A field trial was conducted in a 7-year-old “Tango” mandarin orchard at the Lindcove Research and Extension Center, Exeter, California to compare the effects of miticides to manage citrus red mite. The experimental design was completely randomized using 5 individual trees as replicates. Treatments were diluted in 100 gal of water per acre and were applied on 3 May using a 100-gal high-pressure D30 diaphragm pump sprayer with mechanical agitation at 250 psi. The pre- and post-treatment counts were done by counting the number of motile citrus red mites on 25 randomly selected leaves around the tree. We also counted predatory mites on 25 inner canopy leaves per tree on each evaluation date. The average numbers of citrus red mites and predatory mites per leaf were evaluated using ANOVA after Log10 (x + 1) transformation with means separated according to Fisher’s Protected LSD (P < 0.05).

Before treatments, there were no significant differences in the number of citrus red mites per leaf among treatments (Table 1). All treatments, when applied with the inclusion of 1% 415 Supreme Spray Oil, significantly reduced the number of mites 1 week after treatment (1 WAT) compared to untreated check and water-only treatment. Reductions in mites were seen through 3 WAT in plots treated with Fujimite SC, and through 4 WAT in plots treated with Kodama GXP and Nealta. When 415 Supreme Oil was applied by itself, there were significant reductions in the mite population at 1 WAT, but not thereafter.

Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of citrus red mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check5.722.24a2.82a2.62ab1.87abc
Water only100 gal6.182.07a2.57a1.95bcd1.28bcd
Grandevo1 lb1%5.701.25b1.61ab2.38abc1.92abc
Venerate XC1 qt1%5.760.92bc2.28a3.61a2.99a
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%5.900.46cd2.02a1.29cde2.98a
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%5.910.33d1.9ab3.82a2.92ab
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%5.890.14d1.02bc1.09de0.73de
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%5.740.25d0.49c0.6e0.35e
FujiMite SC2 pt1%6.270.11d0.41c0.75e0.83cde
P value1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of citrus red mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check5.722.24a2.82a2.62ab1.87abc
Water only100 gal6.182.07a2.57a1.95bcd1.28bcd
Grandevo1 lb1%5.701.25b1.61ab2.38abc1.92abc
Venerate XC1 qt1%5.760.92bc2.28a3.61a2.99a
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%5.900.46cd2.02a1.29cde2.98a
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%5.910.33d1.9ab3.82a2.92ab
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%5.890.14d1.02bc1.09de0.73de
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%5.740.25d0.49c0.6e0.35e
FujiMite SC2 pt1%6.270.11d0.41c0.75e0.83cde
P value1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001

Pre: pretreatment. WAT: week after treatment. Means within each column followed by a different letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). The number of mites was Log10 (x + 1)) transformed before analysis. Untransformed means are reported.

Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of citrus red mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check5.722.24a2.82a2.62ab1.87abc
Water only100 gal6.182.07a2.57a1.95bcd1.28bcd
Grandevo1 lb1%5.701.25b1.61ab2.38abc1.92abc
Venerate XC1 qt1%5.760.92bc2.28a3.61a2.99a
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%5.900.46cd2.02a1.29cde2.98a
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%5.910.33d1.9ab3.82a2.92ab
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%5.890.14d1.02bc1.09de0.73de
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%5.740.25d0.49c0.6e0.35e
FujiMite SC2 pt1%6.270.11d0.41c0.75e0.83cde
P value1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of citrus red mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check5.722.24a2.82a2.62ab1.87abc
Water only100 gal6.182.07a2.57a1.95bcd1.28bcd
Grandevo1 lb1%5.701.25b1.61ab2.38abc1.92abc
Venerate XC1 qt1%5.760.92bc2.28a3.61a2.99a
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%5.900.46cd2.02a1.29cde2.98a
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%5.910.33d1.9ab3.82a2.92ab
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%5.890.14d1.02bc1.09de0.73de
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%5.740.25d0.49c0.6e0.35e
FujiMite SC2 pt1%6.270.11d0.41c0.75e0.83cde
P value1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001

Pre: pretreatment. WAT: week after treatment. Means within each column followed by a different letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). The number of mites was Log10 (x + 1)) transformed before analysis. Untransformed means are reported.

