Abstract

Objectives

This retrospective study compared MRI and US findings among patients with SS over a wide age range.

Methods

Ninety patients with SS aged 8–84 years who had undergone both MRI and US examinations were divided into four groups according to age, as follows: <18 years (juvenile SS, JSS), 9 patients; 18–39 years, 12 patients; 40–69 years, 53 patients; >69 years, 16 patients. Imaging findings of parotid glands (PGs) and submandibular glands (SMGs) were compared among the four groups. Furthermore, the relationships within and between imaging findings and various clinical findings were examined.

Results

On MRI, patients with JSS commonly exhibited multiple high-intensity spots in the PGs on MR sialography and fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging. With increasing SS group age, the frequencies and numbers of the high-intensity spots were lower. Fat areas on MRI and hyperechoic bands on US were rarely observed in the PGs and SMGs of patients with JSS, whereas they were more common in patients with adult SS. In addition, the presence of hyperechoic bands on US, the presence of fat areas on MRI, and decreased salivary flow were associated with one another.

Conclusion

Salivary gland imaging findings in patients with JSS were characterized by punctate sialectasis, whereas those findings in patients with adult SS were characterized by fatty degeneration. Distinct findings in patients with JSS and adult SS are likely to reflect differences in glandular lesion stage. MRI and US are presumably useful for evaluation of glandular lesion severity during follow-up.

Rheumatology key messages
  • Salivary gland imaging findings in patients with JSS were characterized by punctate sialectasis.

  • Salivary gland imaging findings in patients with adult SS were characterized by fatty degeneration.

  • These distinct findings are likely to reflect differences in glandular lesion severity.

Introduction

SS is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the infiltration of inflammatory cells into exocrine glands (e.g. lacrimal and salivary glands). This leads to gradual destruction of exocrine gland tissue, thereby causing xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis sicca. SS is most common in women and is classified as primary or secondary, depending on its occurrence with other autoimmune diseases (e.g. RA, SLE, or scleroderma). Primary SS reportedly has two age peaks: after menarche (20–40 years of age) and after menopause (50–60 years of age) [1]. Because the pathology of SS involves chronic progression, a confirmed diagnosis of SS often requires several years of assessments. Younger age has been reported as a risk factor for delayed SS diagnosis [2]; accordingly, some patients with early adult SS may experience disease onset in childhood.

Thus far, the clinical findings and characteristics of patients aged <18 years [i.e. patients with juvenile SS (JSS)] have not been thoroughly elucidated. Because most patients exhibit secondary JSS, primary JSS is particularly rare and may be underdiagnosed [3–5]. Recurrent parotitis is regarded as a common early symptom of primary JSS [3–8]; xerostomia is observed less often in JSS than in adult SS [3, 4, 9, 10]. In an international cohort study of 300 patients with JSS, Basiaga et al. [5] reported that the majority of patients with JSS did not meet the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Because there are differences in characteristics between JSS and adult SS, there is a need to establish JSS-specific criteria or SS classification criteria that consider differences in age, thus facilitating early diagnosis.

Labial gland biopsy is a heavily weighted item in the ACR/EULAR classification criteria; it is also included in the 2002 American–European Consensus Group classification (AECG) criteria and the 2012 ACR classification criteria. However, labial gland biopsy is difficult to perform in all patients with suspected SS because of its invasiveness. Furthermore, the results of labial gland biopsy in children often do not meet the criteria for positive diagnosis in adults [5, 6]; therefore, non-invasive and highly sensitive items (applicable over a wide age range) are desired for inclusion in the diagnostic criteria.

MRI and US are non-invasive imaging methods that have been used for evaluation of salivary glands in patients with SS since the 1990s [11–14]. US is the primary imaging modality for the assessment of SS in salivary glands because it is simple, inexpensive and versatile. On US, characteristic findings of SS include hypoechoic areas and hyperechoic bands in PGs and submandibular glands (SMGs), as well as an irregular SMG margin [13, 15–20]; various scoring systems have been proposed for the diagnosis of SS and assessment of disease stage [11, 13, 16, 21–24]. Recently, salivary gland US as a possible outcome measurement instrument have been validated [25–27], and the OMERACT US scoring system has been reported to exhibit excellent specificity for diagnosis of SS [27]. However, US is examiner-dependent and the findings can be subjective [28]. Although MRI is an expensive imaging modality, its findings are more objective than the findings of US. On salivary gland MRI, characteristic findings of SS include fatty degeneration and punctate sialectasis on MR sialography [14, 29–33].

To our knowledge, most studies thus far have focused on adult SS; it is unclear whether the imaging findings of salivary glands in JSS are similar to the findings in adult SS. Therefore, the present study compared the MRI and US findings of PGs and SMGs among patients with SS over a wide age range. Additionally, because the relationships between various MRI and US findings have rarely been examined in detail, this study assessed the relationships within and between various MRI findings, US findings, and several clinical findings.

