Skip to Main Content
Book cover for Oxford Handbook of Occupational Health (2 edn) Oxford Handbook of Occupational Health (2 edn)

Contents

Book cover for Oxford Handbook of Occupational Health (2 edn) Oxford Handbook of Occupational Health (2 edn)
Disclaimer
Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always … More Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Psychoses due to occupational exposures 306

Stress 1: recognition and assessment 308

Stress 2: interventions/risk controls 311

Post-traumatic stress disorder 1: diagnosis and risk factors 313

Post-traumatic stress disorder 2: management 314

Organic psychosis due to occupational exposures is thankfully unusual, but its very rarity means that the diagnosis may be missed. Historically, exposures in certain industries put workers at risk of organic psychoses or psychiatric effects:

Mirror silvering (mercury)

Manganese mining

Cold vulcanization of rubber (CS2)

Manufacture of organoleads for leaded petrol.

A syndrome of hallucinations, nervousness, insomnia, emotional lability, (especially inappropriate laughter), compulsive behavior, and altered libido.

Insomnia, anxiety, emotional lability, delusions and mania. If exposure is severe, death due to encephalopathy may occur.

Depression, emotional lability (including inappropriate laughter), and increased response to stimuli (erethism). Neurological deficits, including coarse tremor, dysarthria, ataxia, visual field losses, and peripheral neuropathy, may co-exist.

Irritability, agitation, hallucinations, and bipolar illness.

Organolead (tetraethyl lead, triethyl lead)

Methylmercury

Manganese: chronic exposure in manganese mining

Aluminium?

Tin (triethyl tin, trimethyl tin)

Organic solvents: e.g. in glues, paints, degreasants

carbon disulphide (CS2)

styrene—boat building

lacquers, varnishes—furniture making

microelectronics industry.

Manganese: adverse effects generally present in susceptible individuals after 6mths exposure. The young appear more susceptible.

A history of exposure to any of these agents should alert the treating doctor to the possibility of an organic cause for the patient’s illness. Manganese intoxication may present with both psychiatric symptoms and parkinsonian features (see graphic  p. 292, Parkinsonism).

The psychiatric effects of manganese may be reversible if identified early and exposure ceases.

See graphic  p. 436, Organic lead for details of organic lead surveillance.

Withdraw from exposure.

CNS toxicity characterized by tremor and neuropsychiatric disease is prescribed (C5(a)) for Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit in those who have been exposed to mercury for >10yrs.

Control of Lead at Work Regulations 2002 Approved Code of Practice.

The emotional and physiological state of disequilibrium that pertains when the perceived demands of life exceed one’s perceived ability to cope. It is:

Not a mental illness

Not listed in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM IV)

Natural response to range of challenges or life events

Not necessarily harmful; can improve performance in some situations

In some individuals may be a risk factor for poor mental ill health.

435,000 people in the UK reported work related stress, anxiety, or depression in 2006/7. See graphic  http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/overall/hssh0910.pdf

20% of the UK working population ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ stressed

More than 9.3 million working days are lost each year in the UK from work-related mental ill health or ‘stress’

Individual, local, organizational, and cultural factors affect the level of reported stress

The sharp rise in cases of reported stress contrasts with the relatively minor secular changes in prevalence of mental illness.

Clinical features

Individual symptoms

Reduced self-confidence

Feelings of tension and nervousness

Self-doubt

Indecisiveness

Increased irritability

Fluctuations of mood

Sleep difficulties

Poor concentration

‘Burn-out’

Behavioural changes

Increased irritability

Impulsive behaviour

Social withdrawal

Less able to relax at home

Working more than usual

Increased use of caffeine, cigarettes or alcohol, addictive drugs or other substances

graphicRemember stress is not an illness and all these symptoms are non-specific

Adjustment disorders

Mainly anxiety ± depressive symptoms

Temporal association with an apparent stressor

Significant impairment of social and occupational functioning is required to establish the diagnosis

The Management Standards

HSE describes a system to identify risk factors at work (see graphic  p. 134, Organizational psychosocial factors)

Demand

Change

Relationships

Control

Role

Support

Workers in several sectors report higher levels of stress, but that does not mean these sectors are more stressful:

Secondary school teachers

HCWs

Call centre operatives

Emergency service workers (police in particular).

Sector-specific guidance on risk management is available on the HSE website. graphic  http://www.hse.gov.uk/stress/information.htm

Previous history of work-related stress

Co-existing non-work-related stress (e.g. domestic upheavals)

Previous history of mental health problems

High alcohol intake

Excessive personal expectations, Type A personality.

