaves and seeds, seeds only, or absent) corresponding to three different alleles at a single locus, GSL-OH. Fine-scale mapping of the GSL-OH locus identified a 2-oxoacid-dependent dioxygenase encoded by At2g25450 required for the formation of both 2R- and 2S-2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate from the precursor 3-butenyl glucosinolate precursor. Naturally occurring null mutations and T-DNA insertional mutations in At2g25450 exhibit a complete absence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate accumulation. Analysis of herbivory by the generalist lepidopteran Trichoplusia ni showed that production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate provides increased resistance. These results show that At2g25450 is necessary for the hydroxylation of but-3-enyl glucosinolate to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in planta and that this metabolite increases resistance to generalist herbivory.

Plants utilize a suite of defensive compounds to provide resistance to the attacks of other organisms. These secondary metabolites show high levels of variation in terms of both accumulation and structure (Rodman et al., 1981; Zangerl and Berenbaum, 1990; Berenbaum and Zangerl, 1998). This variation is believed to result from an arms race between the plant and its biotic attackers such that each evolutionary innovation in plant defense elicits the evolution of a counteradaptation in the biotic attacker. The repetition of this process may lead to the high level of diversity observed in chemical structures and their amounts (Ehrlich and Raven, 1964) and variation in bioactivity of the different structures (Bowers and Puttick, 1988). An alternative option is that the variation may represent a stable cycling of phenotypic classes (Berenbaum and Zangerl, 1998; Zangerl et al., 2008). The concomitant and often correlated variation in both chemical structure and the total amount of a given class of chemical defense complicates the ability to separate the contribution of these two factors to plant protection (Puttick and Bowers, 1988; Mithen et al., 1995; Giamoustaris and Mithen, 1996). The development of precise tools to tease apart chemical structure and content would make an important contribution to the study of plant chemical defense.

An important model system for studying the role of chemical defenses in plants is the glucosinolates, a class of naturally occurring thioglycosides that are found throughout the order Brassicales. These sulfur-rich plant secondary metabolites are synthesized from a variety of protein amino acids (Met, Leu, Ile, Val, Trp, and Phe; Halkier and Du, 1997; Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006). The glucosinolates are part of a two-component defensive system whereby the intact glucosinolates are stored separate from their activating enzyme myrosinase (Bones et al., 1991; Bones and Rossiter, 1996; Kelly et al., 1998; Koroleva et al., 2000). Upon tissue disruption, the glucosinolate and myrosinase combine and generate a suite of biologically active chemicals that provide resistance against lepidopteran herbivores, aphids, and pathogens (Mithen et al., 1987; Mithen, 1992; Tierens et al., 2001; Barth and Jander, 2006; Kim and Jander, 2007; de Vos et al., 2008). This bipartite system also contains a set of myrosinase-associated proteins that determine the final chemical structure and their resulting biological activity (Burow et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2006).

Another important determinant of the final biological activity is the structure of the glucosinolate side chain prior to activation. One example of this structural variation from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) is the dihomomethionine-derived methylthioalkyl side chain, which can be modified to form methylthioalkyl, methylsulfinylalkyl, alkenyl, and hydroxyalkenyl glucosinolates (Fig. 1  
Dihomomethionine-derived glucosinolate side chain modification. Shown are the major foliar dihomomethionine glucosinolates that accumulate in Arabidopsis accessions. The names of the glucosinolates are below the corresponding structures. The QTL controlling each reaction is listed to the right of the reaction's arrow. In parentheses is included the gene or enzyme underlying the associated QTL for each given reaction.
Figure 1.

Dihomomethionine-derived glucosinolate side chain modification. Shown are the major foliar dihomomethionine glucosinolates that accumulate in Arabidopsis accessions. The names of the glucosinolates are below the corresponding structures. The QTL controlling each reaction is listed to the right of the reaction's arrow. In parentheses is included the gene or enzyme underlying the associated QTL for each given reaction.

; Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Lambrix et al., 2001; Wentzell et al., 2007). Frequently, the chemical structure of the side chain is highly variable within a crucifer species and is often controlled by a set of four genetic loci (Parkin et al., 1994; Giamoustaris and Mithen, 1996; Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). In Arabidopsis and Brassica species, these loci are GSL-Elong, GSL-OX, GSL-ALK, and GSL-OH. The GSL-Elong locus encodes a set of methylthioalkylmalate synthases that control the carbon chain length of the final glucosinolate structure (Benderoth et al., 2006). GSL-OX is controlled by differential expression of a family of flavin monoxygenases that oxidize methylthioalkyl glucosinolates to their corresponding methylsulfinylalkyl derivatives (Hansen et al., 2007). The conversion of methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates to alkenyl and hydroxyalkyl glucosinolates in Arabidopsis is mediated by the GSL-AOP locus, which encodes two 2-oxoacid-dependent dioxygenases (2-ODDs) that have no close relationship with any other members of this large gene family (Fig. 1; Kliebenstein et al., 2001a).

The final member of this set of modular genetic loci is the uncloned GSL-OH locus, which controls the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 1; Parkin et al., 1994; van Doorn et al., 1999; Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). This glucosinolate arises by oxidation of 3-butenyl glucosinolate to produce either the 2R- or 2S-hydroxylated derivative (Rossiter et al., 1990; Daubos et al., 1998). Arabidopsis contains both the 2R and 2S enantiomers of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, whereas Brassica napus makes only the 2R enantiomer and Crambe abyssinica makes only the 2S enantiomer (Daubos et al., 1998; van Doorn et al., 1998). This suggests that there may be enzymatic differences in the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate among different plant species.

The production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate has diverse biological consequences. It is toxic to insects, bacteria, and nematodes, inhibits the germination of various plant species, and is a major source of bitter flavor in Brassica vegetables (Donkin et al., 1995; Angelini et al., 1998; van Doorn et al., 1998; Manici et al., 2000; Peterson et al., 2000). In addition, upon tissue disruption, 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate can be hydrolyzed to form an oxazolidine-2-thione derivative (goitrin), a compound that causes goiter disease in mammals and is a major impediment to the use of Brassica crops as cattle feed (Greer, 1956; Greer and Deeney, 1959; Pearson et al., 1983). Interestingly, if 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate is converted to the simple nitrile instead, as can occur in several Brassica and Arabidopsis genotypes, the resulting compound can stimulate antioxidant pathways in humans (Nho and Jeffery, 2004). Thus, identification of the gene(s) responsible for the GSL-OH locus could aid investigative inquiries into numerous biological phenomena.

To identify the genes required to produce 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and its resulting biological activity, we have undertaken a genetic, biochemical, and molecular analysis of the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. We utilized natural variation in gene expression as well as T-DNA mutations within Arabidopsis to show that a novel 2-ODD is required to form 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The genetic analysis also suggested that this enzyme determines the total level of aliphatic glucosinolates accumulated and resistance to a generalist insect herbivore. Interestingly, this insect resistance appears to be dependent upon the specific structure of the glucosinolate rather than the total accumulation of glucosinolates, as had been found previously (Kliebenstein et al., 2002; Lankau, 2007; Beekwilder et al., 2008).

RESULTS

Natural Variation of 2-Hydroxybut-3-enyl Glucosinolate in Arabidopsis

In Brassica, the occurrence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate is controlled by the allelic status at the GSL-OH locus and the presence of its precursor, but-3-enyl glucosinolate, whose production is in turn regulated by the GSL-Elong and GSL-AOP loci (Magrath et al., 1994; Mithen and Toroser, 1995; Fig. 1). A previous analysis suggested that there is a GSL-OH locus in Arabidopsis but that the segregation of naturally occurring knockout alleles at GSL-Elong and GSL-AOP limits the accessions that accumulate 3-butenyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2001c). Analysis of 38 accessions identified 27 that accumulated but-3-enyl glucosinolate in the leaves and seeds. The presence or absence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in leaf and seed tissues suggested three different phenotypic GSL-OH variants (Supplemental Table S1). Most accessions, such as Aberdeen, have a full-functional variant that contain high levels of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in both leaves and seeds (Supplemental Table S1). In contrast, Sorbo, Shakdara, and Kas-1 (and others) contain 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate only in the seed (seed-functional variant), while Cape Verde Island (Cvi) contains no 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in either tissue (null variant; Supplemental Table S1). It remains to be tested if these variants are alleles of the same locus. All accessions with 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate contained both the 2R and 2S enantiomers in the identical ratios (2R:2S) of approximately 1:3, as found previously, and as such the two forms are summed and presented as the total 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c).

Genetics of 2-Hydroxybut-3-enyl Glucosinolate in a Ler × Cvi Population

Neither Landsberg erecta (Ler) nor Cvi accumulates 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001b, 2001c). However, analysis of the Ler × Cvi recombinant inbred line (RIL) population showed that 37 of the 162 RILs accumulated 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in the seeds (Kliebenstein, et al., 2001b). Utilizing these data, we mapped quantitative trait loci (QTL) for the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. Two of the loci responsible for this conversion mapped to the cloned GSL-Elong and GSL-AOP loci, which are required for production of the precursor but-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 2  
QTL for the accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The locations of three epistatic QTL controlling the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in the Ler × Cvi RIL population are shown with the names of each QTL. Roman numerals refer to the chromosome. The y axis is in log of the odds units, and the x axis is in cM; the horizontal lines represent the 0.05 significance threshold determined by 1,000 permutations.
Figure 2.

QTL for the accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The locations of three epistatic QTL controlling the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in the Ler × Cvi RIL population are shown with the names of each QTL. Roman numerals refer to the chromosome. The y axis is in log of the odds units, and the x axis is in cM; the horizontal lines represent the 0.05 significance threshold determined by 1,000 permutations.

; Kliebenstein et al., 2001a, 2001c). The third locus, GSL-OH, mapped to chromosome II between the markers FD150.C and Erecta (Parkin et al., 1994; Alonso-Blanco et al., 1998; Fig. 2). The Ler allele at this locus allowed the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in the seed but not the leaf. This suggests that the Ler parent contains the seed-functional GSL-OH variant while Cvi contains the null GSL-OH variant and that they are alleles of the same locus. Moreover, Ler × Cvi F1 individuals displayed the seed-functional phenotype showing that the seed-functional GSL-OH complements the null functional variant, further supporting the hypothesis that the two variants are alleles of the same locus.
Further mapping showed that GSL-OH mapped between microsatellite markers: 2 centimorgan (cM) north of T1D16 and 0.3 cM south of F13D4 (Fig. 3  
Cosegregation and association of At2g25450 with GSL-OH. A, Fine-scale mapping of the GSL-OH locus on chromosome II in 588 F2 progeny of the Cvi × Tac cross. Vertical lines represent the location of the polymorphic microsatellite on each BAC, with the number at the top of each line giving the number of recombinants between that marker and GSL-OH in 588 F2 progeny. Two candidate gene positions are shown with the P450 and 2-ODD. GSL-OH allelic status is shown as determined by HPLC: 3 = full functional, 2 = seed functional, 1 = null variant. B, The phylogenetic relationship of GSL-OH (At2g25450) cDNA sequence variation in Arabidopsis accessions combined with the allelic status of the GSL-OH locus. The scale represents 0.002 substitutions per site. C, The association of allelic status at GSL-OH and differential expression of At2g25450. Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels containing products from quantitative RT-PCR are shown. One microliter of cDNA was utilized for these reactions. RAN was used as a loading control. All reactions were done with 0.1 and 0.3 μL of cDNA to confirm the 1-μL reaction results and repeated three times.
Figure 3.

Cosegregation and association of At2g25450 with GSL-OH. A, Fine-scale mapping of the GSL-OH locus on chromosome II in 588 F2 progeny of the Cvi × Tac cross. Vertical lines represent the location of the polymorphic microsatellite on each BAC, with the number at the top of each line giving the number of recombinants between that marker and GSL-OH in 588 F2 progeny. Two candidate gene positions are shown with the P450 and 2-ODD. GSL-OH allelic status is shown as determined by HPLC: 3 = full functional, 2 = seed functional, 1 = null variant. B, The phylogenetic relationship of GSL-OH (At2g25450) cDNA sequence variation in Arabidopsis accessions combined with the allelic status of the GSL-OH locus. The scale represents 0.002 substitutions per site. C, The association of allelic status at GSL-OH and differential expression of At2g25450. Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels containing products from quantitative RT-PCR are shown. One microliter of cDNA was utilized for these reactions. RAN was used as a loading control. All reactions were done with 0.1 and 0.3 μL of cDNA to confirm the 1-μL reaction results and repeated three times.

; Supplemental Table S2). This genomic region contains seven bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) and two potential genes that encode enzymes capable of hydroxylating but-3-enyl glucosinolate to its 2-hydroxyl derivative, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase and a 2-ODD (Fig. 3).

Fine-Scale Mapping of GSL-OH in Cvi × Tacoma

To fine-scale map GSL-OH, we generated F2 progeny from a cross between Cvi (nonfunctional GSL-OH) and Tacoma (Tac; fully functional GSL-OH; Supplemental Table S1). These two parents were chosen because they have the same GSL-Elong and GSL-AOP alleles and, as such, only GSL-OH segregates. A total of 192 F2 progeny were analyzed by HPLC for the presence of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and genotyped at T1D16 and F13D4. GSL-OH again mapped to a single locus 2.6 cM north of T1D16 and 1.5 cM south of F13D4 (Fig. 3). Additionally, in Cvi × Tac F1 individuals, the full-functional GSL-OH phenotype complemented the seed-functional GSL-OH allele (data not shown). Thus, the full-functional, seed-functional, and null GSL-OH phenotypes are caused by different alleles at a single GSL-OH locus. To further fine-scale map GSL-OH, we generated microsatellite markers on T19L18, F17H15, F13B15, and T22F11. This showed that there was no recombination between GSL-OH and microsatellite F13B15 in a total of 580 F2 progeny (Fig. 3). The F13B15 BAC contains only the 2-ODD candidate gene, At2g25450, suggesting that the enzyme encoded by this gene may have the capacity to catalyze the hydroxylation of but-3-enyl glucosinolate to form 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate.

Association of At2g25450 Sequence Variation and the GSL-OH Allele

We sequenced the predicted full-length At2g25450 open reading frame (ORF) from accessions that contained the three GSL-OH variants to determine whether the candidate gene sequence covaried with changes in the accumulation pattern of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The At2g25450 ORF is 1,077 nucleotides long and encodes a protein of 359 amino acids. The cDNAs from accessions with full-functional or seed-functional GSL-OH alleles are nearly identical, with only one to three nucleotide differences among the various copies (Fig. 3). In contrast, the cDNA sequences from accessions with null GSL-OH alleles clearly separated into two groups. Analysis of the At2g25450 cDNA sequences from the GSL-OH null accessions Kondara and Hodja showed that they share a C-to-T substitution, which generates a TAG stop codon. This truncates the protein to 131 amino acids and is probably the reason for the lack of GSL-OH activity in these two accessions. In contrast, the Cvi At2g25450 cDNA encoded an intact ORF that has six nucleotide polymorphisms in comparison with the other sequences, with five of the six polymorphisms being nonsynonymous substitutions (R288-I, G254-E, P218-H, L184-F, and G105-S, with the first amino acid being the consensus and the second being Cvi). Additionally, all five amino acid changes are nonconservative substitutions that could significantly alter the structure of the encoded enzymes. Any of these changes may be sufficient to inactivate At2g25450 and cause the null phenotype in Cvi.