There were no significant differences in the number of predatory mites prior to treatment (Table 2). Venerate XC, Plinazolin, 415 Supreme oil, and FujiMite SC significantly reduced the number of predatory mites through 3 WAT compared to the untreated and water-only checks. At 4 WAT, the number of predatory mites in all treatments was statistically equivalent to both checks. When comparing data across citrus red mites and predatory mites, Kodama GXP and Nealta suppressed the pestiferous mites but did their predators (Tables 1 and 2).1

Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of predatory mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check1.631.49ab1.3ab0.76ab0.49
Water only100 gal1.761.69a1.27ab1.06a0.84
Grandevo1 lb1%1.981.29ab1.08b0.77ab0.57
Venerate XC1 qt1%1.860.08c0.05d0.09c0.74
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%1.670.07c0d0c0.06
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%1.930.43c0.39c0.17c0.69
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%1.971.02b1.56ab0.83ab0.73
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%1.541.19ab1.86a0.69b0.71
FujiMite SC2 pt1%1.850.25c0.37c0.19c0.2
P value0.910<0.001<0.001<0.0010.172
Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of predatory mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check1.631.49ab1.3ab0.76ab0.49
Water only100 gal1.761.69a1.27ab1.06a0.84
Grandevo1 lb1%1.981.29ab1.08b0.77ab0.57
Venerate XC1 qt1%1.860.08c0.05d0.09c0.74
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%1.670.07c0d0c0.06
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%1.930.43c0.39c0.17c0.69
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%1.971.02b1.56ab0.83ab0.73
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%1.541.19ab1.86a0.69b0.71
FujiMite SC2 pt1%1.850.25c0.37c0.19c0.2
P value0.910<0.001<0.001<0.0010.172

Pre: pretreatment. WAT: week after treatment. Means within each column followed by a different letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). The number of mites was Log10 (x + 1) transformed before analysis. Untransformed means are reported.

Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of predatory mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check1.631.49ab1.3ab0.76ab0.49
Water only100 gal1.761.69a1.27ab1.06a0.84
Grandevo1 lb1%1.981.29ab1.08b0.77ab0.57
Venerate XC1 qt1%1.860.08c0.05d0.09c0.74
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%1.670.07c0d0c0.06
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%1.930.43c0.39c0.17c0.69
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%1.971.02b1.56ab0.83ab0.73
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%1.541.19ab1.86a0.69b0.71
FujiMite SC2 pt1%1.850.25c0.37c0.19c0.2
P value0.910<0.001<0.001<0.0010.172
Treatment/FormulationRate-amt form/acre415 Supreme Spray Oil (Amount v:v)Mean number of predatory mites/leaf
2 May (Pre)10 May (1 WAT)17 May (2 WAT)24 May (3 WAT)31 May (4 WAT)
Untreated check1.631.49ab1.3ab0.76ab0.49
Water only100 gal1.761.69a1.27ab1.06a0.84
Grandevo1 lb1%1.981.29ab1.08b0.77ab0.57
Venerate XC1 qt1%1.860.08c0.05d0.09c0.74
Plinazolin1.1 fl oz1%1.670.07c0d0c0.06
415 Supreme Spray Oil1%1.930.43c0.39c0.17c0.69
Kodama GXP8 fl oz1%1.971.02b1.56ab0.83ab0.73
Nealta17.1 fl oz1%1.541.19ab1.86a0.69b0.71
FujiMite SC2 pt1%1.850.25c0.37c0.19c0.2
P value0.910<0.001<0.001<0.0010.172

Pre: pretreatment. WAT: week after treatment. Means within each column followed by a different letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). The number of mites was Log10 (x + 1) transformed before analysis. Untransformed means are reported.

Footnotes

1

This research was supported in part by the Citrus Research Board with additional industry gifts of pesticides and funding.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].
Subject Editor: David Haviland
David Haviland
Subject Editor
Search for other works by this author on: