Abstract

Aims

The aim was to study pregnancy outcomes in women with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) and associations to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Maternal morbidity and mortality are higher in women with heart disease and pre-eclampsia. Chronic hypertension, frequently encountered in CoA, is a risk factor for pre-eclampsia.

Methods and results

Clinical data from the National Unit for Pregnancy and Heart Disease database was reviewed for pregnant women with CoA from 2008 to 2021. The primary outcome was hypertensive pregnancy disorders. The secondary outcomes were other cardiovascular, obstetric, and foetal complications. Seventy-six patients were included, with a total of 87 pregnancies. Seventeen (20%) patients were treated for chronic hypertension before pregnancy. Fifteen (20%) patients developed pre-eclampsia, and 5 (7%) had pregnancy-induced hypertension. Major adverse cardiac events developed in four (5%) patients, with no maternal or foetal mortality. Maternal age at first pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 1.37], body mass index before first pregnancy (OR 1.77), and using acetylsalicylic acid from the first trimester (OR 0.22) were statistically significantly associated with pre-eclampsia. At follow-up (median) 8 years after pregnancy, 29 (38%) patients had anti-hypertensive treatment, an increase of 16% compared to pre-pregnancy. Five (7%) patients had progression of aorta ascendens dilatation to >40 mm, seven (9%) had an upper to lower systolic blood pressure gradient >20 mmHg, and six (8%) had received CoA re-intervention.

Conclusion

Pre-eclampsia occurred in 20% of women with CoA in their first pregnancy. All pre-eclamptic patients received adequate anti-hypertensive treatment. All CoA patients were provided multi-disciplinary management, including cardiologic follow-up, to optimize maternal–foetal outcomes.

Introduction

Women with repaired coarctation of the aorta (CoA) are expected to reach fertile age due to improvements in early surgical repair, surgical techniques, management of arterial hypertension, and other complications.1,2 Pregnant women with repaired CoA are considered to have an intermediate risk of maternal mortality and moderate-to-severe risk of morbidity, with a previously reported event rate of 10–19% during pregnancy. Women with repaired CoA correspond to modified World Health Organization (mWHO) Classes II and III, while women with unrepaired severe CoA are classified as mWHO Class IV.3 The complication rates have varied due to reports on different endpoints and variable proportions of pregnant women with repaired vs. unrepaired CoA.4–7 Despite improvements in survival for patients with CoA, cardiac complication rates are relatively high, with re-coarctation in 34%, aortic aneurysms in 18%, chronic hypertension in 32%, and a 10-fold increase in cerebrovascular events compared to healthy controls.2 Coarctation of the aorta is associated with progressive arterial stiffening, and the timing of surgery does not affect this systemic vascular remodelling.8

Women with structural heart disease such as CoA may have a higher risk of developing pre-eclampsia, as these disorders have shared risk factors such as chronic hypertension. Maternal mortality is higher in patients with a combination of heart disease and pre-eclampsia than in pregnant women without cardiovascular disease. The recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC) report found maternal mortality of up to 3.5% of heart disease patients with pre-eclampsia. All pre-eclampsia-related deaths occurred post-partum, most associated with heart failure.9 Prevention of pre-eclampsia is gaining increased awareness, and the prescription of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) to women with a high risk of pre-eclampsia in Norway may explain the decline in the prevalence in the general population in the last decade. Low-dose ASA is used to prevent cardiovascular diseases in high-risk populations, but women of reproductive age are rarely prescribed ASA for this indication.10

Contemporary data from the pregnancy history and its outcome are needed for an updated cardiovascular risk assessment in women with CoA. Our primary aim was to report on pregnancy outcomes in women with CoA in Norway. The secondary objective was to explore any associations between CoA and pre-eclampsia.

Methods

Study design and population

We performed a single-centre, retrospective study in pregnant women with CoA. By review of the database at the National Unit for Pregnancy and Heart Disease at Oslo University Hospital—Rikshospitalet in Norway—every pregnancy in women with CoA from 2008 to 2021 was included. Inclusion criteria were repaired and unrepaired CoA and pregnancy. A team of cardiologists dedicated to grown-ups with congenital heart disease (CHD) performed pregnancy risk stratification in all women with CoA and consequently counselled those with the lowest mWHO risk to delivery at their local hospital. Women with a higher mWHO risk were advised to have follow-up and delivery at our tertiary centre.

Clinical registrations

Clinical data were obtained from a review of the database at the National Unit for Pregnancy and Heart Disease at Oslo University Hospital—Rikshospitalet. Characteristics of the CoA, the status of the aortic valve, associated congenital heart defects, medication, and occupational status were registered. The last follow-up consultation, including clinical assessment and echocardiography, was recorded and included in the statistical analysis for the follow-up data.

Maternal cardiovascular endpoints

The cardiovascular endpoints registered through pregnancy until follow-up were hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons, heart failure, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, aortic dissection, acute coronary syndrome, and death. A major adverse cardiac event11 was defined as a composite outcome of these endpoints. Native and recurrent CoA and associated cardiac defects were diagnosed by echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or cardiac catheterization.

Obstetric and neonatal endpoints

Obstetric data from the mother and the neonate were obtained through a review of obstetrical charts, including blood pressure (BP) every trimester, pre-delivery, and post-partum before discharge from the birth clinic. Obstetric endpoints were pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets (HELLP) syndrome, and post-partum haemorrhage. Mode of delivery was registered, as spontaneous or assisted vaginal delivery, defined as the vaginal birth performed with the help of forceps or a vacuum device. A caesarean section was registered as planned or emergency. Neonatal endpoints were perinatal mortality >24 weeks of gestation, infant death (<6 months), pre-term delivery (<37 weeks of gestational age), low Apgar score (<7) at 1 and 5 min, and low birth weight.

Data handling

Women with repaired and unrepaired CoA were included in the study. Retrospective systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) trajectories collected from the obstetric record throughout pregnancy were analysed. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were defined as pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or HELLP syndrome, according to the 2018 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) statement.12 Pre-eclampsia was defined as hypertension after 20 weeks’ gestation accompanied by proteinuria and/or evidence of maternal acute kidney injury, liver dysfunction, neurological features, haemolysis or thrombocytopenia, or foetal growth restriction. We performed a subgroup analysis on the women who fulfilled the definition of pre-eclampsia. Postpartum haemorrhage was defined as >1000 mL blood loss or signs of hypovolaemia within 24 h after birth, regardless of the mode of delivery.13 Birth weight was classified as low when <2500 g.14 The non-invasive SBP gradient between the upper and lower extremities (ULE) was calculated to identify patients with a peak-to-peak gradient ≥20 mmHg, requiring increased vigilance and additional examinations on the status of the CoA situation.15 Dilatation of the ascending aorta was defined as an ascending aortic diameter >40 mm.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared in women with and without pre-eclampsia. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviations (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables. The median and range are presented for continuous and not normally distributed variables. Linearity was assessed by partial regression plots. Normality was assessed by Q-Q plot. Comparisons of continuous variables between groups were made by unpaired Student’s t-tests, while the Mann–Whitney U test was applied to compare continuous variables with skewed distribution between groups. A comparison of categorical variables was made using Pearson’s χ2 or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Mixed model analysis was applied to analyse repeated measurements on retrospective BP data. To investigate the strength of association with pre-eclampsia, the relevant variables with significant associations in univariate analyses and clinical variables known to affect pre-eclampsia were selected for multiple regression analysis. The likelihood ratio test was used to determine the statistical significance of the independent variables. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all statistical tests. Data analysis was performed using STATA Standard Edition Version 17 (StataCorp LLC, Texas, USA).

Patient and public involvement

This research was approved by the Data Protection Officer (PVO) at Oslo University Hospital to safeguard the research participant’s privacy, interest, and rights. Individual patients’ consent was waived.

Results

Seventy-six women with CoA and 87 pregnancies were included in the study. Twelve of the women conducted delivery at their respective local hospitals. Baseline characteristics before pregnancy are presented in Table 1, comparing the CoA patients with and without pre-eclampsia. Surgical characteristics of the primary repair of the CoA is presented in the table as Supplementary material.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics in women with CoA before pregnancy

