Skip to Main Content
Book cover for Handbook of Surgical Consent Handbook of Surgical Consent

Contents

Book cover for Handbook of Surgical Consent Handbook of Surgical Consent
Disclaimer
Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always … More Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Achilles tendon repair 350

Ankle fractures 351

Anterior cruciate ligament repair 352

Carpal tunnel decompression 354

Clavicle fractures 355

Distal radius fractures 357

Extracapsular neck of femur fractures 359

Ganglion excision 360

Hallux valgus correction 361

Hip arthroscopy 362

Hip resurfacing 364

Humeral supracondylar fracture (paediatric) 366

Knee arthroscopy 367

Total hip arthroplasty 369

Total knee arthroplasty 371

Intracapsular neck of femur fractures—hemiarthroplasty 373

Intracapsular neck of femur fractures—cannulated screws 374

Intramedullary nail fixation of femoral fractures 375

Intramedullary nail fixation of tibial fractures 376

Trigger finger release 378

Most Achilles tendon problems arise due to overuse injuries and are multifactorial. However, in a trauma setting a true rupture is the most common presentation.

There is still debate regarding open repair and the associated risk of wound complications (reported as up to 4%) and conservative splinting and the risk of re-rupture reported as 3.5% in operative patients versus 12% in non-operative patients.1,2

Open repair is typically performed under general anaesthesia, with the patient prone. If the tendon ends can be approximated a primary repair is achieved and the skin closed with either absorbable subcuticular or non-absorbable sutures. Postoperative rehabilitation programmes vary with some groups preferring cast or brace immobilization for 6–8 weeks; however, the period of immobilization necessary has not been clearly defined.

Tendon grafting

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: cast immobilization, functional bracing

Surgical: percutaneous repair

Common: re-rupture, wound break down, pain, bleeding, stiffness

Occasional: DVT, nerve injury

Rare: tendon lengthening

None/group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Follow up at two weeks for wound review and change of cast

1. Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, et al. Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(10):2202–10.reference
2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture. Guideline and Evidence Report. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2009.

Ankle fractures are a common injury among the young and elderly, often resulting from a combination of rotation and abduction or adduction forces. Stable fractures, i.e. those with isolated lateral malleolus fractures that are in a good position with an intact syndesmosis, may be managed conservatively. If there is failure to achieve or maintain reduction, or there is an unstable fracture pattern, operative intervention is indicated.

Open reduction and internal fixation should be planned once the soft tissues allow, i.e. swelling will allow soft tissue closure postoperatively and fracture blisters are intact or not near the planned incision. Fixation is often carried out with a locking compression plate or one-third tubular plate ± lag screw insertion. The medial malleolus can often be fixed with cannulated screws or partially threaded cancellous screws. The syndesmosis is checked and one or two screws inserted as needed if unstable. The case is usually performed under general anaesthesia with tourniquet control. Closure is with absorbable subcuticular sutures.

Syndesmosis screw insertion

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: casting

Surgical: external fixation

Common: infection (1.5%)

Occasional: malunion, non-union (1% at 5 years)

Rare: failure of metal work, pulmonary embolism (0.5%)

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Follow up at two weeks for wound review and change of cast

Removal of syndesmosis screw typically at 9 weeks

1. SooHoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ, et al. Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1042–9.reference
2. Marx RC, Mizel MS. What's new in foot and ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(2): 512–23.reference

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is integral in stabilizing the knee. The ACL-deficient knee has been linked to an increased rate of degenerative osteoarthritic changes and meniscal injuries. These injuries are most often a result of contact injuries with a rotational component and low-velocity, non-contact, deceleration forces.

Primary suture repair of the ACL used to be performed but due to failure rates of up to 100% it has now been abandoned for reconstructive techniques.

ACL reconstruction can be performed with the use of either autograft (bone-patellar tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autograft) or allograft tissue.1 It is currently unclear if the outcomes of these two methods differ significantly. These techniques are usually performed using an arthroscopic approach under general anaesthesia.

