Skip to Main Content
Book cover for Handbook of Surgical Consent Handbook of Surgical Consent

Contents

Book cover for Handbook of Surgical Consent Handbook of Surgical Consent
Disclaimer
Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always … More Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Bleeding peptic ulcer—oversewing 228

Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia of the cardia 231

Feeding jejunostomy 233

Gastrectomy 234

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery 236

Hiatus hernia repair and antireflux surgery 238

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding 240

Oesophageal repair 242

Oesophageal replacement 244

Oesophagectomy (Ivor Lewis/transhiatal/three-stage) 246

Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy 248

Paraoesophageal hiatus hernia repair 250

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy 252

Oversew of perforated peptic ulcer 254

Sleeve gastrectomy 256

Splenectomy 258

Highly selective vagotomy 260

Approximately 80–85% of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage stops spontaneously and only conservative therapy is needed. The remaining 15–20% require surgical intervention.1,2 Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the first-line treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer. Various endoscopic methods are available, including injection of adrenaline into the ulcer, and the use of clips, thermoprobe, or laser.

Indications for surgical intervention are:14

Requirement of a 6-unit or more transfusion of packed red cells (4 units in the elderly)

Visible vessel at the base of the ulcer

Inability to control bleeding endoscopically

Two or more episodes of re-bleeding

The position of the ulcer should ideally be identified with endoscopy prior to surgical intervention. The gastroduodenal artery runs along the posterior aspect of the first part of duodenum and thus a posterior wall ulcer must be assumed to involve this artery. An upper midline incision is made. In the case of duodenal ulcers a longitudinal pyloroduodenotomy is made. The gastroduodenal artery is under-run proximally and distally. A third suture may be inserted to control the transverse pancreatic branch of the artery. The pyloroduodenotomy is closed transversely (Fig. 8.1).

 Oversewing of bleeding peptic ulcer.
Fig. 8.1

Oversewing of bleeding peptic ulcer.

In the case of gastric ulcers the management depends on the size and position of the ulcer. Smaller ulcers may be sufficiently managed with under-sewing of the bleeding vessel. Very large ulcers may warrant a subtotal gastrectomy.4 Sufficient biopsies should be taken of gastric ulcers in order to exclude malignancy.

The patient may require intensive care unit (ITU)/high-dependency unit (HDU) care postoperatively depending on their comorbidities. They will also have a nasogastric tube and intra-abdominal drains in situ.

Subtotal gastrectomy

Therapeutic: to control haemorrhage

Conservative: management involves supportive therapy only. Although the bleed may stop spontaneously

Medical: all patients should undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to investigate the cause and site of bleeding, with a potential attempt to endoscopically arrest the bleeding

Radiological: angiographic identification of the bleeding vessel and subsequent embolization is another option in centres where interventional radiology is available

Specific: uncontrollable haemorrhage resulting in death, re-bleeding—will usually occur within the first 72h and carries a significant mortality, leak from site of pyloromyotomy

General: infection—chest/intra-abdominal/urinary/systemic, DVT/pulmonary embolism/cerebrovascular accident (CVA)

Late: incisional hernia, recurrent ulceration at site of pyloromyotomy or elsewhere, pyloric stenosis

Cross-match 4–6 units (dependent on starting haemoglobin)

In patients with significant bleeding blood products such as platelets or FFP are likely to be required

General anaesthesia

Hospital stay after this procedure will be approximately 1 week

Patients with peptic ulcer disease will require either medical management or if that fails, a definitive surgical procedure. This will include testing for the presence of Helicobacter pylori and subsequent eradication

Gastric ulcers may prove to be malignant and patients may require further surgery for definitive management of their cancer

All patients will require further upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

1. Sung JJ, Tsoi KK, Ma TK, et al. Causes of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective cohort study of 10,428 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105(1):84–9.reference
2. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, et al. Variation in outcome after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Lancet 1995;346(8971):346–50.reference
3. Rockall TA. Management and outcome of patients undergoing surgery after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Steering Group for the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. J R Soc Med 1998;91(10):518–23.reference
4. Cheung FK, Lau JY. Management of massive peptic ulcer bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2009;38(2):231–43.reference

Achalasia is a condition that causes reduced peristalsis of the oesophagus and a high lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure. The purpose of surgery is to reduce the LOS pressure by dividing the muscle wall, without breaching the inner mucosa. The oesophageal wall consists of overlying adventitia, longitudinal and circular muscles, the muscularis propria layer followed by the submucosa and innermost mucosal layer. A longitudinal incision is made through the adventitia and muscle layers down to submucosa, starting above the LOS and extending down onto the stomach for approximately 3–7cm. This is now most commonly performed laparoscopically, although classically it was an open procedure. An endoscope may be introduced to ensure mucosal integrity on completion of the procedure.

