
Contents
-
-
-
-
-
-
General issues in consent for colorectal procedures General issues in consent for colorectal procedures
-
Introduction Introduction
-
Risk predictors Risk predictors
-
References References
-
-
Anal fissure (botulinum toxin injection, lateral internal sphincterotomy, advancement flap) Anal fissure (botulinum toxin injection, lateral internal sphincterotomy, advancement flap)
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Anal sphincter repair Anal sphincter repair
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Anorectal abscesses (incision and drainage) Anorectal abscesses (incision and drainage)
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Appendicectomy Appendicectomy
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Colectomy and rectal excision Colectomy and rectal excision
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Fistula-in-ano surgery Fistula-in-ano surgery
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Haemorrhoids Haemorrhoids
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Percutaneous caecostomy Percutaneous caecostomy
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
Reference Reference
-
-
Perianal skin tag excision Perianal skin tag excision
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
-
Pilonidal sinus Pilonidal sinus
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Rectal prolapse surgery Rectal prolapse surgery
-
Description Description
-
Anterior resection Anterior resection
-
Trans-abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection (Frykman–Goldberg operation) Trans-abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection (Frykman–Goldberg operation)
-
Orr–Loygue rectopexy Orr–Loygue rectopexy
-
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Rectocele repair Rectocele repair
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Restorative proctocolectomy (ileo-anal pouch) Restorative proctocolectomy (ileo-anal pouch)
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Small bowel resection Small bowel resection
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Small bowel strictureplasty Small bowel strictureplasty
-
Description Description
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
References References
-
-
Stoma (formation/reversal) Stoma (formation/reversal)
-
Description Description
-
Ileostomy Ileostomy
-
Colostomy Colostomy
-
Additional procedures that may become necessary Additional procedures that may become necessary
-
Benefits Benefits
-
Alternative procedures/conservative measures Alternative procedures/conservative measures
-
Serious/frequently occurring risks Serious/frequently occurring risks
-
Blood transfusion necessary Blood transfusion necessary
-
Type of anaesthesia/sedation Type of anaesthesia/sedation
-
Follow-up/need for further procedure Follow-up/need for further procedure
-
Reference Reference
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3 Colorectal surgery
-
Published:December 2011
Cite
General issues in consent for colorectal procedures 78
Anal fissure (botulinum toxin injection, lateral internal sphincterotomy, advancement flap) 81
Anal sphincter repair 83
Anorectal abscesses (incision and drainage) 85
Appendicectomy 87
Colectomy and rectal excision 90
Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy 96
Fistula-in-ano surgery 100
Haemorrhoids 102
Percutaneous caecostomy 105
Perianal skin tag excision 106
Pilonidal sinus 107
Rectal prolapse surgery 109
Rectocele repair 113
Restorative proctocolectomy (ileo-anal pouch) 115
Small bowel resection 117
Small bowel strictureplasty 119
Stoma (formation/reversal) 121
General issues in consent for colorectal procedures
Introduction
The procedure-specific complications will be detailed in each section.
For any colorectal procedure it is important to mention the following general consent issues:
Scarring
Possibility of administration of antibiotics
Allergic reactions
Possibility of administration of blood products (consequently transfusion reactions and transmission of infectious diseases)
Thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism)
Wound infection and/or dehiscence
Peritoneal sepsis
Risks related to anaesthesia
Urinary retention
Urinary tract infection
Lower respiratory tract infection
Myocardial infarction
Death
It should also be documented that should any unforeseen pathologies be identified then additional procedures (in particular hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) should they be involved in a malignant process) should be authorized if deemed in the best interest of the patient
Where appropriate, it is prudent to discuss the disposal of tissues
For laparoscopic procedures it is important to mention the following: perforation of bowel (following port-site insertion), port-site haematoma, port-site hernia and the potential for the operation to be converted to an open procedure
Risk predictors
When discussing a proposed operation with a patient, it is important to mention all significant potential complications, their evidence-based rates where appropriate, the expected recovery, and perceived benefits of surgery. While studies and departmental audits can indicate likely complication rates for a particular procedure, the morbidity and mortality is more difficult to predict.
Risk predictor scoring systems have been in use since the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scoring system was introduced in 1963. This is a simple and effective scoring system, which classifies the physical status of a patient
In 1981 the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scoring system was introduced to classify the severity of a disease based on a number of different physiological parameters. There have since been two updated versions: APACHE II in 1985 and APACHE III in 1991. The APACHE system is used predominantly in the intensive care setting and calculates the mortality risk for a group of patients within a specific disease category
The Simplified Acute Physiological Score (SAPS) is a derivation of the APACHE system that uses fewer of the physiological parameters and is used to calculate the predicted hospital mortality
In 1991, Copeland et al.1 introduced the Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) score.1 It was initially developed in the context of the general surgical population and has since been modified for use in gastrointestinal/colorectal, vascular, head and neck, and orthopaedic patients. It has been shown to over-predict mortality, in particular for patients in the lowest risk category.2 It utilizes 12 physiological parameters and six operative variables to give a percentage estimation of mortality risk:2
Physiological
Age
Cardiac signs
Respiratory
Systolic blood pressure
Pulse
Glasgow Coma Scale
Haemoglobin
White cell count
Urea
Sodium
Potassium
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Operative
Operative severity
Multiple procedures
Total blood loss
Peritoneal soiling
Malignancy
Mode of surgery
For the purpose of this chapter we will consider the colorectal (CR) POSSUM score which involves the following parameters:
Physiological
Age
Cardiac
Systolic blood pressure
Pulse rate
Haemoglobin
Urea
Operative parameters (if calculating risk preoperatively)
Operation type
Peritoneal contamination
Malignancy status
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) classification
When consenting a patient for a colorectal operation (suitable operations for which this would be relevant are indicated in later sections) a colorectal (CR) POSSUM score should be calculated in order to predict mortality risk from a particular procedure. These details can then be conveyed to the patient when consenting for procedural risks.3 This is in order to more accurately estimate the mortality risk involved.
References