Methods

Study population

This retrospective study included nine patients with JSS [eight girls and one boy; mean age, 13 years (range, 8–17 years)] and 81 patients with adult SS [79 women and 2 men; mean age, 58 years (range, 28–84 years)]. Of the nine patients with JSS, five had primary SS and four had secondary SS; of the 81 patients with adult SS, 58 had primary SS and 23 had secondary SS. The inclusion criteria were (i) completion of both MRI and US examinations of PGs and SMGs at our hospital between June 2008 and December 2020; (ii) diagnosis with SS by specialist rheumatologists or paediatric rheumatologists, based on the ACR/EULAR classification criteria (n = 67). Patients who lacked items applicable to ACR/EULAR criteria were diagnosed based on the AECG criteria (n = 55), the ACR criteria (n = 24) or the 1999 revised Japanese Ministry of Health criteria for diagnosis of SS (n = 23). The Saxon test (≤2.0 g/2 min) was used for salivary flow evaluation [20] because the unstimulated whole saliva test was not performed on all included patients. Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of all patients are shown in Supplementary Table S1, available at Rheumatology online. All patients with SS were classified into four groups according to age: JSS (<18 years), adult SS-1 (18–39 years), adult SS-2 (40–69 years) and adult SS-3 (>69 years).

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval of the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Nagasaki University Hospital (#0948–5). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.

MRI and US examinations

MRI examination

MRI was performed using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance unit (Gyroscan Intera 1.5 T Master; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) or a 3.0-T magnetic resonance unit (Skyra 3.0 T; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). All 90 patients underwent transverse T1-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging (T1WI) and fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging (fsT2WI) of PGs and SMGs; 81 patients also underwent MR sialography through single-section single-shot turbo spin-echo imaging of the bilateral PGs and SMGs (details in Supplementary Table S2, available at Rheumatology online).

US examination

Grayscale US was performed at 14 MHz by four radiologists with >22 years of experience in scanning salivary glands using a LOGIQ 9 unit (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) equipped with a wide bandwidth (range, 9–14 MHz) transducer. Stored static images were used for analysis.

MRI and US qualitative assessment

Three radiologists (T.Y., S.M. and E.S.; 24, 24 and 22 years of experience in head and neck radiology, respectively) who were blinded to patient data evaluated the presence or absence of the following published characteristic findings of SS [13–20, 29–33].

  • MRI: multiple high-intensity spots on fsT2WI and MR sialography in bilateral PGs and SMGs, as well as fat areas on T1WI that exhibited reduced high signal intensities on fsT2WI in bilateral PGs and SMGs (Fig. 1).

  • US: hypoechoic areas and hyperechoic bands in bilateral PGs and SMGs, as well as irregular margins of bilateral SMGs (Fig. 2).

MRI findings of (A) parotid (arrowheads) and (B) submandibular (arrows) glands
Fig. 1

MRI findings of (A) parotid (arrowheads) and (B) submandibular (arrows) glands

(+), presence of the finding; (−), absence of the finding.

US findings of (A) parotid and (B) submandibular glands
Fig. 2

US findings of (A) parotid and (B) submandibular glands

(+), presence of the finding; (−), absence of the finding.

Interobserver agreement concerning the presence or absence of each finding was evaluated for each gland. If a specific finding was clearly observed in either of the bilateral glands by a consensus among the three radiologists, that finding was considered present in the affected patient.

MRI quantitative assessment

Quantitative measurement of high-intensity spots in PGs

Because multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on fsT2WI and MR sialography were characteristic findings in patients with JSS, the numbers of high-intensity spots in PGs in all patients with SS were quantitively measured using the particle analysis function of ImageJ software, version 2.1.0/1.53c, as previously reported [31]. These measurements were performed by two radiologists (T.Y. and S.M.; 24 years of experience in head and neck radiology). Interobserver agreements were determined by calculating the mean measurement performed by the two radiologists for each PG.

Grading of high-intensity spots inPGs

In each patient, the high-intensity spots on fsT2WI were graded as follows, based on mean number of high-intensity spots in the bilateral PGs (i.e. mean number of spots in both glands for each patient, as described in Supplementary Data S1, available at Rheumatology online): grade I (0–9 high-intensity spots), grade II (10–19 high-intensity spots), grade III (20–29 high-intensity spots) and grade IV (>29 high-intensity spots) (Fig. 3A).

High-intensity spot grades in parotid glands on (A) fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging and (B) MR sialography
Fig. 3

High-intensity spot grades in parotid glands on (A) fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging and (B) MR sialography

Similarly, the high-intensity spots on MR sialography were graded as follows, based on the mean number of high-intensity spots in the bilateral PGs using the method described in Supplementary Data S1: grade I (0–19 high-intensity spots), grade II (20–39 high-intensity spots), grade III (40–59 high-intensity spots) and grade IV (>59 high-intensity spots) (Fig. 3B).

Relationships of specific findings

The data for all patients with SS were used for statistical analysis of the relationships between MRI, US, and clinical and laboratory findings.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with JMP Pro, version 15.0 (SAS Institute) and IBM SPSS Statistics, version 27.0.1 (IBM Corp.). Cochran–Armitage test statistics were used to evaluate the associations between age group and the frequency of each finding. Jonckheere–Terpstra trend test statistics were used to evaluate monotone trends between age groups and high-intensity spot grades on fsT2WI and MR sialography. The correlation between fsT2WI high-intensity spot grade and MR sialography high-intensity spot grade was evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Associations between dichotomized findings were assessed with Fisher’s exact test. Interobserver agreement concerning the presence or absence of each US and MRI finding was assessed by using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess interobserver agreement concerning the measurements of multiple high-intensity spot numbers on fsT2WI and MR sialography.

