
Contents
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Abstract Abstract
-
Understanding and acknowledging the problem Understanding and acknowledging the problem
-
Understanding treatment targets and impact Understanding treatment targets and impact
-
Previous reviews of psychological and behavioural treatments Previous reviews of psychological and behavioural treatments
-
Identifying treatments that work Identifying treatments that work
-
Are there common elements that work? Are there common elements that work?
-
Theoretical models easily translated to clinical work Theoretical models easily translated to clinical work
-
Treatment fidelity Treatment fidelity
-
Compliance Compliance
-
Targeting identifiable skills Targeting identifiable skills
-
Personal responsibility Personal responsibility
-
Easy access to treatment and crisis services Easy access to treatment and crisis services
-
-
Conclusions Conclusions
-
References References
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
58 The psychological and behavioural treatment of suicidal behaviour: What are the common elements of treatments that work?
-
Published:March 2009
Cite
Abstract
This chapter provides a review of all currently available clinical trials targeting suicidal behaviour. In contrast to some previous available reviews, the focus of the current chapter is on identifying common elements of treatments that work. More specifically, we attempted to answer the question, what do treatments that work have in common? A number of psychological treatments have emerged as effective or potentially effective at reducing suicidal behaviour (i.e. suicide attempts). There now appear to be a number of identifiable core elements for treatments that have proven effective at reducing suicide attempts, all with direct and meaningful implications for day to day clinical practice. We also point out limitations in current science, including problematic follow-up periods and questions about the high-risk nature of some study samples.
Abstract
This chapter provides a review of all currently available clinical trials targeting suicidal behaviour. In contrast to some previous available reviews, the focus of the current chapter is on identifying common elements of treatments that work. More specifically, we attempted to answer the question, what do treatments that work have in common? A number of psychological treatments have emerged as effective or potentially effective at reducing suicidal behaviour (i.e. suicide attempts). There now appear to be a number of identifiable core elements for treatments that have proven effective at reducing suicide attempts, all with direct and meaningful implications for day to day clinical practice. We also point out limitations in current science, including problematic follow-up periods and questions about the high-risk nature of some study samples.
Understanding and acknowledging the problem
Despite considerable disparity in observable rates, it is reasonable to say that suicidality (broadly defined, including death, attempts—single and multiple—and ideation) is a serious and persistent public health problem. Efficacious and effective treatments, both biological and psychological in orientation, are desperately needed. This chapter will summarize some of the current work from the psychological and behavioural perspective. To date, we have been able to identify fifty-three clinical trials targeting suicidality, with the majority (N = 28, 53 per cent) being cognitive-behavioural in orientation. When we say clinical trails, we mean only those studies that included both a treatment and control (or comparison) group; randomization was not an essential element. If randomization was included as a criterion it would have reduced the total number by almost half. For the sake of parsimony, only those studies deemed effective will be mentioned and considered below. However, all currently available studies, including those with negative or equivocal results are included in Table 58.1 (at the end of this chapter). For the most part, it is most accurate to refer to equivocal results, that is, comparable findings across treatment and control conditions. We are unaware of any treatment that actually proved potentially harmful in contrast to treatment as usual or other control treatment conditions.
Study . | Total patients (cumulative drop-out rate), N (N) . | Inclusion/exclusion criteria . | Follow-up period, months . | Suicide attempts by condition, N (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
E: 113 C: 84 | Inclusion: repeat suicide attempters admitted to poisoning treatment centre Exclusion: individuals at high risk of parasuicide to present ethnical concern | 6 | C 19 (23) p * | |
E 1: 57 (12) E 2: 57 (24) E 3: 50 (18) C: 38 (20) | Inclusion: attempted suicide admissions, with suicide defined as ‘any act of self-injury, regardless of its seriousness, which was motivated by self-destructive tendencies’ Exclusion: patients with no initial or final assessment | 3 | E 1: 1 ** E 2: 2 ** E 3: 7 ** C: 2 ** | |
E 63 (1) C 57 | Inclusion: suicide attempters, defined by any non-fatal act of self-damage inflicted with self-destructive intention, however vague and ambiguous; residing in catchment area for community mental health centre; brought to the hospital emergency room Exclusion: under 16 years of age; students living in college or university housing; persons with usual residence of care-giving institution; individuals institutionalized at the time of the suicide attempt | 4 | E 3 * C 9 * | |
E 200 (19 per cent) C 200 (22 per cent) | Inclusion: at least 17 years of age; episode of deliberate self-poisoning; defined geographical area Exclusion: formal psychiatric illness requiring immediate psychiatric treatment; immediate suicide risk; continuing treatment with psychiatrist or social worker seen within 2 weeks | 12 | ||
E: 48 (5) C: 48 (15) | Inclusion: 16 or older; giving informed consent; registered with general practitioner; live within 15 miles of hospital; suitable for outpatient care; admitted to Oxford following an overdose; not in need of formal psychiatric or specialist facilities (i.e., inpatient care or rehabilitation) care; not in current care (social work, probation, psychologist, or other professional); agreeable and willing to receive care | 12 | ||
E: 12 C: 12 | Inclusion: repeated suicide attempters (at least one previous attempt in preceding 2 years); referred to 10-day inpatient programme by psychiatric emergency team, local community mental health services, or hospital emergency room physician Exclusion: psychotic patients; organic brain syndrome; currently addicted to alcohol or drugs | 24 | E: 2 * C: 5 * 11 total attempts | |
E 1: 5 E 2: 5 C: 5 | Inclusion: patients in psychiatric inpatient ward; admitted for suicide attempt Exclusion: diagnosis of psychosis, alcoholism, or drug abuse | none | Not specified | |
E 41 (11) C 39 4) | Inclusion: episode of overdose; at least 16 years of age; give informed consent; registered with GP; living within 15 miles of the hospital; suitable for outpatient counselling (as determined by hospital counsellors)—continuing problems willing to tackle with help of counsellors; not in need of formal psychiatric care or specialist facilities; not in current care of psychiatric services, social worker, probation officer, psychologist, or professional agency; agreeable to assessment with counsellors; willing to accept after care | 9 | E 3 (7.3)* C 6 (15.4) * | |