Open reconstruction, meniscal tear repair/resection

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: functional bracing

Surgical: open repair

Common: re-rupture (8%), anterior knee pain (6%)

Occasional: anterior knee numbness (1.5%)

Rare: DVT

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of sutures by general practitioner or practice nurse

Structured physiotherapy protocol, working especially on quadriceps and hamstring strengthening and stabilization

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL, et al. A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(9):2242–50.reference
2. Poolman RW, Abouali JA, Conter HJ, et al. Overlapping systematic reviews of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: why are they different? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(7):1542–52.reference
3. Geib TM, Shelton WR, Phelps RA, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcome. Arthroscopy 2009;25(12):1408–14.reference

Carpal tunnel syndrome results from compression of the median nerve as it enters the palmar surface of the hand under the flexor retinaculum. It typically presents with pain, paraesthesia, and hypoaesthesia over the radial three and a half fingers, often at night. Electrophysiological tests (nerve conduction studies) are often performed to support the clinical diagnosis.

Surgery usually involves local or regional anaesthesia as a day case. An incision is made over the flexor retinaculum with or without tourniquet control, with complete division of the retinaculum to ensure release. Closure is typically with interrupted non-absorbable sutures, and dressing with a bulky bandage and early mobilization.

Internal neurolysis

Epineurotomy

Tenosynovectomy

Therapeutic: pain relief, restoration of median nerve function

Conservative: avoidance of precipitating activities, splinting

Medical: analgesia and corticosteroid injection may be beneficial

Surgical: endoscopic carpal tunnel release

Common: recurrence of pain, scar, pilar pain (pain in the heel of the scar on pressure)

Occasional: damage to median nerve and its branches, infection

None/group and save

Generally under local/regional anaesthesia

General anaesthesia for secondary revision or other complex cases

Removal of sutures by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 3 months to assess progress

1. Scholten RJ, Mink van der Molen A, Uitdehaag BM, et al. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD003905.reference
2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2008.

Clavicle fractures are common fractures accounting for up to 12% of all fractures. They can be divided into lateral, middle, and medial third fractures, with approximately 80% being middle third fractures. Of middle third clavicle fractures, there is approximately 15% prevalence of non-union of fractures treated without surgery and a 2% rate of non-union of fractures treated with plate fixation.1

Indications for operative treatment of acute midshaft clavicular fractures include open fractures, fractures with compromised skin due to severe fracture displacement (‘tented skin’), and fractures associated with vascular or neurological injury. Other acute fracture indications that are proposed are initial clavicular shortening of 2cm, and comminuted fractures with a displaced transverse fragment.

Lateral third fractures that do go on to form a painful/symptomatic non-union may require fixation with either a synthetic sling or a hook plate. The latter can limit shoulder abduction and will usually need to be removed at around 8 weeks.

The procedure is carried out under general anaesthesia, with plate or intramedullary fixation, with subcuticular absorbable sutures to close. A period of support from a sling postoperatively is usual with rehabilitation as per local protocol.

Removal of metal work at a later date

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: broad arm sling1

Surgical: intramedullary fixation

Common: malunion, non-union (2.2%)

Occasional: hardware prominence requiring removal, plate failure, infection

Rare: supraclavicular neuroma, subclavian vein injury

Group and save

General anaesthesia

Removal of sutures/wound review by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in fracture clinic at 4 weeks to assess progress

1. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1–10.reference
2. Bahk MS, Kuhn JE, Galatz LM, et al. Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular injuries and clavicular glenoid, and scapular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:2492–510.reference
3. Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, et al. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:504–7.reference

Distal radius fractures are a common injury, particularly in the elderly. Several options exist for treatment. Non-operative management consists of closed treatment with casting. Operative treatment options include Kirschner (K) wire insertion, external fixation, arthroscopic-assisted external fixation, and various methods of open reduction and internal fixation. Indications that have been suggested for operative intervention are radial shortening, >2mm articular step, volar tilt of >10°, and dorsal tilt >10°.