Anal fissure (botulinum toxin injection, lateral internal sphincterotomy, advancement flap)
Description
An anal fissure is a breach in the skin in the anal canal, which can be acute (within 6 weeks’ duration) or chronic in nature. Classically patients experience painful defecation and bright per rectal bleeding. Surgical or chemical sphincterotomy is generally reserved for symptomatic chronic anal fissures. For difficult or recurrent anal fissures (particularly in patients without sphincter hypertonia), excision of the fissure with anal advancement flap may be an option.1
Lateral internal sphincterotomy: this can be performed as a day case either under local or general anaesthesia. A small incision is made in order to access the internal sphincter followed by a small incision in the sphincter in order to relieve the spasm associated with the fissure itself
Intra-anal botulinum toxin: the toxin is injected in either three or four positions between the internal and external anal sphincter causing paralysis. This in turn prevents the anal spasm associated with the fissure, encouraging fissure healing
Anal advancement flap: the fissure is excised and adjacent healthy tissue is used as a flap to cover the excised area2
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Anal fissure excision or curettage
Benefits
Diagnostic: examination under anaesthesia will aid in confirming the diagnosis of an anal fissure, in particular those cases who cannot be examined in clinic or in the emergency department due to pain
Therapeutic: relief of pain, allows painless defecation, and decrease constipation rates due to painful infrequent defecation cycles
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: dietary advice, stool softeners and the use of topical analgesic agents
Medical: topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) ointment, topical diltiazem (calcium channel blocker)
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Anal sphincter surgery: bleeding, infection, faecal incontinence, recurrence, acute urinary retention (in patients with pre-existing obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms)
Lateral internal sphincterotomy: haematoma—2.5%, haemorrhage—2.5%, incontinence at 2 months—7.5%, incontinence at 3 years—5%, overall recurrence—7.5%
Intra-anal botulinum toxin injection: haematoma—2.5%, incontinence at 2 months—5%, incontinence at 3 years—0%, overall recurrence—55%
Anal advancement flap: the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ guidelines have suggested this as an acceptable alternative to lateral internal sphincterotomy, however, there is a lack of prospective, randomized studies in the literature at the present time
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Regional/general anaesthesia (this can be a particularly painful procedure when curetting the base of a chronic ulcer and may require forewarning the anaesthetist to deepen the anaesthesia at this point)
Follow-up/need for further procedure
On discharge patients must be reminded of the need for regular sit baths, high-fibre diet, high fluid intake (assuming no contraindications) and the use of bulk-forming agents and/or stool softeners
Routine outpatient review if required
References
Anal sphincter repair
Description
Faecal incontinence is the loss of voluntary control of stool or bowel movements. Incontinence of flatus implies the loss of control of flatulence whilst maintaining faecal control.1 There are a number of different causes of faecal incontinence, which are beyond the scope of this handbook ( see Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery).
If surgery is considered, sphincteroplasty is the mainstay. When explaining to the patient it is often helpful to describe the two anal sphincters (internal and external) as complete circles like doughnuts, which encircle the anal canal. If a defect or tear exists in one or both of these circles, sphincteroplasty is possible. This involves cutting the sphincter, overlapping the two ends, and then securing them in place with sutures. This aims to restore the circle and improve control. This is performed under regional or general anaesthesia with the patient positioned in the lithotomy or jack-knife position.
Preoperatively, the surgeon may recommend either endo-anal ultrasound or MRI in order to fully understand the anatomy of the sphincter complex.
Indications for surgery include:2
Perineal trauma/iatrogenic injury following anorectal surgery
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), which are symptomatic (incontinence, perineal pain, and dyspareunia). These include only grade 3 and 4 perineal tears (classification based on the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guideline3)
It is the external anal sphincter which is repaired using, in general, two recognized sphincteroplasty techniques: first, an end-to-end (approximation) or second, an overlap repair.
If recognized at the time of injury and repaired within 24h, this is termed a primary repair. If left and repaired subsequently (recommended minimum of 3 months) this is termed a secondary repair. Most obstetricians perform primary end-to-end repair, whereas colorectal surgeons would opt for the overlap technique.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Defunctioning colostomy
Further trauma surgery—if other organs injured in the presence of traumatic sphincter injury
Benefits
Therapeutic: restore continence or reduce the risk of further incontinence
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: dietary lifestyle change, the use of bulk-forming agents, pelvic floor exercises, and biofeedback training
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection, difficulty voiding with acute retention of urine, faecal impaction, dyspareunia, perineal pain, failure of procedure, deterioration from preoperative continence level, deterioration in continence with time, the possibility of requiring a further operation
Sphincteroplasty:4
Short-term results: 60–88% patients achieved an excellent or good outcome which was defined as perfect continence or incontinence of flatus with minor staining, 15–20% experienced no change or deterioration in symptoms
Long-term results: 15% patients required further surgery for incontinence, 0% were continent of both stool and flatus, 10.5% were totally continent for stool, 15.8% had no faecal urgency, 52.6% wore a pad for incontinence
Overlapping sphincteroplasty: overall 16.5% complication rate (1.3% mortality, temporary difficulty in voiding, excessive bleeding, abscess formation, haematoma, faecal impaction5)
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Regional/general anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Routine outpatient review
Continue conservative measures including dietary lifestyle change, use of bulk-forming agents, pelvic floor exercises, and biofeedback training
References
Anorectal abscesses (incision and drainage)
Description
An anorectal abscess (Fig. 3.1) is a collection of pus formed adjacent to the anus commonly as a result of an infection originating in the crypts of Morgagni.1 Without intervention in the form of incision and drainage, the abscess will progress, expand in size, and act as an underlying source of sepsis and necrotizing infection.2 Once the abscess has formed, antibiotics are unable to penetrate and are ineffective when used alone. The abscess cavity is generally incised and drained under general anaesthesia, although, if small, it can be treated under local anaesthesia.

It is recommended that an anal speculum or proctoscope should be used to visualize the rectum prior to incision in order to detect the presence of a fistula-in-ano. An incision is made over the most fluctuant point, loculations are broken down, and the abscess cavity is thoroughly irrigated with either saline or hydrogen peroxide. It is important to inform the patient that the wound will most likely be left open, packed on a daily basis, and heal through secondary intention.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Examination of rectum under anaesthesia
Some surgeons advocate immediate management, should a fistula-in-ano be found at the time of incision and drainage
Benefits
Diagnostic: assess the size and extent of abscess and whether there is communication with the rectal mucosa in the form of a fistula-in-ano
Therapeutic: resolve sepsis, prevent fistula formation
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Medical: antibiotic therapy is often used in conjunction with incision and drainage, and may help with systemic sepsis. The abscess cavity does, however, need to be drained surgically or allowed to discharge spontaneously to allow for evacuation of pus from a septic focus3
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection, damage to sphincter mechanism, potential for faecal incontinence, fistula-in-ano formation, recurrence, urinary retention
Even with incision and drainage: up to 66% may develop a fistula-in-ano later in life and up to 35% present at the time of incision and drainage (there is some variation in the literature regarding the incidence of fistula-in-ano)4
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
General anaesthesia/regional anaesthesia (spinal/epidural)
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Regular dressing changes and packing of wound
Occasionally a course of oral or intravenous antibiotics will be given
Follow-up is necessary in cases where fistulas have been identified with subsequent examination under anaesthesia and fistula surgery
References
Appendicectomy
Description
Appendicectomy is the surgical removal of the vermiform appendix either due to clinically or radiologically suspected appendicitis or alternative pathology (i.e. tumour, mucocoele etc). The operation is performed (Fig. 3.2) under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. Both open and laparoscopic appendicectomy are acceptable, local practice may influence the surgeon's decision.
Open: a gridiron or Lanz incision is made in the right iliac fossa. The layers are divided and the peritoneum is opened. The peritoneal cavity is entered and the appendix is identified, ligated, and excised. If the appendix has perforated, a washout is performed. The peritoneum is closed and the layers are closed with absorbable sutures
Laparoscopic:1 in general, three or four small port incisions are be made in the abdominal wall, the ports and camera are inserted following the introduction of a pneumoperitoneum. The appendix is identified, ligated, and removed. The port sites are subsequently closed