E 1: 40 E 2: 40 | Inclusion: suicide attempt by intoxication; first parasuicide; repeated parasuicide Exclusion: psychosis; continuing psychotherapeutic treatment elsewhere; inpatient psychiatric therapy of non-psychotic condition; drug overdose; lack of understanding of language; too long a travel time to outpatient centre | 3, 12 | E 1: (22.5) ** E 2: (22.5) ** Only 2 attempts after 3 months, varies by treatment compliance | |
E: 9 C: 9 | Inclusion/Exclusion: aged 18–24; currently experiencing ‘clinically significant’ suicide ideations, as defined as a score of 11 or more on Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideations (MSSI); no signs of psychosis or substance abuse | 3 | Not specified | |
E 12 (0) C 8 (0) | Inclusion: aged 16–65; fixed abode within hospital boundary; not in need of immediate psychiatric treatment; not psychotic of suffering from organic illness; meet two or more of the following: previous suicide attempts; antidepressants taken as overdose; score of 4 or higher on Bugless and Horton (1974) risk of repetition scale | 12 | E 0 C 3 * 4 ** | |
E 27 C 25 | Inclusion: parasuicides, defined as non-fatal act in which an individual deliberately ingests a substance in excess of any prescribed or generally recognized therapeutic dosage, with no immediate medical or psychiatric treatment needs Exclusion: parasuicides using methods other than self-poisoning; under 16 years of age; no fixed abode; living further than 16 miles from city; current psychiatric inpatient; self-discharges from hospital; direct referral to medical ward/bypassing casualty department | 16 weeks | Not specified | |
E 32 (10) C 31 (9) | Inclusion: score of 7 on Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines; meet criteria for DSM-III diagnosis of BPD; at least 2 incidents of parasuicide in past 5 years, with at least one occurring within the past 8 weeks; aged 15–45; agreed to study conditions Exclusion: meet DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance dependence, or mental retardation | 12 | ||
E 76 (13) C 74 (11) | Inclusion: seen by emergency department after concrete suicide attempt; residing within psychiatric catchment area; speak French or English Exclusion: no fixed address or expecting to move; already in the care of institution responsible for follow-up; physical handicap preventing attendance; inability for informed consent; sociopathy with physical threat to hospital personnel; attempt not occurring within one week | 24 | E 22 (35)* C 19 (30)* | |
E 116 C 121 | Inclusion: 8th grade students | 12 weeks | Not specified | |
E 101 (0) C 111 (0) | Inclusion: reside within hospital catchment area; no previous history of non-fatal deliberate self-harm | 12 | ||
E 19 (2) C 20 (4) | Inclusion: aged 15–45; no history of psychosis, mental retardation, or organic cognitive impairment; engaged in intentional self-poisoning; not in need of inpatient or day-patient car for psychiatric illness and/or suicidal risk; IQ of at least 80 on Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale | 12 | ||
E 47 C 58 | Inclusion: aged 16 or below; suicide attempt, including deliberate self-injury and deliberate-self poisoning | 12 | E 3 (6)* C 7 (12)* | |
E 258 (62) C 258 (63) | Inclusion: at least 15 years of age; live in Gent or suburbs; suicide attempters defined as deliberate self-poisoning and deliberate self-injury Exclusion: patients in need of inpatient medical treatment | 12 | E 21(10.7) * C 34 (17.4) * | |
E 181 (38) C 121 | Inclusion: individuals who made an attempt precipitating referral; individuals with mood disorder and concurrent ideation, to include mixed symptomatology and adjustment disorder diagnoses; those abusing alcohol episodically with concurrent ideation Exclusion: substance dependence or chronic abuse requiring separate treatment; psychotic component to presentation; diagnosable thought disorder; personality disorder diagnosis making outpatient group participation ineffective, disruptive, or inappropriate | 24 | Not specified | |
E 140 (33 per cent) C 134 (63 per cent) | Inclusion: at least 15 years of age; attending Utrecht University Hospital for somatic treatment following suicide attempt Exclusion: habitual self-harm activities (e.g., wrist-cutting or using excessive amounts of substances); accidental overdose; inability to understand and write Dutch; reside outside of hospital catchment area; psychiatric hospitalization; imprisonment; acute psychosis; drug or alcohol addiction; recurrent consultations with liaison psychiatrist; suicide attempters receiving experimental treatment during pilot phase | 12 | E 24 ** C 20 ** | |
E 85 C 77 (33 total) | Inclusion: age 16 or younger; diagnosed with deliberate self-poisoning; consent from legal guardian Exclusion: other forms of self-harm (e.g., cutting or attempted hanging); social situations precluding family intervention; clinical or psychiatric contraindication; cases in which it was not clear if deliberate | 6 | Not specified | |
E 417 C 410 | Inclusion: adult inpatients following deliberate self-harm; referred for routine psychiatric evaluation Exclusion: individuals normally residing outside of catchment area; individuals who met the following clinical criteria meaning they were unlikely to use the intervention appropriately, placing themselves or others at risk; 3 or more contacts in past 6 months but failing to engage with psychiatric services; presenting unacceptable type or degree of aggression within previous 6 months; individuals inappropriately using alcohol or drugs leading to repetitive presentation in intoxicated state resulting in aggression or inability to engage in treatment | 6 | 0 DSH repeats: E: 347 C: 351 1 DSH repeats: E: 46 C: 32 2 or more DSH repeats: E: 24 C: 27 2 suicides in experimental group 3 suicides in control group | |
E 18 (0) C 16 (2) | Inclusion: episode of deliberate self harm; aged 16–50; personality disturbance within flamboyant personality cluster; histrionic or emotionally unstable; at least one previous episode of deliberate self-harm within previous year Exclusion: primary ICD-10 diagnosis within the organic, alcohol or drug dependence, or schizophrenia groups | 6 | E 10 (56) * C 10 (71) * | |
E 12 (5) C 16 (8) | Inclusion: women aged 15–45; met criteria for BPD on both PDE and SCID-II; met criteria for substance use disorder for opiates, cocaine, amphetamines, sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics, or polysubstance use disorder on SCID Exclusion: met criteria for schizophrenia; another psychotic disorder, or bipolar mood disorder on SCID; mental retardation as assessed by Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised | 16 | Not specified | |
E 12 (4) C 12 (6) | Inclusion: patients initially treated in local hospital emergency services for suicide attempts; meet diagnostic criteria for BPD; not meet exclusionary diagnosis; give written informed consent; accept random assignment to treatment Exclusion: schizophrenia; schizoaffective disorder; bipolar disorder; organic mental disorders; mental retardation; in need of inpatient drug or alcohol treatment | 12 | Not specified | |
E 14 (4) C 14 (4) | Inclusion: honourably discharged women veterans; met criteria for DMS-III-R BPD Exclusion: schizophrenia; bipolar disorder; substance dependence; antisocial personality disorder | 6 | ||
E 58 (11) C 61 (13) | Inclusion: presenting with episode of deliberate self-poisoning; able to read and write English; live within hospital catchment area; registered with a GP; not in need of inpatient treatment Exclusion: living outside catchment area; not approached by emergency staff; discharged self without being seen; too physically/psychiatrically unwell; no fixed abode; not registered with GP | 6 | ||