The operation is usually carried out under general anaesthesia with tourniquet control. The method of fixation is defined by the fracture pattern, and currently despite multiple prospective meta-analyses including a Cochrane review, no specific type of fixation has been proven to be advantageous.1,2 The volar approach is favoured over a dorsal incision due to the soft tissue interposition between the plate and the tendons, minimizing adhesions. Skin closure is usually with absorbable subcuticular sutures.

Bone grafting

Nerve decompression

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: casting

Surgical: K-wiring, external fixation (bridging and non-bridging)

Common: malunion, non-union

Occasional: damage to tendons, infection (1–2%)

Rare: failure of metal work

None/group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Follow up at two weeks for wound review and change of cast

Removal of K-wires in fracture clinic, typically at 6 weeks

Routine follow-up in fracture clinic at 3 months to assess progress

1. Liporace FA, Adams MR, Capo JT, et al. Distal radius fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23(10):739–48.reference
2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: Guideline and Evidence Report. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2009.
3. MacKenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1944–51.reference

Neck-of-femur fractures are relatively common. Approximately 50% are extracapsular. Fixation was traditionally with dynamic hip screw, with good long-term results. More recently the cephalomedullary devices have gained popularity, particularly with intertrochanteric and reverse oblique fractures; however, there is currently no consensus on which fixation method is better with a recent prospective blinded study showing no significant benefit of one treatment modality over the other.1,2

The procedure is usually carried out on a traction table under general anaesthesia or spinal/epidural. The prosthesis is inserted and skin closure is with clips or subcuticular sutures.

The emphasis postoperatively is mobilization to help prevent further complications such as pressure sores and infections, which will severely increase morbidity. At this time bone-protecting agents, if not contraindicated, should be commenced.

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Surgical: intramedullary fixation

Common: need for revision (approx 4–6%), DVT (4%)

Occasional: periprosthetic fracture (approx 2–4%)

Rare: infection (superficial 2%, deep 1%)

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of sutures by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in fracture clinic at 6–8 weeks to assess progress

1. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:394–400.reference
2. Nikolaou VS, Papathanasopoulos A, Giannoudis PV. What's new in the management of proximal femoral fractures? Injury 2008;39(12):1309–18.reference

Ganglions are commonly found on the dorsum of the hand over the scapholunate ligament (approx 70% of all ganglions) and are a mucinous filled cyst typically adjacent to joint capsule or the tendon sheath. They may present just as a soft swelling or can cause mild aching.

Options for treatment include aspiration and injection of hyaluronidase; however, the recurrence rate is approximately 50%.1,2 Surgery for a dorsal ganglion usually involves local or regional anaesthesia as a day case. An incision is made directly over the ganglion, with the cyst being mobilized down to the joint capsule, with its capsular extensions then being excised. Closure is typically with interrupted non-absorbable sutures, and dressing with a bulky bandage and early mobilization.

Nil

Therapeutic: pain relief

Conservative: observation

Medical: needle aspiration followed by 3 weeks immobilization

Surgical: arthroscopic excision

Common: recurrence (up to 50%)

Rare: damage to digital nerves (<1%), Infection (<1%)

None/group and save

Generally under local/regional anaesthesia

General anaesthesia for secondary revision or other complex cases

Removal of sutures by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 3 months to assess progress

1. Kang L, Akelman E, Weiss AP. Arthroscopic versus open dorsal ganglion excision: a prospective, randomized comparison of rates of recurrence and of residual pain. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33(4):471–5.reference
2. Thornburg LE. Ganglions of the hand and wrist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999;7(4):231–8.reference

Hallux valgus occurs with lateral deviation of the great toe and medial deviation of the first metatarsal. Commonly the deformity is characterized by progressive subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Patients typically present with pain centred over the medial eminence caused by irritation of the dorsal cutaneous nerve of the great toe or an inflamed or thickened bursa overlying the area.