All reported P-values were descriptive [34]. Correlation/agreement values (for Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ICC, and kappa coefficient assessments) were interpreted as follows: 0–0.2, poor correlation/agreement; >0.2 and ≤0.4, fair correlation/agreement; >0.4 and ≤0.6, moderate correlation/agreement; >0.6 and ≤0.8, substantial correlation/agreement; and >0.8 and ≤1.0, almost perfect correlation/agreement.

Results

Patient characteristics

Detailed clinical and laboratory data were available for all 90 patients regarding (i) anti-Ro/SSA and/or anti-La/SSB antibodies, (ii) decreased salivary flow and (iii) xerostomia; these findings are shown in Table 1. The remaining clinical and laboratory data (results not available for all 90 patients) are shown in Supplementary Table S1, available at Rheumatology online.

Table 1

Frequencies of MRI, US, and clinical and laboratory findings according to age group

MRI findings
US findings
Clinical and laboratory findings
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasMultiple high- intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsIrregular marginAnti-Ro/SSA and/or anti- La/SSB antibodiesDecreased salivary flowaXerostomiaPrimary SS
JSS (<18 years)98 (89%)1 (11%)1 (11%)0 (0%)9 (100%)2 (22%)6 (67%)2 (22%)1 (11%)9 (100%)4 (44%)3 (33%)5 (56%)
Adult SS-1 (18–39 years)125 (42%)6 (50%)0 (0%)5 (42%)8 (67%)2 (17%)5 (42%)3 (25%)3 (25%)11 (92%)8 (67%)12 (100%)9 (75%)
Adult SS-2 (40–69 years)5319 (36%)38 (72%)1 (2%)37 (70%)37 (70%)33 (62%)30 (57%)34 (64%)19 (36%)44 (83%)49 (92%)53 (100%)35 (66%)
Adult SS-3 (>69 years)163 (19%)12 (75%)0 (0%)14 (88%)8 (50%)12 (75%)13 (81%)12 (75%)8 (50%)10 (63%)15 (94%)16 (100%)14 (88%)
P-value by Cochran– Armitage trend test0.00110.00070.1451<0.00010.02170.00050.25330.00090.03630.01270.0001<0.00010.1828
MRI findings
US findings
Clinical and laboratory findings
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasMultiple high- intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsIrregular marginAnti-Ro/SSA and/or anti- La/SSB antibodiesDecreased salivary flowaXerostomiaPrimary SS
JSS (<18 years)98 (89%)1 (11%)1 (11%)0 (0%)9 (100%)2 (22%)6 (67%)2 (22%)1 (11%)9 (100%)4 (44%)3 (33%)5 (56%)
Adult SS-1 (18–39 years)125 (42%)6 (50%)0 (0%)5 (42%)8 (67%)2 (17%)5 (42%)3 (25%)3 (25%)11 (92%)8 (67%)12 (100%)9 (75%)
Adult SS-2 (40–69 years)5319 (36%)38 (72%)1 (2%)37 (70%)37 (70%)33 (62%)30 (57%)34 (64%)19 (36%)44 (83%)49 (92%)53 (100%)35 (66%)
Adult SS-3 (>69 years)163 (19%)12 (75%)0 (0%)14 (88%)8 (50%)12 (75%)13 (81%)12 (75%)8 (50%)10 (63%)15 (94%)16 (100%)14 (88%)
P-value by Cochran– Armitage trend test0.00110.00070.1451<0.00010.02170.00050.25330.00090.03630.01270.0001<0.00010.1828
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialoMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialo

JSS

(<18 years)

77 (100%)1 (14%)

Adult SS-1

(18–39 years)

118 (73%)0 (0%)

Adult SS-2

(40–69 years)

4930 (61%)2 (4%)

Adult SS-3

(>69 years)

148 (57%)0 (0%)
P-value by Cochran–Armitage trend test0.04630.2400
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialoMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialo

JSS

(<18 years)

77 (100%)1 (14%)

Adult SS-1

(18–39 years)

118 (73%)0 (0%)

Adult SS-2

(40–69 years)

4930 (61%)2 (4%)

Adult SS-3

(>69 years)

148 (57%)0 (0%)
P-value by Cochran–Armitage trend test0.04630.2400

Numbers indicate number of patients with each finding (frequency in each age group). a≤2.0 g/2 min on the Saxon test. JSS: juvenile SS; fsT2WI: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; sialo: sialography.