A partial fundoplication may also be performed to prevent excessive acid reflux.

Conversion to open procedure

A thoracoscopic approach—if a more extensive myotomy is required

Therapeutic: to improve symptoms of dysphagia

Conservative: eating slowly, chewing well, and raising the head of the bed when sleeping

Medical: reduce contractility of the LOS. Treatment includes calcium channel blockers and nitrates. Botulinum toxin (Botox®) can be injected into the LOS to paralyse the muscles and hold it shut

Surgical/endoscopic: pneumatic dilatation of the LOS by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) can also be used. This has a risk of perforation and may require repeating

Early:

General: DVT/pulmonary embolism, infection (wound/systemic/chest)

Specific: perforation of oesophagus/stomach, inadequate length of myotomy

Late:

General: port site and incisional hernia

Specific: acid reflux, recurrence of symptoms—due to aperistaltic oesophagus or to scarring following surgery where subsequent dilatation may be required

Group and save

General anaesthesia

Even after successful treatment, patient swallowing may deteriorate over time, necessitating further dilatation or a second myotomy

Some physicians recommend repeated endoscopy to assess for any oesophageal damage secondary to acid reflux

1. Costantini M, Zaninotto G, Guirroli E, et al. The laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation remains an effective treatment for esophageal achalasia at a minimum 6-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 2005;19(3):345–51.reference
2. Luckey AE 3rd, DeMeester SR. Complications of achalasia surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 2006;16(1):95–8.reference
3. Mattioli S, Ruffato A, Lugaresi M, et al. Long-term results of the Heller-Dor operation with intraoperative manometry for the treatment of esophageal achalasia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140(5):962–9.reference
4. Ferulano GP, Dilillo S, D'Ambra M, et al. Short and long term results of the laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy. The influence of age and previous conservative therapies. Surg Endosc 2007;21(11):2017–23.reference

A feeding jejunostomy may be used as a route to provide enteral feed when it is not possible to administer food via the oesophagus or stomach or where supplemental oral intake is required. Oral feeding may not be possible due to pathology in the oesophagus or stomach, or following recent surgery with an oesophageal anastomosis.1 Jejunal feeding is also usually employed in patients with neurological deficits.

A small midline incision is made above the umbilicus and a loop of jejunum identified and delivered though the wound. A fine-bore feeding tube is inserted into the lumen of the jejunum. The tube is then fed through the abdominal wall and a fixation device is attached to the skin. This procedure can also be performed laparoscopically.

None

Diagnostic: to allow enteral feeding while bypassing the oesophagus and stomach

Conservative: nasojejunal tube feeding

Surgical: jejunal extension from percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), total parenteral nutrition via a CVC

Early: tube dislocation/blockage, bowel ischaemia, abdominal wall abscess formation, tube slippage/tearing through of jejunal sutures, intra-abdominal leakage of feed

Late: diarrhoea or constipation, abdominal cramping, nausea and vomiting, tube migration, enterocutaneous fistulas

Group and save

Local anaesthesia/regional anaesthesia (spinal/epidural)/general anaesthesia

The tube should not be removed for 10 days to allow time for a tract to develop

When the jejunostomy is no longer required it can be removed on the ward or in outpatients without any need for local anaesthesia or a further procedure

1. Wakefield SE, Mansell NJ, Baigrie RJ, et al. Use of a feeding jejunostomy after oesophagogastric surgery. Br J Surg 1995;82:811–13.reference
2. Tapia J, Murguia R, Garcia G, et al. Jejunostomy: techniques, indications, and complications. World J Surg 1999;23(6):596–602.reference

This procedure is broadly divided into a subtotal or total gastrectomy and can be performed laparoscopically or as an open procedure. An upper midline incision is made for open procedures. In a total gastrectomy the entire stomach is removed and an anastomosis fashioned between the distal oesophagus and a jejunal loop forming a Roux-en-Y reconstruction, leaving a blind duodenal stump. The same reconstruction is performed in a subtotal gastrectomy with the jejunal loop being anastomosed onto the remaining stomach (Fig. 8.2). This is otherwise known as a Bilroth II procedure. In a Bilroth I procedure enough upper duodenum remains to anastomose directly onto the stomach.