There are multiple operations available for the correction of hallux valgus, the details of which are outside the scope of this book;13 however, the majority require an osteotomy. Closure is typically with interrupted non-absorbable sutures, dressing with a bulky bandage and walking is encouraged with a heel-bearing shoe. At approximately 6 weeks, metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joint movement is initiated.

K-wire insertion

Therapeutic: pain relief

Conservative: use of a wider toe box, padding of the affected area

Medical: analgesia if required

Surgical: osteotomy of the cuneiform, arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal joint, excisional arthroplasty

Common: recurrence (10%)

Occasional: avascular necrosis of the metatarsal head, non-union

Rare: damage to digital nerves (<1%), infection (<1%)

None

General/regional anaesthesia

Follow up at two weeks for wound review and change of cast

Removal of K-wires at 6 weeks

1. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Instructional course lectures—hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78;932–66.reference
2. Easley ME, Trnka HJ. Current concepts review: hallux valgus part II: operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28(6):748–58.reference
3. Robinson AH, Limbers JP. Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(8):1038–45.reference

Hip arthroscopy allows thorough visualization of the acetabular labrum, femoral head, and acetabular chondral surfaces, as well as of the fovea, ligamentum teres, and adjacent synovium. This procedure was initially only performed at specialist centres; however, like most advances in surgery, it is becoming more widespread although it remains technically complex.

Access to the hip joint is difficult because of the resistance to distraction resulting from the large muscular envelope, the strength of the iliofemoral ligament, and the negative intra-articular pressure. The procedure involves general anaesthesia, with the use of a traction table to distract the hip. A guide-wire and sequential dilation under image intensifier control allow suitable port placement. A number of therapeutic procedures can be carried out including removal of loose bodies, debridement of acetabular and femoral head chondral flap lesions, and repair of labral tears. At the end of the procedure, the arthroscopic fluid is drained out of the joint and the incisions are closed with sutures, skin glue or Steri-strips.

Postoperatively, patients can mobilize fully weightbearing as their pain allows, initially with crutches and without them after a few days.

Labral debridement

Synovial biopsy

Removal of loose bodies

Correction of femoro-acetabular impingement

Diagnostic: biopsy if suspicion of chronically infected or inflamed joint

Therapeutic: pain relief, mechanical improvement

Conservative: include physiotherapy/prescribed exercise and other lifestyle changes

Medical: analgesia and anti-inflammatories are the mainstay of first-line treatment. Corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid may be injected into the knee joint

Surgical: total hip replacement (THR), hip resurfacing

Common: recurrence of pain, scar, damage to nerves

Occasional: guide-wire failure, haemarthrosis, infection

Rare: DVT

None/group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Very occasionally under spinal/epidural/local anaesthesia in those unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of sutures by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. McCarthy JC, Lee J. Hip arthroscopy: indications, outcomes, and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1137–45.reference
2. Clarke MT, Arora A, Villar RN. Hip arthroscopy: complications in 1054 cases. Clin Orthop 2003;406:84–8.reference
3. Griffin DR, Villar RN. Complications of arthroscopy of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:604–6.reference

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty involves removal of the diseased or damaged surfaces of the head of the femur and the acetabulum. The hip is then fitted with a non-cemented monoblock acetabular component combined with a metal-on-metal bearing made from cobalt-chromium alloy to form a pair of metal bearings. This is generally performed under general anaesthesia, with closure of the skin by subcuticular sutures or surgical clips.

The procedure was popularized by the reported ease of revision to total hip arthroplasty, the reduced risk of dislocation due to larger bearing size (0.05% in the first year), and decreased risk of loosening due to the use of metal-on-metal bearing surfaces, avoiding the wear debris associated with polyethylene. However, this is now being challenged with revision rates of 14% being reported.1,2

Another concern with these devices is the possibility of metal degradation products being absorbed into the body and their local and systemic effects. The implications of this are presently unknown.