Total CoA patients n = 76CoA patients without PE n = 61CoA patients with PE n = 15P-value
Demographics
 Maternal age at first pregnancy, years30.3 ± 629.9 ± 630.6 ± 70.578
 BMI before first pregnancy, kg/m227.1 ± 4.726.2 ± 5.127.9 ± 3.10.182
 Primipara, n (%)65 (86)53 (70)12 (16)0.105
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Smoking, n (%)15 (20)13 (17)2 (3)0.376
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.579
 Hypertension, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.511
 Supraventricular tachycardia, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.051
 Signs of heart failure, n (%)1 (3)1 (3)0 (0)0.380
 LVEF < 50%, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.711
 Bicuspid aortic valve, n (%)41 (54)32 (42)9 (12)0.428
 Aortic ascendens diameter ≥ 40 mm, n %)7 (9)5 (7)2 (3)0.434
Aortic stenosis15 (20)9 (14)3 (5)0.642
 Mild, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)2 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Aortic regurgitation26 (29)24 (22)3 (3)0.686
 Mild, n (%)21 (23)19 (23)2 (3)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)3 (4)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)
Mitral stenosis, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.642
Mitral regurgitation12 (13)10 (11)2 (2)0.714
 Mild, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)
 Moderate, n (%)4 (4)3 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)
Cardiac medication20 (26)16 (21)4 (5)0.601
 Beta-blocker, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.117
 ACE inhibitor, n (%)4 (5)4 (5)0 (0)0.149
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.781
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (2)2 (2)0 (0)0.248
Total CoA patients n = 76CoA patients without PE n = 61CoA patients with PE n = 15P-value
Demographics
 Maternal age at first pregnancy, years30.3 ± 629.9 ± 630.6 ± 70.578
 BMI before first pregnancy, kg/m227.1 ± 4.726.2 ± 5.127.9 ± 3.10.182
 Primipara, n (%)65 (86)53 (70)12 (16)0.105
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Smoking, n (%)15 (20)13 (17)2 (3)0.376
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.579
 Hypertension, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.511
 Supraventricular tachycardia, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.051
 Signs of heart failure, n (%)1 (3)1 (3)0 (0)0.380
 LVEF < 50%, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.711
 Bicuspid aortic valve, n (%)41 (54)32 (42)9 (12)0.428
 Aortic ascendens diameter ≥ 40 mm, n %)7 (9)5 (7)2 (3)0.434
Aortic stenosis15 (20)9 (14)3 (5)0.642
 Mild, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)2 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Aortic regurgitation26 (29)24 (22)3 (3)0.686
 Mild, n (%)21 (23)19 (23)2 (3)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)3 (4)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)
Mitral stenosis, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.642
Mitral regurgitation12 (13)10 (11)2 (2)0.714
 Mild, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)
 Moderate, n (%)4 (4)3 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)
Cardiac medication20 (26)16 (21)4 (5)0.601
 Beta-blocker, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.117
 ACE inhibitor, n (%)4 (5)4 (5)0 (0)0.149
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.781
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (2)2 (2)0 (0)0.248

Values are given as mean ± SD or median [range]. Percentages calculated from the total CoA population. P-values (at a 95% confidence level) compare CoA patients with PE vs. those without PE.

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; BMI, body mass index; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PE, pre-eclampsia.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics in women with CoA before pregnancy

Total CoA patients n = 76CoA patients without PE n = 61CoA patients with PE n = 15P-value
Demographics
 Maternal age at first pregnancy, years30.3 ± 629.9 ± 630.6 ± 70.578
 BMI before first pregnancy, kg/m227.1 ± 4.726.2 ± 5.127.9 ± 3.10.182
 Primipara, n (%)65 (86)53 (70)12 (16)0.105
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Smoking, n (%)15 (20)13 (17)2 (3)0.376
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.579
 Hypertension, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.511
 Supraventricular tachycardia, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.051
 Signs of heart failure, n (%)1 (3)1 (3)0 (0)0.380
 LVEF < 50%, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.711
 Bicuspid aortic valve, n (%)41 (54)32 (42)9 (12)0.428
 Aortic ascendens diameter ≥ 40 mm, n %)7 (9)5 (7)2 (3)0.434
Aortic stenosis15 (20)9 (14)3 (5)0.642
 Mild, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)2 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Aortic regurgitation26 (29)24 (22)3 (3)0.686
 Mild, n (%)21 (23)19 (23)2 (3)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)3 (4)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)
Mitral stenosis, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.642
Mitral regurgitation12 (13)10 (11)2 (2)0.714
 Mild, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)
 Moderate, n (%)4 (4)3 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)
Cardiac medication20 (26)16 (21)4 (5)0.601
 Beta-blocker, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.117
 ACE inhibitor, n (%)4 (5)4 (5)0 (0)0.149
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.781
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (2)2 (2)0 (0)0.248
Total CoA patients n = 76CoA patients without PE n = 61CoA patients with PE n = 15P-value
Demographics
 Maternal age at first pregnancy, years30.3 ± 629.9 ± 630.6 ± 70.578
 BMI before first pregnancy, kg/m227.1 ± 4.726.2 ± 5.127.9 ± 3.10.182
 Primipara, n (%)65 (86)53 (70)12 (16)0.105
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Smoking, n (%)15 (20)13 (17)2 (3)0.376
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.579
 Hypertension, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.511
 Supraventricular tachycardia, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.051
 Signs of heart failure, n (%)1 (3)1 (3)0 (0)0.380
 LVEF < 50%, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.711
 Bicuspid aortic valve, n (%)41 (54)32 (42)9 (12)0.428
 Aortic ascendens diameter ≥ 40 mm, n %)7 (9)5 (7)2 (3)0.434
Aortic stenosis15 (20)9 (14)3 (5)0.642
 Mild, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)2 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Aortic regurgitation26 (29)24 (22)3 (3)0.686
 Mild, n (%)21 (23)19 (23)2 (3)
 Moderate, n (%)3 (4)3 (4)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)
Mitral stenosis, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.642
Mitral regurgitation12 (13)10 (11)2 (2)0.714
 Mild, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)
 Moderate, n (%)4 (4)3 (3)1 (1)
 Severe, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)
Cardiac medication20 (26)16 (21)4 (5)0.601
 Beta-blocker, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.117
 ACE inhibitor, n (%)4 (5)4 (5)0 (0)0.149
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)1 (1)0.781
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (2)2 (2)0 (0)0.248

Values are given as mean ± SD or median [range]. Percentages calculated from the total CoA population. P-values (at a 95% confidence level) compare CoA patients with PE vs. those without PE.

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; BMI, body mass index; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PE, pre-eclampsia.

Seventy-two (95%) women had an initial repair of CoA before their first completed pregnancy. Four (5%) patients underwent uncomplicated pregnancy with unrepaired CoA. Re-operation was performed within the first 2 years of life in 17 (22%) patients. All patients were diagnosed by computed tomography or MRI scan, and all women had repeated echocardiography during clinical follow-up before and after pregnancy. Four (5%) patients underwent pregnancy with an unrepaired CoA without major cardiac events (MACE). Risk factors for pre-eclampsia, such as parity, age, body mass index (BMI), and chronic hypertension, were comparable in the CoA patients who developed pre-eclampsia vs. those women without pre-eclampsia. The two groups were comparable regarding cardiac function expressed by ejection fraction (EF) and valvular function. In the total study population, patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) (n = 38, 49%) had significantly more aortic regurgitation (25% vs. 12% P < 0.001), aortic valve stenosis (16% vs. 4%, P = 0.004), and larger diameter of ascending aorta on echocardiography before pregnancy (33 ± 4 mm vs. 28 ± 6 mm; P = 0.002) compared to women without BAV. Twenty-five (33%) women had intervention due to re-coarctation before pregnancy, either by open surgery (n = 17) or percutaneous balloon angioplasty (n = 8).

Maternal cardiovascular outcome during pregnancy

The occurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in 87 pregnancies in women with CoA is shown in Figure 1. Sixteen pregnancies (18%) in 15 women (20%) were complicated by pre-eclampsia. Five women (7%) with hypertension before pregnancy had superimposed pre-eclampsia. All the pre-eclamptic patients had proteinuria upon pre-eclampsia diagnosis. There were no cases of eclampsia or HELLP. One patient had pre-eclampsia with early onset, i.e. before the 34th week of gestation, and delivered by emergency caesarean section. One patient had a reoccurrence of pre-eclampsia in her second pregnancy without any other peri-partum or foetal complications. Five (7%) women were diagnosed with pregnancy-induced hypertension.

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy in women with coarctation of the aorta. CoA, coarctation of the aorta.
Figure 1

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy in women with coarctation of the aorta. CoA, coarctation of the aorta.

All three (4%) women who experienced MACE had pre-pregnancy hypertension. In patients with BAV, 16 (21%) had hypertension before pregnancy (P = 0.01).

A low-dose ASA was initiated in 22 (25%) pregnancies during the first trimester, and logistic regression analysis for pre-eclampsia showed an odds ratio (OR) 0.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.41; P = 0.021]. Chronic hypertension and co-existing heart disease were identified as risk factors for pre-eclampsia and an indication for initiation of ASA in these patients.

There were no maternal deaths. There were no aortic dissections, acute coronary syndromes, cerebrovascular events, or interventions due to CoA in pregnancy. During pregnancy, only three (4%) patients had hospital admissions due to MACE. These three patients had repaired CoA, combined with a severe CHD: Patient 1 due to progression of mitral regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension (in the third trimester), Patient 2 due to dyspnoea and worsening of systolic and diastolic function (in the third trimester), and Patient 3 due to progressive symptoms of supraventricular tachycardia (in the second trimester). Patients 1 and 2 had combined congenital heart defects (mitral insufficiency and pulmonary hypertension; ventricular septal defect and aortic stenosis) and had EF < 50% on hospital admission. There were no cases of new onset of heart failure during pregnancy.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes

Obstetric and neonatal data are shown in Table 2. During the study period, two women had a second pregnancy. These two pregnancies were not included in the analysis, because outcome data were not available at the time of registration.