 Anatomy post subtotal and total gastrectomy.
Fig. 8.2

Anatomy post subtotal and total gastrectomy.

Most gastrectomies are performed for gastric cancer. Segmental resection of the stomach can also be performed, for example, in the resections of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. In these procedures the stomach wall is closed primarily and no anastomosis is fashioned.

Patients undergoing gastrectomy need careful preoperative assessment and often require HDU care in the initial postoperative period. Patients may have abdominal drains, a nasogastric tube and/or a urinary catheter in situ in the immediate postoperative period. Depending on their comorbidities they may also require invasive monitoring such as CVCs and arterial cannulation.

If the surgery is performed laparoscopically it may become necessary to convert to an open procedure

When there is invasion of other organs by disease—splenectomy, distal pancreatectomy or transverse colectomy

Splenectomy for bleeding

Irresectable cancer will lead to closure without excision

In nutritionally deplete patients, especially those requiring postoperative chemotherapy—insertion of a feeding jejunostomy to provide supplementary enteral feeding

Diagnostic: provide histological tissue and stage disease

Therapeutic: to remove cancer and improve prognosis, to relieve obstruction if present, symptom control

This depends on the indication for surgery. The most common indication is stomach cancer. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Conservative: symptom control and palliation

Radiological/oncological: chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both in a palliative setting

General: bleeding, infection including wound, chest, intra-abdominal and systemic, DVT/pulmonary embolism/CVA/myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome (ACS)

Specific: anastomotic leak, anastomotic breakdown, duodenal stump leak, dumping syndrome (more prevalent in total gastrectomy), nausea, vomiting, bloating, dizziness, sweating, intolerance of large meals, biliary reflux, incomplete excision, recurrence of disease, vitamin B12 deficiency—necessitating lifelong replacement

Group and save/cross-match 2–4 units

General anaesthesia with or without regional epidural anaesthesia for postoperative pain relief

Hospital stay is usually between 7 and 10 days

Further resection—if surgery is undertaken for cancer, positive resection margins for cancer may require re-resection

Ongoing outpatient monitoring of disease with CT scanning

1. Sasako M, Katai H, Sano T, et al. Management of complications after gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy. Surg Oncol 2000;9(1):31–4.reference
2. McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis PP, et al. Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophagealcancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003;327(7425):1192–7.reference
3. RCSE Clinical Effectiveness Unit/AUGIS/BSG. National Oesophagogastric Cancer Audit 2009. Available at: graphic  www.augis.org/pdf/audits/nhs-ic-og-clinical-audit_2nd_Annual_Report_2009.pdf (accessed 10 May 2011).reference

Bariatric surgical procedures are divided into malabsorptive procedures and restrictive procedures. Restrictive procedures primarily reduce stomach size, and malabsorptive procedures, while they may also reduce the size of the stomach, primarily act to reduce absorption of ingested food. The commonest bariatric procedure, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, is an example of a restrictive procedure. Newer techniques include the sleeve gastrectomy and duodenal switch procedure. Gastric bypass surgery is an example of a mixed restrictive and malabsorptive procedure.

Gastric bypass surgery can be performed either open or laparoscopically. The stomach is divided into a small (∼30mL) proximal pouch and a large distal remnant pouch. The gastrointestinal tract is then reconstructed to allow drainage of both segments of stomach via a Roux En-Y reconstruction. This leads to a marked reduction in the functional volume of the stomach and an alteration in the physiological response to food.

If performed laparoscopically—conversion to open procedure

Weight loss

Secondary: reduction in obesity related comorbidities including hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Conservative: diet and exercise

Medical: lipid binders (e.g. orlistat)

Surgical: restrictive procedures such as laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, intra-gastric balloon

General: bleeding, infection—wound/chest/systemic, DVT/pulmonary embolism/ACS/CVA

Specific: anastomotic leakage/breakdown, anastomotic ulceration, dumping syndrome—tachycardia, sweating, anxiety, diarrhoea, hyperparathyroidism, inadequate absorption of calcium due to bypass of the duodenum, iron and vitamin B12 deficiency, incisional hernias