Exclusion of psychiatric disorder: e.g. major depressive illness, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)

Identification of potential occupational stressors: including interpersonal conflict, bullying, harassment, or grievances, by risk assessment

Identification of non-work stressors

Identify current coping strategies: are they helpful, can they be influenced by individual mentors or training?

‘Post-traumatic stress disorder’ has very specific diagnostic criteria and the term should not be used if these are not met.

In general, excellent

Early intervention critical to successful outcome (see graphic  p. 311, Stress 2: interventions/risk controls).

Can be detrimental to recovery of the employee unless the condition interferes significantly with performance at work. As far as possible, with adequate support and adjustments, it is advisable to keep the employee at work

If time off work is needed, there should be clarity about reason for absence, return to work process, and how progress will be monitored.

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

Tackling stress: The Management Standards Approach (1997). graphic  http://www.hse.gov.uk/stress/standards/

See graphic  p. 134, Organizational psychosocial factors, Risk controls.

Stressor identification and risk assessment

Attention to job design

Skills and leadership training at all levels in the organization

Flexible working as part of work–life balance programme.

Attentive and compassionate management

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)

Change management

Assertiveness training

Time management

Interpersonal skills training.

Psychological support through occupational health (OH) and employee support programme:

Confidential self-referral service available to all employees

Access to clinical psychology

Therapy techniques aimed at problem-solving

Highly focused individualized approach

Emphasis on therapeutic benefits of work.

Involving employee, OH +/– treating psychologist, patient’s manager, and HR taking a shared problem-solving approach to deal with stress issues

Particularly useful if patient is off work and where interpersonal conflict has complicated the situation

Enabling early agreement on a graduated rehabilitation programme back to work, establishing job definition, hours and days of work, etc.

Educating managers on nature of stress-related difficulties and ensuring their commitment to the rehabilitation programme, including preparation of the rest of the team for the employee’s return from sickness absence.

Health and Safety Executive. (1999). Managing Stress at Work. HSE, Sudbury.

Health and Safety Executive. (2001). Tackling work-related stress: a manager’s guide to improving and maintaining employee health and wellbeing. HSE, Sudbury.

Health and Safety Executive. (2004). Stress Management Standards. HSE, Sudbury.

Calnan M, Wainwright D (2002) Work stress: the making of a modern epidemic. Open University Press, London. Available at: graphic  http://www.hse.gov.uk/stress/index.htm

Extremely disturbing events can have marked and sustained emotional effects. Warfare has provided most evidence and it has generated many diagnoses, including Da Costa’s syndrome, soldier’s heart, and shell shock. The Vietnam War led to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) entering the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III) (American Psychiatric Association, 1980). The current revision is the DSM-IV (1994 American Psychiatric Association, 1994). The nosology used most frequently in the UK is the ICD-10 (WHO, 1992).1

Community samples: no community-based survey of PTSD has been conducted in the UK and most data derive from the USA. Note the obvious sociocultural differences, including availability of firearms.

lifetime prevalence for adult exposure to trauma 3.9–89.6%

lifetime PTSD prevalence rates 1.0–11.2%

risk of PTSD is greater for ♀ than ♂ (20.4% vs. 8.1%)

younger urban populations report higher incidence (up to 30.2% for ♀ and 13% for ♂)

Selected samples:

4% of UK Armed Forces deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan

20% of those who have experienced physical assault.

Stressor criterion: victim must have been exposed to a stressful event or situation (either short- or long-lasting) of an exceptionally threatening or catastrophic nature, which is likely to cause pervasive distress in almost anyone.

Symptoms:

repetitive, intrusive recollection or re-enactment in memories, daytime imagery or dreams

commonly fear and avoidance (i.e. reminders of the event)

usually hyperarousal, such as an exaggerated acoustic startle response and hypervigilance.

graphicDo not use the term PTSD loosely.

The ICD-10 is not very specific: The onset [of PTSD] follows the trauma with a latency, which may range from a few weeks to months (but rarely exceeds 6mths)

DSM-IV subclassification: 1–3mths (acute); >3mths (chronic), and onset after 6mths (delayed)

Delayed onset is uncommon; delayed reporting is more common.

Victims may be reluctant to admit to symptoms for fear of being seen as weak (especially military and emergency service personnel)

Victims may find it too disturbing to talk about the event

Insensitive and premature assessment may lead to re-traumatization

Relatives’ observations can be helpful.

Clinician Administered Assessment Scale for PTSD (CAPS): highly structured interview gives a measure of lifetime and current PTSD severity and functional impairment. Regarded as the gold standard

Impact of Event Scale–Revised (IES–R): a 22-item self-report scale, which assesses frequency of the core symptoms; intrusive phenomena (e.g. flashbacks), avoidance, and hyperarousal (not diagnostic measure)

Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS): a 17-item self-report scale that provides a measure of the severity and frequency of each DSM-IV symptom.

No single event will cause PTSD in all exposed individuals. Risk factors include the following:

Pre-trauma factors:

anxious personality

previous and/or familial psychiatric history

lower education and sociocultural status

genetic predisposition, ↑ concordance in monozygotes

female gender, except among the military

younger age, especially in males

Concurrent life stressors

Trauma and peritraumatic factors:

severity—generally, there is a dose–response curve

physical injury—the meaning of an injury is as important as its objective severity

(perceived) threat of serious injury or to life (of self and/or others)

dissociation—depersonalization, derealization

extended exposure, such as being taken hostage and being trapped

elevated autonomic arousal, especially heart rate.

Post-trauma factors:

adverse reactions of others: criticism, rejection, blame

2° life stressors

lack of support.

Sectors likely to expose employees to work-related trauma.

Military

Heavy industry

Emergency services

Offshore oil and gas industry

Construction

Sea fishing

Farming.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has published guidelines on the management of PTSD.

Psychological first aid is a widely agreed paradigm for helping individuals and communities after major calamity, including:

attending to basic needs for food, safety, etc.

outreach and dissemination of information

strengthening community, social, and family structures

psycho-education—normal reactions and coping methods

triage—identify those requiring psychiatric care

Watchful waiting:. most individuals do not develop PTSD; thus do not subject all victims to psychiatric treatment or even counselling. Instead, monitor progress and provide treatment for those whose symptoms last ~1mth

Facilitate peer, family, and community support

Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD):

mandatory debriefs should not be conducted

single-session debriefs are neutral or occasionally harmful.

PTSD mostly occurs in the context of comorbidity, especially depression, anxiety, and alcohol abuse. The NICE guidelines endorse the following treatments:

Psychological therapies should be tried first:

trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TFCBT)

eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)

Pharmacotherapy:

paroxetine and mirtazapine for general use

amitriptyline hydrochloride and phenelzine for specialist use

Medication is appropriate if the patient has not responded to TFCBT or EMDR, or is unwilling and/or unable to undergo such psychotherapy

Patients should be advised of side effects and discontinuation/withdrawal symptoms (particularly paroxetine)

A hypnotic may be used in the short term for sleep problems

Antidepressants are preferred for chronic sleep difficulties to avoid dependence

Propranolol and hydrocortisone may have psychoprophylactic properties, but routine use cannot be justified.

Most spontaneous recovery is within the first few weeks

There may be a re-emergence of symptoms 12mths after the event—the anniversary reaction

If persistent or recurrent after 12mths, symptoms may run a lengthy chronic course.

Civil proceedings: concerns about feigning and exaggeration of PTSD symptoms are common, but evidence suggests that this is not a widespread problem. Symptoms tend not to remit after claim settlement

Criminal proceedings: PTSD can mitigate or explain the conduct of the accused. However, merely suffering from PTSD does not mean that there is any causal connection between the individual’s mental state and the alleged offence

False vs. genuine claimants: rigorous assessment is essential and should include:

clinical interview

standardized measures

GP and hospital records

information from others (e.g. spouse).

Genuine claimants display consistent accounts across different settings and at different times. Caution should be exercised when individuals do not describe their symptoms and experiences in spontaneous and lay terms. Pseudo-technical language may suggest coaching. In most genuine cases, descriptions of dramatic events are accompanied by appropriate emotional displays (e.g. distress, disgust, anxiety). Reporting of symptoms (e.g. hallucinations and delusions), rarely associated with PTSD, should raise suspicion, as should the reporting of unremitting symptoms: PTSD is a phasic condition with spells of remission and relapse. Genuine claimants do not tend to be uncooperative or suspicious of the examiner. Most genuine claimants minimize their suffering and distress, and do not blame all their difficulties on PTSD.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2005). Post-traumatic stress disorder. the management of PTSD in adults and children in primary and secondary care. Royal College of Psychiatrists, London/British Psychological Society, Leicester. Available at: graphic  http://www.nice.org.uk/CG26

Meze G (2006). Post-traumatic stress disorder and the law. Psychiatry,  5, 243–7.
Klein S, Alexander DA (2009). Epidemiology and presentation of post-traumatic disorders. Psychiatry, 8(8), 282–7.
Klein S, Alexander DA (2011). The impact of trauma within organisations. In: Tehrani N., ed., Managing trauma in the workplace, pp. 117–38. Routledge, Abingdon.
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close