Skip to Main Content
Book cover for Oxford Handbook of Palliative Care (2 edn) Oxford Handbook of Palliative Care (2 edn)
Max Watson et al.

A newer edition of this book is available.

Close

Contents

Book cover for Oxford Handbook of Palliative Care (2 edn) Oxford Handbook of Palliative Care (2 edn)
Max Watson et al.
Disclaimer
Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always … More Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

There are three questions that should be answered when starting empirical antibiotics in palliative patients.

Does the patient have an infection?

Is it clinically appropriate to either start or withhold antibiotic therapy? The physician needs to weigh the benefits of antibiotics against the risk of prolonging dying

Which antibiotic will be the most effective while minimizing any burden to the patient?

The first two questions are difficult and complex, and may challenge physicians. Decisions need to be made on an individual basis. The third question should be the easiest to answer, however often it is not.

To look for information to help answer question three, we have reviewed the literature on the use of antibiotics in palliative care.

On quick review of these articles common themes emerge:

Infections are very common in palliative patients who may have been immunosuppressed either by the disease or treatment

The commonest site for bacterial infection seems to vary between chest and urinary tract in different studies. Soft tissue infections are less common

Antibiotics seem, at best, to offer small improvements in symptom control, with urinary symptoms the most likely to improve

In order to produce this guidance we have looked at the published antibiotic policies for other specialties and tried to tailor them to the needs of palliative care patients. It has also been necessary to liaise closely with the local microbiology expert.

These suggestions have been developed in a particular context; microbial profiles and microbiological opinion may vary in different regions.

To inform the choice of empirical antibiotics for hospice patients so that the most effective regimens are used producing the least burden

They will not deal with the ethics of commencing, withdrawing or withholding treatment

They will not discuss the difficulties of making a diagnosis of infection in the palliative population

The decision regarding the transfer of patients from the hospice setting to an acute unit for treatment of an infection is not included here but should always be considered.

To help make the right antibiotic choice

To limit the number of antibiotics that need to be stocked

To reduce the risk of the emergence of multiresistant organisms

To allow audit

Life prolongation without prolonging dying

Symptom control (pyrexia, pain, bleeding, delirium, dyspnoea, reduce odour)

The severity of an infection is of critical importance when planning the appropriate management. In all patients infection severity may determine the antibiotic choice, the route of administration and the safety of outpatient management. Hospice patients will invariably have multiple problems, placing them at risk of more severe infections. However, these risk factors do not allow for accurate prognostication and should be seen as an aide to clinical judgement only.

Risk factors for more severe infections include:

Advanced age

Advanced disease

Steroids

Immunosuppression from disease or treatment

ECOG status 3 and 4

Evidence of organ dysfunction, e.g. biochemical derangement, delirium

Clinical findings of infection severity, e.g. rigors, peripheral hypoperfusion

Change in vital observations, e.g. hypotension

Anatomical distortion in the affected organ system, e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bladder tumour

If antibiotic treatment is deemed necessary, then it is necessary to culture samples. Directed antibiotic therapy gives better outcomes, with fewer adverse effects

Cultures and swabs should always be taken prior to starting antibiotics

There is no point in taking samples for microbiological culture and leaving them sitting at room temprature overnight for a morning collection. This will increase the chance of having false-positive and false-negative results

Swabs and urine samples can be stored overnight at 4°C. Investing in a fridge for this purpose seems most appropriate

Blood cultures must be kept at body temperature

Swabs will pick up commensals as well as pathogens so only treat a positive swab result if symptomatic

Bacteriuria is common so a positive MSU/CSU should only be treated if symptomatic

Positive blood cultures should be treated unless there is a good reason not to. Discussion with the microbiology department would help to assess clinical significance

It is important to know if the patient has a history of drug allergies

Antibiotic courses can be assumed to be for 5 days unless specifically stated

If the infection is severe then the first 24 hours of antibiotics should be given intravenously (IV)

Parenteral antibiotics IV or IM may need to be used for a prolonged course if the patient cannot swallow tablets or absorb them from the gastrointestinal tract. In this case the reason should be clearly documented in the medical notes

After 48 hours, if the patient’s condition has not improved discuss with microbiology regarding changing antibiotics

Direct antibiotic therapy once culture results are known

Cross-reaction in 15–20% of people between penicillin and the cephalosporins, carbapenems and monobactam.

Remember to consider boosting steroids if necessary

If in doubt—liaise with the local microbiology service

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close