Group and save/cross-match 2 units

General anaesthesia

Routine outpatient review

Patients require close monitoring by a multidisciplinary team in the initial postoperative period. This includes monitoring and treatment of any psychological sequelae

After this, follow up of weight loss can be managed in the community by primary care teams

1. Lancaster R, Hutter M. Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2554–63.reference
2. Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg 1995;222:339–52.reference
3. Talieh J, Kirgan D, Fisher BL. Gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a standard technique by consensus. Obesity Surg 1997;7:198–202.reference

These procedures are used to repair a sliding hiatus hernia or to treat some forms of intractable gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. There are many different types of wrap described. Nissen's is a 360° wrap of fundus around the oesophagus. Other partial wraps (170–270°) have also been described.13 The partial wrap is intended to reduce postoperative dysphagia and bloating.

Prior to undergoing either type of procedure, various investigations need to be undertaken. Preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is required to assess for oesophagitis or the presence of hiatus hernia. For patients with reflux, oesophageal pH and manometry studies are required to detect the presence and severity of acid reflux, and to detect abnormal contractility of the oesophagus, which may preclude surgical correction.4 For example, in achalasia, there is abnormal contractility of the LOS and symptoms would not improve and may well deteriorate post-fundoplication.

The procedure is most commonly performed laparoscopically with the patient placed in a modified lithotomy position. The right and left crura are dissected and circumferential dissection of the oesophagus is performed. The hiatus is then closed with sutures. The short gastric vessels may be divided to improve mobilization of the fundus. In Nissen's procedure the mobilized fundus is wrapped 360° around the oesophagus by passing it through the posterior window behind the oesophagus. The wrap is then secured in place on the anterior oesophagus with a varying number of sutures. In a Watson procedure the wrap is wrapped anteriorly through 120° and secured anteriorly (Fig. 8.3).

 Fundal wrap in anti-reflux surgery.
Fig. 8.3

Fundal wrap in anti-reflux surgery.

Conversion to open procedure

Therapeutic: relieve symptoms and complications of reflux disease

Conservative: dietary management

Medical: proton-pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists

Surgical: endoscopic antireflux procedures

Early: postoperative dysphagia—normal for first 6 weeks, but rarely permanent, pneumothorax, oesophageal perforation, gas bloat syndrome, epigastric pain, splenic or hepatic injury, iatrogenic vagotomy

Late: wrap failure, recurrence of symptoms, hiatal stenosis, ongoing dysphagia

Group and save

General anaesthesia

Soft diet for 6 weeks postoperatively

Follow-up at 4 weeks after the surgery

Revision surgery is rarely required for recurrence

Routine outpatient review

1. Cai W, Watson DI, Lally CJ, et al. Ten-year clinical outcome of a prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen versus anterior 180(degrees) partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 2008;95(12):1501–5.reference
2. Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Lally C, et al. Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of laparoscopic nissen vs anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication. Arch Surg 2004;139(11):1160–7.reference
3. Stewart GD, Watson AJ, Lamb PJ, et al. Comparison of three different procedures for antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 2004;91(6):724–9.reference
4. Peters JH, DeMeester TR. Indications, benefits and outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Dig Dis 1996;14(3):169–79.reference
5. DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M. Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1986;204(1):9–20.reference

Bariatric surgical procedures are grossly divided into malabsorptive procedures and restrictive procedures. Restrictive procedures primarily reduce stomach size, and malabsorptive procedures, while they may also reduce the size of the stomach, primarily act to reduce absorption of ingested food. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is an example of a restrictive procedure.

In laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding an inflatable silicone band is placed around the fundus of the stomach. This produces a proximal pouch of stomach, which can hold approximately 120g of food. The band slows the passage of food into the remainder of the stomach and the stomach registers as full, giving the patient a sensation of early satiety. The band is connected to a subcutaneous port in the abdominal wall to allow inflation and deflation of the band. This allows the optimum ‘tightness’ of the band to be achieved, i.e. the level which produces optimum weight loss with an acceptable level of side effects.