At2g25450 Expression Correlates with GSL-OH Allelic Status

To further corroborate the relationship between At2g25450 and GSL-OH, the expression of At2g25450 in leaves of Arabidopsis accessions was compared with the GSL-OH allele variant present in each accession based on its glucosinolate composition. In all accessions tested, the fully functional GSL-OH allele was associated with high At2g25450 transcript accumulation in the leaf (Fig. 3). In contrast, all accessions with the seed-functional allele had low to nondetectable GSL-OH expression in the leaf (Fig. 3).

HPLC analysis of leaves from accessions with the fully functional allele identified heritable differences in the ratio of but-3-enyl glucosinolate to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). Interestingly, there are also differences in At2g25450 expression among these functional GSL-OH accessions (Fig. 3, compare Tac with Mt-0). To test if differences in At2g25450 gene expression could explain the different 2-hydroxyl-but-3-enyl glucosinolate production, we compared GSL-OH expression with the accumulation of 2-hydroxyl-but-3-enyl glucosinolate in 11 accessions containing but-3-enyl glucosinolate. This showed a strong positive correlation between At2g25450 expression and an increased proportion of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 4  
Positive correlation between At2g25450 expression and the accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl. The accumulation of At2g25450 mRNA as determined by quantitative RT-PCR is compared with the amount of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in 11 accessions containing endogenous but-3-enyl glucosinolate. GSL-OH activity is expressed as the percentage of the sum of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and the precursor but-3-enyl glucosinolate. The following accessions were utilized for this experiment: Ang-0, Bs-1, Bur-0, Edi-0, Ge-0, Lc-0, Loe-2, Mir-0, Rd-0, Rou-0, and Sf-1.
Figure 4.

Positive correlation between At2g25450 expression and the accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl. The accumulation of At2g25450 mRNA as determined by quantitative RT-PCR is compared with the amount of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in 11 accessions containing endogenous but-3-enyl glucosinolate. GSL-OH activity is expressed as the percentage of the sum of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and the precursor but-3-enyl glucosinolate. The following accessions were utilized for this experiment: Ang-0, Bs-1, Bur-0, Edi-0, Ge-0, Lc-0, Loe-2, Mir-0, Rd-0, Rou-0, and Sf-1.

; n = 11, r = 0.817, P = 0.001). The combination of fine-scale mapping and association in the accessions suggests that the enzyme encoded by At2g25450 could be responsible for the 2-hydroxylation of 3-butenyl glucosinolate.

At2g25450 Expression and GSL-OH Enzyme Activity

At2g25450 is expressed in some accessions that do not contain but-3-enyl glucosinolate, the substrate for the encoded enzyme (Fig. 3). For example, the Ei-2 accession does not accumulate any but-3-enyl or 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 5A  
Conversion of exogenous but-3-enyl to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in selected Arabidopsis accessions. Purified but-3-enyl glucosinolate (50 μ  m) was fed to accessions that do not accumulate but-3-enyl glucosinolate, and HPLC was used to monitor the conversion of the precursor to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. Depicted are partial traces of HPLC results (monitored at 229 nm) of purified desulfoglucosinolates extracted from equal amounts of leaves. A, Ei-2 leaves incubated with water for 4 d (control). B, Cvi extract containing allyl and but-3-enyl glucosinolates. C, Ei-2 leaves after incubation with 500 μL of Cvi extract. D, Correlation of in vivo but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity with At2g25450 expression in accessions fed exogenous but-3-enyl glucosinolate. GSL-OH activity is expressed as the amount of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate produced per day as the percentage of the sum of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl plus but-3-enyl glucosinolate. At2g25450 expression was measured by RT-PCR in comparison with RAN. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and averages are presented. Accessions utilized are as follows: Col-0, Di-1, Mt-0, Kondara, Ei-2, Hodja, Ler-0, Lip-0, Mrk-0, Wei-0, Tsu-1, and Yo-0.
Figure 5.

Conversion of exogenous but-3-enyl to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in selected Arabidopsis accessions. Purified but-3-enyl glucosinolate (50 μ  m) was fed to accessions that do not accumulate but-3-enyl glucosinolate, and HPLC was used to monitor the conversion of the precursor to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. Depicted are partial traces of HPLC results (monitored at 229 nm) of purified desulfoglucosinolates extracted from equal amounts of leaves. A, Ei-2 leaves incubated with water for 4 d (control). B, Cvi extract containing allyl and but-3-enyl glucosinolates. C, Ei-2 leaves after incubation with 500 μL of Cvi extract. D, Correlation of in vivo but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity with At2g25450 expression in accessions fed exogenous but-3-enyl glucosinolate. GSL-OH activity is expressed as the amount of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate produced per day as the percentage of the sum of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl plus but-3-enyl glucosinolate. At2g25450 expression was measured by RT-PCR in comparison with RAN. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and averages are presented. Accessions utilized are as follows: Col-0, Di-1, Mt-0, Kondara, Ei-2, Hodja, Ler-0, Lip-0, Mrk-0, Wei-0, Tsu-1, and Yo-0.

). However, after incubating Ei-2 leaves with extract containing but-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 5B), the leaves took up the but-3-enyl glucosinolate precursor and converted it into both enantiomeric forms of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in the same ratio as observed previously for accessions producing 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 5C). This shows that At2g25450 expression and but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity are found in accessions that do not contain the precursor glucosinolate. Utilizing this substrate-feeding protocol, we tested the correlation between At2g25450 expression and in vivo but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity in 12 accessions that do not naturally contain the substrate. The absence of the precursor in these plants allowed for a simultaneous direct measurement of but-3-enyl glucosinolate uptake and its subsequent conversion to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. We observed a positive correlation between the accumulation of At2g25450 mRNA and but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity (Fig. 5D; n = 11, r = 0.913, P < 0.0001).

T-DNA Mutation in At2g25450 Abolishes Glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase Activity

To further confirm the causal relationship between At2g25450 and 2-hydroxylase activity, we obtained a homozygous T-DNA insertion mutant in the Columbia (Col-0) background (SALK_089807). The T-DNA insertion is located in the second exon of At2g25450 and abolishes At2g25450 expression (Supplemental Fig. S1). While the standard Arabidopsis reference accession for T-DNA knockouts, Col-0, does not contain 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate due to a lack of its precursor but-3-enyl glucosinolate, we relied on the fact that introduction of a functional AOP2 into Col-0 causes the accumulation of both but-3-enyl glucosinolate and 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Li and Quiros, 2003; Wentzell et al., 2007). Thus, Col-0 has a functional At2g25450. The At2g25450 T-DNA knockout was then crossed to Col-0 expressing AOP2, and homozygotes were obtained for all four genotypic combinations. Lines containing AOP2 and a functional At2g25450 accumulated both but-3-enyl glucosinolate and 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 6  
Analysis of GSL-OH activity in an At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant in the presence and absence of AOP2. Glucosinolate (GLS) content was determined in a segregating population from a Col-0 plant heterozygous for both 35S:AOP2 and the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout allele. Values shown are mean accumulation and se of the major aliphatic glucosinolates in nanomoles per milligram fresh weight of leaf tissue from at least 10 independent replicates. Glucosinolates that were not detected are listed as nd; other letters show mean glucosinolate contents that differ significantly by Student's t test within that graph. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. [See online article for color version of this figure.]
Figure 6.

Analysis of GSL-OH activity in an At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant in the presence and absence of AOP2. Glucosinolate (GLS) content was determined in a segregating population from a Col-0 plant heterozygous for both 35S:AOP2 and the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout allele. Values shown are mean accumulation and se of the major aliphatic glucosinolates in nanomoles per milligram fresh weight of leaf tissue from at least 10 independent replicates. Glucosinolates that were not detected are listed as nd; other letters show mean glucosinolate contents that differ significantly by Student's t test within that graph. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. [See online article for color version of this figure.]

). In contrast, lines with AOP2 and the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout only accumulated the precursor but-3-enyl glucosinolate, with no detectable accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Fig. 6).