Table 1

Frequencies of MRI, US, and clinical and laboratory findings according to age group

MRI findings
US findings
Clinical and laboratory findings
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasMultiple high- intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsIrregular marginAnti-Ro/SSA and/or anti- La/SSB antibodiesDecreased salivary flowaXerostomiaPrimary SS
JSS (<18 years)98 (89%)1 (11%)1 (11%)0 (0%)9 (100%)2 (22%)6 (67%)2 (22%)1 (11%)9 (100%)4 (44%)3 (33%)5 (56%)
Adult SS-1 (18–39 years)125 (42%)6 (50%)0 (0%)5 (42%)8 (67%)2 (17%)5 (42%)3 (25%)3 (25%)11 (92%)8 (67%)12 (100%)9 (75%)
Adult SS-2 (40–69 years)5319 (36%)38 (72%)1 (2%)37 (70%)37 (70%)33 (62%)30 (57%)34 (64%)19 (36%)44 (83%)49 (92%)53 (100%)35 (66%)
Adult SS-3 (>69 years)163 (19%)12 (75%)0 (0%)14 (88%)8 (50%)12 (75%)13 (81%)12 (75%)8 (50%)10 (63%)15 (94%)16 (100%)14 (88%)
P-value by Cochran– Armitage trend test0.00110.00070.1451<0.00010.02170.00050.25330.00090.03630.01270.0001<0.00010.1828
MRI findings
US findings
Clinical and laboratory findings
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Parotid glands
Submandibular glands
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasMultiple high- intensity spots on fsT2WIFat areasHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsHypoechoic areasHyperechoic bandsIrregular marginAnti-Ro/SSA and/or anti- La/SSB antibodiesDecreased salivary flowaXerostomiaPrimary SS
JSS (<18 years)98 (89%)1 (11%)1 (11%)0 (0%)9 (100%)2 (22%)6 (67%)2 (22%)1 (11%)9 (100%)4 (44%)3 (33%)5 (56%)
Adult SS-1 (18–39 years)125 (42%)6 (50%)0 (0%)5 (42%)8 (67%)2 (17%)5 (42%)3 (25%)3 (25%)11 (92%)8 (67%)12 (100%)9 (75%)
Adult SS-2 (40–69 years)5319 (36%)38 (72%)1 (2%)37 (70%)37 (70%)33 (62%)30 (57%)34 (64%)19 (36%)44 (83%)49 (92%)53 (100%)35 (66%)
Adult SS-3 (>69 years)163 (19%)12 (75%)0 (0%)14 (88%)8 (50%)12 (75%)13 (81%)12 (75%)8 (50%)10 (63%)15 (94%)16 (100%)14 (88%)
P-value by Cochran– Armitage trend test0.00110.00070.1451<0.00010.02170.00050.25330.00090.03630.01270.0001<0.00010.1828
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialoMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialo

JSS

(<18 years)

77 (100%)1 (14%)

Adult SS-1

(18–39 years)

118 (73%)0 (0%)

Adult SS-2

(40–69 years)

4930 (61%)2 (4%)

Adult SS-3

(>69 years)

148 (57%)0 (0%)
P-value by Cochran–Armitage trend test0.04630.2400
Age groupNumber of patientsMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialoMultiple high-intensity spots on MR sialo

JSS

(<18 years)

77 (100%)1 (14%)

Adult SS-1

(18–39 years)

118 (73%)0 (0%)

Adult SS-2

(40–69 years)

4930 (61%)2 (4%)

Adult SS-3

(>69 years)

148 (57%)0 (0%)
P-value by Cochran–Armitage trend test0.04630.2400

Numbers indicate number of patients with each finding (frequency in each age group). a≤2.0 g/2 min on the Saxon test. JSS: juvenile SS; fsT2WI: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; sialo: sialography.

Evaluation of trends between age groups and clinical/laboratory findings revealed that, as the SS group age increased, xerostomia and decreased salivary flow were observed with increasing frequency (P = 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Anti-Ro/SSA and/or anti-La/SSB antibodies were present in all nine patients with JSS; patients in the older group had a lower frequency of Anti-Ro/SSA and/or anti-La/SSB antibody positivity (P = 0.0127).

Interobserver agreements

Kappa coefficients of interobserver agreements concerning the presence/absence of each MRI and US finding indicated moderate to almost perfect agreement (Supplementary Table S3, available at Rheumatology online.). Interobserver agreements concerning the numbers of high-intensity spots in PGs on fsT2WI and MR sialography were almost perfect, according to Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, as follows: r = 0.9889 (almost perfect), P < 0.0001 on fsT2WI; r = 0.9696 (almost perfect), P < 0.0001 on MR sialography. The results of ICC assessment between the two observers regarding the numbers of high-intensity spots on fsT2WI and MR sialography were also almost perfect, as follows: ICC (2.1) =  0.978 (almost perfect), 95% CI: 0.966, 0.985 on fsT2WI; ICC (2.1) = 0.968 (almost perfect), 95% CI: 0.951, 0.979 on MR sialography.

MRI and US qualitative evaluation

MRI

The frequencies of MRI findings are described in Table 1. The most frequent MRI findings in patients with JSS were multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on MR sialography and fsT2WI (100% and 89% of patients with JSS, respectively). Evaluation of trends between age groups and MRI findings revealed that, as the SS group age increased, the findings on MR sialography and fsT2WI were observed with decreasing frequency (P = 0.0011 and P < 0.0463, respectively); the frequencies of the findings were 57% and 19% in patients with adult SS who were >69 years of age.

Fat areas within PGs and SMGs were rarely observed in patients with JSS (one and none of the patients with JSS, respectively). As the SS group age increased, fat areas in PGs and SMGs were observed with increasing frequency (P = 0.0007 and P < 0.0001, respectively).