Conversion to total hip arthroplasty

Therapeutic: pain relief, mechanical improvement

Conservative: physiotherapy/prescribed exercise and other lifestyle changes

Medical: analgesia and anti-inflammatories are the mainstay of first-line treatment. Corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid may be injected into the hip joint

Surgical: hip arthroscopy (although not currently indicated for moderate to severe osteoarthritis, may be beneficial in other aetiologies), THR

Common: pain, scar, revision of prosthesis (loosening, periprosthetic fracture), exposure to metal ions, pseudo-tumour formation

Occasional: bleeding, infection, dislocation (0.05% in the first year)

Rare: DVT, pulmonary embolism

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Very occasionally under spinal/epidural with sedation in those unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of surgical clips by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Modern Metal-on Metal Hip Resurfacing: A Technology Overview. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2009.
2. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the Use of Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. London: NICE, 2002.
3. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89(11):1431–8.reference
4. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(6 Suppl 1):36–43.reference

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are a common paediatric injury. Classically Gartland II and III type fractures (displaced) are managed operatively, usually with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Gartland I type fractures (undisplaced) are managed conservatively with an above-elbow cast.

There is still debate regarding the wiring technique, with opinion split between lateral entry and medial/lateral entry. Lateral entry advocates state that there is a reduced risk of inadvertently damaging the ulnar nerve, while advocates of medial/lateral entry point to a possible benefit with increased mechanical strength.13

The procedure involves general anaesthesia and K-wire insertion under image intensifier guidance. The wires are dressed and the elbow is immobilized in an above-elbow cast.

Opening of fracture site to reduce fragments

Therapeutic: pain relief, mechanical improvement

Conservative: manipulation and above elbow cast

Common: loss of reduction (3%)

Occasional: damage to nerves (2%), conversion to open reduction

Rare: infection (<1%)

None

General anaesthesia

Follow-up and review of fracture position and pin sites at 1 week in fracture clinic

Removal of K-wires at 4 weeks

1. Zenios M, Ramachandran M, Milne B, et al. Intraoperative stability testing of lateral-entry pin fixation of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27(6):695–702.reference
2. Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(5):1121–32.reference
3. Brauer CA, Lee BM, Bae DS, et al. A systematic review of medial and lateral entry pinning versus lateral entry pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27(2):181–6.reference

Knee arthroscopy is usually performed under general anaesthesia as a day case procedure. A small incision is made in the knee and saline is pumped into the joint space to facilitate visualization. An arthroscope, attached to a video camera is inserted through a second small incision. Some loose debris may be flushed out through the cannula along with the irrigation fluid, but consent must include the possibility for the need to carry out other procedures such as meniscal tear excision.

Debridement is often performed at the same time as washout; this involves the use of instruments to remove damaged cartilage or bone. At the end of the procedure, the saline is drained out of the joint, local anaesthetic is often added at this point and the incisions are closed with sutures, skin glue, or Steri-strips.

Meniscal tear excision/repair

Synovial biopsy

Removal of loose bodies

Diagnostic: biopsy if suspicion of chronically infected or inflamed joint

Therapeutic: pain relief, mechanical improvement

Conservative: physiotherapy/prescribed exercise and other lifestyle changes

Medical: analgesia and anti-inflammatories are the mainstay of first-line treatment. Corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid may be injected into the knee joint

Surgical: if there is a knee-joint effusion, fluid around the knee may be aspirated with a needle to reduce pain and swelling. After arthroscopy, if these therapies do not work, a knee replacement may be necessary for severe osteoarthritis (approximately 10%)

Common: recurrence of pain, scar

Occasional: haemarthrosis, infection (<1%)3

Rare: DVT (0.5%)

None/group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Very occasionally under spinal/epidural/local anaesthesia in those unfit for a general anaesthesia

Removal of sutures by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Petersen NJ, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. New Engl J Med 2002;347:81–8.reference
2. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Arthroscopic Knee Washout, With or Without Debridement, for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: Guidance. London: NICE, 2007.
3. Montgomery S, Campbell J. Septic arthritis following arthroscopy and intra-articular steroids. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71:540.reference

Elective THR is carried out to relieve discomfort and disability caused by arthropathies (including osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis) of the hip. THR is considered to be one of the most effective orthopaedic procedures performed at the present time.