E 32 (1) C 31 (0) | Inclusion: aged 12–16; referred to child and adolescent mental health service following deliberate self-harm incident; incident of deliberate self-harm at least once over the previous year; deliberate self-harm defined as any intentional self-inflicted injury, irrespective of the apparent purpose of the act Exclusion: accidental overdose of recreational drugs or alcohol; judged as too suicidal for ambulatory care; could not attend groups given current situation (e.g., incarceration); psychiatric diagnosis; unlikely to benefit from group intervention (e.g., learning problems) | 6 | ||
E 389 C 454 | Inclusion: Patients admitted to psychiatric inpatient unit following depressive or suicidal state | 15 years | E 25 (death by suicide) C 27 (death by suicide) | |
E: 20 C: 20 | Inclusion: individuals with first or second attempted suicide by overdose of drugs or pesticides; aged 16–50; anxiety, depression (without psychotic symptoms), or adjustment disorder Exclusion: score of less than 20 on MMSE; psychosis; dysthymia; bipolar affective disorder; obsessive–compulsive disorder; eating disorder; alcohol dependence or abusing other psychoactive substances; personality disorders; previous psychological intervention | 3 | E: 0 C: 1* | |
E: 32 (1) C: 31 (0) | Inclusion: aged 12–16; referred for treatment following incident of deliberate self-harm, defined as any intentional self-inflicted injury, irrespective of the apparent purpose of the act; at least one other deliberate self-harm incident during previous year Exclusion: judged to be too suicidal for ambulatory care; current situation meant they could not attend groups (e.g., incarcerated); psychotic disorder; unlikely to benefit from group intervention (e.g., learning problems) | 7 | ||
E 964 C 968 | Inclusion: patients with episode of self-harm; self-harm defined as deliberate and non-fatal act done in the knowledge that it is potentially harmful/excessive (as in drug overdose) Exclusion: alcohol overdose (unless act of self-harm or suicide); illicit drug overdose (unless act of self-harm or suicide); less than 16 years of age; no fixed abode; imprisoned request for no one to be informed of the episode; deliberate self-harm in response to psychotic hallucination or delusion; managed entirely by primary care | 12 | ||
E 107 (18) C 109 (20) | Inclusion: suicide attempt; living within hospital catchment area | 12 | E 14 (17) * 26 ** C 15 (17) * 27 ** | |
E 220 C 247 | Inclusion: episode of deliberate self-harm; deliberate self-harm defined as non-fatal act in which an individual deliberately causes self-injury or ingests a substance in excess of the therapeutic dose; adult residents of geographical area Exclusion: less than 16 years of age; individuals aged 16–19 in full-time secondary education; overdose from recreational or problematic alcohol and/or drug use | 12 | ||
E: 156 (35) C: 148 (42) | Inclusion/Exclusion: aged 18 to 45; legal residence in catchment area; diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizotypal disorder, delusional disorder, acute or transient psychosis, schizoaffective psychosis, induced psychosis, or unspecified non-organic psychosis according to ICD-10; exposure to antipsychotic medication never exceeding 12 weeks of continuous medication in antipsychotic dosage; absence of mental retardation (learning disability), organic mental disorder, and psychotic condition because of acute poisoning or a withdrawal state; familiarity with Danish language; written informed consent | 12 | E: 1 suicide E: 18 (12) * C: 13 (10.4)* | |
E: 29 C: 82 | Inclusion: adolescent outpatient admissions; inclusion for DBT (must have both): suicide attempt within last 16 weeks (defined as self-harm with the intent to die); diagnosis of borderline personality disorder or minimum of 3 borderline personality features Inclusion to TAU: those meeting either criteria A or B for DBT, but not both | |||
E 36 (7) C 40 (6) | Inclusion: aged 12–18; receiving medical care at children's hospital following suicide attempt; suicide attempt defined as any intentional self-injury, regardless of lethality, as attempt to harm or kill oneself | 3 | Not specified | |
E 490 (192) C 490 (187) | Inclusion: women; aged 18–65; DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder; considered to be at high risk for committing suicide, defined as any one of the following: history of previous attempts or hospitalizations in previous 3 years; moderate to severe current suicidal ideation with depressive symptoms; command hallucinations for self-harm within 1 week | 12 | E: 34 C: 55 | |
E 31 (10) C 25 (4) | Inclusion: acutely suicidal youth with severe mental illness; score between 4 and 7 on Expanded Version 4 of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) suicidality subscore, with 4 equating a ‘suicidal thoughts frequent, without intent or plan’ and 7 equating ‘a specific suicidal plan and intent or suicide attempt’; agreement to participate Exclusion: attended service for more than 1 year | 6 | E: 1 suicide C: 1 suicide | |
E 239 (40) C 241(38) | Inclusion: episode of self-harm; previous episode; informed written consent; do not require in-patient psychiatric treatment Exclusion: psychotic disorder; bipolar disorder; primary diagnosis of substance dependence | 12 | E (39) p C (46) p | |
E 27 (3) C 31 (8) | Inclusion: women aged 18–70; borderline personality disorder; no restriction on referral source; were able to find or had a referral source willing to provide 12 months treatment Exclusion: DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder or chronic psychotic disorder; insufficient command of Dutch language; severe cognitive impairments | 12 | E: 2 (7) * C: 8 (26) * Self-mutilation E: 8 (35) * C: 13 (57) * | |
E: 32 (6) C: 30 (3) | Inclusion: aged 14–17; suicide attempt or suicidal ideation severe enough to warrant psychiatric admission; adolescent agreed to stay in the hospital for brief treatment Exclusion: mental retardation; psychosis; bipolar affective disorder; severe learning disabilities | 12 | Total hospitalizations E: 6 C: 6 Total ER visits E: 8 C: 14 Total incidents in hospital E: 2 C: 10 | |
E1 109 (18) E2 111 (24) E3 107 (17) C 112 (23) | Inclusion: aged 12–17; ability to receive care as outpatient; primary DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD; written consent from patient and at least one parent; Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total score of 45 or higher; not taking antidepressants; depressive mood in at least 2 of 3 contexts (home, school, among peers) for at least 6 weeks prior Exclusion: ccurrent or past diagnosis of bipolar disorder, severe conduct disorder, current substance abuse or dependence, pervasive developmental disorder(s), thought disorder; concurrent treatment with psychotropic medication or psychotherapy outside study; 2 failed SSRI trials; poor response to clinical treatment containing CBT for depression; intolerance of fluoxetine; confounding medical condition; non-English speaking patient or parent; pregnancy or refusal to use birth control; hospitalization for dangerousness to self or others within 3 months of consent; deemed ‘high risk’ because of a suicide attempt requiring medical attention within 6 months, clear intent or an active plan to commit suicide, or suicidal ideation with disorganized family unable to guarantee adequate safety monitoring | 12 weeks | Total adverse events: 33 (7.5)* E1: 13 (11.9) E2: 5 (4.5) E3: 107 (8.4) C: 6 (5.4) Total suicide-related adverse events: 24 (5.5)* E1: 9 *8.26) E2: 5 (4.50) E3: 6 (5.61) C: 4 (3.57) | |
