Abstract

We present evidence from a firm level experiment in which we engineered an exogenous change in managerial compensation from fixed wages to performance pay based on the average productivity of lower-tier workers. Theory suggests that managerial incentives affect both the mean and dispersion of workers' productivity through two channels. First, managers respond to incentives by targeting their efforts towards more able workers, implying that both the mean and the dispersion increase. Second, managers select out the least able workers, implying that the mean increases but the dispersion may decrease. In our field experiment we find that the introduction of managerial performance pay raises both the mean and dispersion of worker productivity. Analysis of individual level productivity data shows that managers target their effort towards high ability workers, and the least able workers are less likely to be selected into employment. These results highlight the interplay between the provision of managerial incentives and earnings inequality among lower-tier workers.

*

We thank the editor, Lawrence Katz, and two anonymous referees for useful comments. We have also benefited from discussions with James Banks, Timothy Besley, Nicholas Bloom, Richard Blundell, Kong-Pin Chen, Andrew Chesher, David De Meza, Wouter Dessein, Rachel Griffith, Andrea Ichino, Edward Lazear, Gilat Levy, Harry Paarsch, Canice Prendergast, Christopher Udry, and seminar participants at Bocconi, Boston College, Bristol, CEMMAP, Chicago GSB, Columbia, Essex, EUI, Frankfurt, Haas, LSE, MITlHarvard, Royal Holloway, UCL, Warwick, Yalo, and the LEaF 2005 Conference in London. Financial support from the ESRC is gratefully acknowledged. Brandon R. Halcott provided excellent research assistance. We thank all those involved in providing the data. This paper has been screened to ensure no confidential information is revealed. All errors are our own.

This content is only available as a PDF.