There are a number of surgical approaches to the hip, with the posterior approach remaining the most common for elective primary THR. There is good evidence to support the combined use of antibiotic impregnated cement and systemic antibiotics to reduce infection.13 This is generally performed under general anaesthesia, with closure of the skin by subcuticular sutures or surgical clips.

There are a large number of prosthesis designs, bearing materials and fixation modalities. Many of these have specific complications, e.g. ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces have an increased risk of squeaking and cracking. Metal-on-metal has the possible risk of metal ion exposure. The rate of revision as reported by the Swedish Joint Registry is approximately 6% at 7 years.

Fixation of intraoperative femoral fracture

Therapeutic: pain relief, mechanical improvement

Conservative: physiotherapy/prescribed exercise and other lifestyle changes

Medical: analgesia and anti-inflammatories are the mainstay of first-line treatment. Corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid may be injected into the hip joint

Surgical: hip arthroscopy (although not currently indicated for moderate to severe osteoarthritis, may be beneficial in other aetiologies), hip resurfacing, osteotomy, and arthrodesis

Common: pain, scar, revision of prosthesis

Occasional: bleeding, infection (superficial 2% and deep 0.2%1,3), intraoperative femoral fracture, dislocation (5%), damage to sciatic nerve, leg length discrepancy

Rare: DVT, pulmonary embolism (0.4% even in the untreated patient4)

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Very occasionally under spinal/epidural with sedation in those unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of surgical clips by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks

1. Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Nelson CL. Prevention of deep periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78(3):458-71.reference
2. British Orthopaedic Association. Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Guide To Good Practice. London: British Orthopaedic Association, 2006.
3. AlBuhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A. Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(7):915–19.reference
4. Lie SA, Engesaeter LB. Early post-operative mortality after 67 548 total hip replacements. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73(4):392–9.reference

Severe pain and disability with accompanying radiological changes in the knee are almost always the indications for total knee arthroplasty, in patients where conservative treatment has failed or is futile. Occasionally there may be an indication to replace a knee because of progressive deformity and/or instability, and pain may not necessarily be the most significant factor.

This is generally performed under general anaesthesia. A midline incision is made with intraoperative tourniquet to aid the surgical field. There are multiple implants available, varying in fixation, whether cruciate sparing or sacrificing, constraint, and composition. Even though for a true total knee replacement all three compartments—medial, lateral and patellofemoral—are resurfaced, commonly, depending on surgeon preference or patella condition, the patellofemoral compartment may not be resurfaced.

There is good evidence to support the combined use of antibiotic impregnated cement and systemic antibiotics to reduce infection.1,2 The routine use of drains is still a matter of debate. Closure of the skin is by subcuticular sutures or surgical clips.

Postoperatively the patient is either mobilized with physiotherapy or continuous passive movement machines immediately or on day 1 postoperatively.

Fixation of intraoperative femoral or tibial fracture

Therapeutic: pain relief, mechanical improvement

Conservative: physiotherapy/prescribed exercise and other lifestyle changes

Medical: analgesia and anti-inflammatories are the mainstay of first-line treatment. Corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid may be injected into the hip joint

Surgical: knee arthroscopy, unicompartmental arthroplasty, osteotomy, and arthrodesis

Common: pain, scar, revision of prosthesis (approximately 1.4% at 8 years)

Occasional: vascular injury (0.1%), infection (1% at 1 year), intraoperative femoral or tibial fracture, dislocation, damage to common peroneal nerve (0.58%4)

Rare: DVT, pulmonary embolism

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/epidural with sedation in those unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of surgical clips by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks

1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Instructional course lectures—common complications of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:278–311.
2. British Orthopaedic Association. Knee Replacement: A Guide To Good Practice. London: British Orthopaedic Association, 1999.
3. Deirmengian CA, Lonner JH. What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(12):3008–18.reference
4. Mont MA, Dellon AL, Chen F, et al. The operative treatment of peroneal nerve palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:863–9.reference

For intracapsular fractures, the Garden classification is the most commonly used: I, incomplete; II, complete but non-displaced; III, complete, partially displaced; and IV, complete and fully displaced.1

Classically displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures are managed with hemiarthroplasty, either cemented or uncemented.2 There is still debate about the use of cemented prosthesis and their potential for better functional results balanced with the risk of intraoperative hypotension.3 Total hip arthroplasty may be considered in those patients with good preoperative function and existing osteoarthritis; however, there are concerns over an increased risk of postoperative dislocation.

The bipolar prosthesis has a theoretical advantage in that it is designed to move on its inner bearing, in addition to articulating at the prosthesis–acetabulum interface. The purpose of this design is to achieve less acetabular wear, less pain, lower dislocation rates, and increased range of motion. However, bipolar prostheses are more expensive and it is still unclear whether or not the inner bearing loses mobility with time and becomes stiff, thereby minimizing the advantage of this design.

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Surgical: bipolar hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty

Common: dislocation (5%), pain (5% at 24 months)

Occasional: DVT, pulmonary embolism (1–5%), need for revision

Rare: infection (1%)

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of clips by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6–8 weeks to assess progress

1. Garden RS. Reduction and fixation of subcapital fractures of the femur. Orthop Clin North Am 1974;5:683.reference
2. Frihagen F, Nordsletten L, Madsen JE. Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2007;335:1251–4.reference
3. Khan RJ, MacDowell A, Crossman P, et al. Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip—a systematic review. Injury 2002;33(1):13–17.reference

For intracapsular fractures, the Garden classification is the most commonly used: I, incomplete; II, complete but non-displaced; III, complete, partially displaced; and IV, complete and fully displaced.

Typically cannulated screws are used for undisplaced or minimally displaced intracapsular fractures, as the blood supply is likely to be sufficient, in patients with good-quality bone to prevent avascular necrosis, although this is still one of the major postoperative risks. The procedure involves the patient positioned on a traction table, then, with image intensifier guidance, insertion of three cannulated screws, usually positioned in an inverted triangle with the lowest screw being inserted above the lesser trochanter.

The wound is closed in layers with subcuticular sutures or surgical clips to the skin. Weightbearing status is usually partial to full.

Hemiarthroplasty

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: skin traction

Surgical: dynamic hip screw with derotation screw

Common: revision at 10 years (33%), avascular necrosis (10%)

Occasional: malunion and non-union (5–10%)

Rare: infection 1%

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of staples by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. Nikolaou VS, Papathanasopoulos A, Giannoudis PV. What's new in the management of proximal femoral fractures? Injury 2008;39(12):1309–18.reference
2. Parker MJ. The management of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82(7):937–41.reference
3. Parker MJ, Tagg CE. Internal fixation of intracapsular fractures. J R Coll Surg Edinb 2002;47(3):541–7.reference

Intramedullary nail fixation of a femoral fracture has become gold standard when compared with plate fixation or conservative treatment in the majority of cases. The benefits over plate fixation include reduction of extensive soft tissue dissection with the increased risk of infection and quadriceps scarring.

Intramedullary nailing can be performed as either retrograde or antegrade and can be reamed or unreamed. The debate surrounding reamed versus unreamed is ongoing.1 The negative effects proposed for reaming are elevated intramedullary pressures, elevated pulmonary artery pressures, and increased fat embolism. However, reaming allows the use of larger nails and the overall outcome of bone growth and blood supply does not differ, with the latter being re-established at approximately 11 weeks.

Utilization of skeletal traction pin intraoperatively

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: skin traction

Surgical: external fixation, plate fixation

Common: malunion and non-union (2%)

Occasional: infection

Rare: compartment syndrome, fat embolism, DVT, pulmonary embolism

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of staples by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in fracture clinic at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. Rudloff MI, Smith WR. Intramedullary nailing of the femur: current concepts concerning reaming. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23(5 Suppl):S12–17.reference
2. Giannoudis PV, Pape HC, Cohen AP, et al. Review: systemic effects of femoral nailing: from Küntscher to the immune reactivity era. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:378–86.reference

Intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial shaft fracture has become gold standard when compared to plate fixation or conservative treatment in the majority of cases. Fractures close to the mortise, the knee and multisegmental fractures will likely benefit from plating or the use of external fixation devices.

Tibial intramedullary nails are often used in open fractures, using less soft tissue stripping, which allows concomitant soft tissue coverage. Conservative management of tibial fractures still has an important role to play in those who have significant comorbidities; however, nailing allows early mobilization, avoiding the stiffness of the ankle and the knee associated with full leg casting.1

The debate surrounding reamed versus unreamed is ongoing. The negative effects proposed for reaming are elevated intramedullary pressures, elevated pulmonary artery pressures, and increased fat embolism. However, reaming allows the use of larger nails and the overall outcome of bone growth and blood supply does not differ with the latter being re-established at approximately 11 weeks.

Poller screw insertion in more proximal fractures

Therapeutic: mechanical improvement

Conservative: cast immobilization

Surgical: external fixation, plate fixation

Common: anterior knee pain (50%), malunion and non-union (4%2,3)

Occasional: infection (2%)

Rare: compartment syndrome, fat embolism, DVT, pulmonary embolism

Group and save

Generally under general anaesthesia

Spinal/regional anaesthesia if unfit for general anaesthesia

Removal of staples by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in fracture clinic at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. Bone LB, Sucato D, Stegemann PM, et al. Displaced isolated fractures of the tibial shaft treated with either a cast or intramedullary nailing. An outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79(9):1336–41.reference
2. Väistö O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, et al. Anterior knee pain and thigh muscle strength after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a report of 40 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18(1):18–23.reference
3. Toivanen JA, Väistö O, Kannus P, et al. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84(4):580–5.reference

Trigger finger results from localized tenosynovitis of the superficial and deep flexor tendons adjacent to the A1 pulley at the metacarpal head. This inflammation causes nodular enlargement of the tendon (commonly in the ring and middle fingers), causing a painful clicking as the nodule moves through the pulley.

Surgery usually involves local or regional anaesthesia as a day case. An incision is made over the A1 pulley with tourniquet control, care is taken to visualize the digital nerves and release the A1 pulley and then to assess if there is any further triggering. Closure is typically with interrupted non-absorbable sutures, and dressing with a bulky bandage and early mobilization.

Excision of small piece of tendon sheath if passage of tendon is still restricted after release of A1 pulley

Therapeutic: pain relief, mechanical improvement

Conservative: physiotherapy, typically by splinting the distal interphalangeal joint of the affected finger

Medical: analgesia and corticosteroid injection may be beneficial

Surgical: percutaneous release of the A1 pulley

Common: recurrence (3%)

Occasional: bowstringing of tendons

Rare: damage to digital nerves, infection

None/group and save

Generally under local/regional anaesthesia

General anaesthesia for secondary revision or other complex cases

Removal of sutures by general practitioner or practice nurse

Routine follow-up in orthopaedic outpatients at 6 weeks to assess progress

1. Turowski general anaesthesia, Zdankiewicz PD, Thomson JG. The results of surgical treatment of trigger finger. J Hand Surg Am 1997;22(1):145–9.reference
2. Ryzewicz M, Wolf JM. Trigger digits: principles, management, and complications. J Hand Surg Am 2006;31(1):135–46.reference
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close