E 60 (15) C 60 (20) | Inclusion: suicide attempt, defined as a potentially self-injurious behavior with a non-fatal outcome for which there is evidence, either explicit or implicit, that the individual intended to kill himself or herself, within 48 hours prior to evaluation in emergency department; age 16 or older; English-speaking; able to complete baseline assessment; able to provide at least 2 verifiable contacts for tracking; ability to give informed consent Exclusion: medical disorder preventing outpatient treatment | 18 | E 13 (24.1)* C 23 (41.6)* | |
E 15 C 16 (8 total) | Inclusion: adolescents aged 12–17; admitted to emergency department or inpatient unit following suicide attempt; suicide identified as any intentional, non-fatal self-injury, regardless of medical lethality with intent to die Exclusion: primary inclusion other than English; psychosis indicated on mental status examination; intellectual functioning precluding outpatient psychotherapy | 6 | E 4 (26.7) * C 2 (12.5) * | |
E 417 C 410 | Inclusion: patients admitted to hospital for self-harm | 12 | ||
E: 362 (149) C: 39 (19) | Inclusion: inhabitants in Copenhagen or Frederiksberg municipality; aged 16–40; severe suicidal thoughts or incidents of attempted suicide; understand and willing to give informed consent Exclusion: psychotic illness; intravenous drug abuse | 12 | 3 suicides in experimental group E: 213 (7)* C: 21 (33.3)* | |
E1 (16, 50 per cent) E2 (10, 37 per cent) C (15 per cent) Total: 85 | Inclusion: callers from telephone crisis hotline; currently not in therapy; currently at no or low risk for suicide; no indications for psychiatric referral due to severe impairment of functioning or psychotic symptoms; no indications for hospitalization or police intervention; expressed interest in beginning psychotherapy Exclusion: medium or high risk for suicide | 6 weeks | Not specified | |
E 27 C 31 | Inclusion: female; aged 18–65; DSM-IV diagnosis of BPD according to SCID-II Exclusion: DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder or chronic psychotic disorder; insufficient command of Dutch language; severe cognitive impairments | 18 | During 12-month study E: (7)* C: (26)* During 26-week follow-up E: 1 (4)* C: 6 (19)* | |
E: 52 (16) C: 49 (35) | Inclusion: women; aged 18–45; met criteria for BPD; current and past suicidal behaviour defined as at least 2 suicide attempts or self-injuries in the past 5 years, with at least 1 in the past 8 weeks Exclusion: lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder NOS, or mental retardation; seizure requiring medication; mandate to treatment; need for primary treatment for another debilitating condition | 24 | E: (23.1) ** C: (46)** | |
Inclusion/Exclusion: either first or second admission (within 2 years of a first admission) to inpatient or day patient unit for treatment of psychosis; DSM-IV criteria of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, or psychosis NOS; Positive psychotic symptoms for 4 weeks or more; score of 4 or more (moderate to extreme) on PANSS target item for either delusions or hallucination; no substance misuse; psychotic symptoms not caused by organic disorder | 18 | E: 0 C: 3 deaths by suicide | ||
E: 15 C: 15 | Inclusion: females; borderline personality disorder; aged 18–40; history of repetitive DSH, with at least one episode during past month Exclusion: comorbid psychotic disorder; bipolar I disorder; substance dependence score of 9 or higher on Beck Hopelessness Scale describing concrete immediate suicide plan | 8 | Frequency E: 1.98 SH C: 6.69 SH |
Study . | Total patients (cumulative drop-out rate), N (N) . | Inclusion/exclusion criteria . | Follow-up period, months . | Suicide attempts by condition, N (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
E: 113 C: 84 | Inclusion: repeat suicide attempters admitted to poisoning treatment centre Exclusion: individuals at high risk of parasuicide to present ethnical concern | 6 | C 19 (23) p * | |
E 1: 57 (12) E 2: 57 (24) E 3: 50 (18) C: 38 (20) | Inclusion: attempted suicide admissions, with suicide defined as ‘any act of self-injury, regardless of its seriousness, which was motivated by self-destructive tendencies’ Exclusion: patients with no initial or final assessment | 3 | E 1: 1 ** E 2: 2 ** E 3: 7 ** C: 2 ** | |
E 63 (1) C 57 | Inclusion: suicide attempters, defined by any non-fatal act of self-damage inflicted with self-destructive intention, however vague and ambiguous; residing in catchment area for community mental health centre; brought to the hospital emergency room Exclusion: under 16 years of age; students living in college or university housing; persons with usual residence of care-giving institution; individuals institutionalized at the time of the suicide attempt | 4 | E 3 * C 9 * | |
E 200 (19 per cent) C 200 (22 per cent) | Inclusion: at least 17 years of age; episode of deliberate self-poisoning; defined geographical area Exclusion: formal psychiatric illness requiring immediate psychiatric treatment; immediate suicide risk; continuing treatment with psychiatrist or social worker seen within 2 weeks | 12 | ||
E: 48 (5) C: 48 (15) | Inclusion: 16 or older; giving informed consent; registered with general practitioner; live within 15 miles of hospital; suitable for outpatient care; admitted to Oxford following an overdose; not in need of formal psychiatric or specialist facilities (i.e., inpatient care or rehabilitation) care; not in current care (social work, probation, psychologist, or other professional); agreeable and willing to receive care | 12 | ||
E: 12 C: 12 | Inclusion: repeated suicide attempters (at least one previous attempt in preceding 2 years); referred to 10-day inpatient programme by psychiatric emergency team, local community mental health services, or hospital emergency room physician Exclusion: psychotic patients; organic brain syndrome; currently addicted to alcohol or drugs | 24 | E: 2 * C: 5 * 11 total attempts | |
E 1: 5 E 2: 5 C: 5 | Inclusion: patients in psychiatric inpatient ward; admitted for suicide attempt Exclusion: diagnosis of psychosis, alcoholism, or drug abuse | none | Not specified | |
E 41 (11) C 39 4) | Inclusion: episode of overdose; at least 16 years of age; give informed consent; registered with GP; living within 15 miles of the hospital; suitable for outpatient counselling (as determined by hospital counsellors)—continuing problems willing to tackle with help of counsellors; not in need of formal psychiatric care or specialist facilities; not in current care of psychiatric services, social worker, probation officer, psychologist, or professional agency; agreeable to assessment with counsellors; willing to accept after care | 9 | E 3 (7.3)* C 6 (15.4) * | |
E 1: 40 E 2: 40 | Inclusion: suicide attempt by intoxication; first parasuicide; repeated parasuicide Exclusion: psychosis; continuing psychotherapeutic treatment elsewhere; inpatient psychiatric therapy of non-psychotic condition; drug overdose; lack of understanding of language; too long a travel time to outpatient centre | 3, 12 | E 1: (22.5) ** E 2: (22.5) ** Only 2 attempts after 3 months, varies by treatment compliance | |
E: 9 C: 9 | Inclusion/Exclusion: aged 18–24; currently experiencing ‘clinically significant’ suicide ideations, as defined as a score of 11 or more on Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideations (MSSI); no signs of psychosis or substance abuse | 3 | Not specified | |