As observed previously, introduction of a functional AOP2 into Col-0 results in an elevated total aliphatic glucosinolate level (Fig. 6; Wentzell et al., 2007). Interestingly, combining AOP2 expression in Col-0 with an At2g25450 T-DNA mutation led to a further increase in aliphatic glucosinolate accumulation. This suggests that At2g25450, in addition to producing 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, also affects aliphatic glucosinolate accumulation. As this effect requires a functional AOP2 gene, it suggests that this repressive function is not an inherent property of the At2g25450 transcript or protein. Instead, it is possible that the 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate product may feedback regulate the biosynthetic pathway or that At2g25450 directly influences the inductive capacity of AOP2 (Fig. 6; Wentzell et al., 2007). These results confirm that At2g25450 is the GSL-OH locus and likely encodes the enzyme responsible for the conversion of but-3-enyl to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, which, interestingly, also affects the regulation of the aliphatic glucosinolate pathway.

GSL-OH and Trichoplusia ni Herbivory

Arabidopsis resistance against generalist lepidopteran herbivory has been consistently shown to be controlled by increasing glucosinolate content or activation (Kliebenstein et al., 2002; Barth and Jander, 2006; Gigolashvili et al., 2007; Beekwilder et al., 2008). This negative relationship between glucosinolate accumulation and Trichoplusia ni herbivory would predict that the higher glucosinolate content in Col-0 with AOP2 and At2g25450 should increase resistance to T. ni herbivory (Fig. 6). Until now, most studies on Arabidopsis-insect interactions have focused on the Col-0 accession, due to the plethora of tools and information available for this accession. However, Col-0 accumulates only nonalkenyl glucosinolate structures; therefore, it has not been tested what effect the different chemical structures have on T. ni. To test if the chemical structure or content of glucosinolates modulate insect herbivory, we conducted a no-choice herbivory assay with first instar T. ni larvae using the above lines that vary for the AOP2 and At2g25450 loci. This showed a highly significant effect of glucosinolate chemical structure, rather than total amounts of glucosinolates upon T. ni herbivory (n = 88, F3/88 = 9.01, P < 0.001). Plant genotypes accumulating alkenyl glucosinolates were less resistant to T. ni herbivory than the Col-0 parent, with or without a functional At2g25450 (Fig. 7  
Chemical structure rather than total glucosinolate content affects T. ni herbivory. Four genotypes generated with the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant and the AOP2 expression construct in a Col-0 background were assayed for resistance to T. ni herbivory. Two first instar larvae per plant were allowed to feed for 96 h on at least 20 plants per genotypic class. Each plant was physically separated to prevent the larvae from moving between plants. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. The amount of leaf area removed by T. ni at 48, 72, and 96 h on each plant per genotype was measured in two independent experiments and analyzed via ANOVA. There was a significant difference between the genotypes at all three time points; here, 96-h herbivory data ± se are presented with significant differences as determined by t tests shown by letters. [See online article for color version of this figure.]
Figure 7.

Chemical structure rather than total glucosinolate content affects T. ni herbivory. Four genotypes generated with the At2g25450 T-DNA knockout mutant and the AOP2 expression construct in a Col-0 background were assayed for resistance to T. ni herbivory. Two first instar larvae per plant were allowed to feed for 96 h on at least 20 plants per genotypic class. Each plant was physically separated to prevent the larvae from moving between plants. The presence of the 35S:AOP2 gene is shown as + or −, and the status of At2g25450 is shown as WT (wild type) or KO (knockout) at bottom. The amount of leaf area removed by T. ni at 48, 72, and 96 h on each plant per genotype was measured in two independent experiments and analyzed via ANOVA. There was a significant difference between the genotypes at all three time points; here, 96-h herbivory data ± se are presented with significant differences as determined by t tests shown by letters. [See online article for color version of this figure.]

). This is not due to the methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates being differentially induced, as glucosinolate content after 96 h of herbivory showed the same relationship of genotype to glucosinolate content as was found previously in the absence of herbivory (Fig. 6). This suggests that the glucosinolate structure is an important determinant of Arabidopsis-T. ni interactions and that alkenyl glucosinolates are less effective defense metabolites than the 4-methylsulfinylbutyl glucosinolate predominant in wild-type Col-0. Interestingly, the presence of a functional At2g25450 imparted increased resistance to T. ni herbivory in the presence of the functional AOP2 gene (Fig. 7). Thus, converting a methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolate to the alkenyl decreases resistance, but further conversion to the hydroxyl-alkenyl begins to restore insect defense in an evolutionary sense.

GSL-OH Promoter Variation and Expression

To identify the polymorphisms responsible for differential gene expression, we sequenced 4.9 kb of the At2g25450 genomic region from the 12 accessions that differ in At2g25450 expression levels (Fig. 5). The sequenced region extended from the stop codon of the upstream gene to the start codon of the downstream gene and is expected to include all regulatory elements. Sequence comparison identified a unique 120-bp motif that is repeated five times in accessions with low leaf GSL-OH alleles and four times in full-functional alleles (Fig. 8  
Variable regulatory motifs in the At2g25450 promoter. The long black rectangle represents the complete At2g25450 gene with the locations of the mRNA sequence and start/stop codon positions. The boxes below the genomic fragment show the locations of the identified repeat motifs. Black boxes are the positions of the repeated motif in accessions with low At2g25450 leaf expression, and light gray boxes are the motif positions in accessions with high At2g25450 leaf expression. The graph at right represents the average transcript accumulation and se of At2g25450 in the two allelic classes using the measured expression levels of the 12 accessions in Figure 5.
Figure 8.

Variable regulatory motifs in the At2g25450 promoter. The long black rectangle represents the complete At2g25450 gene with the locations of the mRNA sequence and start/stop codon positions. The boxes below the genomic fragment show the locations of the identified repeat motifs. Black boxes are the positions of the repeated motif in accessions with low At2g25450 leaf expression, and light gray boxes are the motif positions in accessions with high At2g25450 leaf expression. The graph at right represents the average transcript accumulation and se of At2g25450 in the two allelic classes using the measured expression levels of the 12 accessions in Figure 5.

; Supplemental Table S3). Two motifs overlap with the putative transcription start and stop sites, while the others are in the promoter region (Fig. 8). BLAST analysis against the complete Arabidopsis genomic sequence showed that this motif is not found elsewhere. The difference in motif number between the expression classes is caused by a deletion removing part of two intact motifs and the intervening DNA to produce one intact motif in the high-expression accessions (Fig. 8). The one accession with undetectable leaf expression, Ler, has two separate deletions that remove two-thirds of the two motifs flanking the ORF. Because the sequence extended from the upstream gene to the downstream gene in all accessions, this eliminates the possibility of a tandemly duplicated At2g25450. Thus, the three different variant classes are probably due to differential expression of At2g25450 caused by polymorphisms altering these unique motifs.

DISCUSSION

Several lines of evidence strongly support the identification of At2g25450 as the causal gene for the GSL-OH QTL. First, fine-scale mapping of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate production in several Arabidopsis populations identified At2g25450 as the best candidate gene with the appropriate enzymatic activity to convert but-3-enyl to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Figs. 2 and 3). Second, association experiments using Arabidopsis accessions showed a nearly total congruence between At2g25450 expression and the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate from both endogenous and exogenous precursor (Figs. 4 and 5). Furthermore, examination of existing genomic sequence polymorphism data indicates that At2g25450 does not have any linkage disequilibrium with its neighboring genes and hence varies independently of these genes in the accessions. This shows that this association between GSL-OH and sequence and expression variation in the accessions is centered on the At2g25450 gene itself and not on any proximal loci (Borevitz et al., 2007; Clark et al., 2007). Furthermore, three accessions with nonfunctional GSL-OH alleles have loss-of-function mutations in At2g25450. Finally, an independent T-DNA knockout in At2g25450 abolishes all measurable GSL-OH activity. In combination, these multiple and independent genetic lines of evidence show that At2g25450 is the GSL-OH QTL.

