Skip to Main Content
Book cover for Handbook of Surgical Consent Handbook of Surgical Consent

Contents

Book cover for Handbook of Surgical Consent Handbook of Surgical Consent
Disclaimer
Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always … More Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

General issues in consent for colorectal procedures 78

Anal fissure (botulinum toxin injection, lateral internal sphincterotomy, advancement flap) 81

Anal sphincter repair 83

Anorectal abscesses (incision and drainage) 85

Appendicectomy 87

Colectomy and rectal excision 90

Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy 96

Fistula-in-ano surgery 100

Haemorrhoids 102

Percutaneous caecostomy 105

Perianal skin tag excision 106

Pilonidal sinus 107

Rectal prolapse surgery 109

Rectocele repair 113

Restorative proctocolectomy (ileo-anal pouch) 115

Small bowel resection 117

Small bowel strictureplasty 119

Stoma (formation/reversal) 121

The procedure-specific complications will be detailed in each section.

For any colorectal procedure it is important to mention the following general consent issues:

Scarring

Possibility of administration of antibiotics

Allergic reactions

Possibility of administration of blood products (consequently transfusion reactions and transmission of infectious diseases)

Thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism)

Wound infection and/or dehiscence

Peritoneal sepsis

Risks related to anaesthesia

Urinary retention

Urinary tract infection

Lower respiratory tract infection

Myocardial infarction

Death

It should also be documented that should any unforeseen pathologies be identified then additional procedures (in particular hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) should they be involved in a malignant process) should be authorized if deemed in the best interest of the patient

Where appropriate, it is prudent to discuss the disposal of tissues

For laparoscopic procedures it is important to mention the following: perforation of bowel (following port-site insertion), port-site haematoma, port-site hernia and the potential for the operation to be converted to an open procedure

When discussing a proposed operation with a patient, it is important to mention all significant potential complications, their evidence-based rates where appropriate, the expected recovery, and perceived benefits of surgery. While studies and departmental audits can indicate likely complication rates for a particular procedure, the morbidity and mortality is more difficult to predict.

Risk predictor scoring systems have been in use since the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scoring system was introduced in 1963. This is a simple and effective scoring system, which classifies the physical status of a patient

In 1981 the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scoring system was introduced to classify the severity of a disease based on a number of different physiological parameters. There have since been two updated versions: APACHE II in 1985 and APACHE III in 1991. The APACHE system is used predominantly in the intensive care setting and calculates the mortality risk for a group of patients within a specific disease category

The Simplified Acute Physiological Score (SAPS) is a derivation of the APACHE system that uses fewer of the physiological parameters and is used to calculate the predicted hospital mortality

In 1991, Copeland et al.1 introduced the Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) score.1 It was initially developed in the context of the general surgical population and has since been modified for use in gastrointestinal/colorectal, vascular, head and neck, and orthopaedic patients. graphic It has been shown to over-predict mortality, in particular for patients in the lowest risk category.2 It utilizes 12 physiological parameters and six operative variables to give a percentage estimation of mortality risk:2

Physiological

Age

Cardiac signs

Respiratory

Systolic blood pressure

Pulse

Glasgow Coma Scale

Haemoglobin

White cell count

Urea

Sodium

Potassium

Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Operative

Operative severity

Multiple procedures

Total blood loss

Peritoneal soiling

Malignancy

Mode of surgery

For the purpose of this chapter we will consider the colorectal (CR) POSSUM score which involves the following parameters:

Physiological

Age

Cardiac

Systolic blood pressure

Pulse rate

Haemoglobin

Urea

Operative parameters (if calculating risk preoperatively)

Operation type

Peritoneal contamination

Malignancy status

National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) classification

When consenting a patient for a colorectal operation (suitable operations for which this would be relevant are indicated in later sections) a colorectal (CR) POSSUM score should be calculated in order to predict mortality risk from a particular procedure. These details can then be conveyed to the patient when consenting for procedural risks.3 This is in order to more accurately estimate the mortality risk involved.

1. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78(3):355–60.reference
2. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, et al. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 1998;85(9):1217–20.reference
3. Smith JJ, Tekkis PP. Risk prediction in surgery. Available at: graphic  www.riskprediction.org.uk (accessed 5 May 2011).reference

An anal fissure is a breach in the skin in the anal canal, which can be acute (within 6 weeks’ duration) or chronic in nature. Classically patients experience painful defecation and bright per rectal bleeding. Surgical or chemical sphincterotomy is generally reserved for symptomatic chronic anal fissures. For difficult or recurrent anal fissures (particularly in patients without sphincter hypertonia), excision of the fissure with anal advancement flap may be an option.1

Lateral internal sphincterotomy: this can be performed as a day case either under local or general anaesthesia. A small incision is made in order to access the internal sphincter followed by a small incision in the sphincter in order to relieve the spasm associated with the fissure itself

Intra-anal botulinum toxin: the toxin is injected in either three or four positions between the internal and external anal sphincter causing paralysis. This in turn prevents the anal spasm associated with the fissure, encouraging fissure healing

Anal advancement flap: the fissure is excised and adjacent healthy tissue is used as a flap to cover the excised area2

Anal fissure excision or curettage

Diagnostic: examination under anaesthesia will aid in confirming the diagnosis of an anal fissure, in particular those cases who cannot be examined in clinic or in the emergency department due to pain

Therapeutic: relief of pain, allows painless defecation, and decrease constipation rates due to painful infrequent defecation cycles

Conservative: dietary advice, stool softeners and the use of topical analgesic agents

Medical: topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) ointment, topical diltiazem (calcium channel blocker)

Anal sphincter surgery: bleeding, infection, faecal incontinence, recurrence, acute urinary retention (in patients with pre-existing obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms)

Lateral internal sphincterotomy: haematoma—2.5%, haemorrhage—2.5%, incontinence at 2 months—7.5%, incontinence at 3 years—5%, overall recurrence—7.5%

Intra-anal botulinum toxin injection: haematoma—2.5%, incontinence at 2 months—5%, incontinence at 3 years—0%, overall recurrence—55%

Anal advancement flap: the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ guidelines have suggested this as an acceptable alternative to lateral internal sphincterotomy, however, there is a lack of prospective, randomized studies in the literature at the present time

None/group and save

Regional/general anaesthesia (this can be a particularly painful procedure when curetting the base of a chronic ulcer and may require forewarning the anaesthetist to deepen the anaesthesia at this point)

On discharge patients must be reminded of the need for regular sit baths, high-fibre diet, high fluid intake (assuming no contraindications) and the use of bulk-forming agents and/or stool softeners

Routine outpatient review if required

1. Orsay C, Rakinic J, Perry B, et al. Practice parameters for the management of anal fissures (Revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:2003–7.reference
2. Arroyo A, Pérez F, Serrano P, et al. Surgical versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: Long-term results of a prospective randomized clinical and manometric study. Am J Surg 2005;189(4):429–34.reference

Faecal incontinence is the loss of voluntary control of stool or bowel movements. Incontinence of flatus implies the loss of control of flatulence whilst maintaining faecal control.1 There are a number of different causes of faecal incontinence, which are beyond the scope of this handbook (graphic see Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery).

If surgery is considered, sphincteroplasty is the mainstay. When explaining to the patient it is often helpful to describe the two anal sphincters (internal and external) as complete circles like doughnuts, which encircle the anal canal. If a defect or tear exists in one or both of these circles, sphincteroplasty is possible. This involves cutting the sphincter, overlapping the two ends, and then securing them in place with sutures. This aims to restore the circle and improve control. This is performed under regional or general anaesthesia with the patient positioned in the lithotomy or jack-knife position.

Preoperatively, the surgeon may recommend either endo-anal ultrasound or MRI in order to fully understand the anatomy of the sphincter complex.

Indications for surgery include:2

Perineal trauma/iatrogenic injury following anorectal surgery

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), which are symptomatic (incontinence, perineal pain, and dyspareunia). These include only grade 3 and 4 perineal tears (classification based on the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guideline3)

It is the external anal sphincter which is repaired using, in general, two recognized sphincteroplasty techniques: first, an end-to-end (approximation) or second, an overlap repair.

If recognized at the time of injury and repaired within 24h, this is termed a primary repair. If left and repaired subsequently (recommended minimum of 3 months) this is termed a secondary repair. Most obstetricians perform primary end-to-end repair, whereas colorectal surgeons would opt for the overlap technique.