Conversion to an open procedure

Primary: weight loss

Secondary: resolution of obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension

Conservative: diet and exercise

Medical: lipid binders (e.g. orlistat)

Surgical: malabsorptive surgical procedures, sleeve gastrectomy, intragastric balloon

General: bleeding, infection (chest/wound/systemic), DVT/pulmonary embolism/CVA/myocardial infarction

Specific:

Early: band slippage, intolerance of band, dysphagia, port site infections, gastro-oesophageal reflux

Late: band erosion, port site hernia, diarrhoea

Group and save

General anaesthesia

The band is adjusted in outpatients until the optimum tightness of the band is achieved. This can then be adjusted according to the patient's wishes

Patients may require revision bariatric surgery, commonly a gastric bypass procedure, if weight loss plateaus or the band is not tolerated2,3

1. Lancaster R, Hutter M. Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2554–63.reference
2. Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg 2006;16(7):829–35.reference
3. O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Brown W, et al. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life. Obes Surg 2002;12(5):652–60.reference

Oesophageal perforation, while rare, is life-threatening, and 90% of cases are secondary to instrumentation of the oesophagus during endoscopy. The remaining 10% are due to Boerhaave's syndrome (oesophageal rupture secondary to vomiting or retching), trauma, or caustic injury secondary to ingestion of substances such as bleach.1

Perforations can occur in the neck (cervical), the chest, or in the abdomen. Management depends on the level of the perforation. Diagnosis can be made by direct visualization at endoscopy, water-soluble contrast studies or during contrast CT scanning.2

This condition is usually dealt with by the ENT department. The perforations are most often treated conservatively but surgical repair may be recommended in the early stages. Later the tissues become friable where only drainage is possible.

Primary repair may be possible in the early stages. In cases of extreme contamination or late intervention, treatment consists of removal of contamination, copious washout, mediastinal drainage, and insertion of a T-tube into the defect. The use of a T-tube creates a controlled fistula.

These are most commonly iatrogenic secondary to surgery. When noted intraoperatively they can be repaired immediately. If they are detected postoperatively, a upper midline laparotomy is required for primary oesophageal repair and peritoneal washout.

Feeding jejunostomy

Drainage gastrostomy

Insertion of a T-tube for drainage

Emergency oesophagectomy—if the perforation is extensive or not amenable to repair; carries a high rate of mortality

Cervical oesophagostomy3

Therapeutic: to relieve sepsis, This is a life-saving procedure

Conservative: antibiotics, antifungal treatment, proton pump inhibitors, total parenteral nutrition, nasogastric tube drainage, palliative care

Endoscopic: covered oesophageal stents

Early: death (thoracic perforation holds a mortality rate of over 50% for those not explored within 24h and between 10% and 15% for those repaired within 24h1), sepsis (intrathoracic/systemic), mediastinitis/ mediastinal collection (may require drainage via mediastinoscopy), acute respiratory distress syndrome, prolonged ITU stay

Late: chronic lung disease, dysphagia, multiple operations

Cross-match 4–6 units

General anaesthesia

Prolonged hospital stay

Repeated imaging and endoscopy to assess the progress of the perforation

1. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, et al. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77(4):1475–83.reference
2. Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Shenfine J, et al. Spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 2008;95(9):1115–20.reference
3. Rohatgi A, Papanikitas J, Sutcliffe R, et al. The role of oesophageal diversion and exclusion in the management of oesophageal perforations. Int J Surg 2009;7(2):142–4.reference

The conduit of choice for oesophageal reconstruction is the stomach. However, if the stomach is not available, for example after a total gastrectomy or if pathology involves the stomach and oesophagus, another conduit will be necessary. The commonest indication for this is caustic injury of the oesophagus and stomach. For short defects a free jejunal interposition may be possible, however, larger defects require the colon.

Colonic interposition involves the fashioning of three anastomoses (Fig. 8.4). Ascending or transverse colon is used depending on the length required. The ascending colon is mobilized as an iso-peristaltic loop with a vascular pedicle formed from the middle colic vessels. The caecum is anastomosed to the cervical oesophagus in the neck or the thoracic oesophagus in the chest, forming an oesophagocolic anastomosis. To restore gastrointestinal continuity an ileocolic or colojejunal anastomosis is fashioned.1

 Right colonic interposition from cervical oesophagus to antrum with colo-colic anastomosis.
Fig. 8.4

Right colonic interposition from cervical oesophagus to antrum with colo-colic anastomosis.

Reproduced with permission from McLatchie GR and Leaper DJ. Oxford Specialist Handbook of Operative Surgery 2nd edition. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.219, Figure 6.6.

Jejunal grafts can be used as an iso-peristaltic interposition graft, however, its blood supply limits how high within the thoracic cavity it can be used. If it is required above the level of the aortic arch a vascularized free flap is required. This is technically a much more difficult procedure but may be physiologically preferable and therefore only used where other options are not possible or have failed. An oesophagojejunal anastomosis is fashioned in the chest followed by a jejuno-jejunal anastomosis to restore continuity.2

The conduit can be brought up into the neck via the posterior mediastinal, retrosternal, or subcutaneous route. The preferred route is the anatomical route, posterior mediastinal. However if this is not possible alternative routes may become necessary.

Although another procedure may not be necessary, the route and choice of interposition conduit may vary intraoperatively

Therapeutic: to provide gastrointestinal continuity allowing for enteral feeding

Conservative: total parenteral nutrition

Endoscopic: oesophageal stenting

Surgical: long-term feeding jejunostomy

General: bleeding, infection(wound/chest/systemic), pulmonary embolism/DVT/ACS/CVA

Specific:

Early: anastomotic leak/breakdown, ischaemic necrosis of conduit

Late: dumping syndrome, bile reflux, long-term dysphagia (due to poor peristalsis of colon)

Cross-match blood (4–6 units)

General anaesthesia/regional anaesthesia with thoracic epidural insertion is usually performed

Follow up is dependent on the indication for surgery

For cancer patients follow-up is lifelong and may require further oncological treatment dependent on their pathological staging

1. DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Franze I, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg 1988;208(4):460–74.reference
2. Sasaki TM, McConnell DB, Moseley HS, et al. Antethoracic jejunal esophagoplasty. An alternate method of repair. Am J Surg 1981;141(5):534–6.reference
3. Motoyama S, Kitamura M, Saito R, et al. Surgical outcome of colon interposition by the posterior mediastinal route for thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83(4):1273–8.reference

The commonest indication for oesophagectomy is malignant disease, however, occasionally it is needed for benign tumours or strictures. Oesophagectomy may be total or subtotal. The conduit for oesophageal replacement is usually the stomach but colon or vascularized small bowel may be used. Anastomosis may be in the neck or within the thorax. Access to the abdomen is required to mobilize the stomach (or other replacement organs1).

Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy involves gastric mobilization and right thoracotomy with intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis. Transhiatal oesophagectomy involves transhiatal mobilization of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric anastomosis via an incision in the neck. Three-stage McKeown oesophagectomy involves laparotomy, thoracotomy, and neck incision with oesophagogastric anastomosis in the neck.

Minimally invasive techniques, thoracoscopy, and laparoscopy are being used in all of the procedures mentioned.

Conversion from minimally invasive to open procedure

Feeding jejunostomy

Postoperative ventilation in the ITU

Diagnostic: histopathological diagnosis of underlying pathology with staging

Therapeutic: potential curative procedure

Adenocarcinoma: surgery is the only option for cure in appropriately selected patients

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC): chemoradiation may be an equivalent treatment

Palliative: oesophageal stents, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy

General: bleeding, infection (wound—including cervical sepsis, chest—increased post-thoracotomy, intra-abdominal, systemic), pulmonary embolism/DVT/CVA/ACS, death

Specific:

Early: anastomotic leak/breakdown—leads to a leak of gastric contents into the thoracic cavity. The management depends of the timing and site of the leak. Left pneumothorax, bronchial injury and air leak, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, chyle leak

Late: early satiety, bile reflux, anastomotic stricture

Group and save as a minimum, cross match 4–6 units

General anaesthesia/regional anaesthesia (thoracic epidural usually performed)

Patients require a minimum of HDU care postoperatively and many will require a stay in the ITU

Follow-up is dependent on indication for surgery. For cancer patients follow-up is lifelong, and they may require further oncological treatment dependent on their pathological staging

1. Akiyama H. Surgery for Cancer of the Oesophagus. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1990.
2. RCSE Clinical Effectiveness Unit/AUGIS/BSG. National Oesophagogastric Cancer Audit 2009. Available at: graphic  www.augis.org/pdf/audits/nhs-ic-og-clinical-audit_2nd_Annual_Report_2009.pdf (accessed 10 May 2011).reference
3. Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194(3):285–97.reference

OGD is a telescopic examination that is used for direct visualization of the oesophagus, stomach, and the first and second parts of the duodenum (Fig. 8.5). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may be diagnostic or therapeutic; emergency or elective. Common indications include gastrointestinal bleeding, dysphagia, vomiting, weight loss, epigastric pain, and reflux symptoms. Various procedures can be performed during an OGD, for example:

Biopsy

Campylobacter-like organism (CLO) testing

Management of bleeding ulcers—injection, clips, laser, cryotherapy

Variceal banding

Oesophageal stent placement

Nasogastric/nasojejunal tube placement

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Balloon dilatation of stricture

Mucosal resection

 Anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract.
Fig. 8.5

Anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract.