US

The frequencies of US findings are described in Table 1. The most frequent US findings in patients with JSS were hypoechoic areas within PGs and SMGs (100% and 67% of patients with JSS, respectively). Conversely, hyperechoic bands in PGs and SMGs and an irregular SMG margin were rarely observed in patients with JSS (two, two and one of the patients with JSS, respectively). Evaluation of trends between age groups and US findings revealed that, as the SS group age increased, hypoechoic areas within PGs were observed with decreasing frequency (P = 0.0011); in contrast, hyperechoic bands within PGs and SMGs and irregular SMG margins were observed with increasing frequency (P = 0.0005, P = 0.0009 and P = 0.0363, respectively).

MRI quantitative evaluation

Evaluation of trends between age groups and high-intensity spot grades revealed that, with increasing SS group age, lower high-intensity spot grades in PGs were observed on both fsT2WI and MR sialography (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively) (Fig. 4). A substantial correlation was observed between fsT2WI high-intensity spot grade and MR sialography high-intensity spot grade (r = 0.603, P < 0.0001).

Frequencies of high-intensity spot grades in parotid glands according to age group
Fig. 4

Frequencies of high-intensity spot grades in parotid glands according to age group

Numerators indicate numbers of patients with each grade on fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (A) and MR sialography (B); denominators indicate numbers of overall patients in each age group. *P-values by Jonckheere–Terpstra trend test.

Relationships of specific findings

The pairwise correlations of specific findings were evaluated by odds ratios (ORs) and P-values (Fig. 5) [35]. A correlation between the presence of multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on fsT2WI and the presence of multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on MR sialography was observed (OR = 15.71, P < 0.0001); each of these findings was correlated with the presence of hypoechoic areas in PGs on US (OR = 8.89 and OR = 7.74, P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In both PGs and SMGs, correlations were observed between the presence of fat areas on MRI and the presence of hyperechoic bands on US (OR = 13.82 and OR = 5.23, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively); notably, these correlations were observed within and between PGs and SMGs (OR = 7.47 and OR = 5.51, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively). In addition, a correlation was observed between the presence of irregular SMG margins and the presence of hyperechoic bands in SMGs on US (OR = 5.29, P = 0.0015); the presence of irregular SMG margins on US was also correlated with the presence of hyperechoic bands in PGs on US (OR = 3.65, P = 0.0078) and the presence of fat areas in both SMGs and PGs on MRI (OR = 6.98 and OR = 4.70, P = 0.0005 and P = 0.0052, respectively ).

Relationships between MRI, US, and clinical and laboratory findings in all patients with SS
Fig. 5

Relationships between MRI, US, and clinical and laboratory findings in all patients with SS

Numbers outside and inside parentheses indicate P-value and odds ratios by Fisher’s exact test, respectively. bOdds ratios of contingency tables with 0 counts were corrected by the Haldane–Anscombe method. a≤2.0 g/2 min on the Saxon test. SMGs: submandibular glands; fsT2WI: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; MR sialo: MR sialography.

Regarding the pairs of clinical and laboratory findings, decreased salivary flow was correlated with xerostomia (OR = 14.8, P = 0.0048). Imaging findings that had the first to fourth significant correlations with decreased salivary flow were fat areas in PGs and SMGs on MRI (OR = 36.4 and OR = 14.73, P = 3.7 × 10–6 and P = 9.9 × 10–5, respectively) and hyperechoic bands inPGs and SMGs on US (OR = 5.62 and OR = 4.05, P = 0.0088 and P = 0.0373, respectively).

A significantly different finding between primary SS and secondary SS was hypoechoic areas in PGs on US (OR = 3.54, P = 0.0454) (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S4, available at Rheumatology online.), although hypoechoic areas in PGs were observed in all patients with primary and secondary JSS; no difference was observed between primary and secondary JSS in our study.

Discussion

This study investigated the MRI and US findings both of PGs and SMGs in patients with JSS and adult SS; it demonstrated that the characteristics in patients with JSS were distinct from the characteristics in patients with adult SS. To our knowledge, this is the first study with the following features: (i) it investigated PGs and SMGs of patients with SS over a wide age range (8–84 years); (ii) it compared MRI and US findings among four SS groups according to age; and (iii) it examined relationships between MRI and US findings of PGs and SMGs, and clinical and laboratory findings in patients with SS over a wide age range.

In our study, the most frequent MRI finding in patients with JSS was the presence of multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on MR sialography, suggesting punctate sialectasis [31]. This result supported the findings by Sumida et al. [36]. The second-most frequent MRI finding in patients with JSS was the presence of multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on fsT2WI. Because there were associations between fsT2WI and MR sialography findings in terms of the frequency and grade of multiple high-intensity spots in PGs, the presence of multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on fsT2WI may be suggestive of punctate sialectasis. These findings became less common with increasing SS group age; thus, they constitute characteristic findings of JSS. Because fsT2WI is a routine conventional sequence in head and neck MRI examinations, while MR sialography is an additional sequence used for detailed examination of ductal abnormalities, JSS may be detected by multiple high-intensity spots on fsT2WI during MRI examinations for other complaints. Indeed, our hospital policy is that incidental findings of multiple high-intensity spots on fsT2WI during MRI examinations for other complaints (e.g. ranulas) [37] trigger a referral to specialist rheumatologists; these specialists confirm the diagnosis of primary SS on the basis of further assessments in accordance with ACR/EULAR or AECG classification criteria. Conversely, within SMGs, multiple high-intensity spots on MR sialography and fsT2WI were rarely observed in patients with JSS or patients with adult SS (Table 1), potentially because of differences in the PG and SMG ductal systems [38–40].

On US, hypoechoic areas within PGs and SMGs were frequently observed in patients with JSS. In PGs, hypoechoic areas were associated with multiple high-intensity spots on MR sialography and fsT2WI; similar associations were not observed in SMGs (Fig. 5). Accordingly, hypoechoic areas may not be equivalent to multiple high-intensity spots on MR sialography and fsT2WI. Hypoechoic areas have been reported to represent lymphocyte infiltration in the glandular parenchyma and/or punctate sialectasis [12, 38, 41, 42], but this relationship remains unclear [40, 43].

In contrast, the presence of fat areas on MRI and hyperechoic bands on US, reportedly characteristic of adult SS [14, 29–31, 33], was rarely observed in PGs and SMGs of patients with JSS; with increasing SS group age, these findings were observed with increasing frequency. The presence of hyperechoic bands inPGs and SMGs was associated with the presence of fat areas on MRI, implying that hyperechoic bands represent fatty degeneration similar to fat areas on MRI [38, 41]. Additionally, an irregular SMG margin was rarely observed in patients with JSS and was more common in older SS groups; it was associated with the presence of hyperechoic bands and the presence of fat areas on MRI in PGs and SMGs. These findings imply that fatty degeneration of the glandular parenchyma obscures the outline of the SMG. The difference in salivary gland characteristic findings between JSS and adult SS likely reflects differences in SS glandular lesion severity.

Importantly, decreased salivary flow was associated with fat areas on MRI and hyperechoic bands in PGs and SMGs on US, implying that the fatty degeneration findings are the most useful features for assessment of salivary gland dysfunction and may be an indicator of advanced disease. Our finding that fatty degeneration is rarely observed in patients with JSS suggests that most patients with JSS exhibit early-stage SS; the hypothesis is consistent with the findings of less frequent decreased salivary flow and xerostomia in patients with JSS. In contrast, multiple high-intensity spots in PGs on fsT2WI and on MR sialography became less common with increasing age. Therefore, the punctate sialectasis in PGs observed in patients with JSS is presumably a component of relatively early disease. This might be related to inflammatory ductal changes caused by SS, which precede atrophy and fatty degeneration in the glandular parenchyma [33].

This study had some limitations. First, because it was a single-centre study, the number of patients was small and a control group could not be established. Therefore, imaging findings specific to JSS and adult SS could not be clarified. Because fat filtration of salivary glands is often observed in elderly healthy controls, there is a need to clarify differences in fat infiltration and ductal change patterns between SS and non-SS controls in a larger cohort. Moreover, ophthalmic and labial gland biopsy findings could not be analysed because of insufficient data. Thus, multicentre studies with additional patients and control groups are needed. Second, tissue biopsy of PGs and SMGs was not performed; therefore, we could not clarify relationships between imaging findings and histological findings. Third, this study did not determine the mechanisms underlying each specific disease finding. Animal model experiments using mouse models, such as the NZB/W F1 mouse [44], are needed to clearly elucidate those mechanisms.

In conclusion, we have shown that MRI and US examinations are useful for the assessment of ductal and parenchymal damage in salivary glands. Salivary gland imaging findings in patients with JSS were characterized by punctate sialectasis, whereas those findings in patients with adult SS were characterized by fatty degeneration. This suggests that the glandular lesions in most patients with JSS comprise relatively early disease, compared with those in patients with adult SS. MRI and US examinations will be useful for evaluation of glandular lesion severity during follow-up.

There remains a need to establish SS classification criteria that consider differences in age, thus facilitating early diagnosis. These criteria may permit earlier treatment initiation and aid in preventing disease progression in exocrine glands; they may also prevent complications in other organs. It is important to establish the diagnostic capabilities of MRI and US imaging findings in a larger cohort to enable their implementation for assessment of patients with suspected SS over a wide age range.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ryan Chastain-Gross, Ph.D., from Edanz Group (https://jp.edanz.com/expert/immunology) for editing a draft of this manuscript. The various author contributions are as follows—

(1) conception and design: M.S. and Y.T.;

(2) administrative support: M.S.;

(3) provision of study materials or patients: Y.T., I.K., K.H., H.N., T.S. and A.K.;

(4) collection and assembly of data: Y.T., M.S., S.E. and I.K.;

(5) data analysis and interpretation: Y.T., M.S., S.M.;

(6) statistical analysis: M.S. and S.M. (biostatistician);

(7) manuscript writing: M.S. and Y.T.;

(8) critical revision of the drafted manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors.

All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work by ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Funding: No specific funding was received from any funding bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this manuscript.

Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the privacy of individuals who participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at Rheumatology online.

References

1

Fox
RI.
Sjögren syndrome
.
Lancet
2005
;
366
:
321
31
.

