Abstract

Previous research on the devaluation of women's work has investigated whether the net effect of gender composition varies across jobs and organizational settings. We extend that research by using hierarchical linear models that combine data from a random sample of U.S. work establishments with metropolitan-area data to explore whether macro-level gender inequality also influences the tendency to devalue women's work roles. Thus, we offer the first attempt to examine processes that lead to organizational gender inequality in local labor market contexts. Specifically we hypothesize that gender devaluation will be strongest in highly gender-segregated labor markets. One reason for this may be that in segregated markets, men are in a stronger position to benefit from devaluation while women are less able to resist it. The results strongly support this hypothesis: Higher levels of occupational segregation at the labor market level are associated with a significantly increased tendency to devalue women's work roles. This finding is not explained by a diverse set of controls at both the establishment and local labor market level. Our findings highlight an additional way that gender segregation intensifies labor market inequality.

*

The authors contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript; we list our names alphabetically.

An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2001 meetings of the American Sociological Association.

Some of the data used in this analysis are derived from sensitive data files of the 1991 National Organizations Study (NOS), obtained under special contractual arrangements designed to protect the anonymity of respondents. These data are not available from the authors. People interested in obtaining NOS sensitive data files should contact David Knoke, Department of Sociology University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: [email protected]. We thank Reeve Vanneman and his colleagues for sharing their Metropolitan Area data file with us. We also thank Michelle Budig, Marta Elvira, Julie Kmec, Barbara Reskin, Judy Stepan-Norris, Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, and anonymous Social Forces reviewers for their very helpful comments and suggestions. The authors are responsible for any remaining errors or omissions.

This content is only available as a PDF.