At2g25450 (GSL-OH) belongs to the 2-ODD gene superfamily, a group that has at least 100 members in Arabidopsis, but none of the closely related Arabidopsis 2-ODDs have any defined biochemical functions (Supplemental Fig. S2). 2-ODDs are nonmembranous dioxygenases with activities similar to those of the membrane-bound cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, but usually requiring Fe2+ ions and a 2-oxoacid such as ascorbate or oxoglutarate (De Carolis and De Luca, 1993; Prescott, 1993). 2-ODDs catalyze a range of hydroxylations, desaturations, and epoxidations, including the oxidation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in ethylene biosynthesis and several different position-specific hydroxylations of gibberellins. As such, the allylic hydroxylation of a glucosinolate side chain is a likely reaction for a 2-ODD to catalyze. This is supported by the observation that other 2-ODDs closely related to the At2g25450 protein are known to catalyze hydroxylation reactions of secondary metabolism (De Carolis and De Luca, 1993; Jonczyk et al., 2008; Supplemental Fig. S3). This suggests that At2g25450 is the but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase enzyme. Unfortunately, all attempts at heterologous expression of a catalytically active protein in yeast or Escherichia coli were unsuccessful. As such, it is formally possible that the At2g25450 gene product does not itself have 2-hydroxylase activity but is necessary for the catalytic ability of the actual 3-butenyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase. However, given that At2g25450 is a member of the 2-ODD gene family, whose members often encode hydroxylases, it seems more likely that this gene encodes the bona fide 3-butenyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase and we were simply unable to successfully express the protein in a heterologous host.

Glucosinolate Structure versus Content in Insect Herbivory Resistance

Total aliphatic glucosinolate content is often used as a variable to explain insect resistance without including information about the specific structures. Our data show that the different aliphatic glucosinolate structures are not functionally equivalent as herbivory deterrents in the Col-0 background (Fig. 7). The methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates were the most effective deterrents, with the hydroxyalkenyl glucosinolates being more effective than their alkenyl precursors. This is in spite of lines with methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates having the lowest levels of total aliphatic glucosinolates (Fig. 6). Thus, At2g25450, in addition to controlling hydroxyalkenyl glucosinolate production, also affects resistance to insect herbivory. The increased generalist lepidopteran resistance of hydroxyalkenyl glucosinolates over simple alkenyl glucosinolates may explain why most Arabidopsis accessions with alkenyl glucosinolates produce them as the hydroxyalkenyl form (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Lambrix et al., 2001).

This observation of alkenyl glucosinolates being a less effective generalist lepidopteran defense, specifically against T. ni, than methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates is in contradiction to the fact that half of the natural Arabidopsis accessions make alkenyl glucosinolates (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Lambrix et al., 2001). One explanation is that the Col-0 accession hydrolyzes glucosinolates to isothiocyanates, while nearly all wild Arabidopsis accessions with alkenyl glucosinolates form epithionitriles on hydrolysis (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Lambrix et al., 2001). Thus, alkenyl glucosinolates may be a more effective defense in a nitrile-producing background. This was suggested by a previous analysis of the nitrile-producing Ler × Cvi RIL population, in which alkenyl glucosinolates showed an ability to prevent generalist insect herbivory and methylsulfinylalkyl glucosinolates showed no correlation with insect defense (Supplemental Fig. S4; Kliebenstein et al., 2002). Thus, genetic variation in glucosinolate hydrolysis may epistatically determine the relative effectiveness of the different glucosinolate structures in deterring generalist lepidopteran herbivory. Accordingly, adequate assessment of the role of glucosinolate content, structure, and hydrolysis in herbivore resistance will require the generation of a population of nearly isogenic lines that simultaneously vary with respect to glucosinolate content, glucosinolate structure, and hydrolysis structure. The recent identification of single gene mutants in all of these processes allows us to recreate this full phenotypic matrix in a single defined polygenic population (Haughn et al., 1991; Kroymann et al., 2001; Lambrix et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2006; Gigolashvili et al., 2007; Hansen et al., 2007; Hirai et al., 2007; Sønderby et al., 2007; Wentzell et al., 2007).

The Expression of Hidden Enzymes

Numerous accessions lacking the but-3-enyl glucosinolate precursor nevertheless had detectable At2g25450 mRNA and measurable in vivo 2-hydroxylase activity (Fig. 8). If this enzyme has no natural substrate in these plants, one would expect the encoding gene to rapidly lose its function over the course of evolutionary time. Why then is GSL-OH activity found in lines lacking the necessary precursor? One possibility is that the levels of out-crossing and levels in Arabidopsis are sufficient to maintain a functional GSL-OH even in lines lacking precursor. An alternative is that the enzyme is multifunctional and required for another biosynthetic reaction. However, this second reaction, if it exists, must not be critical for basic growth and development, because the accessions Kondara and Hodja, which have premature stop codons, and the T-DNA insertion line are all viable (Fig. 9). Furthermore, this second reaction cannot affect insect herbivory or glucosinolate content in the absence of the but-3-enyl precursor (Figs. 6 and 7).

The presence of enzymes lacking precursors has interesting implications for the manipulation of secondary metabolic pathways. It has been proposed to utilize transgenic technologies to introduce new biosynthetic capacities into plants. However, the presence of hidden enzyme activities makes it difficult to predict the final compound that may accumulate from a given transgenic modification. As more and more genes of secondary metabolism are studied, it will be interesting to see what proportion of these encode enzyme activities that are hidden by the lack of an endogenous substrate.

Stereoselectivity of the 2-Hydroxylase

The stereoselectivity of but-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase varies among species within the Brassicales. In Arabidopsis, both the 2R and 2S enantiomers of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate are produced in a constant ratio (2R:2S) of 1:3. While some enzyme reactions lead to a racemic mixture of products, it is unusual to find a reaction that yields a mixture of two enantiomers in a fixed, nonequivalent ratio. In contrast, Brassica napus and Arabis alpina make only the 2R enantiomer of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate, while Crambe abyssinica makes only the 2S enantiomer (Daubos et al., 1998; van Doorn et al., 1998). The lack of stereospecificity in Arabidopsis could result from the fact that the enzyme has evolutionarily lost the ability to form a single enantiomer. Alternatively, the enzyme may not have been altered, but the species may have lost an associated protein that imparts stereospecificity to the enzyme. Another possibility is that the different species may use completely different enzymes for the production of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. This final possibility is supported by the analysis of crucifer species thought to be more closely related to Arabidopsis than A. alpina is. Only one of these species contains the substrate, but-3-enyl glucosinolate, and none of these species has 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Daxenbichler et al., 1991; Fahey et al., 2001; Koch et al., 2001; Windsor et al., 2005). Because the split between Arabidopsis and A. alpina was at least 20 million years ago, either Arabidopsis is the only species in the entire clade to have maintained the ancestral 2-hydroxylase activity or Arabidopsis reevolved this activity on its own. Comparison of GSL-OH sequences between these species should distinguish between these possible explanations.

Future Work

The isolation of the gene responsible for converting but-3-enyl glucosinolate to 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate provides a key molecular tool for studying the function and formation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. The GSL-OH gene creates new opportunities for the modification of glucosinolate-containing agricultural species. 2-Hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate is goiterogenic because the hydroxyl substituent promotes the formation of the cyclic 5-vinyl-oxazolidine-2-thione (Fenwick et al., 1983) from myrosinase hydrolysis-generated isothiocyanate. This substance inhibits iodine metabolism in the thyroid, causing goiter disease in most mammals. This problem has been previously dealt with by generating lines low in total glucosinolate content. The identification of At2g25450 could allow for specific suppression of the 2-hydroxylase activity in certain Brassica crops, allowing for their widespread use as animal food while maintaining their endogenous glucosinolates for insect defense. The gene also enables specific transgenic or genetic modification of the ability to produce 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate in nearly isogenic lines to allow testing of the specific effects of this glucosinolate on herbivores, pathogens, and competing plant species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Accession Analysis

All Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plant lines were obtained from the Arabidopsis Stock Center. Ten plants were grown in 3.25- × 3.25- × 2.25-inch pots at 18 pots to a flat for 3 weeks in a standard soil-vermiculite mixture at 26°C. They were placed 10 inches from four 60-W cool-white GE bulbs and four 60-W wide-spectrum bulbs in a 16-h-light/8-h-dark photoperiod. This study utilized a collection of 37 accessions, as listed in Supplemental Table S1.