2

Komori
K
,
Komori
M
,
Horino
T
et al.
Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome among members of the Japanese Sjögren’s Association for Patients
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
2021
;
39. PMID:33822710
[online ahead of print].

3

Cimaz
R
,
Casadei
A
,
Rose
C
et al.
Primary Sjögren syndrome in the paediatric age: a multicentre survey
.
Eur J Pediatr
2003
;
162
:
661
5
.

4

Means
C
,
Aldape
MA
,
King
E.
Pediatric primary Sjögren syndrome presenting with bilateral ranulas: a case report and systematic review of the literature
.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
2017
;
101
:
11
9
.

5

Basiaga
ML
,
Stern
SM
,
Mehta
JJ
et al.
Childhood Sjögren syndrome: features of an international cohort and application of the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria
.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
2021
:
60
:
3144
55
.

6

Schiffer
BL
,
Stern
SM
,
Park
AH.
Sjögren’s syndrome in children with recurrent parotitis
.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
2020
;
129
:
109768
.

7

Singer
NG
,
Tomanova-Soltys
I
,
Lowe
R.
Sjögren’s syndrome in childhood
.
Curr Rheumatol Rep
2008
;
10
:
147
55
.

8

de Souza
TR
,
Silva
IH
,
Carvalho
AT
et al.
Juvenile Sjögren syndrome: distinctive age, unique findings
.
Pediatr Dent
2012
;
34
:
427
30
.

9

Schuetz
C
,
Prieur
AM
,
Quartier
P.
Sicca syndrome and salivary gland infiltration in children with autoimmune disorders: when can we diagnose Sjögren syndrome?
Clin Exp Rheumatol
2010
;
28
:
434
9
.

10

Yokogawa
N
,
Lieberman
SM
,
Sherry
DD
,
Vivino
FB.
Features of childhood Sjögren’s syndrome in comparison to adult Sjögren’s syndrome: considerations in establishing child-specific diagnostic criteria
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
2016
;
34
:
343
51
.

11

De Vita
S
,
Lorenzon
G
,
Rossi
G
,
Sabella
M
,
Fossaluzza
V.
Salivary gland echography in primary and secondary Sjögren’s syndrome
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
1992
;
10
:
351
6
.

12

Takashima
S
,
Morimoto
S
,
Tomiyama
N
et al.
Sjogren syndrome: comparison of sialography and ultrasonography
.
J Clin Ultrasound
1992
;
20
:
99
109
.

13

Ariji
Y
,
Ohki
M
,
Eguchi
K
et al.
Texture analysis of sonographic features of the parotid gland in Sjögren’s syndrome
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
1996
;
166
:
935
41
.

14

Izumi
M
,
Eguchi
K
,
Ohki
M
et al.
MR imaging of the parotid gland in Sjögren’s syndrome: a proposal for new diagnostic criteria
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
1996
;
166
:
1483
7
.

15

Salaffi
F
,
Argalia
G
,
Carotti
M
,
Giannini
FB
,
Palombi
C.
Salivary gland ultrasonography in the evaluation of primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Comparison with minor salivary gland biopsy
.
J Rheumatol
2000
;
27
:
1229
36
.

16

Hočevar
A
,
Ambrožič
A
,
Rozman
B
,
Kveder
T
,
Tomšič
M.
Ultrasonographic changes of major salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Diagnostic value of a novel scoring system
.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
2005
;
44
:
768
72
.

17

Takagi
Y
,
Kimura
Y
,
Nakamura
H
et al.
Salivary gland ultrasonography: can it be an alternative to sialography as an imaging modality for Sjögren’s syndrome?
Ann Rheum Dis
2010
;
69
:
1321
4
.

18

Takagi
Y
,
Sumi
M
,
Nakamura
H
et al.
Ultrasonography as an additional item in the American College of Rheumatology classification of Sjögren’s syndrome
.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
2014
;
53
:
1977
83
.

19

Takagi
Y
,
Sumi
M
,
Nakamura
H
et al.
Salivary gland ultrasonography as a primary imaging tool for predicting efficacy of xerostomia treatment in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome
.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
2016
;
55
:
237
45
.

20

Takagi
Y
,
Nakamura
H
,
Sumi
M
et al.
Combined classification system based on ACR/EULAR and ultrasonographic scores for improving the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome
.
PLoS One
2018
;
13
:
e0195113
.

21

El Miedany
YM
,
Ahmed
I
,
Mourad
HG
et al.
Quantitative ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging of the parotid gland: can they replace the histopathologic studies in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome?
Joint Bone Spine
2004
;
71
:
29
38
.

22

Milic
VD
,
Petrovic
RR
,
Boricic
IV
et al.
Major salivary gland sonography in Sjögren’s syndrome: diagnostic value of a novel ultrasonography score (0–12) for parenchymal inhomogeneity
.
Scand J Rheumatol
2010
;
39
:
160
6
.

23

Cornec
D
,
Jousse-Joulin
S
,
Pers
JO
et al.
Contribution of salivary gland ultrasonography to the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome: toward new diagnostic criteria?
Arthritis Rheum
2013
;
65
:
216
25
.

24

Theander
E
,
Mandl
T.
Primary Sjögren’s syndrome: diagnostic and prognostic value of salivary gland ultrasonography using a simplified scoring system
.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
2014
;
66
:
1102
7
.