Table 2

Maternal and neonatal data from pregnancies in women with CoA

Total number of pregnanciesPregnancies without PEPregnancies with PEP-value
n = 87n = 71n = 16
Cardiovascular outcomes during pregnancy
 Maternal mortality, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Hospital admission for cardiac reasons, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.303
 Atrial fibrillation or flutter, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)0.779
 Thromboembolic events, n (%)1 (1)0 (0)1 (1)0.579
 Aortic dissection, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Acute coronary syndromes in pregnancy, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Overall MACE, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.281
Use of acetylsalicylate in first trimester, n (%)22 (25)14 (16)8 (9)0.029
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy
 Pregnancy-induced hypertension, n (%)5 (6)5 (6)n.a.n.a.
 Pre-eclampsia, n (%)16 (21)n.a.n.a.
 Eclampsia or HELLP, n (%)0 (0)n.a.0 (0)n.a.
Obstetrical outcomes
 Delivery at tertiary centre, n (%)75 (86)59 (67)16 (18)0.325
 Delivery at local hospital, n (%)12 (14)12 (14)n.a.n.a.
 Gestational diabetes, n (%)5 (6)3 (3)2 (1)0.231
 Induction, n (%)21 (24)12 (14)9 (10)0.067
Mode of delivery:
 Spontan vaginal80 (92)66 (76)15 (17)0.495
 Assisted vaginal delivery, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.593
 Elective caesarean delivery, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.103
 Emergency caesarean delivery, n (%)3 (3)2 (2)1 (1)0.391
Postpartum bleeding (>500 mL), n (%)13 (15)8 (9)5 (6)0.046
Neonatal outcomes (n = 94, twin included)
 Neonatal mortality0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Gestational age at birth, weeks/days39.4 ± 1.439.3 ± 1.838.1 ± 2.20.073
 Premature delivery (<37th GA week), n (%)7 (10)4 (7)3 (25)0.168
 Twin pregnancies, n (%)3 (3)2 (1)1 (1)0.414
 Apgar score 1 min [range]8 [8–9]9 [8–9]7 [6–9]0.047
 Apgar score 5 min [range]9 [7–10]9 [8–10]8 [7–9]0.650
 Mean infant weight, grams3422 ± 5333373 ± 5223421 ± 5910.270
  With beta-blocker3313 ± 5743378 ± 3453251 ± 5950.413
  Without beta-blocker3513 ± 4433544 ± 3943375 ± 5120.574
P = 0.305*P = 0.410*P = 0.613*
  Low birth weight (<2500 grams), n (%)10 (4)6 (4)4(7)0.062
  Congenital heart defect in neonates, n (%)3 (3)2 (3)1 (1)0.551
Total number of pregnanciesPregnancies without PEPregnancies with PEP-value
n = 87n = 71n = 16
Cardiovascular outcomes during pregnancy
 Maternal mortality, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Hospital admission for cardiac reasons, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.303
 Atrial fibrillation or flutter, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)0.779
 Thromboembolic events, n (%)1 (1)0 (0)1 (1)0.579
 Aortic dissection, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Acute coronary syndromes in pregnancy, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Overall MACE, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.281
Use of acetylsalicylate in first trimester, n (%)22 (25)14 (16)8 (9)0.029
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy
 Pregnancy-induced hypertension, n (%)5 (6)5 (6)n.a.n.a.
 Pre-eclampsia, n (%)16 (21)n.a.n.a.
 Eclampsia or HELLP, n (%)0 (0)n.a.0 (0)n.a.
Obstetrical outcomes
 Delivery at tertiary centre, n (%)75 (86)59 (67)16 (18)0.325
 Delivery at local hospital, n (%)12 (14)12 (14)n.a.n.a.
 Gestational diabetes, n (%)5 (6)3 (3)2 (1)0.231
 Induction, n (%)21 (24)12 (14)9 (10)0.067
Mode of delivery:
 Spontan vaginal80 (92)66 (76)15 (17)0.495
 Assisted vaginal delivery, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.593
 Elective caesarean delivery, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.103
 Emergency caesarean delivery, n (%)3 (3)2 (2)1 (1)0.391
Postpartum bleeding (>500 mL), n (%)13 (15)8 (9)5 (6)0.046
Neonatal outcomes (n = 94, twin included)
 Neonatal mortality0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Gestational age at birth, weeks/days39.4 ± 1.439.3 ± 1.838.1 ± 2.20.073
 Premature delivery (<37th GA week), n (%)7 (10)4 (7)3 (25)0.168
 Twin pregnancies, n (%)3 (3)2 (1)1 (1)0.414
 Apgar score 1 min [range]8 [8–9]9 [8–9]7 [6–9]0.047
 Apgar score 5 min [range]9 [7–10]9 [8–10]8 [7–9]0.650
 Mean infant weight, grams3422 ± 5333373 ± 5223421 ± 5910.270
  With beta-blocker3313 ± 5743378 ± 3453251 ± 5950.413
  Without beta-blocker3513 ± 4433544 ± 3943375 ± 5120.574
P = 0.305*P = 0.410*P = 0.613*
  Low birth weight (<2500 grams), n (%)10 (4)6 (4)4(7)0.062
  Congenital heart defect in neonates, n (%)3 (3)2 (3)1 (1)0.551

Values are given as mean ± SD or median [interquartile range]. Percentages calculated from the total CoA population. P-value (at a 95% confidence level) comparing CoA patients with PE vs. those without PE.

CoA, coarctation of the aorta; GA, gestational age; HELLP, haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets; MACE, major cardiac events; n.a., not available. PE, pre-eclampsia.

*

P-values were calculated using unpaired t-tests for birth weight between CoA groups with and without the use of a beta-blocker.

Table 2

Maternal and neonatal data from pregnancies in women with CoA

Total number of pregnanciesPregnancies without PEPregnancies with PEP-value
n = 87n = 71n = 16
Cardiovascular outcomes during pregnancy
 Maternal mortality, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Hospital admission for cardiac reasons, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.303
 Atrial fibrillation or flutter, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)0.779
 Thromboembolic events, n (%)1 (1)0 (0)1 (1)0.579
 Aortic dissection, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Acute coronary syndromes in pregnancy, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Overall MACE, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.281
Use of acetylsalicylate in first trimester, n (%)22 (25)14 (16)8 (9)0.029
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy
 Pregnancy-induced hypertension, n (%)5 (6)5 (6)n.a.n.a.
 Pre-eclampsia, n (%)16 (21)n.a.n.a.
 Eclampsia or HELLP, n (%)0 (0)n.a.0 (0)n.a.
Obstetrical outcomes
 Delivery at tertiary centre, n (%)75 (86)59 (67)16 (18)0.325
 Delivery at local hospital, n (%)12 (14)12 (14)n.a.n.a.
 Gestational diabetes, n (%)5 (6)3 (3)2 (1)0.231
 Induction, n (%)21 (24)12 (14)9 (10)0.067
Mode of delivery:
 Spontan vaginal80 (92)66 (76)15 (17)0.495
 Assisted vaginal delivery, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.593
 Elective caesarean delivery, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.103
 Emergency caesarean delivery, n (%)3 (3)2 (2)1 (1)0.391
Postpartum bleeding (>500 mL), n (%)13 (15)8 (9)5 (6)0.046
Neonatal outcomes (n = 94, twin included)
 Neonatal mortality0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Gestational age at birth, weeks/days39.4 ± 1.439.3 ± 1.838.1 ± 2.20.073
 Premature delivery (<37th GA week), n (%)7 (10)4 (7)3 (25)0.168
 Twin pregnancies, n (%)3 (3)2 (1)1 (1)0.414
 Apgar score 1 min [range]8 [8–9]9 [8–9]7 [6–9]0.047
 Apgar score 5 min [range]9 [7–10]9 [8–10]8 [7–9]0.650
 Mean infant weight, grams3422 ± 5333373 ± 5223421 ± 5910.270
  With beta-blocker3313 ± 5743378 ± 3453251 ± 5950.413
  Without beta-blocker3513 ± 4433544 ± 3943375 ± 5120.574
P = 0.305*P = 0.410*P = 0.613*
  Low birth weight (<2500 grams), n (%)10 (4)6 (4)4(7)0.062
  Congenital heart defect in neonates, n (%)3 (3)2 (3)1 (1)0.551
Total number of pregnanciesPregnancies without PEPregnancies with PEP-value
n = 87n = 71n = 16
Cardiovascular outcomes during pregnancy
 Maternal mortality, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Hospital admission for cardiac reasons, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.303
 Atrial fibrillation or flutter, n (%)1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)0.779
 Thromboembolic events, n (%)1 (1)0 (0)1 (1)0.579
 Aortic dissection, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Acute coronary syndromes in pregnancy, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Overall MACE, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.281
Use of acetylsalicylate in first trimester, n (%)22 (25)14 (16)8 (9)0.029
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy
 Pregnancy-induced hypertension, n (%)5 (6)5 (6)n.a.n.a.
 Pre-eclampsia, n (%)16 (21)n.a.n.a.
 Eclampsia or HELLP, n (%)0 (0)n.a.0 (0)n.a.
Obstetrical outcomes
 Delivery at tertiary centre, n (%)75 (86)59 (67)16 (18)0.325
 Delivery at local hospital, n (%)12 (14)12 (14)n.a.n.a.
 Gestational diabetes, n (%)5 (6)3 (3)2 (1)0.231
 Induction, n (%)21 (24)12 (14)9 (10)0.067
Mode of delivery:
 Spontan vaginal80 (92)66 (76)15 (17)0.495
 Assisted vaginal delivery, n (%)7 (8)6 (7)1 (1)0.593
 Elective caesarean delivery, n (%)17 (20)12 (16)5 (7)0.103
 Emergency caesarean delivery, n (%)3 (3)2 (2)1 (1)0.391
Postpartum bleeding (>500 mL), n (%)13 (15)8 (9)5 (6)0.046
Neonatal outcomes (n = 94, twin included)
 Neonatal mortality0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n.a.
 Gestational age at birth, weeks/days39.4 ± 1.439.3 ± 1.838.1 ± 2.20.073
 Premature delivery (<37th GA week), n (%)7 (10)4 (7)3 (25)0.168
 Twin pregnancies, n (%)3 (3)2 (1)1 (1)0.414
 Apgar score 1 min [range]8 [8–9]9 [8–9]7 [6–9]0.047
 Apgar score 5 min [range]9 [7–10]9 [8–10]8 [7–9]0.650
 Mean infant weight, grams3422 ± 5333373 ± 5223421 ± 5910.270
  With beta-blocker3313 ± 5743378 ± 3453251 ± 5950.413
  Without beta-blocker3513 ± 4433544 ± 3943375 ± 5120.574
P = 0.305*P = 0.410*P = 0.613*
  Low birth weight (<2500 grams), n (%)10 (4)6 (4)4(7)0.062
  Congenital heart defect in neonates, n (%)3 (3)2 (3)1 (1)0.551