Sample Preparation and HPLC

Samples were extracted and analyzed by HPLC as described previously (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). Specific glucosinolates were identified by comparison of retention times and UV absorption spectra with purified standards. All glucosinolate absorption data (measured at 229 nm) were converted to nanomoles per gram dry weight using response factors determined from the purified standards for each of the glucosinolates (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c; Reichelt et al., 2002).

Microsatellites

DNA was isolated with the 96-well DNA prep described previously. The primers listed in Supplemental Table S2 were utilized for fine-scale mapping in both the Ler × Cvi and Cvi × Tac populations. Five microliters of the 96-well DNA prep was added to 20 μL of PCR mixture (2.5 mm MgCl2, 200 pm primers, and 0.5 units of Taq) and run with the following cycle program (95°C for 3 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 56°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 1 s; 72°C for 3 min; and 4°C final). The microsatellites were then scored on 4% agarose.

Genetic Mapping of GSL-OH

Glucosinolates were extracted and analyzed from 5 mg of seeds from each Ler × Cvi RIL to phenotype the GSL-OH activity. Scoring of the Ler × Cvi RILs was done by analyzing the seeds for the presence of the 2R- and 2S-2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate as well as for the benzylated derivatives 2R- and 2S-2-benzyloxy-but-3-enyl glucosinolate. Lines that produced these glucosinolates were given a score of 1. Lines that did not contain any of the detectable products were given a score of 0. QTL mapping was done with QTL Cartographer using composite interval mapping and 1,000 permutations to estimate the 0.05 significance threshold (Basten et al., 1999). Mapmaker version 3 and the RILs that accumulated but-3-enyl glucosinolate were used to refine the chromosome II map position (Lander et al., 1987).

For the Cvi × Tac mapping experiment, homozygous Cvi and Tac were crossed and the resulting F1 progeny were selfed to generate an F2 population. A total of 192 Cvi × Tac F2 plants were simultaneously scored for the T1D16 and F13D4 microsatellites (Supplemental Table S2) and the GSL-OH phenotype by HPLC. They were phenotyped by planting a single F2 seed per cell in a 96-well flat. The seeds were allowed to germinate and grown for 4 weeks under a 9-h-light/15-h-dark photoperiod. After 4 weeks, two to three leaves were harvested for glucosinolate extraction and HPLC analysis, and one to two leaves were taken for DNA purification. After confirming that the GSL-OH locus was between T1D16 and F13D4, an additional 388 F2 progeny were genotyped with these microsatellites to identify recombinant progeny. All recombinant progeny were then scored for the T19L18#2, T22F11, and F17H15 microsatellites (Supplemental Table S2), and their HPLC phenotypes were scored in the F3 generation.

In Vivo Assay for But-3-enyl Glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase Activity

But-3-enyl glucosinolate was obtained from 30 g of freeze-dried Cvi and extracted with 200 mL of methanol for 4 h. Cvi contains but-3-enyl glucosinolate and has no detectable accumulation of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (Kliebenstein et al., 2001c). The extract was centrifuged to remove insoluble material, dried, resuspended in 15 mL of water, centrifuged to remove any precipitate, and stored at 4°C until needed. Plants to be assayed were grown for 4 weeks as described above, and 10 leaves with petioles were removed and placed into small petri plates with 30 mL of water such that the leaf was lying on the water with the cut petiole end completely submerged. Approximately 500 μL of the glucosinolate extract was added to the water. The leaves were then incubated in the solutions for 2 or 4 d under 24 h of light. Controls incubated in pure water were run simultaneously. The 10 leaves were then divided into two samples of five leaves each, and the glucosinolates were extracted and analyzed by HPLC as described. But-3-enyl glucosinolate-2-hydroxylase activity was estimated by taking the sum of the R and S forms of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate and dividing this by the total of the but-3-enyl glucosinolate plus the R and S forms of 2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate. This was then divided by the number of days for which the sample was incubated to generate a per day activity measure. The least-square means for the average conversion from three independent experiments are presented.

cDNA and DNA Preparation for Sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from approximately 100 mg of leaf tissue utilizing the Trizol reagent. Approximately 1 μg of total RNA was utilized for cDNA synthesis as described (Frohman et al., 1988). One to 8 μL of the resulting total cDNA was then added to 25-μL PCR samples with the GSOH1-F and GSOH1-R primers from Supplemental Table S2 to amplify the At2g25450 cDNA. The resulting product was then separated on a 1.5% agarose gel, the band was removed, and the cDNA was purified with Qiagen gel purification columns. The resulting cDNA was sequenced with the primers from Supplemental Table S2 using Perkin-Elmer big dye terminator chemistry on a Perkin-Elmer 3700 sequencer. The sequences were then analyzed with the DNAstar analysis package. Trees were generated utilizing TREECON for Windows version 1.3b with 1,000 reiterations and neighbor-joining analysis. Genomic DNA for sequencing of the 4.9-kb gene was prepared by designing primers to split the gene into two 2.6-kb pieces, and each piece was independently amplified, cloned, and sequenced as described above. The primers utilized are listed in Supplemental Table S2. The accessions sequenced for the full gene were Col-0, Cvi, Di-1, Ei-2, Hodja, Kondara, Ler, Mrk-0, Mt-0, Tac-0, and Tsu-1.

Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR

cDNA was generated as described previously. Primers for the RAN cDNA were utilized to standardize for the amount of cDNA present in each of the samples. Each accession utilized in this study was first sequenced as described above. This sequence was then used to generate the GSOHRT-F and GSOHRT-R primers, which are perfectly homologous to all of the accessions tested (Supplemental Table S2). The GSOH and RAN primers were then used to amplify specific cDNAs from 10, 1, and 0.1 μL of starting cDNA. The resulting products were then separated on a gel and detected with an Eagle Eye and ethidium bromide. The resulting files were transferred to a phosphoimager, which was used in densitometric mode to measure the cDNA produced. Each accession was measured in triplicate.

Analysis of the At2g25450 T-DNA Mutant

A T-DNA mutation in the second exon of At2g25450, SALK_089807, was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. This was then crossed three independent times to Col-0 containing a functional AOP2 transgene (Wentzell et al., 2007). At least five homozygous plants for each of the four genotypic classes were obtained per cross and measured via HPLC for glucosinolate content. This was replicated twice, and the homozygous plants were selfed to generate homozygous F3 families. Individual and total aliphatic glucosinolate accumulation was then analyzed via ANOVA using a general linear model. In this model, y  rgc denotes the glucosinolate accumulation on Arabidopsis genotype g from cross c in replicate r. The ANOVA model for the glucosinolate accumulation is y  rgc = μ + G  g + C  c + R  r + ϵ  rgc, where ϵ  rgc represents the error and is assumed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and variance σ  ϵ  2. Cross and replicate did not show any significance in this model for any glucosinolate tested. Genotypic means were compared within the model using t tests.

In Vitro and in Planta Complementation Attempts

Numerous attempts at expressing the protein in Escherichia coli or Saccharomyces cerevisiae using multiple vectors and systems were unsuccessful, potentially from the in vitro protein being insoluble. Additionally, the presence of two direct repeats at the beginning and end of the protein sequence led to the requirement for recombination-suppressed E. coli, but in the absence of such, an Agrobacterium tumefaciens complementation construct would be quickly destroyed in the bacteria prior to introduction into the plant. As such, we were unable to conduct in planta complementation attempts with the resources available.