25

Jousse-Joulin
S
,
D’Agostino
MA
,
Nicolas
C
et al.
Video clip assessment of a salivary gland ultrasound scoring system in Sjögren’s syndrome using consensual definitions: an OMERACT ultrasound working group reliability exercise
.
Ann Rheum Dis
2019
;
78
:
967
73
.

26

Finzel
S
,
Jousse-Joulin
S
,
Costantino
F
et al.
Patient-based reliability of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound scoring system for salivary gland assessment in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome
.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
2021
;
60
:
2169
76
.

27

Fana
V
,
Dohn
UM
,
Krabbe
S
,
Terslev
L.
Application of the OMERACT Grey-scale Ultrasound Scoring System for salivary glands in a single-centre cohort of patients with suspected Sjögren’s syndrome
.
RMD Open
2021
;
7
:
e001516
.

28

Cornec
D
,
Jousse-Joulin
S
,
Saraux
A
,
Devauchelle-Pensec
V.
Salivary gland ultrasound to diagnose Sjögren’s syndrome: a claim to standardize the procedure
.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
2015
;
54
:
199
200
.

29

Izumi
M
,
Eguchi
K
,
Nakamura
H
,
Nagataki
S
,
Nakamura
T.
Premature fat deposition in the salivary glands associated with Sjögren syndrome: MR and CT evidence
.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
1997
;
18
:
951
8
.

30

Izumi
M
,
Hida
A
,
Takagi
Y
et al.
MR imaging of the salivary glands in sicca syndrome: comparison of lipid profiles and imaging in patients with hyperlipidemia and patients with Sjögren’s syndrome
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
2000
;
175
:
829
34
.

31

Takagi
Y
,
Sumi
M
,
Sumi
T
,
Ichikawa
Y
,
Nakamura
T.
MR microscopy of the parotid glands in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome: quantitative MR diagnostic criteria
.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2005
;
26
:
1207
14
.

32

Takagi
Y
,
Sumi
M
,
Van Cauteren
M
,
Nakamura
T.
Fast and high-resolution MR sialography using a small surface coil
.
J Magn Reson Imaging
2005
;
22
:
29
37
.

33

Niemelä
RK
,
Pääkkö
E
,
Suramo
I
,
Takalo
R
,
Hakala
M.
Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance sialography of parotid glands in primary Sjögren’s syndrome
.
Arthritis Rheum
2001
;
45
:
512
8
.

34

Amrhein
V
,
Trafimow
D
,
Greenland
S.
Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: there is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication
.
Am Stat
2019
;
73
:
262
70
.

35

Ruxton GD, Neuhäuser M. Review of alternative approaches to calculation of a confidence interval for the odds ratio of a 2 × 2 contingency table. Methods Eco Evol 2013;4:9–13.

36

Sumida
T
,
Azuma
N
,
Moriyama
M
et al.
Clinical practice guideline for Sjögren’s syndrome 2017
.
Mod Rheumatol
2018
;
28
:
383
408
.

37

Takagi
Y
,
Hashimoto
K
,
Katayama
I
,
Eida
S
,
Sumi
M.
Juvenile primary Sjögren’s syndrome with ranula: is ranula a clinical sign that leads to early detection of Sjögren’s syndrome?
Oral Radiol
2021
;
37
:
328
35
.

38

Wernicke
D
,
Hess
H
,
Gromnica-Ihle
E
,
Krause
A
,
Schmidt
WA.
Ultrasonography of salivary glands—a highly specific imaging procedure for diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome
.
J Rheumatol
2008
;
35
:
285
93
.

39

André
R
,
Becker
M
,
Lombardi
T
et al.
Comparison of clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging of salivary glands with magnetic resonance sialography in Sjögren’s syndrome
.
Laryngoscope
2021
;
131
:
83
9
.

40

van Ginkel
MS
,
Glaudemans
AWJM
,
van der Vegt
B
et al.
Imaging in primary Sjögren’s syndrome
.
J Clin Med
2020
;
9
:
2492
.

41

Chikui
T
,
Shimizu
M
,
Kawazu
T
et al.
A quantitative analysis of sonographic images of the salivary gland: a comparison between sonographic and sialographic findings
.
Ultrasound Med Biol
2009
;
35
:
1257
64
.

42

Jousse-Joulin
S
,
Coiffier
G.
Current status of imaging of Sjogren’s syndrome
.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
2020
;
34
:
101592
.

43

Jonsson
R
,
Brokstad
KA
,
Jonsson
MV
,
Delaleu
N
,
Skarstein
K.
Current concepts on Sjögren’s syndrome—classification criteria and biomarkers
.
Eur J Oral Sci
2018
;
126
:
37
48
.

44

Bagavant
H
,
Michrowska
A
,
Deshmukh
US.
The NZB/W F1 mouse model for Sjögren’s syndrome: a historical perspective and lessons learned
.
Autoimmun Rev
2020
;
19
:
102686
.

45

Shiboski
CH
,
Shiboski
SC
,
Seror
R
et al. ; International Sjögren’s Syndrome Criteria Working Group.
2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts
.
Ann Rheum Dis
2017
;
76
:
9
16
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.