Values are given as mean ± SD or median [interquartile range]. Percentages calculated from the total CoA population. P-value (at a 95% confidence level) comparing CoA patients with PE vs. those without PE.

CoA, coarctation of the aorta; GA, gestational age; HELLP, haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets; MACE, major cardiac events; n.a., not available. PE, pre-eclampsia.

*

P-values were calculated using unpaired t-tests for birth weight between CoA groups with and without the use of a beta-blocker.

The differences in BP between the measurements from the first trimester through pregnancy and post-partum were highly significant in the pre-eclamptic group. The stepwise and pairwise comparison of SBP throughout pregnancy is reported in Table 3. Repeated measures of retrospectively collected SBP and DBP during the first, second, and third trimesters, pre-delivery, and post-delivery before discharge from the maternal ward are shown in Figure 2. Blood pressure measurements before discharge showed higher SBP (131 ± 9 vs. 123 ± 11; P = 0.119) and DBP (75 ± 8 vs. 69 ± 12; P = 0.051) in the pre-eclamptic women compared to those without pre-eclampsia. All women with pre-eclampsia (without pre-pregnancy hypertension) (n = 10, 13%) were treated with calcium blocker and beta-blocker before delivery.

Blood pressure trajectory during pregnancy in women with coarctation of the aorta. BP, blood pressure; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; PE, pre-eclampsia.
Figure 2

Blood pressure trajectory during pregnancy in women with coarctation of the aorta. BP, blood pressure; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; PE, pre-eclampsia.

Table 3

Changes in blood pressure during pregnancy in women with CoA

1st
trimester
2nd
trimester
3rd
trimester
Pre- deliveryPost- partum95% (CI) change in preceding measurementP-value
SBP in CoA without PE, mmHg115 ± 11119 ± 10130 ± 11128 ± 17123 ± 20
SBP in CoA with PE, mmHg119 ± 10131 ± 9143 ± 13152 ± 12131 ± 18
P = 0.198P = 0.000P = 0.002P = 0.000P = 0.239
Change in SBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg9(6,14)P = 0.002
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg12(6,14)P = 0.000
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg9(4,12)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−21(−29,−12)P = 0.000
DBP in CoA without PE, mmHg69 ± 1166 ± 872 ± 875 ± 1172 ± 9
DBP in CoA with PE, mmHg72 ± 1073 ± 879 ± 690 ± 777 ± 8
P = 0.306P = 0.003P = 0.048P = 0.001P = 0.051
Change in DBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg1(−7,3)P = 0.407
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg6(2,11)P = 0.014
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg11(6,14)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−13(−16,−7)P = 0.000
1st
trimester
2nd
trimester
3rd
trimester
Pre- deliveryPost- partum95% (CI) change in preceding measurementP-value
SBP in CoA without PE, mmHg115 ± 11119 ± 10130 ± 11128 ± 17123 ± 20
SBP in CoA with PE, mmHg119 ± 10131 ± 9143 ± 13152 ± 12131 ± 18
P = 0.198P = 0.000P = 0.002P = 0.000P = 0.239
Change in SBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg9(6,14)P = 0.002
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg12(6,14)P = 0.000
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg9(4,12)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−21(−29,−12)P = 0.000
DBP in CoA without PE, mmHg69 ± 1166 ± 872 ± 875 ± 1172 ± 9
DBP in CoA with PE, mmHg72 ± 1073 ± 879 ± 690 ± 777 ± 8
P = 0.306P = 0.003P = 0.048P = 0.001P = 0.051
Change in DBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg1(−7,3)P = 0.407
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg6(2,11)P = 0.014
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg11(6,14)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−13(−16,−7)P = 0.000

The data are presented as mean ± SD.

CI, confidence interval; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PE, pre-eclampsia; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

a

Measures the change of blood pressure from the preceding measurement.

Table 3

Changes in blood pressure during pregnancy in women with CoA

1st
trimester
2nd
trimester
3rd
trimester
Pre- deliveryPost- partum95% (CI) change in preceding measurementP-value
SBP in CoA without PE, mmHg115 ± 11119 ± 10130 ± 11128 ± 17123 ± 20
SBP in CoA with PE, mmHg119 ± 10131 ± 9143 ± 13152 ± 12131 ± 18
P = 0.198P = 0.000P = 0.002P = 0.000P = 0.239
Change in SBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg9(6,14)P = 0.002
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg12(6,14)P = 0.000
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg9(4,12)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−21(−29,−12)P = 0.000
DBP in CoA without PE, mmHg69 ± 1166 ± 872 ± 875 ± 1172 ± 9
DBP in CoA with PE, mmHg72 ± 1073 ± 879 ± 690 ± 777 ± 8
P = 0.306P = 0.003P = 0.048P = 0.001P = 0.051
Change in DBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg1(−7,3)P = 0.407
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg6(2,11)P = 0.014
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg11(6,14)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−13(−16,−7)P = 0.000
1st
trimester
2nd
trimester
3rd
trimester
Pre- deliveryPost- partum95% (CI) change in preceding measurementP-value
SBP in CoA without PE, mmHg115 ± 11119 ± 10130 ± 11128 ± 17123 ± 20
SBP in CoA with PE, mmHg119 ± 10131 ± 9143 ± 13152 ± 12131 ± 18
P = 0.198P = 0.000P = 0.002P = 0.000P = 0.239
Change in SBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg9(6,14)P = 0.002
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg12(6,14)P = 0.000
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg9(4,12)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−21(−29,−12)P = 0.000
DBP in CoA without PE, mmHg69 ± 1166 ± 872 ± 875 ± 1172 ± 9
DBP in CoA with PE, mmHg72 ± 1073 ± 879 ± 690 ± 777 ± 8
P = 0.306P = 0.003P = 0.048P = 0.001P = 0.051
Change in DBP in CoA with PEa
1st to 2nd trimester, mmHg1(−7,3)P = 0.407
2nd to 3rd trimester, mmHg6(2,11)P = 0.014
3rd to pre-delivery, mmHg11(6,14)P = 0.004
Pre-delivery to post-partum, mmHg−13(−16,−7)P = 0.000

The data are presented as mean ± SD.

CI, confidence interval; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PE, pre-eclampsia; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

a

Measures the change of blood pressure from the preceding measurement.

Caesarean section was performed in 25% of the deliveries, of which 3% were emergency caesarean sections. Preterm delivery was more common in women with pre-eclampsia. In women with pre-eclampsia, the Apgar score at 1 min was significantly lower compared to patients without pre-eclampsia (P = 0.047); the Apgar score at 5 min was comparable between the groups (P = 0.651). Four neonates had congenital heart defects: three atrial septal defects and one persistent ductus arteriosus. There were no perinatal or infant deaths.

Predictors of pre-eclampsia

Multi-variable logistic regression analysis for predictors of pre-eclampsia is displayed in Figure 3. Maternal age at first pregnancy (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.09–1.71; P = 0.006), BMI before first pregnancy (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.28–2.44; P = 0.009), and using ASA from the first trimester (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.10–0.41) were statistically significantly associated with pre-eclampsia. The logistic regression model was statistically significant with a likelihood ratio of χ2 = 73.75 (P = 0.000). Assessing the goodness of fit of the model, the likelihood ratio pseudo-R2 = 0.749.

Predictors for pre-eclampsia in women with coarctation of the aorta. ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3

Predictors for pre-eclampsia in women with coarctation of the aorta. ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.