Trichoplusia ni Herbivory Analysis

The lines generated using the At2g25450 T-DNA mutation and the functional AOP2 transgene were used for assaying resistance to T. ni herbivory. At least 10 plants for each of the four genotypic classes were obtained per cross. Each plant was in an individual pot, and these pots were physically separated to prevent larval movement. T. ni eggs were obtained from Benzon Research and hatched on artificial medium. After 48 h, two first instar larvae were placed on each plant, and herbivory was measured every 24 h by visual measurements whereby leaf area removed was estimated using a ruled grid. The entire experiment was replicated twice. Herbivory at each time point was independently analyzed via ANOVA using a general linear model. In this model, y  rgc denotes the herbivory in square centimeters on Arabidopsis genotype g from cross c in replicate r. The ANOVA model for the glucosinolate accumulation is y  rgc = μ + G  g + C  c + R  r + ϵ  rgc, where ϵ  rgc represents the error and is assumed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and variance σ  ϵ  2. Cross and replicate did not show any significance in this analysis. Genotypic means were compared within the model using t tests.

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

LITERATURE CITED

Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJM, Koornneef M, Lister C, Dean C, van den Bosch N, Pot J, Kuiper MTR (

1998
) Development of an AFLP based linkage map of Ler, Col and Cvi Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes and construction of a Ler/Cvi recombinant inbred line population.
Plant J
 
14
:
259
271

Angelini L, Lazzeri L, Galletti S, Cozzani A, Macchia M, Palmieri S (

1998
) Antigerminative activity of three glucosinolate-derived products generated by myrosinase hydrolysis.
Seed Science and Technology
 
26
:
771
779

Barth C, Jander G (

2006
) Arabidopsis myrosinases TGG1 and TGG2 have redundant function in glucosinolate breakdown and insect defense.
Plant J
 
46
:
549
562

Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB (

1999
) QTL Cartographer, Version 1.13. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

Beekwilder J, van Leeuwen W, van Dam NM, Bertossi M, Grandi V, Mizzi L, Soloviev M, Szabados L, Molthoff JW, Schipper B, et al (

2008
) The impact of the absence of aliphatic glucosinolates on insect herbivory in Arabidopsis.
PLoS ONE
 
3
:
e2068

Benderoth M, Textor S, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J, Kroymann J (

2006
) Positive selection driving diversification in plant secondary metabolism.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
103
:
9118
9123

Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR (

1998
) Chemical phenotype matching between a plant and its insect herbivore.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
95
:
13743
13748

Bones AM, Rossiter JT (

1996
) The myrosinase-glucosinolate system, its organisation and biochemistry.
Physiol Plant
 
97
:
194
208

Bones AM, Thangstad OP, Haugen OA, Espevik T (

1991
) Fate of myrosin cells: characterization of monoclonal antibodies against myrosinase.
J Exp Bot
 
42
:
1541
1549

Borevitz JO, Hazen SP, Michael TP, Morris GP, Baxter IR, Hu TT, Chen H, Werner JD, Nordborg M, Salt DE, et al (

2007
) Genome-wide patterns of single-feature polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
104
:
12057
12062

Bowers MD, Puttick GM (

1988
) Response of generalist and specialist insects to qualitative allelochemical variation.
J Chem Ecol
 
14
:
319
334

Burow M, Müller R, Gershenzon J, Wittstock U (

2006
) Altered glucosinolate hydrolysis in genetically engineered Arabidopsis thaliana and its influence on the larval development of Spodoptera littoralis.
J Chem Ecol
 
32
:
2333
2349

Clark RM, Schweikert G, Toomajian C, Ossowski S, Zeller G, Shinn P, Warthmann N, Hu TT, Fu G, Hinds DA, et al (

2007
) Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Science
 
317
:
338
342

Daubos P, Grumel V, Iori R, Leoni O, Palmieri S, Rollin P (

1998
) Crambe abyssinica meal as starting material for the production of enantiomerically pure fine chemicals.
Ind Crops Prod
 
7
:
187
193

Daxenbichler ME, Spencer GF, Carlson DG, Rose GB, Brinkler AM, Powell RG (

1991
) Glucosinolate composition of seeds from 297 species of wild plants.
Phytochemistry
 
30
:
2623
2638

De Carolis E, De Luca V (

1993
) Purification, characterization, and kinetic analysis of a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase involved in vindoline biosynthesis from Catharanthus roseus.
J Biol Chem
 
268
:
5504
5511

de Vos M, Kriksunov KL, Jander G (

2008
) Indole-3-acetonitrile production from indole glucosinolates deters oviposition by Pieris rapae.
Plant Physiol
 
146
:
916
926

Donkin SG, Eiteman MA, Williams PL (

1995
) Toxicity of glucosinolates and their enzymatic decomposition products to Caenorhabditis elegans.
J Nematol
 
27
:
258
262

Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (

1964
) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution.
Evolution Int J Org Evolution
 
18
:
586
608

Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, Talalay P (

2001
) The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants.
Phytochemistry
 
56
:
5
51

Fenwick GR, Heaney RK, Mullin WJ (

1983
) Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr
 
18
:
123
201

Frohman MA, Dush MK, Martin GR (

1988
) Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
85
:
8998
9002

Giamoustaris A, Mithen R (

1996
) Genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. IV. Side-chain modification in Brassica oleracea.
Theor Appl Genet
 
93
:
1006
1010

Gigolashvili T, Yatusevich R, Berger B, Müller C, Flügge UI (

2007
) The R2R3-MYB transcription factor HAG1/MYB28 is a regulator of methionine-derived glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J
 
51
:
247
261

Greer MA (

1956
) Isolation from rutabaga seed of progoitrin, the precursor of the naturally occurring antithyroid compound, goitrin (L-5-vinyl-2-thiooxazolidone).
J Am Chem Soc
 
78
:
1260
1261

Greer MA, Deeney JM (

1959
) Antithyroid activity elicited by the ingestion of pure progoitrin, a naturally occurring thioglycoside of the turnip family.
J Clin Invest
 
38
:
1465
1474

Halkier BA, Du L (

1997
) The biosynthesis of glucosinolates.
Trends Plant Sci
 
2
:
425
431

Halkier BA, Gershenzon J (

2006
) Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates.
Annu Rev Plant Biol
 
57
:
303
333

Hansen BG, Kliebenstein DJ, Halkier BA (

2007
) Identification of a flavin-monooxygenase as the S-oxygenating enzyme in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis.
Plant J
 
50
:
902
910

Haughn GW, Davin L, Giblin M, Underhill EW (

1991
) Biochemical genetics of plant secondary metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana: the glucosinolates.
Plant Physiol
 
97
:
217
226

Hirai M, Sugiyama K, Sawada Y, Tohge T, Obayashi T, Suzuki A, Ryoichi A, Sakurai N, Suzuki H, Aoki K, et al (

2007
) Omics-based identification of Arabidopsis Myb transcription factors regulating aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
104
:
6478
6483

Jonczyk R, Schmidt H, Osterrieder A, Fiesselmann A, Schullehner K, Haslbeck M, Sicker D, Hofmann D, Yalpani N, Simmons C, et al (

2008
) Elucidation of the final reactions of DIMBOA-glucoside biosynthesis in maize: characterization of Bx6 and Bx7.
Plant Physiol
 
146
:
1053
1063

Kelly PJ, Bones A, Rossiter JT (

1998
) Sub-cellular immunolocalization of the glucosinolate sinigrin in seedlings of Brassica juncea.
Planta
 
206
:
370
377

Kim JH, Jander G (

2007
) Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) feeding on Arabidopsis induces the formation of a deterrent indole glucosinolate.
Plant J
 
49
:
1008
1019

Kliebenstein D, Lambrix V, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (

2001
a) Gene duplication and the diversification of secondary metabolism: side chain modification of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant Cell
 
