The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of insecticidal materials for control of corn earworm (CEW) on sweet corn under desert growing conditions during the spring season. Sweet corn, “Xtra-Tender 1278” was direct seeded on 21 March 2014 at the University of California Desert Research and Extension Center, Holtville, CA, into single row beds on 40-inch centers. Stand establishment and crop maintenance was achieved using furrow irrigation. Plots were two beds in width (6.67 ft) by 50 ft in length. Five replications of each treatment were arranged in an RCB design. Formulations and rates for each compound are provided in Table 1 along with the adjuvants used; RNA Activator 85 (RNA, San Joaquin, CA) or Hasten-modified vegetable oil (Wilbur-Ellis Company, San Francisco, CA). The insecticide applications were made on dates indicated in Table 1 , with a 6-nozzle, 2-bed boom, on a handheld CO 2 propelled sprayer, with 3 Conjet TXVS-4 nozzles per bed spaced 15 inches apart; outer 2 nozzles on 15 inch drops facing the plant angled 135° down from vertical delivering 17.9 gpa at 30 psi. Evaluation of insecticide efficacy against CEW was based on the number of live larvae and numbers of CEW damaged ears per 20 randomly selected corn ears per plot and on the average length (cm) of CEW feeding damage per ear (the length of damage from the ear tip) on 16 June 2014. Data sets were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and means separated by a protected LSD ( P  < 0.05). Arcsine transformation (ARSIN(SQRT(X))) was also used for percentage data shown in Table 2 .

Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acreApplication dates
1. Check
2. Belt SC a r/w 3.021, 30 May, 6, 13 June
Baythroid XL a2.827, 28 May, 2, 4, 9, 11 June
3. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11, 13 June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9 June
4. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant SC b6.02, 11 June
5. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9, 13 June
6. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant b6.02, 11 June
Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acreApplication dates
1. Check
2. Belt SC a r/w 3.021, 30 May, 6, 13 June
Baythroid XL a2.827, 28 May, 2, 4, 9, 11 June
3. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11, 13 June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9 June
4. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant SC b6.02, 11 June
5. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9, 13 June
6. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant b6.02, 11 June

a RNA Activator 85 at 0.25% vol/vol.

b Hasten-modified vegetable oil at 0.5 % vol/vol.

Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acreApplication dates
1. Check
2. Belt SC a r/w 3.021, 30 May, 6, 13 June
Baythroid XL a2.827, 28 May, 2, 4, 9, 11 June
3. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11, 13 June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9 June
4. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant SC b6.02, 11 June
5. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9, 13 June
6. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant b6.02, 11 June
Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acreApplication dates
1. Check
2. Belt SC a r/w 3.021, 30 May, 6, 13 June
Baythroid XL a2.827, 28 May, 2, 4, 9, 11 June
3. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11, 13 June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9 June
4. Paradigm VC b f/b 3.221, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant SC b6.02, 11 June
5. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May 4, 6, 11June
Lannate LV b24.027 May, 2, 9, 13 June
6. Brigade 2EC b f/b 2.1321, 28, 30 May, 6, 9 June
Lannate LV b f/b 24.027 May, 4, 13 June
Radiant b6.02, 11 June

a RNA Activator 85 at 0.25% vol/vol.

b Hasten-modified vegetable oil at 0.5 % vol/vol.

Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acre CEW damage and larvae per 25 ears
Live larvae a CEW damaged ears aTotal cm of CEW damage% CEW damaged earsArcsine % CEW damaged ears
Check7.4 a14.4 a75.68 a72 a58.37 a
Belt SC r/w3.03.8 a7.2 c26.92 c36 c36.65 b
Baythroid XL2.8
Paradigm VC f/b3.24.2 a10.2 b46.96 b51 bc45.22 b
Lannate LV24.0
Paradigm VC f/b3.25.2 a10.0 b37.26 bc50 bc44.90 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant SC6.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.135.0 a10.6 b42.00 bc53 b46.73 b
Lannate LV24.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.134.4 a10.6 b38.30 bc53 b46.62 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant6.0
Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acre CEW damage and larvae per 25 ears
Live larvae a CEW damaged ears aTotal cm of CEW damage% CEW damaged earsArcsine % CEW damaged ears
Check7.4 a14.4 a75.68 a72 a58.37 a
Belt SC r/w3.03.8 a7.2 c26.92 c36 c36.65 b
Baythroid XL2.8
Paradigm VC f/b3.24.2 a10.2 b46.96 b51 bc45.22 b
Lannate LV24.0
Paradigm VC f/b3.25.2 a10.0 b37.26 bc50 bc44.90 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant SC6.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.135.0 a10.6 b42.00 bc53 b46.73 b
Lannate LV24.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.134.4 a10.6 b38.30 bc53 b46.62 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant6.0

Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P  > 0.05, LSD.

a Log 10 ( X  + 1) transformed data used for analysis but actual means reported in the table.

Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acre CEW damage and larvae per 25 ears
Live larvae a CEW damaged ears aTotal cm of CEW damage% CEW damaged earsArcsine % CEW damaged ears
Check7.4 a14.4 a75.68 a72 a58.37 a
Belt SC r/w3.03.8 a7.2 c26.92 c36 c36.65 b
Baythroid XL2.8
Paradigm VC f/b3.24.2 a10.2 b46.96 b51 bc45.22 b
Lannate LV24.0
Paradigm VC f/b3.25.2 a10.0 b37.26 bc50 bc44.90 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant SC6.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.135.0 a10.6 b42.00 bc53 b46.73 b
Lannate LV24.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.134.4 a10.6 b38.30 bc53 b46.62 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant6.0
Treatment/formulationRate amt (fl oz)/acre CEW damage and larvae per 25 ears
Live larvae a CEW damaged ears aTotal cm of CEW damage% CEW damaged earsArcsine % CEW damaged ears
Check7.4 a14.4 a75.68 a72 a58.37 a
Belt SC r/w3.03.8 a7.2 c26.92 c36 c36.65 b
Baythroid XL2.8
Paradigm VC f/b3.24.2 a10.2 b46.96 b51 bc45.22 b
Lannate LV24.0
Paradigm VC f/b3.25.2 a10.0 b37.26 bc50 bc44.90 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant SC6.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.135.0 a10.6 b42.00 bc53 b46.73 b
Lannate LV24.0
Brigade 2EC f/b2.134.4 a10.6 b38.30 bc53 b46.62 b
Lannate LV f/b24.0
Radiant6.0

Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P  > 0.05, LSD.

a Log 10 ( X  + 1) transformed data used for analysis but actual means reported in the table.

The CEW pressure was high for the spring sweet corn season. None of the insecticide treatments had significantly fewer CEW larvae than the untreated check, but all of the insecticide treatments had fewer CEW damaged ears than the untreated check ( Table 2 ). All of the insecticide treatments had fewer total cm of CEW damage to the sweet corn ear tips compared to the untreated check. The percentage of sweet corn ears damaged by CEW in the untreated check was significantly greater than the percentages of CEW damaged ears in any of the insecticide treatments. The percentages of CEW damage ears for all of the insecticide treatments were above a level acceptable for commercial production. No phytotoxicity symptoms were observed following any of the insecticide treatments.

* This research was supported by industry gifts.

Author notes

Subject Editor: John Palumbo

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]