Recent Cochrane review recommends that all patients undergoing appendicectomy should be prophylactically administered antibiotics. If the appendix has perforated antibiotics may need to be continued over a number of days (either intravenously or oral).
If an intra-abdominal mass is found (commonly following a perforated appendix) the decision may be made to manage this with antibiotics. Some surgeons may elect to subsequently perform an interval appendicectomy.
If the appendix is found to be macroscopically normal and the operation is performed open it is best practice to perform the appendicectomy for two reasons: the first is that the appendix may be microscopically inflamed, the second being if a patient is noted to have either a gridiron or Lanz incision it is assumed (rightly or wrongly) that they have previously undergone appendicectomy.
If the operation is performed laparoscopically and the appendix is noted to be normal, the decision to perform the appendicectomy is less clear. If, for example in a young female blood is noted in the pelvis (commonly from a ruptured ovarian cyst) the diagnosis is clear and an appendicectomy would confer additional unnecessary risks. If no other obvious cause is found an appendicectomy may be indicated as a proportion will be histologically inflamed.
Once the operation has been performed, the appendix will be sent to the histopathology lab for examination. Possible aetiologies of the appendicitis include faecaliths, intestinal parasites, carcinoid appendix, caecal tumour, and inflammatory bowel disease.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Conversion to open procedure (from laparoscopic) or laparotomy
Need for alternative procedure (i.e. right hemicolectomy, Meckel's diverticulectomy) if alternative diagnosis encountered
Excision of appendix despite macroscopically normal appearance
Benefits
Diagnostic: to identify the cause of pain/sepsis/symptoms
Therapeutic: remove a diseased appendix and source of sepsis
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Medical: intravenous followed by oral antibiotic therapy (a comparison of 252 men with suspected appendicitis, randomized to antibiotic therapy or early surgery showed 86% improved with antibiotics of which 14% required surgery within 24h)2
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection3 (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection and urinary infection), perforation of bowel, stump leak/blow out with resultant peritonitis, colo-cutaneous faecal fistula, subfertility (a potentially rare complication following pelvic abscess)
Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: wound infections are half as likely following open appendicectomy. Intra-abdominal abscess formation is three-fold higher following laparoscopic appendicectomy4
<1% risk of pulmonary complications, urinary tract complications, venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, post-procedure haemorrhage
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Regional (spinal/epidural)/general anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
No routine outpatient follow-up required unless histopathological examination of appendix alters management plan
References
Colectomy and rectal excision
Description
There are a number of different reasons why a segment of bowel (Fig. 3.3) may require resection. Indications include benign polyps, carcinoma, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, ischaemia, trauma, and Hirschsprung's disease. The segment of bowel that is affected dictates the operation performed.1
Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER): here the pathology (commonly rectal carcinoma) is situated in the distal one-third of the rectum. The procedure involves two incisions: one midline laparotomy wound and one in the perineum. The anus, rectum, and part of the sigmoid colon are resected (Fig. 3.4) and an end-colostomy may be fashioned
Anterior resection of rectum: here the pathology is situated in the middle and upper thirds of the rectum. This involves the resection of a portion of the sigmoid colon and part of the rectum (Fig. 3.5). The remainder of the sigmoid colon is anastomosed to the rectal stump. A protective stoma can be performed to protect the anastomosis. In most cases this will be later reversed. With modern surgical techniques a low anterior resection will be possible in a proportion of patients with tumours in the lower third. Total mesorectal excision (TME) should be performed for tumours located in the middle to lower third of the rectum, either as part of an APER or low anterior resection to reduce the risk of local recurrence
Hartmann's procedure (Fig. 3.6): this is performed either in the emergency setting where gross contamination exists (for example secondary to a colonic perforation) thereby precluding primary anastomosis or as a palliative procedure. It involves resection of part of the distal colon with formation of a colostomy, which may be permanent. The rectal stump is closed
Left hemi-colectomy: involves the resection of part or the entire descending colon for pathology in the descending colon or splenic flexure. If it is extended, part of the transverse colon is also resected beyond the middle colic vessels. An anastomosis is made between the proximal colon and the distal colon. A defunctioning ileostomy or colostomy may be performed which the surgeon will decide in the postoperative period whether or not to reverse
Transverse colectomy: a rarely performed procedure for pathology in the transverse colon
Right hemi-colectomy: the caecum and ascending colon are resected. If it is extended, part of the transverse colon is also resected beyond the middle colic vessels. An anastomosis is made between the proximal segment of bowel and the transverse colon. It is performed for pathology in the caecum, ascending colon, or hepatic flexure
Total colectomy: this procedure involves resection of the entire colon with formation either of an ileorectal anastomosis or an end-ileostomy and mucous fistula. If the rectum is also excised it is termed a proctocolectomy. Indications include pancolitis refractory to medical therapy, patients with known HNPCC or FAP. An end-ileostomy may be fashioned. Alternatively, an ileoanal pouch or ileorectal anastomosis may be performed
Ileocaecal resection: for pathology in the terminal ileum and caecum. It is commonly performed for Crohn's disease or occasionally an appendiceal mass. Here, the terminal ileum and caecum are resected. The ileum is then anastomosed with the ascending colon


Section of bowel removed during an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER).


The operations listed can all be performed either open or laparoscopically. Preoperatively the patient may be asked to undergo bowel preparation.2 If the colectomy is planned open this will be performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine or lithotomy position. A midline laparotomy wound will be made, the segment of bowel identified and resected.
Depending on the operation, an anastomosis of healthy bowel will be made or alternatively an end-ileostomy or colostomy will be performed. Should the surgeon wish to protect the anastomosis they may elect to fashion a defunctioning stoma. This may be temporary and is potentially reversible—the decision for this will be made in the postoperative period once the patient has recovered from the initial operation.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Extension of resection margins to include extended colectomy, sub-total colectomy or pan-proctocolectomy depending on intraoperative findings
Excision of gynaecological or urological organs
Formation of defunctioning stoma
Benefits
Diagnostic: to provide histopathological diagnosis of underlying pathology with or without local staging
Therapeutic: to remove underlying pathology/disease process of bowel and restore function or reduce the risk of future complications
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Malignancy: should a patient be deemed fit for surgery and it thought possible to achieve an R0 resection, surgery should be advised. If there is evidence of metastatic disease then alternative treatments such as chemo-radiotherapy should be discussed. If a tumour is likely to obstruct then options other than surgery include the use of colonic stents or diverting stomas. The appropriateness of this will be somewhat dependant on the patient's life expectancy and multidisciplinary team discussion
HNPCC/FAP: should the patient be in a high-risk category for future development of colonic carcinoma, alternatives to surgery include surveillance colonoscopies at regular intervals. It is important to inform the patient of the possibility of an interval cancer developing between consecutive colonoscopies. For most FAP patients with polyps total proctocolectomy is advised
Diverticular disease: dietary advice can be given for symptomatic disease. In acute diverticulitis perforates this may be treated initially with antibiotics or, alternatively if an abscess cavity develops, this may be radiologically drained. It is important to inform the patient that the disease process may persist or recur despite these measures at which point surgery may be the only option
Inflammatory bowel disease: medical therapy (steroids, immunosuppressants and 5-aminosalycilic acid (5-ASA) drugs) is generally advocated as first-line treatment for acute exacerbations. If unresponsive or there is risk of imminent perforation or indeed perforation of bowel, surgery would be advocated
Ischaemia: antibiotics, adequate oxygenation, intravenous fluids and bowel rest may resolve the acute event. If the bowel is non-viable and the patient is fit for surgery, resection of the affected bowel with stoma formation is advocated
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal sepsis in the presence or absence of an anastomosis and wound infection), perforation of bowel, anastomotic leak, ileus, possibility of blood transfusion, irresectability of tumour and recurrence, incisional or parastomal hernia, mortality (guidelines recommend operative mortality should be <20% for emergency surgery and <7% for elective surgery for colorectal cancer1), possibility of splenectomy (for left-sided colectomies), damage to or resection of female organs (e.g. hysterectomy, BSO) or resection of a segment of bladder, ureteric injury
Pelvic surgery: urinary and sexual dysfunction (impotence and retrograde ejaculation), faecal urgency, increased frequency of defecation3
Anastomotic leak: anterior resection (leak rate varies from 6% to 7.4%), other colonic anastomosis (leak rate varies from 2.6% to 4.1%). Anastomotic leak is associated with fivefold increased 30-day mortality4
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save/cross-match 2–6 units
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
General anaesthesia (often with a regional block for postoperative pain control)
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Follow-up is often required depending on the underlying pathology. This may necessitate further imaging to identify local and systemic recurrence or a review of postoperative symptoms.
References
Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
Description
Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy encompasses four separate procedures: proctoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.
Proctoscopy: visualization of the anal canal and lower rectum (visualization up to 10cm of lower gastrointestinal tract). An enema or suppository is, in general, advised prior to commencing the listed procedures to aid in visualization of the mucosa. The patient is positioned on their left side. A digital examination is performed before the lubricated proctoscope is inserted. The mucosa is visualized and if a procedure is indicated ( see ‘Haemorrhoids’, p.102) it will be performed at this point
Rigid sigmoidoscopy: visualization of the rectum (it is rare to directly visualize the sigmoid colon—up to 15–20cm of lower gastrointestinal tract). An enema or suppository is, in general, advised prior to commencing to aid in visualization of the mucosa. The patient is positioned on their left side. A digital examination is performed before the sigmoidoscope (Fig. 3.7) is inserted with the obturator lubricated. Once inside the rectum the obturator is removed and the bellows are used to insufflate air and dilate the rectum. The sigmoidoscope is advanced to approximately 15cm while negotiating the valves of Houston. Patients may experience discomfort and the sensation of the need to pass flatus
Flexible sigmoidoscopy: visualization of the rectum, sigmoid colon, and up to two-thirds of the transverse colon (in the majority of cases the descending colon is not seen). An enema will be administered prior to commencement. The patient is positioned on their left side with both knees brought forward. A digital examination is performed before the sigmoidoscope is inserted. The flexible sigmoidoscope is inserted into the rectum and advanced to the splenic flexure. Air will be insufflated during the procedure in order to view the mucosa adequately and aid advancement. The images are transmitted onto a screen, which the operator will observe. Should there be an abnormal area a biopsy can be taken which will be sent to pathology. The patient may experience an uncomfortable sensation and abdominal cramps as a result of the insufflated air. The procedure should last less than 10min
Colonoscopy: here the entire lower gastrointestinal tract can be visualized up to and including the caecum. Skilled endoscopists are able to cannulate the ileocaecal valve to visualize the terminal ileum. In the 2–3 days leading up to the procedure the patient is advised to maintain a low fibre, clear fluid-only diet. The day before, a laxative preparation is taken with large quantities of clear fluid. This will enable the colon to be free of solid matter. The patient is positioned on their left side with their left leg. A sedative can be administered to relax the patient. A digital examination is performed before the colonoscope (Fig. 3.8) is inserted. The colonoscope is inserted into the rectum and advanced to the terminal ileum. Air will be insufflated during the procedure in order to view the mucosa adequately and aid advancement. The images are transmitted onto a screen, which the operator will observe. Should there be an abnormal area a biopsy can be taken which will be sent to pathology. Should a tumour be noted, India ink can be injected at the site to aid location during surgery. The patient may experience an uncomfortable sensation and abdominal cramps as a result of the insufflated air. The procedure will last 15–20min