E 12 (0) C 8 (0) | Inclusion: aged 16–65; fixed abode within hospital boundary; not in need of immediate psychiatric treatment; not psychotic of suffering from organic illness; meet two or more of the following: previous suicide attempts; antidepressants taken as overdose; score of 4 or higher on Bugless and Horton (1974) risk of repetition scale | 12 | E 0 C 3 * 4 ** | |
E 27 C 25 | Inclusion: parasuicides, defined as non-fatal act in which an individual deliberately ingests a substance in excess of any prescribed or generally recognized therapeutic dosage, with no immediate medical or psychiatric treatment needs Exclusion: parasuicides using methods other than self-poisoning; under 16 years of age; no fixed abode; living further than 16 miles from city; current psychiatric inpatient; self-discharges from hospital; direct referral to medical ward/bypassing casualty department | 16 weeks | Not specified | |
E 32 (10) C 31 (9) | Inclusion: score of 7 on Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines; meet criteria for DSM-III diagnosis of BPD; at least 2 incidents of parasuicide in past 5 years, with at least one occurring within the past 8 weeks; aged 15–45; agreed to study conditions Exclusion: meet DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance dependence, or mental retardation | 12 | ||
E 76 (13) C 74 (11) | Inclusion: seen by emergency department after concrete suicide attempt; residing within psychiatric catchment area; speak French or English Exclusion: no fixed address or expecting to move; already in the care of institution responsible for follow-up; physical handicap preventing attendance; inability for informed consent; sociopathy with physical threat to hospital personnel; attempt not occurring within one week | 24 | E 22 (35)* C 19 (30)* | |
E 116 C 121 | Inclusion: 8th grade students | 12 weeks | Not specified | |
E 101 (0) C 111 (0) | Inclusion: reside within hospital catchment area; no previous history of non-fatal deliberate self-harm | 12 | ||
E 19 (2) C 20 (4) | Inclusion: aged 15–45; no history of psychosis, mental retardation, or organic cognitive impairment; engaged in intentional self-poisoning; not in need of inpatient or day-patient car for psychiatric illness and/or suicidal risk; IQ of at least 80 on Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale | 12 | ||
E 47 C 58 | Inclusion: aged 16 or below; suicide attempt, including deliberate self-injury and deliberate-self poisoning | 12 | E 3 (6)* C 7 (12)* | |
E 258 (62) C 258 (63) | Inclusion: at least 15 years of age; live in Gent or suburbs; suicide attempters defined as deliberate self-poisoning and deliberate self-injury Exclusion: patients in need of inpatient medical treatment | 12 | E 21(10.7) * C 34 (17.4) * | |
E 181 (38) C 121 | Inclusion: individuals who made an attempt precipitating referral; individuals with mood disorder and concurrent ideation, to include mixed symptomatology and adjustment disorder diagnoses; those abusing alcohol episodically with concurrent ideation Exclusion: substance dependence or chronic abuse requiring separate treatment; psychotic component to presentation; diagnosable thought disorder; personality disorder diagnosis making outpatient group participation ineffective, disruptive, or inappropriate | 24 | Not specified | |
E 140 (33 per cent) C 134 (63 per cent) | Inclusion: at least 15 years of age; attending Utrecht University Hospital for somatic treatment following suicide attempt Exclusion: habitual self-harm activities (e.g., wrist-cutting or using excessive amounts of substances); accidental overdose; inability to understand and write Dutch; reside outside of hospital catchment area; psychiatric hospitalization; imprisonment; acute psychosis; drug or alcohol addiction; recurrent consultations with liaison psychiatrist; suicide attempters receiving experimental treatment during pilot phase | 12 | E 24 ** C 20 ** | |
E 85 C 77 (33 total) | Inclusion: age 16 or younger; diagnosed with deliberate self-poisoning; consent from legal guardian Exclusion: other forms of self-harm (e.g., cutting or attempted hanging); social situations precluding family intervention; clinical or psychiatric contraindication; cases in which it was not clear if deliberate | 6 | Not specified | |
E 417 C 410 | Inclusion: adult inpatients following deliberate self-harm; referred for routine psychiatric evaluation Exclusion: individuals normally residing outside of catchment area; individuals who met the following clinical criteria meaning they were unlikely to use the intervention appropriately, placing themselves or others at risk; 3 or more contacts in past 6 months but failing to engage with psychiatric services; presenting unacceptable type or degree of aggression within previous 6 months; individuals inappropriately using alcohol or drugs leading to repetitive presentation in intoxicated state resulting in aggression or inability to engage in treatment | 6 | 0 DSH repeats: E: 347 C: 351 1 DSH repeats: E: 46 C: 32 2 or more DSH repeats: E: 24 C: 27 2 suicides in experimental group 3 suicides in control group | |
E 18 (0) C 16 (2) | Inclusion: episode of deliberate self harm; aged 16–50; personality disturbance within flamboyant personality cluster; histrionic or emotionally unstable; at least one previous episode of deliberate self-harm within previous year Exclusion: primary ICD-10 diagnosis within the organic, alcohol or drug dependence, or schizophrenia groups | 6 | E 10 (56) * C 10 (71) * | |
E 12 (5) C 16 (8) | Inclusion: women aged 15–45; met criteria for BPD on both PDE and SCID-II; met criteria for substance use disorder for opiates, cocaine, amphetamines, sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics, or polysubstance use disorder on SCID Exclusion: met criteria for schizophrenia; another psychotic disorder, or bipolar mood disorder on SCID; mental retardation as assessed by Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised | 16 | Not specified | |
E 12 (4) C 12 (6) | Inclusion: patients initially treated in local hospital emergency services for suicide attempts; meet diagnostic criteria for BPD; not meet exclusionary diagnosis; give written informed consent; accept random assignment to treatment Exclusion: schizophrenia; schizoaffective disorder; bipolar disorder; organic mental disorders; mental retardation; in need of inpatient drug or alcohol treatment | 12 | Not specified | |
E 14 (4) C 14 (4) | Inclusion: honourably discharged women veterans; met criteria for DMS-III-R BPD Exclusion: schizophrenia; bipolar disorder; substance dependence; antisocial personality disorder | 6 | ||
E 58 (11) C 61 (13) | Inclusion: presenting with episode of deliberate self-poisoning; able to read and write English; live within hospital catchment area; registered with a GP; not in need of inpatient treatment Exclusion: living outside catchment area; not approached by emergency staff; discharged self without being seen; too physically/psychiatrically unwell; no fixed abode; not registered with GP | 6 | ||
E 32 (1) C 31 (0) | Inclusion: aged 12–16; referred to child and adolescent mental health service following deliberate self-harm incident; incident of deliberate self-harm at least once over the previous year; deliberate self-harm defined as any intentional self-inflicted injury, irrespective of the apparent purpose of the act Exclusion: accidental overdose of recreational drugs or alcohol; judged as too suicidal for ambulatory care; could not attend groups given current situation (e.g., incarceration); psychiatric diagnosis; unlikely to benefit from group intervention (e.g., learning problems) | 6 | ||