Defunctioning colostomy

Further trauma surgery—if other organs injured in the presence of traumatic sphincter injury

Therapeutic: restore continence or reduce the risk of further incontinence

Conservative: dietary lifestyle change, the use of bulk-forming agents, pelvic floor exercises, and biofeedback training

Bleeding, infection, difficulty voiding with acute retention of urine, faecal impaction, dyspareunia, perineal pain, failure of procedure, deterioration from preoperative continence level, deterioration in continence with time, the possibility of requiring a further operation

Sphincteroplasty:4

Short-term results: 60–88% patients achieved an excellent or good outcome which was defined as perfect continence or incontinence of flatus with minor staining, 15–20% experienced no change or deterioration in symptoms

Long-term results: 15% patients required further surgery for incontinence, 0% were continent of both stool and flatus, 10.5% were totally continent for stool, 15.8% had no faecal urgency, 52.6% wore a pad for incontinence

Overlapping sphincteroplasty: overall 16.5% complication rate (1.3% mortality, temporary difficulty in voiding, excessive bleeding, abscess formation, haematoma, faecal impaction5)

None/group and save

Regional/general anaesthesia

Routine outpatient review

Continue conservative measures including dietary lifestyle change, use of bulk-forming agents, pelvic floor exercises, and biofeedback training

1. Bartolo DCC, Paterson HM. Anal incontinence. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009;23(4):505–15.reference
2. Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, et al. Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 2004;364(9434):621–32.reference
3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2007 (Green-top guideline; no. 29).
4. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, et al. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000;355(9200):260–5.reference
5. Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, et al. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27(11):720–2.reference

An anorectal abscess (Fig. 3.1) is a collection of pus formed adjacent to the anus commonly as a result of an infection originating in the crypts of Morgagni.1 Without intervention in the form of incision and drainage, the abscess will progress, expand in size, and act as an underlying source of sepsis and necrotizing infection.2 Once the abscess has formed, antibiotics are unable to penetrate and are ineffective when used alone. The abscess cavity is generally incised and drained under general anaesthesia, although, if small, it can be treated under local anaesthesia.

 Sites and relationships of the commonest anorectal abscesses.
Fig. 3.1

Sites and relationships of the commonest anorectal abscesses.

Reproduced with permission from MacKay GJ, Dorrance HR, Molloy RG, et al. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery. 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.275, Figure 6.6.

It is recommended that an anal speculum or proctoscope should be used to visualize the rectum prior to incision in order to detect the presence of a fistula-in-ano. An incision is made over the most fluctuant point, loculations are broken down, and the abscess cavity is thoroughly irrigated with either saline or hydrogen peroxide. It is important to inform the patient that the wound will most likely be left open, packed on a daily basis, and heal through secondary intention.

Examination of rectum under anaesthesia

Some surgeons advocate immediate management, should a fistula-in-ano be found at the time of incision and drainage

Diagnostic: assess the size and extent of abscess and whether there is communication with the rectal mucosa in the form of a fistula-in-ano

Therapeutic: resolve sepsis, prevent fistula formation

Medical: antibiotic therapy is often used in conjunction with incision and drainage, and may help with systemic sepsis. The abscess cavity does, however, need to be drained surgically or allowed to discharge spontaneously to allow for evacuation of pus from a septic focus3

Bleeding, infection, damage to sphincter mechanism, potential for faecal incontinence, fistula-in-ano formation, recurrence, urinary retention

Even with incision and drainage: up to 66% may develop a fistula-in-ano later in life and up to 35% present at the time of incision and drainage (there is some variation in the literature regarding the incidence of fistula-in-ano)4

None/group and save

General anaesthesia/regional anaesthesia (spinal/epidural)

Regular dressing changes and packing of wound

Occasionally a course of oral or intravenous antibiotics will be given

Follow-up is necessary in cases where fistulas have been identified with subsequent examination under anaesthesia and fistula surgery

1. Marcus RH, Stine RJ, Cohen MA. Perirectal abscess. Ann Emerg Med 1995;25(5):597–603.reference
2. Lichtenstein D, Stavorovsky M, Irge D. Fournier's gangrene complicating perianal abscess: Report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1977;21(5):377–9.reference
3. Scoma JA, Salvati EP, Rubin RJ. Incidence of fistulas subsequent to anal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 1974;17(3):357–9.reference
4. Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H, et al. Perianal abscesses an fistulas: A study of 1023 patients Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27(9):593–7.reference

Appendicectomy is the surgical removal of the vermiform appendix either due to clinically or radiologically suspected appendicitis or alternative pathology (i.e. tumour, mucocoele etc). The operation is performed (Fig. 3.2) under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. Both open and laparoscopic appendicectomy are acceptable, local practice may influence the surgeon's decision.

Open: a gridiron or Lanz incision is made in the right iliac fossa. The layers are divided and the peritoneum is opened. The peritoneal cavity is entered and the appendix is identified, ligated, and excised. If the appendix has perforated, a washout is performed. The peritoneum is closed and the layers are closed with absorbable sutures

Laparoscopic:1 in general, three or four small port incisions are be made in the abdominal wall, the ports and camera are inserted following the introduction of a pneumoperitoneum. The appendix is identified, ligated, and removed. The port sites are subsequently closed

 Routine steps during open appendicectomy.
Fig. 3.2

Routine steps during open appendicectomy.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.247, Figure 7.19 .

Recent Cochrane review recommends that all patients undergoing appendicectomy should be prophylactically administered antibiotics. If the appendix has perforated antibiotics may need to be continued over a number of days (either intravenously or oral).

If an intra-abdominal mass is found (commonly following a perforated appendix) the decision may be made to manage this with antibiotics. Some surgeons may elect to subsequently perform an interval appendicectomy.

If the appendix is found to be macroscopically normal and the operation is performed open it is best practice to perform the appendicectomy for two reasons: the first is that the appendix may be microscopically inflamed, the second being if a patient is noted to have either a gridiron or Lanz incision it is assumed (rightly or wrongly) that they have previously undergone appendicectomy.

If the operation is performed laparoscopically and the appendix is noted to be normal, the decision to perform the appendicectomy is less clear. If, for example in a young female blood is noted in the pelvis (commonly from a ruptured ovarian cyst) the diagnosis is clear and an appendicectomy would confer additional unnecessary risks. If no other obvious cause is found an appendicectomy may be indicated as a proportion will be histologically inflamed.

Once the operation has been performed, the appendix will be sent to the histopathology lab for examination. Possible aetiologies of the appendicitis include faecaliths, intestinal parasites, carcinoid appendix, caecal tumour, and inflammatory bowel disease.

Conversion to open procedure (from laparoscopic) or laparotomy

Need for alternative procedure (i.e. right hemicolectomy, Meckel's diverticulectomy) if alternative diagnosis encountered

Excision of appendix despite macroscopically normal appearance

Diagnostic: to identify the cause of pain/sepsis/symptoms

Therapeutic: remove a diseased appendix and source of sepsis

Medical: intravenous followed by oral antibiotic therapy (a comparison of 252 men with suspected appendicitis, randomized to antibiotic therapy or early surgery showed 86% improved with antibiotics of which 14% required surgery within 24h)2

Bleeding, infection3 (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection and urinary infection), perforation of bowel, stump leak/blow out with resultant peritonitis, colo-cutaneous faecal fistula, subfertility (a potentially rare complication following pelvic abscess)

Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: wound infections are half as likely following open appendicectomy. Intra-abdominal abscess formation is three-fold higher following laparoscopic appendicectomy4

graphic <1% risk of pulmonary complications, urinary tract complications, venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, post-procedure haemorrhage

Group and save

Regional (spinal/epidural)/general anaesthesia

No routine outpatient follow-up required unless histopathological examination of appendix alters management plan

1. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;4:CD001546.reference
2. Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, et al. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2006;30(6):1033–7.reference
3. Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:CD001439.reference
4. Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, et al. Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 2004;188(6):813–20.reference

There are a number of different reasons why a segment of bowel (Fig. 3.3) may require resection. Indications include benign polyps, carcinoma, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, ischaemia, trauma, and Hirschsprung's disease. The segment of bowel that is affected dictates the operation performed.1

Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER): here the pathology (commonly rectal carcinoma) is situated in the distal one-third of the rectum. The procedure involves two incisions: one midline laparotomy wound and one in the perineum. The anus, rectum, and part of the sigmoid colon are resected (Fig. 3.4) and an end-colostomy may be fashioned

Anterior resection of rectum: here the pathology is situated in the middle and upper thirds of the rectum. This involves the resection of a portion of the sigmoid colon and part of the rectum (Fig. 3.5). The remainder of the sigmoid colon is anastomosed to the rectal stump. A protective stoma can be performed to protect the anastomosis. In most cases this will be later reversed. With modern surgical techniques a low anterior resection will be possible in a proportion of patients with tumours in the lower third. Total mesorectal excision (TME) should be performed for tumours located in the middle to lower third of the rectum, either as part of an APER or low anterior resection to reduce the risk of local recurrence

Hartmann's procedure (Fig. 3.6): this is performed either in the emergency setting where gross contamination exists (for example secondary to a colonic perforation) thereby precluding primary anastomosis or as a palliative procedure. It involves resection of part of the distal colon with formation of a colostomy, which may be permanent. The rectal stump is closed

Left hemi-colectomy: involves the resection of part or the entire descending colon for pathology in the descending colon or splenic flexure. If it is extended, part of the transverse colon is also resected beyond the middle colic vessels. An anastomosis is made between the proximal colon and the distal colon. A defunctioning ileostomy or colostomy may be performed which the surgeon will decide in the postoperative period whether or not to reverse

Transverse colectomy: a rarely performed procedure for pathology in the transverse colon

Right hemi-colectomy: the caecum and ascending colon are resected. If it is extended, part of the transverse colon is also resected beyond the middle colic vessels. An anastomosis is made between the proximal segment of bowel and the transverse colon. It is performed for pathology in the caecum, ascending colon, or hepatic flexure

Total colectomy: this procedure involves resection of the entire colon with formation either of an ileorectal anastomosis or an end-ileostomy and mucous fistula. If the rectum is also excised it is termed a proctocolectomy. Indications include pancolitis refractory to medical therapy, patients with known HNPCC or FAP. An end-ileostomy may be fashioned. Alternatively, an ileoanal pouch or ileorectal anastomosis may be performed

Ileocaecal resection: for pathology in the terminal ileum and caecum. It is commonly performed for Crohn's disease or occasionally an appendiceal mass. Here, the terminal ileum and caecum are resected. The ileum is then anastomosed with the ascending colon

 Anatomy and blood supply of the large bowel.
Fig. 3.3

Anatomy and blood supply of the large bowel.

Reproduced with permission from MacKay GJ, Dorrance HR, Molloy RG, et al. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery. 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.23, Figure 1.11.
 Section of bowel removed during an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER).
Fig. 3.4

Section of bowel removed during an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER).

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.295, Figure 7.53.
 Section of bowel removed during an anterior resection.
Fig. 3.5

Section of bowel removed during an anterior resection.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.287, Figure 7.49.
 Hartmann's procedure.
Fig. 3.6

Hartmann's procedure.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.301, Figure 7.55.

The operations listed can all be performed either open or laparoscopically. Preoperatively the patient may be asked to undergo bowel preparation.2 If the colectomy is planned open this will be performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine or lithotomy position. A midline laparotomy wound will be made, the segment of bowel identified and resected.

Depending on the operation, an anastomosis of healthy bowel will be made or alternatively an end-ileostomy or colostomy will be performed. Should the surgeon wish to protect the anastomosis they may elect to fashion a defunctioning stoma. This may be temporary and is potentially reversible—the decision for this will be made in the postoperative period once the patient has recovered from the initial operation.

Extension of resection margins to include extended colectomy, sub-total colectomy or pan-proctocolectomy depending on intraoperative findings

Excision of gynaecological or urological organs

Formation of defunctioning stoma

Diagnostic: to provide histopathological diagnosis of underlying pathology with or without local staging

Therapeutic: to remove underlying pathology/disease process of bowel and restore function or reduce the risk of future complications

Malignancy: should a patient be deemed fit for surgery and it thought possible to achieve an R0 resection, surgery should be advised. If there is evidence of metastatic disease then alternative treatments such as chemo-radiotherapy should be discussed. If a tumour is likely to obstruct then options other than surgery include the use of colonic stents or diverting stomas. The appropriateness of this will be somewhat dependant on the patient's life expectancy and multidisciplinary team discussion

HNPCC/FAP: should the patient be in a high-risk category for future development of colonic carcinoma, alternatives to surgery include surveillance colonoscopies at regular intervals. It is important to inform the patient of the possibility of an interval cancer developing between consecutive colonoscopies. For most FAP patients with polyps total proctocolectomy is advised

Diverticular disease: dietary advice can be given for symptomatic disease. In acute diverticulitis perforates this may be treated initially with antibiotics or, alternatively if an abscess cavity develops, this may be radiologically drained. It is important to inform the patient that the disease process may persist or recur despite these measures at which point surgery may be the only option

Inflammatory bowel disease: medical therapy (steroids, immunosuppressants and 5-aminosalycilic acid (5-ASA) drugs) is generally advocated as first-line treatment for acute exacerbations. If unresponsive or there is risk of imminent perforation or indeed perforation of bowel, surgery would be advocated

Ischaemia: antibiotics, adequate oxygenation, intravenous fluids and bowel rest may resolve the acute event. If the bowel is non-viable and the patient is fit for surgery, resection of the affected bowel with stoma formation is advocated

Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal sepsis in the presence or absence of an anastomosis and wound infection), perforation of bowel, anastomotic leak, ileus, possibility of blood transfusion, irresectability of tumour and recurrence, incisional or parastomal hernia, mortality (guidelines recommend operative mortality should be <20% for emergency surgery and <7% for elective surgery for colorectal cancer1), possibility of splenectomy (for left-sided colectomies), damage to or resection of female organs (e.g. hysterectomy, BSO) or resection of a segment of bladder, ureteric injury

Pelvic surgery: urinary and sexual dysfunction (impotence and retrograde ejaculation), faecal urgency, increased frequency of defecation3

Anastomotic leak: anterior resection (leak rate varies from 6% to 7.4%), other colonic anastomosis (leak rate varies from 2.6% to 4.1%). graphicAnastomotic leak is associated with fivefold increased 30-day mortality4

Group and save/cross-match 2–6 units

General anaesthesia (often with a regional block for postoperative pain control)

Follow-up is often required depending on the underlying pathology. This may necessitate further imaging to identify local and systemic recurrence or a review of postoperative symptoms.

1. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for the Management of Colorectal Cancer, 3rd edn. London: The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2007.
2. Guenaga KKFG, Matos D, Wille-Jergensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:CD001544.reference
3. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 2005;92(9):1124–32.reference
4. Matos D, Atallah ÁN, Castro AA, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;3:CD003144.

Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy encompasses four separate procedures: proctoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.

Proctoscopy: visualization of the anal canal and lower rectum (visualization up to 10cm of lower gastrointestinal tract). An enema or suppository is, in general, advised prior to commencing the listed procedures to aid in visualization of the mucosa. The patient is positioned on their left side. A digital examination is performed before the lubricated proctoscope is inserted. The mucosa is visualized and if a procedure is indicated (graphic see ‘Haemorrhoids’, p.102) it will be performed at this point

Rigid sigmoidoscopy: visualization of the rectum (it is rare to directly visualize the sigmoid colon—up to 15–20cm of lower gastrointestinal tract). An enema or suppository is, in general, advised prior to commencing to aid in visualization of the mucosa. The patient is positioned on their left side. A digital examination is performed before the sigmoidoscope (Fig. 3.7) is inserted with the obturator lubricated. Once inside the rectum the obturator is removed and the bellows are used to insufflate air and dilate the rectum. The sigmoidoscope is advanced to approximately 15cm while negotiating the valves of Houston. Patients may experience discomfort and the sensation of the need to pass flatus