Through these techniques, both visualization and biopsy of lesions are possible. Therapeutic procedures are also possible for certain conditions.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Biopsy, polypectomy, decompression of volvulus, injection of India ink at tumour site (for intraoperative identification), colonic stenting for obstructing/potentially obstructing colonic tumours, argon laser coagulation, treatment of haemorrhoids, insertion of flatus tube, insertion of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC).
Benefits
Diagnostic: investigate change in bowel habit, investigate lower gastro-intestinal bleeding for surveillance (previous history of colonic polyps or cancer, ulcerative colitis, strong family history of colonic cancer), investigation of colorectal neoplasia, investigation of symptoms suggestive of anorectal pathology1
Therapeutic: permits biopsy of lesions, polypectomy, decompression of volvulus, injection of ink at tumour site (for intraoperative identification), colonic stenting for obstructing/potentially obstructing colonic tumours, argon laser coagulation for the management of colorectal disease (palliative therapy for obstructing or bleeding, malignancies, anastomotic strictures, ablation of colonic mucosal lesions, radiation proctitis), treatment of haemorrhoids (band ligation, injection of oily phenol), insertion of flatus tube, insertion of PEC for the management of recurrent sigmoid volvulus or acute colonic pseudo-obstruction
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Radiological: CT colonogram/pneumocolon, barium/Gastrografin enema, capsule endoscopy (poor sensitivity for lower gastrointestinal lesions)
Surgical: open or laparoscopic surgical procedure for biopsy or tissue diagnosis or colostomy formation
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection (local/systemic), post-procedure pain, bloating, perforation, respiratory compromise, abdominal distension, flatulence
Flexible sigmoidoscopy: UK multicentre randomized trial of 40 322 patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy shows approximate risk of perforation at 1 in 40 000)
Caution is advised in neutropenic patients owing to the potential of bacteraemia. Antibiotics may be considered in this scenario and for patients with prosthetic heart valves
In a UK multicentre randomized trial of 2377 patients undergoing colonoscopy there were four perforations (approximate risk of 1 in 500), all following snare polypectomy. Nine patients were admitted with bleeding
For the insertion of colonic stents, a review of 27 studies performed between 2000 and 2006 concluded that the perforation rate was 2.5%, distal migration of stents 4.4%, rectal tenesmus 2.2%, occlusion 0.8% and recto-vaginal fistula 0.8%2
There are limited data available with reference to argon laser coagulation, however, perforation is a recognized complication3
With regard to PEC, the most common complications reported in the published literature are granular formation and infection. Other reported complications included pain, colonic leakage, and tube erosion.4 Unpublished data from a multicentre UK audit showed a 12% (13/105) infection rate following the procedure. Two deaths were also reported in patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus due to late tube dislodgement. There were seven other cases of reported tube dislodgement following the procedure as well as four cases of migration (Simson, unpublished data, 2005)
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Local/general anaesthesia (particularly for children)
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Dependent on the underlying indication, findings and therapeutic intervention during lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
References

Fistula-in-ano surgery
Description
A fistula-in-ano is an abnormal communication between the anal canal or lower rectum and the perianal skin (Fig. 3.9). They either result primarily as a result of anorectal sepsis or secondary to pathology such as Crohn's disease, malignancy, hidradenitis suppurativa, or, rarely, tuberculosis. In general, for operations involving fistula-in-ano, it is performed either under local or general anaesthesia with the patient either face down or in the supine position. When explaining the procedure to the patient it is important to cover the following points:
Conventional fistulotomy: the tract must first be identified (hydrogen peroxide may be injected from the external opening or a probe inserted) and is then subsequently ‘laid-open’ (or de-roofed) using cautery and allowed to heal from the inside out
Fistulectomy: the entire fistulous tract is excised. It is left open and allowed to heal through secondary intention, closed primarily with sutures, or closed with an advancement flap. The rectal side of the tract is closed internally
Seton suture: if the fistulous tract is high and involves a significant proportion of the sphincter complex, the surgeon may elect to pass a seton suture (which is essentially a thin Silastic tube or non-absorbable suture) through the tract and the two ends tied together outside the body. There are two types of seton available, the first being a cutting seton which is gradually tightened every 2 weeks (over an approximate 6–8-week period). This allows fibrosis to occur and the tract to gradually heal or becomes low enough to be ‘laid-open’. The second is a draining seton which is inserted in the presence of sepsis (if, for example a fistula is noted during incision and drainage of an anorectal abscess). This can be left indefinitely until the abscess has drained and then definitive treatment considered
Marsupialization fistulotomy: a conventional fistulotomy is performed and the wound edges are marsupialized to the fistulous tract with absorbable sutures
If the fistula is deemed to be ‘high’ (i.e. includes a substantial amount of the sphincter complex), fistulotomy is relatively contraindicated, given the high incidence of incontinence