E 389 C 454 | Inclusion: Patients admitted to psychiatric inpatient unit following depressive or suicidal state | 15 years | E 25 (death by suicide) C 27 (death by suicide) | |
E: 20 C: 20 | Inclusion: individuals with first or second attempted suicide by overdose of drugs or pesticides; aged 16–50; anxiety, depression (without psychotic symptoms), or adjustment disorder Exclusion: score of less than 20 on MMSE; psychosis; dysthymia; bipolar affective disorder; obsessive–compulsive disorder; eating disorder; alcohol dependence or abusing other psychoactive substances; personality disorders; previous psychological intervention | 3 | E: 0 C: 1* | |
E: 32 (1) C: 31 (0) | Inclusion: aged 12–16; referred for treatment following incident of deliberate self-harm, defined as any intentional self-inflicted injury, irrespective of the apparent purpose of the act; at least one other deliberate self-harm incident during previous year Exclusion: judged to be too suicidal for ambulatory care; current situation meant they could not attend groups (e.g., incarcerated); psychotic disorder; unlikely to benefit from group intervention (e.g., learning problems) | 7 | ||
E 964 C 968 | Inclusion: patients with episode of self-harm; self-harm defined as deliberate and non-fatal act done in the knowledge that it is potentially harmful/excessive (as in drug overdose) Exclusion: alcohol overdose (unless act of self-harm or suicide); illicit drug overdose (unless act of self-harm or suicide); less than 16 years of age; no fixed abode; imprisoned request for no one to be informed of the episode; deliberate self-harm in response to psychotic hallucination or delusion; managed entirely by primary care | 12 | ||
E 107 (18) C 109 (20) | Inclusion: suicide attempt; living within hospital catchment area | 12 | E 14 (17) * 26 ** C 15 (17) * 27 ** | |
E 220 C 247 | Inclusion: episode of deliberate self-harm; deliberate self-harm defined as non-fatal act in which an individual deliberately causes self-injury or ingests a substance in excess of the therapeutic dose; adult residents of geographical area Exclusion: less than 16 years of age; individuals aged 16–19 in full-time secondary education; overdose from recreational or problematic alcohol and/or drug use | 12 | ||
E: 156 (35) C: 148 (42) | Inclusion/Exclusion: aged 18 to 45; legal residence in catchment area; diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizotypal disorder, delusional disorder, acute or transient psychosis, schizoaffective psychosis, induced psychosis, or unspecified non-organic psychosis according to ICD-10; exposure to antipsychotic medication never exceeding 12 weeks of continuous medication in antipsychotic dosage; absence of mental retardation (learning disability), organic mental disorder, and psychotic condition because of acute poisoning or a withdrawal state; familiarity with Danish language; written informed consent | 12 | E: 1 suicide E: 18 (12) * C: 13 (10.4)* | |
E: 29 C: 82 | Inclusion: adolescent outpatient admissions; inclusion for DBT (must have both): suicide attempt within last 16 weeks (defined as self-harm with the intent to die); diagnosis of borderline personality disorder or minimum of 3 borderline personality features Inclusion to TAU: those meeting either criteria A or B for DBT, but not both | |||
E 36 (7) C 40 (6) | Inclusion: aged 12–18; receiving medical care at children's hospital following suicide attempt; suicide attempt defined as any intentional self-injury, regardless of lethality, as attempt to harm or kill oneself | 3 | Not specified | |
E 490 (192) C 490 (187) | Inclusion: women; aged 18–65; DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder; considered to be at high risk for committing suicide, defined as any one of the following: history of previous attempts or hospitalizations in previous 3 years; moderate to severe current suicidal ideation with depressive symptoms; command hallucinations for self-harm within 1 week | 12 | E: 34 C: 55 | |
E 31 (10) C 25 (4) | Inclusion: acutely suicidal youth with severe mental illness; score between 4 and 7 on Expanded Version 4 of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) suicidality subscore, with 4 equating a ‘suicidal thoughts frequent, without intent or plan’ and 7 equating ‘a specific suicidal plan and intent or suicide attempt’; agreement to participate Exclusion: attended service for more than 1 year | 6 | E: 1 suicide C: 1 suicide | |
E 239 (40) C 241(38) | Inclusion: episode of self-harm; previous episode; informed written consent; do not require in-patient psychiatric treatment Exclusion: psychotic disorder; bipolar disorder; primary diagnosis of substance dependence | 12 | E (39) p C (46) p | |
E 27 (3) C 31 (8) | Inclusion: women aged 18–70; borderline personality disorder; no restriction on referral source; were able to find or had a referral source willing to provide 12 months treatment Exclusion: DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder or chronic psychotic disorder; insufficient command of Dutch language; severe cognitive impairments | 12 | E: 2 (7) * C: 8 (26) * Self-mutilation E: 8 (35) * C: 13 (57) * | |
E: 32 (6) C: 30 (3) | Inclusion: aged 14–17; suicide attempt or suicidal ideation severe enough to warrant psychiatric admission; adolescent agreed to stay in the hospital for brief treatment Exclusion: mental retardation; psychosis; bipolar affective disorder; severe learning disabilities | 12 | Total hospitalizations E: 6 C: 6 Total ER visits E: 8 C: 14 Total incidents in hospital E: 2 C: 10 | |
E1 109 (18) E2 111 (24) E3 107 (17) C 112 (23) | Inclusion: aged 12–17; ability to receive care as outpatient; primary DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD; written consent from patient and at least one parent; Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total score of 45 or higher; not taking antidepressants; depressive mood in at least 2 of 3 contexts (home, school, among peers) for at least 6 weeks prior Exclusion: ccurrent or past diagnosis of bipolar disorder, severe conduct disorder, current substance abuse or dependence, pervasive developmental disorder(s), thought disorder; concurrent treatment with psychotropic medication or psychotherapy outside study; 2 failed SSRI trials; poor response to clinical treatment containing CBT for depression; intolerance of fluoxetine; confounding medical condition; non-English speaking patient or parent; pregnancy or refusal to use birth control; hospitalization for dangerousness to self or others within 3 months of consent; deemed ‘high risk’ because of a suicide attempt requiring medical attention within 6 months, clear intent or an active plan to commit suicide, or suicidal ideation with disorganized family unable to guarantee adequate safety monitoring | 12 weeks | Total adverse events: 33 (7.5)* E1: 13 (11.9) E2: 5 (4.5) E3: 107 (8.4) C: 6 (5.4) Total suicide-related adverse events: 24 (5.5)* E1: 9 *8.26) E2: 5 (4.50) E3: 6 (5.61) C: 4 (3.57) | |
E 60 (15) C 60 (20) | Inclusion: suicide attempt, defined as a potentially self-injurious behavior with a non-fatal outcome for which there is evidence, either explicit or implicit, that the individual intended to kill himself or herself, within 48 hours prior to evaluation in emergency department; age 16 or older; English-speaking; able to complete baseline assessment; able to provide at least 2 verifiable contacts for tracking; ability to give informed consent Exclusion: medical disorder preventing outpatient treatment | 18 | E 13 (24.1)* C 23 (41.6)* | |
E 15 C 16 (8 total) | Inclusion: adolescents aged 12–17; admitted to emergency department or inpatient unit following suicide attempt; suicide identified as any intentional, non-fatal self-injury, regardless of medical lethality with intent to die Exclusion: primary inclusion other than English; psychosis indicated on mental status examination; intellectual functioning precluding outpatient psychotherapy | 6 | E 4 (26.7) * C 2 (12.5) * | |
E 417 C 410 | Inclusion: patients admitted to hospital for self-harm | 12 | ||
E: 362 (149) C: 39 (19) | Inclusion: inhabitants in Copenhagen or Frederiksberg municipality; aged 16–40; severe suicidal thoughts or incidents of attempted suicide; understand and willing to give informed consent Exclusion: psychotic illness; intravenous drug abuse | 12 | 3 suicides in experimental group E: 213 (7)* C: 21 (33.3)* | |
E1 (16, 50 per cent) E2 (10, 37 per cent) C (15 per cent) Total: 85 | Inclusion: callers from telephone crisis hotline; currently not in therapy; currently at no or low risk for suicide; no indications for psychiatric referral due to severe impairment of functioning or psychotic symptoms; no indications for hospitalization or police intervention; expressed interest in beginning psychotherapy Exclusion: medium or high risk for suicide | 6 weeks | Not specified | |
E 27 C 31 | Inclusion: female; aged 18–65; DSM-IV diagnosis of BPD according to SCID-II Exclusion: DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder or chronic psychotic disorder; insufficient command of Dutch language; severe cognitive impairments | 18 | During 12-month study E: (7)* C: (26)* During 26-week follow-up E: 1 (4)* C: 6 (19)* | |
E: 52 (16) C: 49 (35) | Inclusion: women; aged 18–45; met criteria for BPD; current and past suicidal behaviour defined as at least 2 suicide attempts or self-injuries in the past 5 years, with at least 1 in the past 8 weeks Exclusion: lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder NOS, or mental retardation; seizure requiring medication; mandate to treatment; need for primary treatment for another debilitating condition | 24 | E: (23.1) ** C: (46)** | |
Inclusion/Exclusion: either first or second admission (within 2 years of a first admission) to inpatient or day patient unit for treatment of psychosis; DSM-IV criteria of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, or psychosis NOS; Positive psychotic symptoms for 4 weeks or more; score of 4 or more (moderate to extreme) on PANSS target item for either delusions or hallucination; no substance misuse; psychotic symptoms not caused by organic disorder | 18 | E: 0 C: 3 deaths by suicide | ||
E: 15 C: 15 | Inclusion: females; borderline personality disorder; aged 18–40; history of repetitive DSH, with at least one episode during past month Exclusion: comorbid psychotic disorder; bipolar I disorder; substance dependence score of 9 or higher on Beck Hopelessness Scale describing concrete immediate suicide plan | 8 | Frequency E: 1.98 SH C: 6.69 SH |
E, experimental condition; C, control condition; p parasuicide; SH deliberate self-harm; * total repeat attempters; ** total repeat attempts.
Understanding treatment targets and impact
The focus of the chapter is on clinical trials that utilized a psychological and/or behavioural approach to treating suicidality. As mentioned, we were able to identify a total of fifty-three, with the majority (53 per cent) being cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in orientation. When considering treatment for suicidality, it is important to consider the broad variability in both the patient populations targeted (i.e. those exhibiting ideation, having made attempts, or those having made multiple attempts) and treatment goals (i.e. reduction of suicidal thinking, attempts, and/or related symptomatology). As is apparent, the possible permutations across targeted groups and outcomes are considerable, adding to the complexity in interpreting results and identifying effective treatments. A problem that has persisted across studies is the exclusion of high-risk cases, with Linehan (1997) estimating that 45 per cent of treatment efficacy trials excluded high-risk patients. Accordingly, we will make a distinction in the severity of the targeted patient population, along with treatment goals, in the discussion to follow.
When talking about treatment outcome for suicidality, we can ask two critical questions. First, what treatments work? And second, what do they have in common that might help us understand why they work? Although dismantling studies are yet to be conducted that would definitely answer these questions, we do have enough data to engage in informed discussion. We do not have adequate data to answer the question about whether or not psychological treatment has enduring impact, that is, that treatment effects will last for many years. To date (among the fifty-three trials identified), the longest follow-up available is 24 months with the average being 10 months. Clearly, such limited follow-up timeframes are inadequate to address questions about enduring impact. It could actually be argued that current data only indicate that psychological and behavioural treatments can delay suicide.
Perhaps the primary contribution this chapter can make is to identify common elements across treatment trials that are associated with positive outcomes. More specifically, can we identify similarities across treatments demonstrated to be effective? This would help distil existing findings into clear, concise and usable recommendations for day to day clinical practice. By comparison to other problems targeted in the medical literature, a total number of fifty-three for treatment outcome studies is indeed very small. Accordingly, it is important to look for similarities across trials in an effort to focus resources in the areas that hold the most promise for effective treatment and intervention. There is little question that more difficult and elaborate questions can be asked of the treatment literature (cf. Rudd et al. 2004), but at this point, we simply do not have adequate data to answer them.
Somewhat in opposition to the current chapter and our emphasis on identifying what actually works in treatment, it is important to note that a recent meta-analysis concluded that ‘results do not provide evidence that additional psychosocial interventions following self-harm have a marked effect on the likelihood of subsequent suicide’ (Crawford et al. 2007, p. 11). As has been mentioned elsewhere (Rudd 2007), there are a number of confounds that limit the accuracy of their conclusion, but two are at the heart of the problem. First, the interventions included in the meta-analysis were not developed nor intended to reduce suicide rates, rather they targeted suicide attempts and associated symptoms such as suicidal ideation, hopelessness, and depression. Second, it is also arguable that the studies included are not actually amenable to a meta-analytic approach given variable inclusion/exclusion criteria and treatment targets, with the net outcome being that the meta-analysis inappropriately assumed intervention and treatment studies were comparable, along with including samples of highly disparate ages, ranging from age 12 to over 50. Rudd (2007) provides a detailed list of identifiable confounds that corrupt the conclusions offered by Crawford et al. (2007).