Flexible sigmoidoscopy: visualization of the rectum, sigmoid colon, and up to two-thirds of the transverse colon (in the majority of cases the descending colon is not seen). An enema will be administered prior to commencement. The patient is positioned on their left side with both knees brought forward. A digital examination is performed before the sigmoidoscope is inserted. The flexible sigmoidoscope is inserted into the rectum and advanced to the splenic flexure. Air will be insufflated during the procedure in order to view the mucosa adequately and aid advancement. The images are transmitted onto a screen, which the operator will observe. Should there be an abnormal area a biopsy can be taken which will be sent to pathology. The patient may experience an uncomfortable sensation and abdominal cramps as a result of the insufflated air. The procedure should last less than 10min

Colonoscopy: here the entire lower gastrointestinal tract can be visualized up to and including the caecum. Skilled endoscopists are able to cannulate the ileocaecal valve to visualize the terminal ileum. In the 2–3 days leading up to the procedure the patient is advised to maintain a low fibre, clear fluid-only diet. The day before, a laxative preparation is taken with large quantities of clear fluid. This will enable the colon to be free of solid matter. The patient is positioned on their left side with their left leg. A sedative can be administered to relax the patient. A digital examination is performed before the colonoscope (Fig. 3.8) is inserted. The colonoscope is inserted into the rectum and advanced to the terminal ileum. Air will be insufflated during the procedure in order to view the mucosa adequately and aid advancement. The images are transmitted onto a screen, which the operator will observe. Should there be an abnormal area a biopsy can be taken which will be sent to pathology. Should a tumour be noted, India ink can be injected at the site to aid location during surgery. The patient may experience an uncomfortable sensation and abdominal cramps as a result of the insufflated air. The procedure will last 15–20min

 Rigid sigmoidoscope.
Fig. 3.7

Rigid sigmoidoscope.

Reproduced with permission from MacKay GJ, Dorrance HR, Molloy RG, et al. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery. 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.67, Figure 2.24a.
 Colonoscope.
Fig. 3.8

Colonoscope.

Reproduced with permission from MacKay GJ, Dorrance HR, Molloy RG, et al. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery. 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.61, Figure 2.20.

Through these techniques, both visualization and biopsy of lesions are possible. Therapeutic procedures are also possible for certain conditions.

Biopsy, polypectomy, decompression of volvulus, injection of India ink at tumour site (for intraoperative identification), colonic stenting for obstructing/potentially obstructing colonic tumours, argon laser coagulation, treatment of haemorrhoids, insertion of flatus tube, insertion of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC).

Diagnostic: investigate change in bowel habit, investigate lower gastro-intestinal bleeding for surveillance (previous history of colonic polyps or cancer, ulcerative colitis, strong family history of colonic cancer), investigation of colorectal neoplasia, investigation of symptoms suggestive of anorectal pathology1

Therapeutic: permits biopsy of lesions, polypectomy, decompression of volvulus, injection of ink at tumour site (for intraoperative identification), colonic stenting for obstructing/potentially obstructing colonic tumours, argon laser coagulation for the management of colorectal disease (palliative therapy for obstructing or bleeding, malignancies, anastomotic strictures, ablation of colonic mucosal lesions, radiation proctitis), treatment of haemorrhoids (band ligation, injection of oily phenol), insertion of flatus tube, insertion of PEC for the management of recurrent sigmoid volvulus or acute colonic pseudo-obstruction

Radiological: CT colonogram/pneumocolon, barium/Gastrografin enema, capsule endoscopy (poor sensitivity for lower gastrointestinal lesions)

Surgical: open or laparoscopic surgical procedure for biopsy or tissue diagnosis or colostomy formation

Bleeding, infection (local/systemic), post-procedure pain, bloating, perforation, respiratory compromise, abdominal distension, flatulence

Flexible sigmoidoscopy: UK multicentre randomized trial of 40 322 patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy shows approximate risk of perforation at 1 in 40 000)

Caution is advised in neutropenic patients owing to the potential of bacteraemia. Antibiotics may be considered in this scenario and for patients with prosthetic heart valves

In a UK multicentre randomized trial of 2377 patients undergoing colonoscopy there were four perforations (approximate risk of 1 in 500), all following snare polypectomy. Nine patients were admitted with bleeding

For the insertion of colonic stents, a review of 27 studies performed between 2000 and 2006 concluded that the perforation rate was 2.5%, distal migration of stents 4.4%, rectal tenesmus 2.2%, occlusion 0.8% and recto-vaginal fistula 0.8%2

There are limited data available with reference to argon laser coagulation, however, perforation is a recognized complication3

With regard to PEC, the most common complications reported in the published literature are granular formation and infection. Other reported complications included pain, colonic leakage, and tube erosion.4 Unpublished data from a multicentre UK audit showed a 12% (13/105) infection rate following the procedure. Two deaths were also reported in patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus due to late tube dislodgement. There were seven other cases of reported tube dislodgement following the procedure as well as four cases of migration (Simson, unpublished data, 2005)

None/group and save

Local/general anaesthesia (particularly for children)

Dependent on the underlying indication, findings and therapeutic intervention during lower gastrointestinal endoscopy

1. Ransohoff DF. Lessons from the UK sigmoidoscopy screening trial. Lancet 2002;359(9314):1266–7.reference
2. Dionigi G, Villa F, Rovera F, et al. Colonic stenting for malignant disease: Review of literature. Surg Oncol 2007;16(Suppl):153–5.reference
3. Manner H, Plum N, Pech O, et al. Colon explosion during argon plasma coagulation, Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67(7):1123–7.reference
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy. London: NICE, 2006. Available at: graphic  www.nice.org.uk/guidance/IPG161.reference

A fistula-in-ano is an abnormal communication between the anal canal or lower rectum and the perianal skin (Fig. 3.9). They either result primarily as a result of anorectal sepsis or secondary to pathology such as Crohn's disease, malignancy, hidradenitis suppurativa, or, rarely, tuberculosis. In general, for operations involving fistula-in-ano, it is performed either under local or general anaesthesia with the patient either face down or in the supine position. When explaining the procedure to the patient it is important to cover the following points:

Conventional fistulotomy: the tract must first be identified (hydrogen peroxide may be injected from the external opening or a probe inserted) and is then subsequently ‘laid-open’ (or de-roofed) using cautery and allowed to heal from the inside out

Fistulectomy: the entire fistulous tract is excised. It is left open and allowed to heal through secondary intention, closed primarily with sutures, or closed with an advancement flap. The rectal side of the tract is closed internally

Seton suture: if the fistulous tract is high and involves a significant proportion of the sphincter complex, the surgeon may elect to pass a seton suture (which is essentially a thin Silastic tube or non-absorbable suture) through the tract and the two ends tied together outside the body. There are two types of seton available, the first being a cutting seton which is gradually tightened every 2 weeks (over an approximate 6–8-week period). This allows fibrosis to occur and the tract to gradually heal or becomes low enough to be ‘laid-open’. The second is a draining seton which is inserted in the presence of sepsis (if, for example a fistula is noted during incision and drainage of an anorectal abscess). This can be left indefinitely until the abscess has drained and then definitive treatment considered

Marsupialization fistulotomy: a conventional fistulotomy is performed and the wound edges are marsupialized to the fistulous tract with absorbable sutures

If the fistula is deemed to be ‘high’ (i.e. includes a substantial amount of the sphincter complex), fistulotomy is relatively contraindicated, given the high incidence of incontinence

Parks is the recognized classification system and defines four different types of fistula-in-ano: intersphincteric, trans-sphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric (Fig. 3.9)1

 Parks’ classification of fistula-in-ano: 1: extrasphincteric; 2: intersphincteric; 3:trans-sphinceteric; 4: suprasphincteric.
Fig. 3.9

Parks’ classification of fistula-in-ano: 1: extrasphincteric; 2: intersphincteric; 3:trans-sphinceteric; 4: suprasphincteric.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.235, Figure 7.9.