Parks’ classification of fistula-in-ano: 1: extrasphincteric; 2: intersphincteric; 3:trans-sphinceteric; 4: suprasphincteric.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Incision and drainage of perianal/anorectal abscess
Packing of wound
Biopsies of fistula tract/rectal mucosa
Benefits
Diagnostic: confirm cause of underlying fistula tract (i.e. Crohn's disease)
Therapeutic: allow for fistula healing, reduce symptoms (pain/bleeding/mucopurulent discharge/incontinence)
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Radiofrequency ablation, anal fistula plug, fibrin glue
It should be emphasized, however, that these treatments are associated with a high fistula recurrence rate
Serious/frequently occurring risks1
Postoperative pain, bleeding, incontinence, recurrence, delayed healing, need for multiple procedures
Conventional fistulotomy: recurrence rates range from 1.9% to 12.5% with an incontinence rate ranging from 4.2% to 12.8%
Fistulectomy: fewer studies are available to contrast fistulectomy, however, one study demonstrated a recurrence rate of 9.5% with an incontinence rate of 14.3%
Seton suture: regarding conventional seton suture placement, the recurrence rate is 6.2% with an incontinence rate of 12.5%
Marsupialization fistulotomy: recurrence rate of 4.5% with incontinence rate of 6%
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Local/regional/general anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Dressing change/pack changes if abscess drained
Routine outpatient review with histopathology results and review of symptoms
Review in outpatient clinic if seton is of cutting type and has to be tightened
References
Haemorrhoids
Description
Haemorrhoids are enlarged vascular cushions around the anus and can be classified into internal (proximal to the dentate line) and external. Internal haemorrhoids can be further subdivided into grades 1–4.
Traditionally, treatment of haemorrhoids has fallen into two categories: non-surgical techniques such as rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, infrared coagulation, and cryotherapy; and surgical procedures such as haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy.
Non-surgical treatments should be advocated in the first instance for 1st and 2nd degree haemorrhoids with surgical procedures reserved for:
3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids
Those that have failed to respond to non-surgical measures
Significant external component
Extensive thrombosis (may best be managed conservatively)
Associated fissure-in-ano
Non-surgical procedures can generally be performed in the outpatient clinic. If the haemorrhoids are above the dentate line no anaesthesia is required. The patient will be positioned in the left lateral position and a proctoscope or rigid sigmoidoscope will be inserted into the rectum in order to adequately visualize the mucosa.
Rubber band ligation: a small elastic band will be placed just above the haemorrhoid. This cuts the blood supply and as a consequence the haemorrhoid will undergo necrosis and fall off within a few days. The area will then heal naturally
Sclerotherapy: a solution of 5% oily phenol (in a solution of almond oil) is injected into the base of the haemorrhoid causing the blood supply to thrombose and in turn the haemorrhoid to shrink and disappear
Infra-red coagulation: infra-red light is directed at the haemorrhoid which causes the blood in the surrounding veins to coagulate, the haemorrhoid will shrink and eventually disappear
Cryotherapy: the haemorrhoid is frozen, causing it to shrink and eventually disappear
For surgical procedures, the procedure is generally performed under regional or general anaesthesia with the patient placed in the lithotomy position.
Haemorrhoidectomy: a proctoscope is inserted to adequately visualize the ano-rectal mucosa. The haemorrhoids are identified and excised either using cautery/scalpel or alternatively with a staple gun. Haemostasis is ensured and a local anaesthetic may be injected to minimize postoperative pain. A haemostatic pack may be inserted in the rectum to aid haemostasis and this will pass within a day or two. If the Milligan–Morgan technique is used the mucocutaneous defect is left open. Alternatively, if the Hil–Ferguson technique is adopted the mucocutaneous defect is closed
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a circular anal dilator is inserted and the prolapsed mucous membrane falls within the device. A purse-string suture anoscope is then inserted and rotated allowing a purse-string suture to be stitched into the anal circumference. A circular stapler is then introduced and traction applied to the purse-string. This pulls the prolapsed mucous membrane into the stapler and the device is fired excising a circumferential layer of mucosa. Meticulous haemostasis is then achieved
Patients should also be advised about conservative measures such as dietary modification, topical ointments, and retraining in toilet habit (i.e. the avoidance of straining).
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Nil
Benefits
Therapeutic: reduce the symptoms associated with haemorrhoids and prevent complications associated with large haemorrhoids (e.g. thrombosis/ulceration)
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: dietary modification, topical ointments, retraining in toilet habit (i.e. the avoidance of straining)
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection, post-procedural pain, prostatitis (following injection sclerotherapy), anaphylaxis (the 5% oily phenol is in a solution of almond oil, therefore, it is important to ascertain if the patient has a nut allergy), recurrence1
Rubber band ligation: overall success between 69% and 94%. Overall complication rate less than 2% (vasovagal syncope, anal pain, minor bleeding, chronic ulcer formation, priapism, difficulty in urination, thrombosis of external haemorrhoids)2
Haemorrhoidectomy:
Early: urinary retention (20.1%), bleeding (secondary (7–10 days post-procedure) or (reactionary 2.4–6%), subcutaneous abscess (0.5%)
Late: anal fissure (1.2–6%), anal stenosis (1%), incontinence (0.4%), fistula (0.5%1)
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: postoperative bleeding (1.5–9%), urinary retention (<5%), external haemorrhoidal thrombosis (1.2–4.7%), pelvic sepsis, rectovaginal fistula, rectal perforation, and anal stenosis are well-recognized complications of stapled haemorrhoidopexy and should be included in the consent process. Temporary faecal incontinence and faecal urgency have been documented, although these resolved in all cases by 3 months3
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Local/regional/general anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Routine outpatient review if required
Patients must be discharged on laxatives and analgesia, and given appropriate advice regarding diet and toilet habits
References
Percutaneous caecostomy
Description
This is largely performed as a palliative procedure in patients with significant comorbidities unable to receive more aggressive surgery. It is not the optimal treatment modality, however, given the limited options as a result of the condition of the patient, it may be considered necessary. Primary indications include distal colonic obstruction, colonic pseudo-obstruction, caecal perforation, caecal volvulus, and to divert the stream in order to protect a distal anastomosis.
There are a number of techniques for the insertion of a caecostomy tube. The basic principle is to inflate the caecum with air (through a catheter inserted per rectum) and then, under fluoroscopic guidance, a small incision is made in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. Access is gained to the caecum via a needle, a tract is then formed using a dilator. Contrast is used to confirm correct position and a catheter is then inserted and sutured in place.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Surgical fashioning of a caecostomy/appendicostomy
Blind percutaneous caecostomy formation
Benefits
Therapeutic: Percutaneous caecostomy is a palliative procedure and is only performed when other surgical alternatives are deemed unsuitable
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Surgical: blind percutaneous caecostomy, open surgery to fashion caecostomy/appendicostomy/loop colostomy/trephine
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection (intra-abdominal and wound), pericatheter leak, tube occlusion, skin excoriation, premature tube dislodgement, colo-cutaneous fistula, ventral hernia
Up to 45% patients experience minor complications including: pericatheter leak, superficial wound infection, tube occlusion, skin excoriation, premature tube dislodgement, colo-cutaneous fistula, ventral hernia1
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Local anaesthesia/sedation
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Patients will need regular caecostomy care involving cleaning, skin care, and flushing of port on a regular basis
Complications with caecostomy may necessitate removal or replacement
Reference
Perianal skin tag excision
Description
Perianal skin tags are a common problem and may represent underlying or coexistent pathology. They are commonly the result of a previous anorectal insult for example haemorrhoids. A sentinel tag is one that is situated at the inferior border of an infection, injury, or chronic anal fissure. The excision will either be performed under local or general anaesthesia with the patient either positioned on their side or in the lithotomy position. The excision will result in an irregular anal verge and this should be emphasized to patients who request excision for cosmetic reasons. An examination of the surrounding area will be performed for coexistent pathology, the lesion will be excised either with a scalpel or electrocautery and the tag sent for histological analysis.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Curettage of chronic anal fissure/intra-anal botulinum toxin/advancement flap
Biopsy of anorectal mucosa
Benefits
Diagnostic: to obtain a histological diagnosis of the lesion in question
Therapeutic: symptomatic benefit for perianal skin tag (pruritis/bleeding/pain), interference with perianal hygiene, cosmesis
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: manage symptoms with good perianal hygiene, moisturizing cream, antipruritic agents
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection, postoperative pain, recurrence, prolonged healing time which may take several weeks, irregular anal verge, poor cosmetic result
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Local/regional/general anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Maintain good perianal hygiene, change dressings regularly, laxatives, and diet to ensure soft stool during wound healing
No outpatient follow-up necessary
Pilonidal sinus
Description
A pilonidal sinus is a small tract present in or near the natal cleft at the top of the buttocks. They commonly form around a dilated hair follicle into which hairs, desquamated skin, and other debris become entrapped leading to secondary infection (the pit is the primary cause). The operation is performed under local or general anaesthesia and the patient is positioned either face down or in the lateral position. An incision is made either in the midline or off midline, the sinus tracts are obliterated, and then irrigated. The wound is either closed with sutures or left open to close by secondary intention.
There are two traditional methods for excising the pilonidal sinuses and two for closing the wound. Regarding the excision the first is a midline approach, the second off-midline. When closing the wound following the excision of pilonidal sinuses one method is to leave the wound open (therefore allowing healing through secondary intention), the second method is for primary closure.1 Risks involved have been structured around the categories mentioned here, however, within these categories there are a number of different surgical procedures for which individual risks have not been given (e.g. the use of classic and modified rhomboid flaps, V-Y advancement flap, Bascom procedure, Karydakis procedure, marsupialization, and z-plasty).
Rhomboid flap: the sinus tracts are excised and a rhomboid flap is transposed to cover the defect
V-Y advancement flap: in this technique a V incision is made, this is then approached to cover the defective as a Y shape
Bascom procedure: lateral (or off-line) incision to access the pilonidal cavity followed by curettage. The midline pits are then excised separately. The midline incisions are closed, the lateral incision is left open
Karydakis procedure: midline elliptical incision of the sinus down to the sacrum. A flap is then created by undercutting the midline side of the wound and advanced across the wound to the opposite side and sutured in place. The skin is then closed
Marsupialization: the sinus is incised, the borders are raised and stitched to form a pouch. This gradually closes and may need to be packed until this has happened
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Drainage of underlying sepsis
Laying open of sinus tract
Insertion of surgical drain
Benefits
Diagnostic: assess extent of injury
Therapeutic: to resolve a symptomatic or recurrent pilonidal sinus
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: meticulous hygiene although resolution of the sinus is unlikely
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection, pain, scar, prolonged healing, wound dehiscence, need for regular dressing changes, large cavity/dimple/scar, recurrence (open wound 5.3%, closed wound 8.7%)
Midline procedures: surgical site infection (12.4%), recurrence rate (9.4%), variable healing time (midline open wound is 41–91 days, midline closed wound is 10–27 days)
Off-midline procedures: surgical site infection (3.6–9.3%), recurrence rate (1.5–2.4%), variable healing time (off-midline open wound is 41–120 days, off-midline closed wound is 15–23 days)2
Blood transfusion necessary
None/group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Regional/general/local anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Regular follow-up is required to monitor progress
References
Rectal prolapse surgery
Description
This is a full thickness prolapse of the rectum through the anal canal. There are two approaches to the repair of a rectal prolapse; either a trans-abdominal or perineal. The trans-abdominal approach can be further subdivided into the traditional open and the newer laparoscopic method. Generally, younger patients may benefit from a trans-abdominal approach, given the lower risks of recurrence, whereas older patients may be more suitable for a perineal approach, given the higher morbidity associated with the trans-abdominal approach.1
The perineal approach encompasses several recognized techniques:
Perineal recto-sigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure): indicated in patients with external full thickness prolapse. It is performed under regional or general anaesthesia, the patient is placed in the lithotomy or prone position. The rectum is withdrawn as fully as possible and an incision is made 1.5cm proximal to the dentate line and is continued through the full thickness of the bowel wall and extended circumferentially. The peritoneum is entered, the sigmoid colon is pulled down and the transection line determined. In general, 15–30cm of bowel is resected and a colo-anal anastomosis is performed
Delorme's procedure (Fig. 3.10): indicated in full thickness rectal prolapse. It is performed under regional or general anaesthesia, the patient is placed in the lithotomy or prone position. The basic principle is that only the mucosa (inner lining) of the prolapsed rectum is resected and the lining above is sutured back down to the anal canal. The outer wall of the rectum is plicated to strengthen the repair. The prolapse is then reduced, the stitches tied and a circular doughnut of tissue is left just inside the rectum

The trans-abdominal approach encompasses several recognized techniques:
Trans-abdominal Marlex rectopexy (Ripstein's procedure): is indicated in patients with rectal prolapse without constipation and a redundant sigmoid colon. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. The rectum is mobilized down to the coccyx posteriorly often with division of the upper portion of the lateral ligament and the anterior cul-de-sac. The rectum is retracted and placed under tension. A non-absorbable Marlex mesh is then fixed to the presacral fascia and wrapped round and sutured to the anterior wall of the rectum to keep it in position
Trans-abdominal suture rectopexy: indicated in patients with rectal prolapse without constipation and a redundant sigmoid colon. Essentially the same as the Marlex rectopexy, with the exception that the rectum is sutured in place to the presacral fascia as opposed to the use of the mesh
Anterior resection
Some authors have advocated resection for patients with constipation, however, evidence is lacking. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. The rectum is mobilized to the level of the lateral ligaments and the redundant sigmoid colon is resected. An anastomosis is then performed between the cut end of the colon and the proximal end of the rectum. The colon is maintained under tension in order to prevent the prolapse recurring.
Trans-abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection (Frykman–Goldberg operation)
Advocated by some for patients with a significant degree of associated constipation. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. The rectum is mobilized to the coccyx posteriorly and the cul-de-sac anteriorly. A section of the sigmoid colon is resected with the cut end of the colon being subsequently anastomosed with the proximal end of the rectum. The presacral fascia is then sutured either to the lateral ligament or to the rectal fascia itself thus maintaining the rectum under tensions and preventing subsequent prolapse.
Orr–Loygue rectopexy
More commonly performed in mainland Europe in patients with full thickness rectal prolapsed. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. Essentially the same as the traditional abdominal rectopexy, the difference being that the dissection is limited to the anterior and posterior rectal wall.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Abdominal or perineal drain insertion
Defunctioning colostomy/ileostomy when redundant bowel is resected and anastomosed
Benefits
Therapeutic: symptomatic rectal prolapse (incontinence, bowel habit disturbances, rectal bleeding)
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: treatment involves advice regarding safe reduction of the prolapse itself and advice regarding bowel habit
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection, recurrence (full thickness and mucosal), incontinence, constipation, anastomotic dehiscence, incisional hernia and pelvic sepsis
Perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure): 8.6% major complications, pelvic haematomas, anastomotic dehiscence, sigmoid perforation, pararectal abscess, late anal strictures, 14% minor complications, 18% recurrence rate at 41 months2
Delorme's procedure: urinary retention 12%, Clostridium difficile colitis 4%, myocardial infarction 1.3%, 4% suture line bleeding, 3% anastomotic disruption, 1.3% anastomotic stricture, 6.6% faecal incontinence postoperatively (includes patients who were continent and incontinent prior to procedure), 7% postoperative constipation, 14.5% recurrence rate at 60 months3
Trans-abdominal suture rectopexy: complication rates ranging from 9.4% to 20%, recurrence rate of 2–3.1%, postoperative incontinence of 16–26%, postoperative constipation of 31–71%4
Trans-abdominal Marlex rectopexy (Ripstein procedure): complication rates ranging from 2.3% to 28%, recurrence rate of 2–14%, post-operative incontinence of 28–50%, post-operative constipation of 17–43%5
Trans-abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection (Frykman–Goldberg operation): 6.3% full thickness recurrence, 8.5% mucosal prolapsed, 6.3% constipation (in patients who had not pre-operatively experienced this), 12.8% patients experienced diminished continence postoperatively, 8.5% developed significant diarrhoea6
Anterior resection: 15% morbidity, 7% recurrence at 5.5 years, 7.3% incisional hernia, 4.9% small bowel obstruction, 2.4% stroke7
Orr–Loygue rectopexy: prolapse recurrence 4.11% (mean follow-up 27.5 months) pelvic abscess 0%, 62.5% patients who were preoperatively incontinent of faeces were ‘totally cured’
Common: bleeding; swelling; pain; scar; prolonged wound healing, infection
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save/cross-match 2–6 units
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Regional/general anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Monitor patient in hospital until patient passes urine and faeces prior to discharge
Symptomatic review in outpatient clinic
References
Rectocele repair
Description
A rectocele is the result of a defect in the rectovaginal septum (a tough fibrous layer), which separates the vagina (anteriorly) from the rectum (posteriorly). This defect results in the protrusion of the rectum into the vagina and the resultant symptoms.
The primary indication for repair of a rectocele is obstructive defecation with objective evidence of faecal trapping demonstrated through a defecating proctogram. Other indications include a subjective sensation of ‘pressure’ in the vagina and a feeling of incomplete evacuation post-defecation. This may progress to difficult or painful defecation or sexual intercourse, constipation, incontinence, vaginal bleeding, and even prolapse of the bulge through the opening of the vagina.
Various approaches are employed in the repair of a rectocele including posterior colporrhaphy, trans-anal and trans-perineally. For the purpose of this colorectal chapter we will consider the trans-anal and trans-perineal approach.
Trans-anal rectocele repair: the procedure is performed under regional or general anaesthesia with the patient positioned either in the jack-knife position or supine. An incision is generally made just proximal to the dentate line, the redundant rectal mucosa is either removed or plicated and the rectal submucosa and mucosa are closed in separate layers
Trans-perineal rectocele repair: this approach is also performed under general anaesthesia with the patient positioned either in the jack-knife position or supine. The recto-vaginal septum is repaired through an incision in the perineum and a decision whether or not to use a prosthetic mesh is made
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Cystocoele repair
Suprapubic catheter insertion
Pelvic floor reconstruction
Defunctioning colostomy/ileostomy
Benefits
Therapeutic: symptomatic improvement from rectocoele (e.g. constipation, incontinence, painful vaginal bulge, painful intercourse, vaginal bleeding)
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: pelvic floor strengthening exercises should be advised
Biofeedback devices
Vaginal pessaries
Transvaginal/transcutaneous electrical stimulation to allow muscle contraction
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Trans-perineal rectocoele repair: anatomical cure 89.2%, bleeding 3.6%, infection 4.8%, incomplete evacuation, faecal impaction, faecal incontinence, recto-vaginal fistula, dyspareunia, sexual dysfunction, failure of procedure, recurrence, if a mesh is used there is potential for mesh erosion and infection3
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
General anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Monitor patient in hospital until patient passes urine and faeces prior to discharge
Symptomatic review in outpatient clinic
References
Restorative proctocolectomy (ileo-anal pouch)
Description
Restorative proctocolectomy (Fig. 3.11) is a procedure designed to use loops of small bowel as a reservoir for faeces prior to defecation. The ileo-anal pouch is indicated in patients with ulcerative colitis (resistant to medical therapy), FAP, HNPCC, and has been performed in some patients with constipation.1