13
:
681
693

Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (

2001
b) Comparative quantitative trait loci mapping of aliphatic, indolic and benzylic glucosinolate production in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves and seeds.
Genetics
 
159
:
359
370

Kliebenstein DJ, Kroymann J, Brown P, Figuth A, Pedersen D, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (

2001
c) Genetic control of natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana glucosinolate accumulation.
Plant Physiol
 
126
:
811
825

Kliebenstein DJ, Pedersen D, Mitchell-Olds T (

2002
) Comparative analysis of insect resistance QTL and QTL controlling the myrosinase/glucosinolate system in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Genetics
 
161
:
325
332

Koch M, Haubold B, Mitchell-Olds T (

2001
) Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences.
Am J Bot
 
88
:
534
544

Koroleva OA, Davies A, Deeken R, Thorpe MR, Tomos AD, Hedrich R (

2000
) Identification of a new glucosinolate-rich cell type in Arabidopsis flower stalk.
Plant Physiol
 
124
:
599
608

Kroymann J, Textor S, Tokuhisa JG, Falk KL, Bartram S, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (

2001
) A gene controlling variation in Arabidopsis glucosinolate composition is part of the methionine chain elongation pathway.
Plant Physiol
 
127
:
1077
1088

Lambrix V, Reichelt M, Mitchell-Olds T, Kliebenstein D, Gershenzon J (

2001
) The Arabidopsis epithiospecifier protein promotes the hydrolysis of glucosinolates to nitriles and influences Trichoplusia ni herbivory.
Plant Cell
 
13
:
2793
2807

Lander E, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly M, Lincoln S, Newburg L, Green P (

1987
) Mapmaker a computer package for constructing genetic-linkage maps.
Cytogenet Cell Genet
 
46
:
642

Lankau RA (

2007
) Specialist and generalist herbivores exert opposing selection on a chemical defense.
New Phytol
 
175
:
176
184

Li G, Quiros CF (

2003
) In planta side-chain glucosinolate modification in Arabidopsis by introduction of dioxygenase Brassica homolog BoGSL-ALK.
Theor Appl Genet
 
106
:
1116
1121

Magrath R, Bano F, Morgner M, Parkin I, Sharpe A, Lister C, Dean C, Turner J, Ludiate D, Mithen R (

1994
) Genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. I. Side chain elongation in Brassica napus and Arabidopsis thaliana.
Heredity
 
72
:
290
299

Manici LM, Lazzeri L, Baruzzi G, Leoni O, Galletti S, Palmieri S (

2000
) Suppressive activity of some glucosinolate enzyme degradation products on Pythium irregulare and Rhizoctonia solani in sterile soil.
Pest Manag Sci
 
56
:
921
926

Mithen R (

1992
) Leaf glucosinolate profiles and their relationships to pest and disease resistance in oilseed rape.
Euphytica
 
63
:
71
83

Mithen R, Clarke J, Lister C, Dean C (

1995
) Genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. III. Side-chain structure of aliphatic glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Heredity
 
74
:
210
215

Mithen R, Toroser D (

1995
) Biochemical genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates in Brassica and Arabidopsis. In Seminar Series 56. Society for Experimental Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 261–275

Mithen RF, Lewis BG, Heaney RK, Fenwick GR (

1987
) Resistance of leaves of Brassica species to Leptosphaeria maculans.
Trans Br Mycol Soc
 
88
:
525
531

Nho CW, Jeffery E (

2004
) Crambene, a bioactive nitrile derived from glucosinolate hydrolysis, acts via the antioxidant response element to upregulate quinone reductase alone or synergistically with indole-3-carbinol.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
 
198
:
40
48

Parkin I, Magrath R, Keith D, Sharpe A, Mithen R, Lydiate D (

1994
) Genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. II. Hydroxylation of alkenyl glucosinolates in Brassica napus.
Heredity
 
72
:
594
598

Pearson AW, Greenwood NM, Butler EJ, Fenwick GR (

1983
) Biochemical changes in layer and broiler chickens when fed on a high-glucosinolate rapeseed meal.
Br Poult Sci
 
24
:
417
427

Peterson CJ, Cosse A, Coats JR (

2000
) Insecticidal components in the meal of Crambe abyssinica.
Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology
 
17
:
27
35

Prescott AG (

1993
) A dilemma of dioxygenases (or where biochemistry and molecular-biology fail to meet).
J Exp Bot
 
44
:
849
861

Puttick GM, Bowers MD (

1988
) Effect of qualitative and quantitative variation in allelochemicals on a generalist insect: iridoid glycosides and the southern armyworm.
J Chem Ecol
 
14
:
335
351

Reichelt M, Brown PD, Schneider B, Oldham NJ, Stauber E, Tokuhisa J, Kliebenstein DJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J (

2002
) Benzoic acid glucosinolate esters and other glucosinolates from Arabidopsis thaliana.
Photochemistry
 
59
:
663
671

Rodman JE, Kruckeberg AR, Alshehbaz IA (

1981
) Chemotaxonomic diversity and complexity in seed glucosinolates of Caulanthus and Streptanthus (Cruciferae).
Syst Bot
 
6
:
197
222

Rossiter JT, James DC, Atkins N (

1990
) Biosynthesis of 2-hydroxy-3-butenylglucosinolate and 3-butenylglucosinolate in Brassica napus.
Phytochemistry
 
29
:
2509
2512

Sønderby IE, Hansen BG, Bjarnholt N, Ticconi C, Halkier BA, Kliebenstein DJ (

2007
) A systems biology approach identifies a R2R3 MYB gene subfamily with distinct and overlapping functions in regulation of aliphatic glucosinolates.
PLoS ONE
 
2
:
e1322

Tierens KJ, Thomma B, Brower M, Schmidt J, Kistner K, Porzel A, Mauch-Mani B, Cammue B, Broekaert W (

2001
) Study of the role of antimicrobial glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates in resistance of Arabidopsis to microbial pathogens.
Plant Physiol
 
125
:
1688
1699

van Doorn HE, van der Kruk GC, van Holst GJ, Raaijmakers-Ruijs N, Postma E, Groeneweg B, Jongen WHF (

1998
) The glucosinolates sinigrin and progoitrin are important determinants for taste preference and bitterness of brussels sprouts.
J Sci Food Agric
 
78
:
30
38

van Doorn JE, van der Kruk GC, van Holst GJ, Schoofs M, Broer JB, de Nijs JJM (

1999
) Quantitative inheritance of the progoitrin and sinigrin content in brussels sprouts.
Euphytica
 
108
:
41
52

Wentzell AM, Rowe HC, Hansen BG, Ticconi C, Halkier BA, Kliebenstein DJ (

2007
) Linking metabolic QTL with network and cis-eQTL controlling biosynthetic pathways.
PLOS Genetics
 
3
:
e162

Windsor AJ, Reichelt M, Figuth A, Svatos A, Kroymann J, Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T (

2005
) Geographic and evolutionary diversification of glucosinolates among near relatives of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae).
Photochemistry
 
66
:
1321
1333

Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (

1990
) Furanocoumarin induction in wild parsnip: genetics and populational variation.
Ecology
 
71
:
1933
1940

Zangerl AR, Stanley MC, Berenbaum MR (

2008
) Selection for chemical trait remixing in an invasive weed after reassociation with a coevolved specialist.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
105
:
4547
4552

Zhang ZY, Ober JA, Kliebenstein DJ (

2006
) The gene controlling the quantitative trait locus EPITHIOSPECIFIER MODIFIER1 alters glucosinolate hydrolysis and insect resistance in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
 
18
:
1524
1536

Author notes

1

These authors contributed equally to the article.

*

Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected].

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Daniel J. Kliebenstein ([email protected]).

[C]

Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.

[W]

The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

[OA]

Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

© The Author(s) 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Plant Biologists. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary data