
Contents
Cite
Abstract
This chapter covers antibiotics in palliative care, including the aim of antibiotic guidance, generic severity considerations, cultures, and other important considerations.
There are three questions that should be answered when starting empirical antibiotics in palliative patients.
Does the patient have an infection?
Is it clinically appropriate to either start or withhold antibiotic therapy? The physician needs to weigh the benefits of antibiotics against the risk of prolonging dying
Which antibiotic will be the most effective while minimizing any burden to the patient?
The first two questions are difficult and complex, and may challenge physicians. Decisions need to be made on an individual basis. The third question should be the easiest to answer, however often it is not.
To look for information to help answer question three, we have reviewed the literature on the use of antibiotics in palliative care.
On quick review of these articles common themes emerge:
Infections are very common in palliative patients who may have been immunosuppressed either by the disease or treatment
The commonest site for bacterial infection seems to vary between chest and urinary tract in different studies. Soft tissue infections are less common
Antibiotics seem, at best, to offer small improvements in symptom control, with urinary symptoms the most likely to improve
In order to produce this guidance we have looked at the published antibiotic policies for other specialties and tried to tailor them to the needs of palliative care patients. It has also been necessary to liaise closely with the local microbiology expert.
These suggestions have been developed in a particular context; microbial profiles and microbiological opinion may vary in different regions.
The aim of antibiotic guidance
To inform the choice of empirical antibiotics for hospice patients so that the most effective regimens are used producing the least burden
They will not deal with the ethics of commencing, withdrawing or withholding treatment
They will not discuss the difficulties of making a diagnosis of infection in the palliative population
The decision regarding the transfer of patients from the hospice setting to an acute unit for treatment of an infection is not included here but should always be considered.
Importance of guidelines/ance
To help make the right antibiotic choice
To limit the number of antibiotics that need to be stocked
To reduce the risk of the emergence of multiresistant organisms
To allow audit
Aim of antibiotic therapy within the hospice
Life prolongation without prolonging dying
Symptom control (pyrexia, pain, bleeding, delirium, dyspnoea, reduce odour)
Generic severity considerations
The severity of an infection is of critical importance when planning the appropriate management. In all patients infection severity may determine the antibiotic choice, the route of administration and the safety of outpatient management. Hospice patients will invariably have multiple problems, placing them at risk of more severe infections. However, these risk factors do not allow for accurate prognostication and should be seen as an aide to clinical judgement only.
Risk factors for more severe infections include:
Advanced age
Advanced disease
Steroids
Immunosuppression from disease or treatment
ECOG status 3 and 4
Evidence of organ dysfunction, e.g. biochemical derangement, delirium
Clinical findings of infection severity, e.g. rigors, peripheral hypoperfusion
Change in vital observations, e.g. hypotension
Anatomical distortion in the affected organ system, e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bladder tumour
Cultures
If antibiotic treatment is deemed necessary, then it is necessary to culture samples. Directed antibiotic therapy gives better outcomes, with fewer adverse effects
Cultures and swabs should always be taken prior to starting antibiotics
There is no point in taking samples for microbiological culture and leaving them sitting at room temprature overnight for a morning collection. This will increase the chance of having false-positive and false-negative results
Swabs and urine samples can be stored overnight at 4°C. Investing in a fridge for this purpose seems most appropriate
Blood cultures must be kept at body temperature
Swabs will pick up commensals as well as pathogens so only treat a positive swab result if symptomatic
Bacteriuria is common so a positive MSU/CSU should only be treated if symptomatic
Positive blood cultures should be treated unless there is a good reason not to. Discussion with the microbiology department would help to assess clinical significance
Other important considerations
It is important to know if the patient has a history of drug allergies
Antibiotic courses can be assumed to be for 5 days unless specifically stated
If the infection is severe then the first 24 hours of antibiotics should be given intravenously (IV)
Parenteral antibiotics IV or IM may need to be used for a prolonged course if the patient cannot swallow tablets or absorb them from the gastrointestinal tract. In this case the reason should be clearly documented in the medical notes
After 48 hours, if the patient’s condition has not improved discuss with microbiology regarding changing antibiotics
Direct antibiotic therapy once culture results are known
Cross-reaction in 15–20% of people between penicillin and the cephalosporins, carbapenems and monobactam.
Remember to consider boosting steroids if necessary
If in doubt—liaise with the local microbiology service
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 3 |
December 2022 | 3 |
January 2023 | 2 |
February 2023 | 5 |
March 2023 | 4 |
April 2023 | 1 |
May 2023 | 1 |
June 2023 | 2 |
July 2023 | 2 |
August 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 2 |
October 2023 | 4 |
November 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 3 |
January 2024 | 1 |
February 2024 | 1 |
March 2024 | 4 |
April 2024 | 6 |
May 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 2 |
July 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 7 |