The operation is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient positioned in the lithotomy position. If performed open, a midline laparotomy incision is made, the layers divided and the abdomen entered. The colon and rectum are excised, a mucosectomy may be performed, the small intestine is mobilized and the pouch is formed (either fully stapled or hand-sewn). A pouch-anal anastomosis is fashioned and the decision is then made whether or not to form an ileostomy.
The procedure can be performed either laparoscopically or as an open procedure. It can be performed as one operation or divided into two or three procedures.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Defunctioning ileostomy
Failure to create pouch and alternative procedure performed (end-ileostomy, total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis)
Benefits
Therapeutic: avoid an end-stoma, allow for an element of continence, avoid social stigmas associated with stoma formation, allow for defecation through anus
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Surgical: total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, total colectomy and end-ileostomy formation
Serious/frequently occurring risks2
Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound, urinary tract pelvic sepsis 4.7%, peritoneal abscess 1%), perforation of bowel, sexual and urinary dysfunction, infertility, anastomotic dehiscence and leak, anastomotic stricture 21.3%, pouchitis 15–50% (ulcerative colitis patients only), staple line ulcer 13.5%, pouchitis 5.4%, bowel obstruction 7.1%, alteration in bowel habit, incontinence, entero-cutaneous fistula, incisional hernia 4%, anal fistula 4%, the need for a temporary defunctioning ileostomy
Regarding mucosectomy (excision of the rectal mucosa prior to ileo-anal anastomosis), one review article concluded that whereas performing mucosectomy results in both lower rates of inflammation and dysplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis and lower rates of cuff polyposis in FAP patients, it also leads to worse functional outcomes3
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save/cross-match 4–6 units
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
General anaesthesia with regional epidural block for postoperative analgesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Monitor patient in hospital until patient passes urine and faeces prior to discharge
Symptomatic review in outpatient clinic
Patients will often require follow-up pouchoscopy with rigid/flexible sigmoidoscopy, especially if symptomatic to ensure no evidence of pouchitis or recurrence of pathology in pouch4
References
Small bowel resection
Description
Small bowel resection is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. The procedure is performed either open or laparoscopically for the following conditions:
Small bowel tumour (benign/malignant)
Crohn's disease resistant to medical treatment
Small bowel ischaemia (i.e. superior mesenteric artery infarction)
Radiation or Crohn's disease induced stricture
Open: a midline laparotomy or other appropriate incision is made, the layers are divided and the abdomen is entered. The diseased segment of bowel is identified and resected. The two healthy ends are then either anastomosed (using hand sewn or stapled technique) or alternatively a stoma is brought to the skin surface.
Laparoscopic: 3–5 small incisions are made on the abdomen in order that the camera and instruments can be inserted. The diseased segment of bowel is identified and resected. The two healthy ends are then either anastomosed (using hand-sewn or stapled technique) or, alternatively, a stoma is brought to the skin surface.
As the length of the small bowel varies from person to person, the length of small bowel resected is not as important as the amount left behind. The British Society of Gastroenterology suggests that if there is <200cm small bowel, nutritional or fluid supplements are likely to be needed. If it is anticipated that there will be <150cm of small bowel remaining it is important to discuss the possibility of the long-term need of total parenteral nutrition.1
Following distal ileal resection patients are more prone to the formation of gallstones. As a consequence of dehydration and abnormal oxalate metabolism, certain patients following small bowel resection will also be more prone to developing kidney stones.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
End-ileostomy/loop ileostomy/defunctioning stoma/abdominal drain insertion
Benefits
Diagnostic: to obtain tissue for histopathological diagnosis
Therapeutic: remove diseased segment of small bowel
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Medical: for Crohn's disease, medical therapy and immunotherapy can be used to decrease the inflammatory process and reduce the risk of stricture formation and fistulation
Surgical: for small bowel structuring disease in patients where length of bowel will need to be conserved, stricturoplasty can be considered as an alternative to small bowel resection
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound and urinary infection), perforation of bowel, anastomotic dehiscence or leak (1.1%), small bowel syndrome, intestinal failure, entero-cutaneous fistula, incisional hernia, alteration of bowel habit, mortality rate (1.7%)2
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save/cross-match (depending on starting haemoglobin)
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
Regional/general anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Routine outpatient review if required
References

Small bowel strictureplasty
Description
Obstructing small bowel fibrotic strictures are commonly secondary to Crohn's disease or tuberculosis. Strictures up to 25cm are amenable to strictureplasty. Heineke–Mikulicz technique is preferred for strictures smaller than 10cm with the Finney technique reserved for segments over 10cm.
Heineke–Mikulicz:1 the operation is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient placed in the supine position. A midline laparotomy incision is made, the layers are divided, and the abdomen entered (Fig. 3.12). The small bowel is carefully examined to identify the previously imaged strictures and ensure none are missed. Non-traumatic bowel clamps are secured at either end of the stricture. A longitudinal incision is made over the entire length of the stricture, and stay sutures are placed to retract and aid in the transverse closure.
Finney: the operation is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient placed in the supine position. A midline laparotomy incision is made, the layers are divided and the abdomen entered. The small bowel is carefully examined to identify the previously imaged strictures and ensure none are missed. The segment of bowel containing the stricture is brought together in a side-to-side U-shaped configuration with stay sutures placed to maintain this (Fig. 3.13). The enterotomy over the stricture is closed, suturing the opposed surfaces of the bowel together.

Heineke-Mikulicz strictureplasty. Short (<10cm) strictures are opened longitudinally and closed transversely.

Additional procedures that may become necessary
Small bowel resection and anastomosis
Defunctioning small bowel stoma
Benefits
Diagnostic: identify the underlying cause of structuring disease, histopathological analysis of underlying stricture (Crohn's disease)
Therapeutic: to relieve symptoms, signs and complications of small bowel obstruction
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
Conservative: high fluid intake, low-residue diet, low-volume frequent meals
Surgical: small bowel resection
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess and wound infection), perforation of bowel, enterocutaneous fistula, incisional hernia, alteration of bowel habit, new disease at site of strictureplasty or at alternative small bowel segments
One long-term study of 314 patients undergoing Heineke–Mikulicz (88%) and Finney (11%) strictureplasties (1% not clearly defined) demonstrated the following: overall morbidity 18%, septic complications 5%, intra-abdominal abscess 2%, anastomotic leak or enterocutaneous fistula 2%, wound infection 1%, reoperation in postoperative period 1%, prolonged ileus 4%, mechanical small bowel obstruction 1%, luminal bleeding requiring transfusion 7%, at a mean period of 7.7 years 37% had undergone a reoperation (92% as a result of obstruction)2
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save/cross-match (dependent on preoperative haemoglobin)
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
General anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Dependent on underlying cause of stricture formation and post operative course
References
Stoma (formation/reversal)
Description
The formation of a stoma will likely form only part of an operation. It is advisable that a specialist stoma nurse discuss with the patient preoperatively (when possible) the implications involved and also to aid in the siting. The important points when informing a patient of a potential stoma are:
Permanent or temporary: if it is anticipated to be temporary it is important to stress that it may be permanent depending on intra- and postoperative events
Single- versus double-barrelled
Possibility of a mucous fistula


Ileostomy
End—formed following the complete removal of the colon including the rectum (Fig. 3.16). A mucous fistula may be fashioned in addition, termed a double-barrelled stoma
Loop—formed in order to defunction either a distal obstructing colonic lesion or in order to protect a distal anastomosis

Colostomy
End—formed in order to defunction a distal segment of bowel (Fig. 3.17). Commonly performed following an anterior resection, APER, or as part of a Hartmann's operation. May be indicated in a distal colonic fistula. A mucous fistula may be fashioned in addition to this procedure
Loop—formed in order to defunction either a distal obstructing colonic lesion, a distal anastomosis or complex pelvic disease

Reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: is performed in order to restore the integrity of the intestinal tract. If performed open, involves either a circumferential incision around the stoma or possibly through the previous laparotomy incision. Reversal of loop ileostomies or colostomies can generally be performed through the circumferential incision around the stoma whereas reversal of end-ileostomies or colostomies usually involves opening the old scar in order to safely access the bowel. The anastomosis is performed and the wound is closed.
The formation of a stoma and indeed the reversal may also be performed either open or laparoscopically.
Additional procedures that may become necessary
Stoma formation can be both the primary procedure or part of a larger sequence of events as a temporary stoma (defunctioning)
Benefits
Therapeutic: Diversion stoma—divert faeces away from a segment of bowel that has been removed or away from the perineum in trauma or pathology (i.e. necrotizing fasciitis). Defunctioning stoma—to allow a segment of bowel, distal pathology, or anastomosis to heal
Therapeutic: to relieve symptoms, signs and complications of small or large bowel obstruction
Alternative procedures/conservative measures
The patient should be advised of the indications and reasons for stoma formation. If it feasible to avoid the formation of a stoma (which may result in the increased risk of an anastomotic leak) and the patient is advised of these risks then the operating surgeon may opt to forego the stoma. This should be appropriately documented on the consent form.
Serious/frequently occurring risks
Formation of a stoma: overall complication rates ranging from 13.1% to 69.4%; bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound and urinary infection), vascular compromise (ischaemia and infarction of the stoma 2.3–17%), retraction, prolapsed, peristomal skin irritation (3–42%), peristomal infection/abscess/fistula formation (2–14.8%), stenosis, alteration of bowel habit, parastomal hernia (early and late presentation 4.6–13%)1
Reversal of stoma: Bleeding, infection (intra-abdominal abscess, urinary and wound infection), perforation of bowel, anastomotic leak, enterocutaneous fistula, ileus, stricture at the anastomotic site, reoperation
Blood transfusion necessary
Group and save/cross-match blood (dependent on preoperative haemoglobin and nature of the primary procedure being performed)
Type of anaesthesia/sedation
General anaesthesia
Follow-up/need for further procedure
Dependent on underlying reason for stoma formation and postoperative course of patient
Reference
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 3 |
November 2022 | 2 |
February 2023 | 2 |
March 2023 | 1 |
April 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 1 |
July 2023 | 1 |
August 2023 | 3 |
September 2023 | 2 |
November 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 3 |
February 2024 | 2 |
March 2024 | 3 |
April 2024 | 4 |
June 2024 | 1 |
July 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 1 |
September 2024 | 2 |
October 2024 | 1 |
December 2024 | 1 |
January 2025 | 4 |
March 2025 | 2 |