Incision and drainage of perianal/anorectal abscess

Packing of wound

Biopsies of fistula tract/rectal mucosa

Diagnostic: confirm cause of underlying fistula tract (i.e. Crohn's disease)

Therapeutic: allow for fistula healing, reduce symptoms (pain/bleeding/mucopurulent discharge/incontinence)

Radiofrequency ablation, anal fistula plug, fibrin glue

It should be emphasized, however, that these treatments are associated with a high fistula recurrence rate

Postoperative pain, bleeding, incontinence, recurrence, delayed healing, need for multiple procedures

Conventional fistulotomy: recurrence rates range from 1.9% to 12.5% with an incontinence rate ranging from 4.2% to 12.8%

Fistulectomy: fewer studies are available to contrast fistulectomy, however, one study demonstrated a recurrence rate of 9.5% with an incontinence rate of 14.3%

Seton suture: regarding conventional seton suture placement, the recurrence rate is 6.2% with an incontinence rate of 12.5%

Marsupialization fistulotomy: recurrence rate of 4.5% with incontinence rate of 6%

None/group and save

Local/regional/general anaesthesia

Dressing change/pack changes if abscess drained

Routine outpatient review with histopathology results and review of symptoms

Review in outpatient clinic if seton is of cutting type and has to be tightened

1. Jacob TJ, Perakath B, Keighley MR. Surgical intervention for anorectal fistula. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;5:CD006319.reference
2. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg; 63(1):1–12.reference

Haemorrhoids are enlarged vascular cushions around the anus and can be classified into internal (proximal to the dentate line) and external. Internal haemorrhoids can be further subdivided into grades 1–4.

Traditionally, treatment of haemorrhoids has fallen into two categories: non-surgical techniques such as rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, infrared coagulation, and cryotherapy; and surgical procedures such as haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy.

Non-surgical treatments should be advocated in the first instance for 1st and 2nd degree haemorrhoids with surgical procedures reserved for:

3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids

Those that have failed to respond to non-surgical measures

Significant external component

Extensive thrombosis (may best be managed conservatively)

Associated fissure-in-ano

Non-surgical procedures can generally be performed in the outpatient clinic. If the haemorrhoids are above the dentate line no anaesthesia is required. The patient will be positioned in the left lateral position and a proctoscope or rigid sigmoidoscope will be inserted into the rectum in order to adequately visualize the mucosa.

Rubber band ligation: a small elastic band will be placed just above the haemorrhoid. This cuts the blood supply and as a consequence the haemorrhoid will undergo necrosis and fall off within a few days. The area will then heal naturally

Sclerotherapy: a solution of 5% oily phenol (in a solution of almond oil) is injected into the base of the haemorrhoid causing the blood supply to thrombose and in turn the haemorrhoid to shrink and disappear

Infra-red coagulation: infra-red light is directed at the haemorrhoid which causes the blood in the surrounding veins to coagulate, the haemorrhoid will shrink and eventually disappear

Cryotherapy: the haemorrhoid is frozen, causing it to shrink and eventually disappear

For surgical procedures, the procedure is generally performed under regional or general anaesthesia with the patient placed in the lithotomy position.

Haemorrhoidectomy: a proctoscope is inserted to adequately visualize the ano-rectal mucosa. The haemorrhoids are identified and excised either using cautery/scalpel or alternatively with a staple gun. Haemostasis is ensured and a local anaesthetic may be injected to minimize postoperative pain. A haemostatic pack may be inserted in the rectum to aid haemostasis and this will pass within a day or two. If the Milligan–Morgan technique is used the mucocutaneous defect is left open. Alternatively, if the Hil–Ferguson technique is adopted the mucocutaneous defect is closed

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a circular anal dilator is inserted and the prolapsed mucous membrane falls within the device. A purse-string suture anoscope is then inserted and rotated allowing a purse-string suture to be stitched into the anal circumference. A circular stapler is then introduced and traction applied to the purse-string. This pulls the prolapsed mucous membrane into the stapler and the device is fired excising a circumferential layer of mucosa. Meticulous haemostasis is then achieved

Patients should also be advised about conservative measures such as dietary modification, topical ointments, and retraining in toilet habit (i.e. the avoidance of straining).

Nil

Therapeutic: reduce the symptoms associated with haemorrhoids and prevent complications associated with large haemorrhoids (e.g. thrombosis/ulceration)

Conservative: dietary modification, topical ointments, retraining in toilet habit (i.e. the avoidance of straining)

Bleeding, infection, post-procedural pain, prostatitis (following injection sclerotherapy), anaphylaxis (the 5% oily phenol is in a solution of almond oil, therefore, it is important to ascertain if the patient has a nut allergy), recurrence1

Rubber band ligation: overall success between 69% and 94%. Overall complication rate less than 2% (vasovagal syncope, anal pain, minor bleeding, chronic ulcer formation, priapism, difficulty in urination, thrombosis of external haemorrhoids)2

Haemorrhoidectomy:

Early: urinary retention (20.1%), bleeding (secondary (7–10 days post-procedure) or (reactionary 2.4–6%), subcutaneous abscess (0.5%)

Late: anal fissure (1.2–6%), anal stenosis (1%), incontinence (0.4%), fistula (0.5%1)

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: postoperative bleeding (1.5–9%), urinary retention (<5%), external haemorrhoidal thrombosis (1.2–4.7%), pelvic sepsis, rectovaginal fistula, rectal perforation, and anal stenosis are well-recognized complications of stapled haemorrhoidopexy and should be included in the consent process. Temporary faecal incontinence and faecal urgency have been documented, although these resolved in all cases by 3 months3

None/group and save

Local/regional/general anaesthesia

Routine outpatient review if required

Patients must be discharged on laxatives and analgesia, and given appropriate advice regarding diet and toilet habits

1. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50(9):1297–305.reference
2. Shanmugam V, Campbell KL, Loudon MA, et al. Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;1:CD005034.reference
3. Lehur PA, Gravie JF, Meurette G. Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results. Colorectal Dis 2001;3(6):374–9.reference

This is largely performed as a palliative procedure in patients with significant comorbidities unable to receive more aggressive surgery. It is not the optimal treatment modality, however, given the limited options as a result of the condition of the patient, it may be considered necessary. Primary indications include distal colonic obstruction, colonic pseudo-obstruction, caecal perforation, caecal volvulus, and to divert the stream in order to protect a distal anastomosis.

There are a number of techniques for the insertion of a caecostomy tube. The basic principle is to inflate the caecum with air (through a catheter inserted per rectum) and then, under fluoroscopic guidance, a small incision is made in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. Access is gained to the caecum via a needle, a tract is then formed using a dilator. Contrast is used to confirm correct position and a catheter is then inserted and sutured in place.

Surgical fashioning of a caecostomy/appendicostomy

Blind percutaneous caecostomy formation

Therapeutic: Percutaneous caecostomy is a palliative procedure and is only performed when other surgical alternatives are deemed unsuitable

Surgical: blind percutaneous caecostomy, open surgery to fashion caecostomy/appendicostomy/loop colostomy/trephine

Bleeding, infection (intra-abdominal and wound), pericatheter leak, tube occlusion, skin excoriation, premature tube dislodgement, colo-cutaneous fistula, ventral hernia

Up to 45% patients experience minor complications including: pericatheter leak, superficial wound infection, tube occlusion, skin excoriation, premature tube dislodgement, colo-cutaneous fistula, ventral hernia1

None/group and save

Local anaesthesia/sedation

Patients will need regular caecostomy care involving cleaning, skin care, and flushing of port on a regular basis

Complications with caecostomy may necessitate removal or replacement

1. Benacci JC, Wolff BG. Cecostomy—therapeutic indications and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38(5):530–4.reference

Perianal skin tags are a common problem and may represent underlying or coexistent pathology. They are commonly the result of a previous anorectal insult for example haemorrhoids. A sentinel tag is one that is situated at the inferior border of an infection, injury, or chronic anal fissure. The excision will either be performed under local or general anaesthesia with the patient either positioned on their side or in the lithotomy position. The excision will result in an irregular anal verge and this should be emphasized to patients who request excision for cosmetic reasons. An examination of the surrounding area will be performed for coexistent pathology, the lesion will be excised either with a scalpel or electrocautery and the tag sent for histological analysis.

Curettage of chronic anal fissure/intra-anal botulinum toxin/advancement flap

Biopsy of anorectal mucosa

Diagnostic: to obtain a histological diagnosis of the lesion in question

Therapeutic: symptomatic benefit for perianal skin tag (pruritis/bleeding/pain), interference with perianal hygiene, cosmesis

Conservative: manage symptoms with good perianal hygiene, moisturizing cream, antipruritic agents

Bleeding, infection, postoperative pain, recurrence, prolonged healing time which may take several weeks, irregular anal verge, poor cosmetic result

None/group and save

Local/regional/general anaesthesia

Maintain good perianal hygiene, change dressings regularly, laxatives, and diet to ensure soft stool during wound healing

No outpatient follow-up necessary

A pilonidal sinus is a small tract present in or near the natal cleft at the top of the buttocks. They commonly form around a dilated hair follicle into which hairs, desquamated skin, and other debris become entrapped leading to secondary infection (the pit is the primary cause). The operation is performed under local or general anaesthesia and the patient is positioned either face down or in the lateral position. An incision is made either in the midline or off midline, the sinus tracts are obliterated, and then irrigated. The wound is either closed with sutures or left open to close by secondary intention.

There are two traditional methods for excising the pilonidal sinuses and two for closing the wound. Regarding the excision the first is a midline approach, the second off-midline. When closing the wound following the excision of pilonidal sinuses one method is to leave the wound open (therefore allowing healing through secondary intention), the second method is for primary closure.1 Risks involved have been structured around the categories mentioned here, however, within these categories there are a number of different surgical procedures for which individual risks have not been given (e.g. the use of classic and modified rhomboid flaps, V-Y advancement flap, Bascom procedure, Karydakis procedure, marsupialization, and z-plasty).

Rhomboid flap: the sinus tracts are excised and a rhomboid flap is transposed to cover the defect

V-Y advancement flap: in this technique a V incision is made, this is then approached to cover the defective as a Y shape

Bascom procedure: lateral (or off-line) incision to access the pilonidal cavity followed by curettage. The midline pits are then excised separately. The midline incisions are closed, the lateral incision is left open

Karydakis procedure: midline elliptical incision of the sinus down to the sacrum. A flap is then created by undercutting the midline side of the wound and advanced across the wound to the opposite side and sutured in place. The skin is then closed

Marsupialization: the sinus is incised, the borders are raised and stitched to form a pouch. This gradually closes and may need to be packed until this has happened

Drainage of underlying sepsis

Laying open of sinus tract

Insertion of surgical drain

Diagnostic: assess extent of injury

Therapeutic: to resolve a symptomatic or recurrent pilonidal sinus

Conservative: meticulous hygiene although resolution of the sinus is unlikely

Bleeding, infection, pain, scar, prolonged healing, wound dehiscence, need for regular dressing changes, large cavity/dimple/scar, recurrence (open wound 5.3%, closed wound 8.7%)

Midline procedures: surgical site infection (12.4%), recurrence rate (9.4%), variable healing time (midline open wound is 41–91 days, midline closed wound is 10–27 days)

Off-midline procedures: surgical site infection (3.6–9.3%), recurrence rate (1.5–2.4%), variable healing time (off-midline open wound is 41–120 days, off-midline closed wound is 15–23 days)2

None/group and save

Regional/general/local anaesthesia

Regular follow-up is required to monitor progress

1. Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, et al. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45(11):1458–67.reference
2. AL-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, et al. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD006213.reference

This is a full thickness prolapse of the rectum through the anal canal. There are two approaches to the repair of a rectal prolapse; either a trans-abdominal or perineal. The trans-abdominal approach can be further subdivided into the traditional open and the newer laparoscopic method. Generally, younger patients may benefit from a trans-abdominal approach, given the lower risks of recurrence, whereas older patients may be more suitable for a perineal approach, given the higher morbidity associated with the trans-abdominal approach.1

The perineal approach encompasses several recognized techniques:

Perineal recto-sigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure): indicated in patients with external full thickness prolapse. It is performed under regional or general anaesthesia, the patient is placed in the lithotomy or prone position. The rectum is withdrawn as fully as possible and an incision is made 1.5cm proximal to the dentate line and is continued through the full thickness of the bowel wall and extended circumferentially. The peritoneum is entered, the sigmoid colon is pulled down and the transection line determined. In general, 15–30cm of bowel is resected and a colo-anal anastomosis is performed

Delorme's procedure (Fig. 3.10): indicated in full thickness rectal prolapse. It is performed under regional or general anaesthesia, the patient is placed in the lithotomy or prone position. The basic principle is that only the mucosa (inner lining) of the prolapsed rectum is resected and the lining above is sutured back down to the anal canal. The outer wall of the rectum is plicated to strengthen the repair. The prolapse is then reduced, the stitches tied and a circular doughnut of tissue is left just inside the rectum

 Delorme's procedure.
Fig. 3.10

Delorme's procedure.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.241, Figure 7.14.

The trans-abdominal approach encompasses several recognized techniques:

Trans-abdominal Marlex rectopexy (Ripstein's procedure): is indicated in patients with rectal prolapse without constipation and a redundant sigmoid colon. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. The rectum is mobilized down to the coccyx posteriorly often with division of the upper portion of the lateral ligament and the anterior cul-de-sac. The rectum is retracted and placed under tension. A non-absorbable Marlex mesh is then fixed to the presacral fascia and wrapped round and sutured to the anterior wall of the rectum to keep it in position

Trans-abdominal suture rectopexy: indicated in patients with rectal prolapse without constipation and a redundant sigmoid colon. Essentially the same as the Marlex rectopexy, with the exception that the rectum is sutured in place to the presacral fascia as opposed to the use of the mesh

Some authors have advocated resection for patients with constipation, however, evidence is lacking. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. The rectum is mobilized to the level of the lateral ligaments and the redundant sigmoid colon is resected. An anastomosis is then performed between the cut end of the colon and the proximal end of the rectum. The colon is maintained under tension in order to prevent the prolapse recurring.

Advocated by some for patients with a significant degree of associated constipation. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. The rectum is mobilized to the coccyx posteriorly and the cul-de-sac anteriorly. A section of the sigmoid colon is resected with the cut end of the colon being subsequently anastomosed with the proximal end of the rectum. The presacral fascia is then sutured either to the lateral ligament or to the rectal fascia itself thus maintaining the rectum under tensions and preventing subsequent prolapse.

More commonly performed in mainland Europe in patients with full thickness rectal prolapsed. It is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A midline incision is made and the abdominal cavity is entered. Essentially the same as the traditional abdominal rectopexy, the difference being that the dissection is limited to the anterior and posterior rectal wall.

Abdominal or perineal drain insertion

Defunctioning colostomy/ileostomy when redundant bowel is resected and anastomosed

Therapeutic: symptomatic rectal prolapse (incontinence, bowel habit disturbances, rectal bleeding)

Conservative: treatment involves advice regarding safe reduction of the prolapse itself and advice regarding bowel habit

Bleeding, infection, recurrence (full thickness and mucosal), incontinence, constipation, anastomotic dehiscence, incisional hernia and pelvic sepsis

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure): 8.6% major complications, pelvic haematomas, anastomotic dehiscence, sigmoid perforation, pararectal abscess, late anal strictures, 14% minor complications, 18% recurrence rate at 41 months2

Delorme's procedure: urinary retention 12%, Clostridium difficile colitis 4%, myocardial infarction 1.3%, 4% suture line bleeding, 3% anastomotic disruption, 1.3% anastomotic stricture, 6.6% faecal incontinence postoperatively (includes patients who were continent and incontinent prior to procedure), 7% postoperative constipation, 14.5% recurrence rate at 60 months3

Trans-abdominal suture rectopexy: complication rates ranging from 9.4% to 20%, recurrence rate of 2–3.1%, postoperative incontinence of 16–26%, postoperative constipation of 31–71%4

Trans-abdominal Marlex rectopexy (Ripstein procedure): complication rates ranging from 2.3% to 28%, recurrence rate of 2–14%, post-operative incontinence of 28–50%, post-operative constipation of 17–43%5

Trans-abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection (Frykman–Goldberg operation): 6.3% full thickness recurrence, 8.5% mucosal prolapsed, 6.3% constipation (in patients who had not pre-operatively experienced this), 12.8% patients experienced diminished continence postoperatively, 8.5% developed significant diarrhoea6

Anterior resection: 15% morbidity, 7% recurrence at 5.5 years, 7.3% incisional hernia, 4.9% small bowel obstruction, 2.4% stroke7

Orr–Loygue rectopexy: prolapse recurrence 4.11% (mean follow-up 27.5 months) pelvic abscess 0%, 62.5% patients who were preoperatively incontinent of faeces were ‘totally cured’

Common: bleeding; swelling; pain; scar; prolonged wound healing, infection

Group and save/cross-match 2–6 units

Regional/general anaesthesia

Monitor patient in hospital until patient passes urine and faeces prior to discharge

Symptomatic review in outpatient clinic

1. Tjandra JJ, Clunie GJA, Kaye AH, et al. Textbook of Surgery. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 2006, p.247.reference
2. Altomare DF, Binda G, Ganio E, et al. Long-term outcome of Altemeier's procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(4):698–703.reference
3. Lieberth M, Kondylis LA, Reilly JC, et al. The Delorme repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a retrospective review. Am J Surg 2009;197(3):418–23.reference
4. Blatchford GJ, Perry RE, Thorson AG, et al. Rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1989;158(6):574–6.reference
5. Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81(6):904–6.reference
6. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, et al. Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87(1):101–4.reference
7. Cirocco WC, Brown AC. Anterior resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse: a 20-year experience. Am Surg 1993;59(4):265–9.reference

A rectocele is the result of a defect in the rectovaginal septum (a tough fibrous layer), which separates the vagina (anteriorly) from the rectum (posteriorly). This defect results in the protrusion of the rectum into the vagina and the resultant symptoms.

The primary indication for repair of a rectocele is obstructive defecation with objective evidence of faecal trapping demonstrated through a defecating proctogram. Other indications include a subjective sensation of ‘pressure’ in the vagina and a feeling of incomplete evacuation post-defecation. This may progress to difficult or painful defecation or sexual intercourse, constipation, incontinence, vaginal bleeding, and even prolapse of the bulge through the opening of the vagina.

Various approaches are employed in the repair of a rectocele including posterior colporrhaphy, trans-anal and trans-perineally. For the purpose of this colorectal chapter we will consider the trans-anal and trans-perineal approach.

Trans-anal rectocele repair: the procedure is performed under regional or general anaesthesia with the patient positioned either in the jack-knife position or supine. An incision is generally made just proximal to the dentate line, the redundant rectal mucosa is either removed or plicated and the rectal submucosa and mucosa are closed in separate layers

Trans-perineal rectocele repair: this approach is also performed under general anaesthesia with the patient positioned either in the jack-knife position or supine. The recto-vaginal septum is repaired through an incision in the perineum and a decision whether or not to use a prosthetic mesh is made

Cystocoele repair

Suprapubic catheter insertion

Pelvic floor reconstruction

Defunctioning colostomy/ileostomy

Therapeutic: symptomatic improvement from rectocoele (e.g. constipation, incontinence, painful vaginal bulge, painful intercourse, vaginal bleeding)

Conservative: pelvic floor strengthening exercises should be advised

Biofeedback devices

Vaginal pessaries

Transvaginal/transcutaneous electrical stimulation to allow muscle contraction

Trans-anal rectocele repair: bleeding, infection 3.3%, incomplete evacuation, faecal impaction, faecal incontinence, recto-vaginal fistula, dyspareunia, sexual dysfunction, failure of procedure, recurrence 40%–66% reported an excellent/good/fair result1,2

Trans-perineal rectocoele repair: anatomical cure 89.2%, bleeding 3.6%, infection 4.8%, incomplete evacuation, faecal impaction, faecal incontinence, recto-vaginal fistula, dyspareunia, sexual dysfunction, failure of procedure, recurrence, if a mesh is used there is potential for mesh erosion and infection3

Group and save

General anaesthesia

Monitor patient in hospital until patient passes urine and faeces prior to discharge

Symptomatic review in outpatient clinic

1. Heriot AG, Maxwell P, Kumar D. Functional and physiological outcome following transanal repair of rectocele, Gastroenterology 2000;118(4):A126.reference
2. Nieminen K, Hiltunen KM, Laitinen J, et al. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(10):1636–42.reference
3. Leventog˘lu S, Mentes¸ BB, Akin M, et al. Transperineal rectocele repair with polyglycolic acid mesh: a case series. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50(12):2085–92.reference

Restorative proctocolectomy (Fig. 3.11) is a procedure designed to use loops of small bowel as a reservoir for faeces prior to defecation. The ileo-anal pouch is indicated in patients with ulcerative colitis (resistant to medical therapy), FAP, HNPCC, and has been performed in some patients with constipation.1

 Restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch.
Fig. 3.11

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.299, Figure 7.54.

The operation is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient positioned in the lithotomy position. If performed open, a midline laparotomy incision is made, the layers divided and the abdomen entered. The colon and rectum are excised, a mucosectomy may be performed, the small intestine is mobilized and the pouch is formed (either fully stapled or hand-sewn). A pouch-anal anastomosis is fashioned and the decision is then made whether or not to form an ileostomy.

The procedure can be performed either laparoscopically or as an open procedure. It can be performed as one operation or divided into two or three procedures.

Defunctioning ileostomy

Failure to create pouch and alternative procedure performed (end-ileostomy, total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis)

Therapeutic: avoid an end-stoma, allow for an element of continence, avoid social stigmas associated with stoma formation, allow for defecation through anus

Surgical: total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, total colectomy and end-ileostomy formation

Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound, urinary tract pelvic sepsis 4.7%, peritoneal abscess 1%), perforation of bowel, sexual and urinary dysfunction, infertility, anastomotic dehiscence and leak, anastomotic stricture 21.3%, pouchitis 15–50% (ulcerative colitis patients only), staple line ulcer 13.5%, pouchitis 5.4%, bowel obstruction 7.1%, alteration in bowel habit, incontinence, entero-cutaneous fistula, incisional hernia 4%, anal fistula 4%, the need for a temporary defunctioning ileostomy

Regarding mucosectomy (excision of the rectal mucosa prior to ileo-anal anastomosis), one review article concluded that whereas performing mucosectomy results in both lower rates of inflammation and dysplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis and lower rates of cuff polyposis in FAP patients, it also leads to worse functional outcomes3

Group and save/cross-match 4–6 units

General anaesthesia with regional epidural block for postoperative analgesia

Monitor patient in hospital until patient passes urine and faeces prior to discharge

Symptomatic review in outpatient clinic

Patients will often require follow-up pouchoscopy with rigid/flexible sigmoidoscopy, especially if symptomatic to ensure no evidence of pouchitis or recurrence of pathology in pouch4

1. Stewart J, Kumar D, Keighley MR. Results of anal or low rectal anastomosis and pouch construction for megarectum and megacolon. Br J Surg 1994;81(7):1051–3.reference
2. Arai K, Koganei K, Kimura H, et al. Incidence and outcome of complications following restorative proctocolectomy. Am J Surg 2005;190(1):39–42.reference
3. Chambers WM, McC Mortensen NJ. Should ileal pouch-anal anastomosis include mucosectomy?. Colorectal Dis 2007;9(5):384–92.reference
4. Pardi DS, D’Haens G, Shen B, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of pouchitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;15:1424–31.reference

Small bowel resection is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in the supine position. The procedure is performed either open or laparoscopically for the following conditions:

Small bowel tumour (benign/malignant)

Crohn's disease resistant to medical treatment

Small bowel ischaemia (i.e. superior mesenteric artery infarction)

Radiation or Crohn's disease induced stricture

Open: a midline laparotomy or other appropriate incision is made, the layers are divided and the abdomen is entered. The diseased segment of bowel is identified and resected. The two healthy ends are then either anastomosed (using hand sewn or stapled technique) or alternatively a stoma is brought to the skin surface.

Laparoscopic: 3–5 small incisions are made on the abdomen in order that the camera and instruments can be inserted. The diseased segment of bowel is identified and resected. The two healthy ends are then either anastomosed (using hand-sewn or stapled technique) or, alternatively, a stoma is brought to the skin surface.

As the length of the small bowel varies from person to person, the length of small bowel resected is not as important as the amount left behind. The British Society of Gastroenterology suggests that if there is <200cm small bowel, nutritional or fluid supplements are likely to be needed. If it is anticipated that there will be <150cm of small bowel remaining it is important to discuss the possibility of the long-term need of total parenteral nutrition.1

Following distal ileal resection patients are more prone to the formation of gallstones. As a consequence of dehydration and abnormal oxalate metabolism, certain patients following small bowel resection will also be more prone to developing kidney stones.

End-ileostomy/loop ileostomy/defunctioning stoma/abdominal drain insertion

Diagnostic: to obtain tissue for histopathological diagnosis

Therapeutic: remove diseased segment of small bowel

Medical: for Crohn's disease, medical therapy and immunotherapy can be used to decrease the inflammatory process and reduce the risk of stricture formation and fistulation

Surgical: for small bowel structuring disease in patients where length of bowel will need to be conserved, stricturoplasty can be considered as an alternative to small bowel resection

Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound and urinary infection), perforation of bowel, anastomotic dehiscence or leak (1.1%), small bowel syndrome, intestinal failure, entero-cutaneous fistula, incisional hernia, alteration of bowel habit, mortality rate (1.7%)2

Group and save/cross-match (depending on starting haemoglobin)

Regional/general anaesthesia

Routine outpatient review if required

1. Nightingale J, Woodward JM. Guidelines for Management of Patients with a Short Bowel, 2006 (on behalf of the Small Bowel and Nutrition Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology). Available at: graphic  www.bsg.org.uk/images/stories/docs/clinical/guidelines/sbn/short_bowel.pdf (accessed 5 May 2011).reference
2. Pickleman J, Watson W, Cunningham J, et al. The failed gastrointestinal anastomosis: an inevitable catastrophe? J Am Coll Surg 1999;188(5):473–82.reference

Obstructing small bowel fibrotic strictures are commonly secondary to Crohn's disease or tuberculosis. Strictures up to 25cm are amenable to strictureplasty. Heineke–Mikulicz technique is preferred for strictures smaller than 10cm with the Finney technique reserved for segments over 10cm.

Heineke–Mikulicz:1 the operation is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient placed in the supine position. A midline laparotomy incision is made, the layers are divided, and the abdomen entered (Fig. 3.12). The small bowel is carefully examined to identify the previously imaged strictures and ensure none are missed. Non-traumatic bowel clamps are secured at either end of the stricture. A longitudinal incision is made over the entire length of the stricture, and stay sutures are placed to retract and aid in the transverse closure.

Finney: the operation is performed under general anaesthesia with the patient placed in the supine position. A midline laparotomy incision is made, the layers are divided and the abdomen entered. The small bowel is carefully examined to identify the previously imaged strictures and ensure none are missed. The segment of bowel containing the stricture is brought together in a side-to-side U-shaped configuration with stay sutures placed to maintain this (Fig. 3.13). The enterotomy over the stricture is closed, suturing the opposed surfaces of the bowel together.

 Heineke-Mikulicz strictureplasty. Short (<10cm) strictures are opened longitudinally and closed transversely.
Fig. 3.12

Heineke-Mikulicz strictureplasty. Short (<10cm) strictures are opened longitudinally and closed transversely.

Reproduced with permission from MacKay GJ, Dorrance HR, Molloy RG, et al. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery. 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.141, Figure 4.15.
 Finney strictureplasty for longer (>10cm) strictures.
Fig. 3.13

Finney strictureplasty for longer (>10cm) strictures.

Reproduced with permission from MacKay GJ, Dorrance HR, Molloy RG, et al. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Colorectal Surgery. 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.142, Figure 4.16.

Small bowel resection and anastomosis

Defunctioning small bowel stoma

Diagnostic: identify the underlying cause of structuring disease, histopathological analysis of underlying stricture (Crohn's disease)

Therapeutic: to relieve symptoms, signs and complications of small bowel obstruction

Conservative: high fluid intake, low-residue diet, low-volume frequent meals

Surgical: small bowel resection

Bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess and wound infection), perforation of bowel, enterocutaneous fistula, incisional hernia, alteration of bowel habit, new disease at site of strictureplasty or at alternative small bowel segments

One long-term study of 314 patients undergoing Heineke–Mikulicz (88%) and Finney (11%) strictureplasties (1% not clearly defined) demonstrated the following: overall morbidity 18%, septic complications 5%, intra-abdominal abscess 2%, anastomotic leak or enterocutaneous fistula 2%, wound infection 1%, reoperation in postoperative period 1%, prolonged ileus 4%, mechanical small bowel obstruction 1%, luminal bleeding requiring transfusion 7%, at a mean period of 7.7 years 37% had undergone a reoperation (92% as a result of obstruction)2

Group and save/cross-match (dependent on preoperative haemoglobin)

General anaesthesia

Dependent on underlying cause of stricture formation and post operative course

1. Brown CJ. Heineke-Mikulicz and Finney strictureplasty in Crohn's disease. Oper Tech Gen Surg 2007;9(1):3–7.reference
2. Dietz DW, Laureti S, Strong SA, et al. Safety and longterm efficacy of strictureplasty in 314 patients with obstructing small bowel Crohn's Disease. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192(3):330–7.reference

The formation of a stoma will likely form only part of an operation. It is advisable that a specialist stoma nurse discuss with the patient preoperatively (when possible) the implications involved and also to aid in the siting. The important points when informing a patient of a potential stoma are:

Permanent or temporary: if it is anticipated to be temporary it is important to stress that it may be permanent depending on intra- and postoperative events

Site: an ileostomy is commonly sited in the right iliac fossa (Fig. 3.14) with a colostomy commonly sited in the right iliac fossa (Fig. 3.15)

Single- versus double-barrelled

Possibility of a mucous fistula

 Usual site of ileostomy.
Fig. 3.14

Usual site of ileostomy.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.255, Figure 7.24.
 Sites of colostomy.
Fig. 3.15

Sites of colostomy.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.263, Figure 7.28.

End—formed following the complete removal of the colon including the rectum (Fig. 3.16). A mucous fistula may be fashioned in addition, termed a double-barrelled stoma

Loop—formed in order to defunction either a distal obstructing colonic lesion or in order to protect a distal anastomosis

 End-ileostomy—with spout.
Fig. 3.16

End-ileostomy—with spout.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.255, Figure 7.25.

End—formed in order to defunction a distal segment of bowel (Fig. 3.17). Commonly performed following an anterior resection, APER, or as part of a Hartmann's operation. May be indicated in a distal colonic fistula. A mucous fistula may be fashioned in addition to this procedure

Loop—formed in order to defunction either a distal obstructing colonic lesion, a distal anastomosis or complex pelvic disease

 End-colostomy, sitting flush to skin.
Fig. 3.17

End-colostomy, sitting flush to skin.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.263, Figure 7.29.

Reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: is performed in order to restore the integrity of the intestinal tract. If performed open, involves either a circumferential incision around the stoma or possibly through the previous laparotomy incision. Reversal of loop ileostomies or colostomies can generally be performed through the circumferential incision around the stoma whereas reversal of end-ileostomies or colostomies usually involves opening the old scar in order to safely access the bowel. The anastomosis is performed and the wound is closed.

The formation of a stoma and indeed the reversal may also be performed either open or laparoscopically.

Stoma formation can be both the primary procedure or part of a larger sequence of events as a temporary stoma (defunctioning)

Therapeutic: Diversion stoma—divert faeces away from a segment of bowel that has been removed or away from the perineum in trauma or pathology (i.e. necrotizing fasciitis). Defunctioning stoma—to allow a segment of bowel, distal pathology, or anastomosis to heal

Therapeutic: to relieve symptoms, signs and complications of small or large bowel obstruction

The patient should be advised of the indications and reasons for stoma formation. If it feasible to avoid the formation of a stoma (which may result in the increased risk of an anastomotic leak) and the patient is advised of these risks then the operating surgeon may opt to forego the stoma. This should be appropriately documented on the consent form.

Formation of a stoma: overall complication rates ranging from 13.1% to 69.4%; bleeding, infection (including intra-abdominal abscess, wound and urinary infection), vascular compromise (ischaemia and infarction of the stoma 2.3–17%), retraction, prolapsed, peristomal skin irritation (3–42%), peristomal infection/abscess/fistula formation (2–14.8%), stenosis, alteration of bowel habit, parastomal hernia (early and late presentation 4.6–13%)1

Reversal of stoma: Bleeding, infection (intra-abdominal abscess, urinary and wound infection), perforation of bowel, anastomotic leak, enterocutaneous fistula, ileus, stricture at the anastomotic site, reoperation

Group and save/cross-match blood (dependent on preoperative haemoglobin and nature of the primary procedure being performed)

General anaesthesia

Dependent on underlying reason for stoma formation and postoperative course of patient

1. Kann BR. Early stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008;21(1):23–30.reference
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close