Maternal cardiovascular function after pregnancy

Data from follow-up of patients with CoA after pregnancy are shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Clinical characteristics of women with CoA on follow-up after pregnancy

Total CoA
n = 76
CoA without PE
n = 61
CoA with PE
n = 15
P-value
Demographics
 Mean age at follow-up, years38.4 ± 737.8 ± 639.5 ± 50.274
 Median time from pregnancy to follow-up, years8.1 ± 6.17.7 ± 6.69.8 ± 5.30.330
 BMI at follow-up, kg/m226.5 ± 4.725.8 ± 3.227.2 ± 3.50.042
 Number of pregnancies at follow-up, n (IQR)1 [1–3]1 [1–2]1 [1]0.298
Hypertension diagnosis, n (%)29 (38)16 (21)13(17)0.143
Cardiac medication, n (%)31 (41)18 (24)13(17)0.008
 Beta-blocker, n (%)15 (20)11 (14)4 (5)0.017
 AT-II or ACE inhibitor, n (%)8 (11)4 (5)4 (5)0.043
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)6 (8)1 (1)5 (7)0.001
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.247
Composite MACE after first delivery, n%5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)
CoA intervention after first pregnancy
 Primary intervention CoA, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.703
 Re-intervention CoA, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.231
Hemodynamic measurements
 SBP right arm, mmHg121 ± 19117 ± 21126 ± 80.033
 DBP right arm, mmHg69 ± 966 ± 874 ± 50.011
 MAP right arm, mmHg85 ± 1181 ± 1189 ± 70.031
 SBP right leg, mmHg109 ± 16105 ± 17112 ± 110.006
 ULE–SBP gradient right, mmHg13.2 ± 15.712.6 ± 16.114.0 ± 15.40.361
 Heart rate, b.p.m.71 ± 1470 ± 1173 ± 160.467
Echocardiographic measurements
 Aorta ascendens diameter, mm31 ± 1130 ± 1132 ± 130.703
 Aorta ascendens diameter > 40 mm, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.885
 Aortic valve peak velocity1.5 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.70.245
 CoA peak velocity, m/s2.4 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.42.3 ± 0.30.643
 LVIDd, cm5.1 ± 0.65.1 ± 0.55.0 ± 0.10.371
 IVSd, cm1.0 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.30.486
 LVPWd, cm0.9 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.20.713
 Number of women with EF < 50%, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.452
 Cardiac index, L/min/m22.9 ± 0.23.1 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.10.052
Total CoA
n = 76
CoA without PE
n = 61
CoA with PE
n = 15
P-value
Demographics
 Mean age at follow-up, years38.4 ± 737.8 ± 639.5 ± 50.274
 Median time from pregnancy to follow-up, years8.1 ± 6.17.7 ± 6.69.8 ± 5.30.330
 BMI at follow-up, kg/m226.5 ± 4.725.8 ± 3.227.2 ± 3.50.042
 Number of pregnancies at follow-up, n (IQR)1 [1–3]1 [1–2]1 [1]0.298
Hypertension diagnosis, n (%)29 (38)16 (21)13(17)0.143
Cardiac medication, n (%)31 (41)18 (24)13(17)0.008
 Beta-blocker, n (%)15 (20)11 (14)4 (5)0.017
 AT-II or ACE inhibitor, n (%)8 (11)4 (5)4 (5)0.043
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)6 (8)1 (1)5 (7)0.001
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.247
Composite MACE after first delivery, n%5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)
CoA intervention after first pregnancy
 Primary intervention CoA, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.703
 Re-intervention CoA, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.231
Hemodynamic measurements
 SBP right arm, mmHg121 ± 19117 ± 21126 ± 80.033
 DBP right arm, mmHg69 ± 966 ± 874 ± 50.011
 MAP right arm, mmHg85 ± 1181 ± 1189 ± 70.031
 SBP right leg, mmHg109 ± 16105 ± 17112 ± 110.006
 ULE–SBP gradient right, mmHg13.2 ± 15.712.6 ± 16.114.0 ± 15.40.361
 Heart rate, b.p.m.71 ± 1470 ± 1173 ± 160.467
Echocardiographic measurements
 Aorta ascendens diameter, mm31 ± 1130 ± 1132 ± 130.703
 Aorta ascendens diameter > 40 mm, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.885
 Aortic valve peak velocity1.5 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.70.245
 CoA peak velocity, m/s2.4 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.42.3 ± 0.30.643
 LVIDd, cm5.1 ± 0.65.1 ± 0.55.0 ± 0.10.371
 IVSd, cm1.0 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.30.486
 LVPWd, cm0.9 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.20.713
 Number of women with EF < 50%, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.452
 Cardiac index, L/min/m22.9 ± 0.23.1 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.10.052

Values are given as mean ± SD or median [interquartile range].

ACE, angiotensin-converting-enzyme; AT, angiotensin; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; DBP, diastolic BP; EF, ejection fraction; FU, follow-up; IVSd, intraventricular septum diastole; LVIDd, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall diameter; MACE, major cardiac events; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SBP, systolic BP; ULE-SBP gradient, upper-to-lower-extremity systolic blood pressure gradient.

Table 4

Clinical characteristics of women with CoA on follow-up after pregnancy

Total CoA
n = 76
CoA without PE
n = 61
CoA with PE
n = 15
P-value
Demographics
 Mean age at follow-up, years38.4 ± 737.8 ± 639.5 ± 50.274
 Median time from pregnancy to follow-up, years8.1 ± 6.17.7 ± 6.69.8 ± 5.30.330
 BMI at follow-up, kg/m226.5 ± 4.725.8 ± 3.227.2 ± 3.50.042
 Number of pregnancies at follow-up, n (IQR)1 [1–3]1 [1–2]1 [1]0.298
Hypertension diagnosis, n (%)29 (38)16 (21)13(17)0.143
Cardiac medication, n (%)31 (41)18 (24)13(17)0.008
 Beta-blocker, n (%)15 (20)11 (14)4 (5)0.017
 AT-II or ACE inhibitor, n (%)8 (11)4 (5)4 (5)0.043
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)6 (8)1 (1)5 (7)0.001
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.247
Composite MACE after first delivery, n%5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)
CoA intervention after first pregnancy
 Primary intervention CoA, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.703
 Re-intervention CoA, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.231
Hemodynamic measurements
 SBP right arm, mmHg121 ± 19117 ± 21126 ± 80.033
 DBP right arm, mmHg69 ± 966 ± 874 ± 50.011
 MAP right arm, mmHg85 ± 1181 ± 1189 ± 70.031
 SBP right leg, mmHg109 ± 16105 ± 17112 ± 110.006
 ULE–SBP gradient right, mmHg13.2 ± 15.712.6 ± 16.114.0 ± 15.40.361
 Heart rate, b.p.m.71 ± 1470 ± 1173 ± 160.467
Echocardiographic measurements
 Aorta ascendens diameter, mm31 ± 1130 ± 1132 ± 130.703
 Aorta ascendens diameter > 40 mm, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.885
 Aortic valve peak velocity1.5 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.70.245
 CoA peak velocity, m/s2.4 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.42.3 ± 0.30.643
 LVIDd, cm5.1 ± 0.65.1 ± 0.55.0 ± 0.10.371
 IVSd, cm1.0 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.30.486
 LVPWd, cm0.9 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.20.713
 Number of women with EF < 50%, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.452
 Cardiac index, L/min/m22.9 ± 0.23.1 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.10.052
Total CoA
n = 76
CoA without PE
n = 61
CoA with PE
n = 15
P-value
Demographics
 Mean age at follow-up, years38.4 ± 737.8 ± 639.5 ± 50.274
 Median time from pregnancy to follow-up, years8.1 ± 6.17.7 ± 6.69.8 ± 5.30.330
 BMI at follow-up, kg/m226.5 ± 4.725.8 ± 3.227.2 ± 3.50.042
 Number of pregnancies at follow-up, n (IQR)1 [1–3]1 [1–2]1 [1]0.298
Hypertension diagnosis, n (%)29 (38)16 (21)13(17)0.143
Cardiac medication, n (%)31 (41)18 (24)13(17)0.008
 Beta-blocker, n (%)15 (20)11 (14)4 (5)0.017
 AT-II or ACE inhibitor, n (%)8 (11)4 (5)4 (5)0.043
 Calcium channel blockers, n (%)6 (8)1 (1)5 (7)0.001
 Diuretics, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.247
Composite MACE after first delivery, n%5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)
CoA intervention after first pregnancy
 Primary intervention CoA, n (%)2 (3)2 (3)0 (0)0.703
 Re-intervention CoA, n (%)5 (7)4 (5)1 (1)0.231
Hemodynamic measurements
 SBP right arm, mmHg121 ± 19117 ± 21126 ± 80.033
 DBP right arm, mmHg69 ± 966 ± 874 ± 50.011
 MAP right arm, mmHg85 ± 1181 ± 1189 ± 70.031
 SBP right leg, mmHg109 ± 16105 ± 17112 ± 110.006
 ULE–SBP gradient right, mmHg13.2 ± 15.712.6 ± 16.114.0 ± 15.40.361
 Heart rate, b.p.m.71 ± 1470 ± 1173 ± 160.467
Echocardiographic measurements
 Aorta ascendens diameter, mm31 ± 1130 ± 1132 ± 130.703
 Aorta ascendens diameter > 40 mm, n (%)12 (16)9 (12)3 (4)0.885
 Aortic valve peak velocity1.5 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.70.245
 CoA peak velocity, m/s2.4 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.42.3 ± 0.30.643
 LVIDd, cm5.1 ± 0.65.1 ± 0.55.0 ± 0.10.371
 IVSd, cm1.0 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.30.486
 LVPWd, cm0.9 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.20.713
 Number of women with EF < 50%, n (%)4 (5)3 (4)1 (1)0.452
 Cardiac index, L/min/m22.9 ± 0.23.1 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.10.052

Values are given as mean ± SD or median [interquartile range].

ACE, angiotensin-converting-enzyme; AT, angiotensin; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; DBP, diastolic BP; EF, ejection fraction; FU, follow-up; IVSd, intraventricular septum diastole; LVIDd, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall diameter; MACE, major cardiac events; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SBP, systolic BP; ULE-SBP gradient, upper-to-lower-extremity systolic blood pressure gradient.

After a median follow-up of 8 years since the first completed pregnancy, five (7%) women had undergone surgery or balloon angioplasty for re-coarctation, one (1%) woman for ascending aortic aneurysm, one (1%) for descending aortic aneurysm, and one (1%) for aortic valvular stenosis. Two patients had primary repair of their CoA after the first pregnancy, one had balloon angioplasty, and one had surgical repair with aortic valve replacement. Five (6%) women showed an increase in the diameter of the ascending aorta above 40 mm, one requiring surgery due to the dilatation. The two patients with combined congenital heart defects (mitral stenosis and pulmonary hypertension; ventricular septal defect and aortic stenosis) had reduced systolic and diastolic ventricular function, which did not worsen after pregnancy.

At follow-up, 29 (38%) women were on anti-hypertensive medication, compared to 22% before pregnancy. The mean SBP (119 mmHg ± 7 vs. 115 mmHg ± 11; P = 0.119) and DBP (71 mmHg ± 10 vs. 67 mmHg ± 8; P = 0.639) were comparable in CoA patients treated for hypertension vs. patients without anti-hypertensive medication. However, for patients with pre-eclampsia, the mean SBP was 9% higher (P = 0.013), and the mean DBP was 16% higher (P = 0.001) compared to patients without pre-eclampsia. Seven (9%) women had an ULE SBP gradient >20 mmHg. These women are followed-up with repeated echocardiography and MRI to evaluate the need for re-intervention of re-coarctation. At follow-up, the cardiac index was 10% lower in women with previous pre-eclampsia (P = 0.052).

Discussion

This report from the National Unit for Pregnancy and Heart Disease in Norway finds a prevalence of 20% of pre-eclampsia in women with CoA. This prevalence is much higher than in the healthy pregnant population16 and substantially higher than in the last report on pregnancy outcomes in women with CoA from the ROPAC study. Age and BMI were significant predictors of pre-eclampsia. Aspirin decreased the OR and seemed to have a protective effect on the development of pre-eclampsia. We found low rates of MACE, in line with recent reports.17

Pre-eclampsia

The prevalence of 20% pre-eclampsia observed in our cohort is significantly higher than the 2.6% reported in the recent ROPAC study.17 It is also higher than the prevalence observed in a recent, large population-based cohort study from Staff et al. using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.16 In previous studies, hypertensive disorders have been reported as the most frequent pregnancy complication in women with repaired CoA, with rates between 14% and 20%.4,6 In the largest retrospective study to date period, Krieger et al.18 found pre-eclampsia rates of 7% in their large CoA cohort. In the prospective study by Siegmund et al.7 of 49 women with CoA, the authors found no difference in hypertensive disorder between healthy controls and women with CoA.

Our cohort of CoA women with and without pre-eclampsia had comparable BPs before pregnancy and in the first trimester. The pre-eclamptic women showed a significant increase in SBP and DBP in the second and third trimesters compared to women without pre-eclampsia, as expected from the commonly described clinical presentation of pre-eclampsia.19 They were closely followed with repeated BP measurements and adjustment of anti-hypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and calcium blockers. At follow-up, 8 years after the first pregnancy, the SBP and the DBP were higher in the pre-eclamptic group than in patients without previous pre-eclampsia. The use of anti-hypertensive treatment was higher at follow-up (32%) compared to during pregnancy (12%).

Contrary to our findings in the CoA cohort, the prevalence of pre-eclampsia in the Norwegian population has decreased from 4.3% to 2.7% over the last two decades. An increase in aspirin prescriptions among pregnant women and an overall increase in labour inductions are observed. This suggests that clinical interventions may partly explain the observed reduction in prevalence in the general population.16 Lower average BP and improved health in the general population may also explain the decline in prevalence.20

Large population-based cohort studies have established the association between PE and cardiovascular disease21 and the shared common risk factors (e.g. hypertension, obesity, and diabetes).22 Studies indicate that cardiovascular dysfunction precedes pre-eclampsia, predominates in the clinical syndrome, and persists post-partum. Both endothelial dysfunction and cardiac changes have been documented from the clinical presentation of pre-eclampsia and beyond pregnancy. The most common cardiac changes include altered left ventricular (LV) geometry with hypertrophy, global diastolic dysfunction, and, in more severe cases, LV systolic dysfunction.23,24 The endothelial dysfunction observed in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia25 exists beyond pre-eclamptic pregnancies.26,27 Coarctation of the aorta is also associated with endothelial dysfunction, expressed in reduced vascular reactivity, and associated with hypertension and increased LV mass.28

A recent meta-analysis could demonstrate a weak association between maternal CHD and pre-eclampsia, except for aortic stenosis and pulmonary atresia.29 Their meta-regression analysis for CoA of pre-eclampsia on a total of 13 studies, including eclampsia and HELLP syndrome (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) in women with CHD, could not find a significant correlation (P = 0.094), though with heterogeneity in variability across studies considered to be moderate (I2 = 69%).30 The rate of PE, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome taken together was 4.3% (in a total of 33 included studies). None of the included studies presented data separately for early- and late-onset PE, so whether CHD specifically predisposes women to early- or late-onset PE could not be evaluated. Women with CHD included in the meta-analyses may have received ASA, but these data were unavailable.

One-fourth of the pregnancies in our study received low-dose ASA from the first trimester throughout pregnancy. The prophylactic effects of ASA have shown a modest ability to reduce the risk of developing pre-eclampsia and its sequelae.31 The Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention (ASPRE) trial showed that ASA initiated in the first trimester to a high-risk population identified by first-trimester screening test could reduce the incidence of early-onset pre-eclampsia by 62%.32 In the ROPAC report on pregnancy outcomes in women with CoA, ASA was only used in 5.9% of pregnancies. It was not associated with a lower incidence of hypertensive disorders (OR 1.1).17 Prescription of ASA for high-risk pregnancies has recently been incorporated in American,33 British,34 and Norwegian guidelines.35

With the high prevalence of pre-eclampsia in our study cohort, the risk of pre-eclampsia and hence the indication for ASA could be underestimated in certain CoA patients. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease, including CHD (and associated lesions like a BAV), may confer a higher risk of pre-eclampsia than previously assumed. Future prospective studies should explore this relationship.

Maternal mortality

There were no maternal deaths in our cohort. The worldwide prospective ROPAC data from the ESC EURObservational Research Program on pregnancies in women with CoA (n = 303 pregnancies) from 2007 to 2018 reported no maternal mortality.17 This is in line with our results.

The most extensive retrospective data collection on American women with CoA (n = 697 deliveries) from 1998 to 2007 by Krieger et al.18 included maternal deaths in their composite adverse cardiovascular outcome, preventing direct comparison on mortality to our results.

Major adverse cardiac events

We had a MACE rate of 5% during the first pregnancy in the CoA cohort, which is lower than the predicted 10–19% event rate for patients in the mWHO risk Classes II and III.3 All patients developing MACE had an additional cardiac condition to the CoA (mitral stenosis and pulmonary hypertension; ventricular septal defect and aortic stenosis). Despite ongoing medical treatment, these patients had clinical worsening leading up to the cardiac event and hospitalization. Feared complications like aortic dissections, coronary artery dissections, cerebrovascular events, or endocarditis did not occur during pregnancy or post-partum in this cohort. Major cardiac event rates in the reports from the ROPAC cohort (4.3%) and Krieger et al. (5%) were also low (4.3%). The ROPAC report found predictors of MACE to be pre-pregnancy signs of heart failure, LVEF < 40%, NYHA Class > 1, and the use of cardiac medication before pregnancy.

Concerning risk, most of the patients in our cohort will be stratified into mWHO Risk Class II, corresponding to a small increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate increase in morbidity.

Obstetrical and neonatal outcome

Two-thirds of the patients in our cohort had a vaginal delivery, and 22% of the women had a caesarean section. This is substantially lower than the observed caesarean section rate of 50% in the ROPAC report on women with structural cardiac disease. Planned caesarean sections in uneventful pregnancies for patients with structural heart disease offer no maternal advantage, while they may increase adverse foetal outcomes.36,37

Evidence from randomized controlled trials that can inform practice regarding planned caesarean section vs. vaginal delivery for women with pre-eclampsia is lacking.38

There was a non-significant lower birth weight in infants of mothers treated with beta-blockers. This contrasts a recent study by Sørbye et al.39, reporting a five-fold increased risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant in women with heart disease treated with a high dose of beta-blocker, and a two-fold increased risk among those treated with a low dose, showing an apparent ‘dose–response’ relation. We found a low rate (3%) of CHD in the offspring, although the recurrence rate is reported to be up to 6.5% for non-syndromic maternal CoA.40 Our data are in line with the recent ROPAC report.17

Strengths and limitations of the study

The strength of this registry study was the complete inclusion of the CoA cohort for the pre-pregnancy and follow-up data. The study had no patients lost to follow-up. From the patient register, we had access to validated information on exposure and outcome variables on all the CoA patients after pregnancy.

In Norway, adults with CHD (ACHD), including patients with CoA, have regular follow-up by ACHD cardiologists at the outpatient clinic. This provides a complete overview of the ACHD population. The pregnant women with ACHD are referred to the National Unit for Pregnancy and Heart Disease for evaluation and follow-up.

Contrary to multi-centre registries, this may perhaps explain the difference in prevalence of pre-eclampsia from our study to previous reports. However, contemporary prospective studies should be performed to confirm our results. A dedicated team of cardiologists, obstetricians, anaesthesiologists, midwives, and nurses standardized the patient follow-up and treatment during the study period. Pre-pregnancy counselling and risk stratification, essential for fertile women with CoA to conduct a safe pregnancy, were performed according to current guidelines, illustrated in Figures 4 and 5.

Pre-pregnancy counselling and pregnancy risk assessment in women with CoA. CoA, coarctation of the aorta; CT, computed tomography; EF, ejection fraction; HRPEAK, heart rate at peak exercise; LV, left ventricular; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mWHO, modified World Health Organization; NYHA, New York Health Association; VO2PEAK, volume of oxygen uptake during peak exercise. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 4

Pre-pregnancy counselling and pregnancy risk assessment in women with CoA. CoA, coarctation of the aorta; CT, computed tomography; EF, ejection fraction; HRPEAK, heart rate at peak exercise; LV, left ventricular; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mWHO, modified World Health Organization; NYHA, New York Health Association; VO2PEAK, volume of oxygen uptake during peak exercise. Created with BioRender.com.

Pregnancy follow-up for patients with repaired coarctation of the aorta. CoA, coarctation of the aorta; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; GA, gestational age; HRPEAK, heart rate at peak exercise; LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Health Association; V̇O2PEAK, volume of oxygen uptake during peak exercise; WHO, World Health Association. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 5

Pregnancy follow-up for patients with repaired coarctation of the aorta. CoA, coarctation of the aorta; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; GA, gestational age; HRPEAK, heart rate at peak exercise; LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Health Association; V̇O2PEAK, volume of oxygen uptake during peak exercise; WHO, World Health Association. Created with BioRender.com.

This study has limitations due to the nature of the retrospective design and the observational data from a single centre. Inherent to our study design is selection bias to the results. Also, the number of events in our data is low. This should be considered in interpreting the study results. To draw any causal inference between pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease and CoA is challenging. Reports from considerable observational data across the past two decades can only show strong associations between pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular outcomes.

Conclusion

In our study, we found a high prevalence of pre-eclampsia in women with CoA. Pre-eclampsia is a cardiovascular risk factor, and ASA should be considered for women with CoA as prevention for pre-eclampsia. Our results show that pregnancy in women with repaired CoA is safe, but vigilance to the presentation of pre-eclampsia is critical to avoid severe peri-partum complications. Over one-fourth of the CoA patients received anti-hypertensive treatment after pregnancy. Long-term follow-up, with targeted anti-hypertensive treatment and lifestyle modifications, is mandatory to prevent cardiovascular disease.

Lead author biography

graphicLasse Gronningsaeter, MD, is a senior consultant in anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. He is a PhD candidate and currently conducts research in the fields of pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease.

Data availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Data are owned by the National Unit for Pregnancy and Heart Disease at Oslo University Hospital.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal Open online.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all the study participants and the multi-disciplinary team contributing to the clinical follow-up and care of the patients with CoA; the Department of Cardiology; the Unit for Grown Up with Congenital Heart Disease; the obstetricians, midwives, and nurses at the Department of Obstetrics; and anaesthesiologists and nurses at the Department of Anesthesiology.

Funding

None declared.

Authors contributors

Study design: M.E.E., E.L., H.S., and L.G.

Data collection: L.G., M.E.E., and E.L.

Data analysis and statistical analysis: L.G.

Manuscript draft: L.G., E.L., I.K.S., M.E.E.

Critical revision, editing, and final manuscript approval: all authors.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.

References

1

Miller
MR
,
Hankinson
J
,
Brusasco
V
,
Burgos
F
,
Casaburi
R
,
Coates
A
,
Crapo
R
,
Enright
P
,
van der Grinten
CP
,
Gustafsson
P
,
Jensen
R
,
Johnson
DC
,
MacIntyre
N
,
McKay
R
,
Navajas
D
,
Pedersen
OF
,
Pellegrino
R
,
Viegi
G
,
Wanger
J
;
ATS/ERS Task Force
.
Standardisation of spirometry
.
Eur Respir J
2005
;
26
:
319
338
.

2

Choudhary
P
,
Canniffe
C
,
Jackson
DJ
,
Tanous
D
,
Walsh
K
,
Celermajer
DS
.
Late outcomes in adults with coarctation of the aorta
.
Heart
2015
;
101
:
1190
1195
.

3

Regitz-Zagrosek
V
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
,
Bauersachs
J
,
Bauersachs
J
,
Blomstrom-Lundqvist
C
,
Cifkova
R
,
De Bonis
M
,
Iung
B
,
Johnson
MR
,
Kintscher
U
,
Kranke
P
,
Lang
IM
,
Morais
J
,
Pieper
PG
,
Presbitero
P
,
Price
S
,
Rosano
GMC
,
Seeland
U
,
Simoncini
T
,
Swan
L
,
Warnes
CA
.
2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy
.
Kardiol Pol
2019
;
77
:
245
326
.

4

Saidi
AS
,
Bezold
LI
,
Altman
CA
,
Ayres
NA
,
Bricker
JT
.
Outcome of pregnancy following intervention for coarctation of the aorta
.
Am J Cardiol
1998
;
82
:
786
788
.

5

Beauchesne
LM
,
Connolly
HM
,
Ammash
NM
,
Warnes
CA
.
Coarctation of the aorta: outcome of pregnancy
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2001
;
38
:
1728
1733
.

6

Vriend
JW
,
Drenthen
W
,
Pieper
PG
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
,
Zwinderman
AH
,
van Veldhuisen
DJ
,
Mulder
BJ
.
Outcome of pregnancy in patients after repair of aortic coarctation
.
Eur Heart J
2005
;
26
:
2173
2178
.

7

Siegmund
AS
,
Kampman
MAM
,
Bilardo
CM
,
Balci
A
,
van Dijk
APJ
,
Oudijk
MA
,
Mulder
BJM
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
,
Sieswerda
GT
,
Koenen
SV
,
Sollie-Szarynska
KM
,
Ebels
T
,
van Veldhuisen
DJ
,
Pieper
PG
;
ZAHARA investigators
.
Pregnancy in women with corrected aortic coarctation: uteroplacental Doppler flow and pregnancy outcome
.
Int J Cardiol
2017
;
249
:
145
150
.

8

Trojnarska
O
,
Szczepaniak-Chicheł
L
,
Mizia-Stec
K
,
Gabriel
M
,
Bartczak
A
,
Grajek
S
,
Gąsior
Z
,
Kramer
L
,
Tykarski
A
.
Vascular remodeling in adults after coarctation repair: impact of descending aorta stenosis and age at surgery
.
Clin Res Cardiol
2011
;
100
:
447
455
.

9

Ramlakhan
KP
,
Malhamé
I
,
Marelli
A
,
Rutz
T
,
Goland
S
,
Franx
A
,
Sliwa
K
,
Elkayam
U
,
Johnson
MR
,
Hall
R
,
Cornette
J
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
.
Hypertensive disorders of pregnant women with heart disease: the ESC EORP ROPAC Registry
.
Eur Heart J
2022
;
43
:
3749
3761
.

10

Ridker
PM
,
Cook
NR
,
Lee
I-M
,
Gordon
D
,
Gaziano
JM
,
Manson
JE
,
Hennekens
CH
,
Buring
JE
.
A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women
.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
352
:
1293
1304
.

11

Schneeberger
S
,
Gorantla
VS
,
Brandacher
G
,
Zeevi
A
,
Demetris
AJ
,
Lunz
JG
,
Metes
DM
,
Donnenberg
AD
,
Shores
JT
,
Dimartini
AF
,
Kiss
JE
,
Imbriglia
JE
,
Azari
K
,
Goitz
RJ
,
Manders
EK
,
Nguyen
VT
,
Cooney
DS
,
Wachtman
GS
,
Keith
JD
,
Fletcher
DR
,
Macedo
C
,
Planinsic
R
,
Losee
JE
,
Shapiro
R
,
Starzl
TE
,
Lee
WP
.
Upper-extremity transplantation using a cell-based protocol to minimize immunosuppression
.
Ann Surg
2013
;
257
:
345
351
.

12

Brown
MA
,
Magee
LA
,
Kenny
LC
,
Karumanchi
SA
,
McCarthy
FP
,
Saito
S
,
Hall
DR
,
Warren
CE
,
Adoyi
G
,
Ishaku
S
;
International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP)
.
The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice
.
Pregnancy Hypertens
2018
;
13
:
291
310
.

13

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics
.
Practice bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
.
Obstet Gynecol
2017
;
130
:
e168
e186
.

14

Blencowe
H
,
Krasevec
J
,
de Onis
M
,
Black
RE
,
An
X
,
Stevens
GA
,
Borghi
E
,
Hayashi
C
,
Estevez
D
,
Cegolon
L
,
Shiekh
S
,
Ponce Hardy
V
,
Lawn
JE
,
Cousens
S
.
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
.
Lancet Glob Health
2019
;
7
:
e849
e860
.

15

European Society of Gynecology (ESG)
;
Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC)
;
German Society for Gender Medicine (DGesGM)
;
Regitz-Zagrosek
V
,
Blomstrom Lundqvist
C
,
Borghi
C
,
Cifkova
R
,
Ferreira
R
,
Foidart
JM
,
Gibbs
JS
,
Gohlke-Baerwolf
C
,
Gorenek
B
,
Iung
B
,
Kirby
M
,
Maas
AH
,
Morais
J
,
Nihoyannopoulos
P
,
Pieper
PG
,
Presbitero
P
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
,
Schaufelberger
M
,
Seeland
U
,
Torracca
L
;
ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines
.
ESC guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
.
Eur Heart J
2011
;
32
:
3147
3197
.

16

Sole
KB
,
Staff
AC
,
Räisänen
S
,
Laine
K
.
Substantial decrease in preeclampsia prevalence and risk over two decades: a population-based study of 1,153,227 deliveries in Norway
.
Pregnancy Hypertens
2022
;
28
:
21
27
.

17

Ramlakhan
KP
,
Tobler
D
,
Greutmann
M
,
Schwerzmann
M
,
Baris
L
,
Yetman
AT
,
Nihoyannopoulos
P
,
Manga
P
,
Boersma
E
,
Maggioni
AP
,
Johnson
MR
,
Hall
R
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
;
ROPAC investigators group
.
Pregnancy outcomes in women with aortic coarctation
.
Heart
2021
;
107
:
290
298
.

18

Krieger
EV
,
Landzberg
MJ
,
Economy
KE
,
Webb
GD
,
Opotowsky
AR
.
Comparison of risk of hypertensive complications of pregnancy among women with versus without coarctation of the aorta
.
Am J Cardiol
2011
;
107
:
1529
1534
.

19

Magee
LA
,
Brown
MA
,
Hall
DR
,
Gupte
S
,
Hennessy
A
,
Karumanchi
SA
,
Kenny
LC
,
McCarthy
F
,
Myers
J
,
Poon
LC
,
Rana
S
,
Saito
S
,
Staff
AC
,
Tsigas
E
,
von Dadelszen
P
.
The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice
.
Pregnancy Hypertens
2022
;
27
:
148
169
.

20

Holmen
J
,
Holmen
TL
,
Tverdal
A
,
Holmen
OL
,
Sund
ER
,
Midthjell
K
.
Blood pressure changes during 22-year of follow-up in large general population—the HUNT study, Norway
.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord
2016
;
16
:
94
.

21

Foo
FL
,
Mahendru
AA
,
Masini
G
,
Fraser
A
,
Cacciatore
S
,
MacIntyre
DA
,
McEniery
CM
,
Wilkinson
IB
,
Bennett
PR
,
Lees
CC
.
Association between prepregnancy cardiovascular function and subsequent preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction
.
Hypertension
2018
;
72
:
442
450
.

22

Romundstad
PR
,
Magnussen
EB
,
Smith
GD
,
Vatten
LJ
.
Hypertension in pregnancy and later cardiovascular risk: common antecedents?
Circulation
2010
;
122
:
579
584
.

23

Melchiorre
K
,
Sharma
R
,
Thilaganathan
B
.
Cardiovascular implications in preeclampsia: an overview
.
Circulation
2014
;
130
:
703
714
.

24

Gronningsaeter
L
,
Skulstad
H
,
Quattrone
A
,
Langesaeter
E
,
Estensen
ME
.
Reduced left ventricular function and sustained hypertension in women seven years after severe preeclampsia
.
Scand Cardiovasc J
2022
;
56
:
292
301
.

25

Staff
AC
.
The two-stage placental model of preeclampsia: an update
.
J Reprod Immunol
2019
;
134–135
:
1
10
.

26

Estensen
ME
,
Remme
EW
,
Grindheim
G
,
Smiseth
OA
,
Segers
P
,
Henriksen
T
,
Aakhus
S
.
Increased arterial stiffness in pre-eclamptic pregnancy at term and early and late postpartum: a combined echocardiographic and tonometric study
.
Am J Hypertens
2013
;
26
:
549
556
.

27

Kvehaugen
AS
,
Dechend
R
,
Ramstad
HB
,
Troisi
R
,
Fugelseth
D
,
Staff
AC
.
Endothelial function and circulating biomarkers are disturbed in women and children after preeclampsia
.
Hypertension
2011
;
58
:
63
69
.

28

de Divitiis
M
,
Pilla
C
,
Kattenhorn
M
,
Donald
A
,
Zadinello
M
,
Wallace
S
,
Redington
A
,
Deanfield
J
.
Ambulatory blood pressure, left ventricular mass, and conduit artery function late after successful repair of coarctation of the aorta
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2003
;
41
:
2259
2265
.

29

Martinez-Portilla
RJ
,
Poon
LC
,
Benitez-Quintanilla
L
,
Sotiriadis
A
,
Lopez
M
,
Lip-Sosa
DL
,
Figueras
F
.
Incidence of pre-eclampsia and other perinatal complications among pregnant women with congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
2021
;
58
:
519
528
.

30

Huedo-Medina
TB
,
Sánchez-Meca
J
,
Marín-Martínez
F
,
Botella
J
.
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Psychol Methods
2006
;
11
:
193
206
.

31

Duley
L
,
Meher
S
,
Hunter
KE
,
Seidler
AL
,
Askie
LM
.
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2019
;
2019
:
CD004659

32

Rolnik
DL
,
Wright
D
,
Poon
LC
,
O’Gorman
N
,
Syngelaki
A
,
de Paco Matallana
C
,
Akolekar
R
,
Cicero
S
,
Janga
D
,
Singh
M
,
Molina
FS
,
Persico
N
,
Jani
JC
,
Plasencia
W
,
Papaioannou
G
,
Tenenbaum-Gavish
K
,
Meiri
H
,
Gizurarson
S
,
Maclagan
K
,
Nicolaides
KH
.
Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia
.
N Engl J Med
2017
;
377
:
613
622
.

33

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743: low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy
.
Obstet Gynecol
2018
;
132
:
e44
e52
.

34

Overview | Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management | Guidance | NICE
.
2020

35

Staff
A
,
Henriksen
T
,
Langsætre
E
,
Michelsen
T
,
Moe
K
,
Strand
KM
,
Vaernesbranden
M
,
Oian
P
.
Hypertensive svangerskapskomplikasjoner og eklampsi
.
Oslo, Norway
:
Den Norske Legeforening; Legeforeningen
;
2014
.

36

Boerma
T
,
Ronsmans
C
,
Melesse
DY
,
Barros
AJD
,
Barros
FC
,
Juan
L
,
Moller
AB
,
Say
L
,
Hosseinpoor
AR
,
Yi
M
,
de Lyra Rabello Neto
D
,
Temmerman
M
.
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections
.
Lancet
2018
;
392
:
1341
1348
.

37

Ruys
TP
,
Roos-Hesselink
JW
,
Pijuan-Domènech
A
,
Vasario
E
,
Gaisin
IR
,
Iung
B
,
Freeman
LJ
,
Gordon
EP
,
Pieper
PG
,
Hall
R
,
Boersma
E
,
Johnson
MR
.
Is a planned caesarean section in women with cardiac disease beneficial?
Heart
2015
;
101
:
530
536
.

38

Amorim
MM
,
Souza
ASR
,
Katz
L
.
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe pre-eclampsia
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2017
;
10
:
Cd009430
.

39

Sørbye
IK
,
Haualand
R
,
Wiull
H
,
Letting
A-S
,
Langesæter
E
,
Estensen
M-E
.
Maternal beta-blocker dose and risk of small-for gestational-age in women with heart disease
.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
2022
;
101
:
794
802
.

40

Pierpont
ME
,
Brueckner
M
,
Chung
WK
,
Garg
V
,
Lacro
RV
,
McGuire
AL
,
Mital
S
,
Priest
JR
,
Pu
WT
,
Roberts
A
,
Ware
SM
,
Gelb
BD
,
Russell
MW
;
American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
;
Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine
.
Genetic basis for congenital heart disease: revisited: a scientific statement from the American heart association
.
Circulation
2018
;
138
:
e653
e711
.

Author notes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
Handling Editor: Edit Nagy
Edit Nagy
Handling Editor
Search for other works by this author on:

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.