Previous reviews of psychological and behavioural treatments
There are a number of comprehensive reviews already available in the literature, including Gunnell and Frankel (1994), Hepp et al. (2004), Linehan (1997), Rudd (2006), and several previous meta-analyses that are methodologically sound (van der Sande et al. 1997; Hawton et al. 1998, 2005). These reviews include in-depth discussion of methodological problems and limitations across studies. We are not going to repeat what is available elsewhere, rather we will critique available studies in an effort to answer the two questions raised earlier: What psychological treatments work in reducing suicidality?, and are there common elements that can be identified across studies that can be integrated into clinical practice?
Identifying treatments that work
As mentioned above, it is important to think about not just the nature of the treatment and the sample targeted (e.g. high versus low risk), but also treatment goals (e.g. reduction in suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, or associated symptoms such as depression, hopelessness, anxiety). Given the variable nature of symptomatology associated with suicide risk, particularly suicidal ideation, the best and most accurate marker of lower risk following treatment is a reduction in suicide attempts during the follow-up period (cf. Rudd et al. 2004). If we focus specifically on what treatments are effective at reducing suicide attempts and also do not have serious or disqualifying methodological problems, the list is relatively short, including nine studies with a CBT focus or orientation (Salkovkis et al. 1990; Linehan et al. 1991; McLeavey et al. 1994; Nordentoft et al. 2002; Linehan et al. 2004; Brown et al. 2005; van den Bosch et al. 2005; Koons et al. 2001, 2006). It would appear that CBT approaches are emerging as a frontrunner when it comes to effective treatments for suicidality. Only two other treatments (Guthrie et al. 2001; Wood et al. 2001) have proven effective at lowering subsequent suicide attempt rates. Guthrie et al. (2001) demonstrated that brief in-home interpersonal psychotherapy was more effective than treatment as usual at reducing subsequent suicide attempts. The follow-up period for this study was only 6 months. Similarly, Wood et al. (2001) found that developmental group therapy was more effective at reducing suicide attempts in comparison to treatment as usual for adolescents. It is important to remember, though, that a number of other treatments have been demonstrated to reduce associated symptoms such as depression, anxiety, hopelessness and features of suicidal thinking (e.g. specificity and intensity). As was mentioned before, though, the variable nature of associated symptoms like suicidal ideation, depression, and hopelessness significantly limit their utility as outcome measures.
Are there common elements that work?
As mentioned above, an important question is whether or not there are identifiable common elements across treatments that work at reducing subsequent suicide attempt rates? Among the studies referenced above, a review of these studies supports several conclusions about common elements, techniques and interventions:
Theoretical models easily translated to clinical work
All of the treatments have clearly articulated well-defined and understandable theoretical models that are embedded in empirical research. The theoretical models also have common elements, as might be expected for CBT-oriented treatments. They all identify cognitions, emotional processing and associated behavioural responses as critical to understanding motivation to die, associated distress (and symptoms) and ultimately changing the suicidal process. Patients find the models easy to understand, distilling them down to thoughts, feelings and behaviours that are associated with suicide risk and hopelessness. In short, these treatments have made it easy to sit down with a patient and explain in understandable language why they have tried or are thinking about killing themselves. This is an important consistency across effective treatments and prompts a number of important questions. When a treatment model is simple, straightforward, and easy to understand, does it facilitate hope, improve motivation and result in better compliance? If so, the net outcome would be enhanced skill development, reduced symptom severity, and fewer subsequent suicide attempts.
Treatment fidelity
In all of the treatments referenced above, treatment fidelity was a critical factor. This translates to clinicians being trained to a target standard of competence and supervised throughout (with variable formats). For the most part, the treatments were manual-driven, with a clear sequence and hierarchy of treatment targets, with a reduction of suicidal behaviour as a central and primary focus. Rather than focus on peripheral or associated symptoms, effective treatments target suicidality specifically. Effective psychological and behavioural treatments view suicidality as, at least to some degree, independent of diagnosis. Targeting suicidal behaviour as a treatment outcome clearly seems to lend itself to positive changes in subsequent attempt rates. What is also clear is that all four studies conceptualized the treatment of suicidality as requiring unique competencies, consistent with the recent movement to identifiable core competencies in the assessment, management and treatment of suicidality (Suicide Prevention Resource Center 2006).
Compliance
Effective treatments also targeted treatment compliance in specific and consistent fashion. More specifically, all had speific interventions and techniques that targeted poor compliance and motivation for treatment. Treatment is only effective if the patient is active, involved and invested. It is clear from effective treatments that compliance with care needs to be a central and primary focus, with clear plans about what to do if non-compliance emerges. Just as suicidal behaviour needs to be a primary target, motivation and investment in care is important. When motivation, investment, and involvement drop, they need to become a primary treatment target until effectively resolved.
Targeting identifiable skills
Consistent with easy to understand theoretical models of suicidality driving the treatment process, effective treatments targeted clearly identifiable skill sets (e.g. emotion regulation, anger management, problem-solving, interpersonal relationships, cognitive distortions). In these treatments, patients understood what was ‘wrong’ and ‘what to do about it’ in order to reduce suicidal thinking and behaviours. They also had the opportunity to practice and build skill sets over time.
Personal responsibility
Consistent with each of the above points, effective treatments emphasized self-reliance, self-awareness, self-control and issues of personal responsibility. Effective treatments are clear in the goal that if patients developed appropriate skills, the distress and upset tied to early events would diminish and associated suicidal urges would as well. Consistent with this goal, patients assumed a considerable degree of personal responsibility for their care, including crisis management. Again, this is consistent with the issue of improved compliance and motivation for care. Although there are a range of models available for facilitating compliance and crisis management, but we would encourage clinicians to consider use of the ‘commitment to treatment agreement’ (cf. Rudd et al. 2006).
Easy access to treatment and crisis services
Effective treatments emphasize the importance of crisis management and access to available emergency services during and after treatment, with a clear plan of action being identified. Additionally, effective treatments more often than not dedicated time to practising the skills sets necessary to effective crisis management, with patients learning to identify what characterizes a ‘crisis or emergency’, using a ‘safety’ or ‘crisis management plan’ and learning to use these services in judicious and appropriate fashion.
Conclusions
As other reviews have made clear (cf. Gunnell and Frankel 1994; Linehan 1997; Hepp et al. 2004; Rudd 2006), a reasonable database is starting to emerge to answer the question about what works in the treatment of suicidality. What has also emerged are some readily identifiable common elements that have important and concrete implications for day to day clinical practice with suicidal patients, not to mention provide a solid foundation for future dismantling studies that can answer the relatively simple questions in more definitive fashion.
References
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 7 |
December 2022 | 3 |
January 2023 | 2 |
February 2023 | 4 |
March 2023 | 4 |
April 2023 | 3 |
May 2023 | 1 |
June 2023 | 6 |
July 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 4 |
October 2023 | 4 |
November 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 6 |
January 2024 | 4 |
February 2024 | 7 |
March 2024 | 2 |
April 2024 | 5 |
May 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 4 |
July 2024 | 1 |
August 2024 | 2 |
October 2024 | 1 |
January 2025 | 4 |
March 2025 | 4 |
May 2025 | 3 |