In an emergency OGD for bleeding—laparotomy for haemostasis

Biopsy for histology/H. pylori

Diagnostic: to identify lesion of concern/cause of symptoms or to obtain histology for histopathological analysis

Therapeutic: treatment of strictures, bleeding, malignancy

Insertion of feeding (nasogastric or nasojejunal) tube

Radiological: CT scanning, barium swallow or meal, fluoroscopy, radiological nasogastric or nasojejunal tube placement

Conservative: blind placement of a nasogastric tube, feeding jejunostomy

Surgical: total parenteral nutrition via a central venous line, surgery for treatment of bleeding and strictures

Bleeding from biopsy site (exceedingly rare), perforation (in diagnostic OGD 1:5000), pain, treatment failure (stent slippage, ongoing bleeding, further structuring), inadequate tissue on biopsy, damage to teeth, aspiration of stomach contents, respiratory depression from sedation

Diagnostic—none

Therapeutic—group and save/cross-match 4–6 units for acute bleeding. Additional blood products should be available for the management of acute gastrointestinal bleeds

Local anaesthesia throat spray or light sedative, very occasionally under general anaesthesia

This is dependent on the indication and findings of the OGD

Repeat endoscopy may be required to ensure ulcer healing or to repeat biopsies

Stents may require replacement or procedures to address tumour overgrowth

1. Wolfsen HC, Hemminger LL, Achem SR, et al. Complications of endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a single-center experience. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79(10):1264–7.reference
2. Reed WP, Kilkenny JW, Dias CE, et al. A prospective analysis of 3525 esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed by surgeons. Surg Endosc 2004;18(1):11–21.reference

A paraoesophageal hiatus hernia is uncommon. The gastro-oesophageal junction remains within the abdomen and the stomach herniates beside it into the mediastinum. Repair is usually performed laparoscopically, however, it may be performed via an upper midline incision.1 The stomach, other herniated contents, and the hernial sac are returned to the abdomen. The hernial sac can then either be circumcised or excised. The widened hiatal defect is then closed with non-absorbable sutures. A fundoplication is then performed to prevent postoperative reflux disease.

For very large defects (>10cm) a mesh may be required as it is not possible to close the crura adequately. The mesh is stapled to the underside of the diaphragm.

Conversion to open procedure

Insertion of mesh—as described

Gastropexy or gastroplasty for shortened oesophagus

Therapeutic: symptom relief, prevention of strangulation/gastric volvulus

Before the advent of laparoscopic surgery, if a patient was asymptomatic it was felt that the risk of surgery outweighed the benefit, especially in elderly patients. However, it is now thought that with a minimally invasive procedure it is a more acceptable risk given the chance of strangulation or volvulus. However, if the patient does not wish to undergo surgery it would be acceptable to monitor symptoms and re-discuss intervention if there is any deterioration.

General: bleeding, infection (wound/systemic, intra-abdominal: this is particularly significant if any mesh inserted becomes infected), pulmonary embolism/DVT/CVA

Specific:

Early: dysphagia, splenic injury, oesophageal perforation

Late: gas bloat syndrome, epigastric pain, wrap failure, recurrent hernia

Group and save/cross match 2–4 units

General anaesthesia

Patients require a soft diet for 6 weeks postoperatively and are seen at 4 weeks postoperatively

If they are well at this stage the patient can be discharged from follow-up

1. Andujar JJ, Papasavas PK, Birdas T, et al. Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surg Endosc 2004;18(3):444–7.reference
2. Hashemi M, Sillin LF, Peters JH. Current concepts in the management of paraesophageal hiatal hernia. J Clin Gastroenterol 1999;29(1):8–13.reference
3. Fuller CB, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR, et al. The role of fundoplication in the treatment of type II paraesophageal hernia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111(3):655–61.reference

PEG is a method of introducing a feeding tube through the abdominal wall into the stomach for enteral feeding. An endoscope is passed into the stomach and used to transilluminate the abdominal wall. Insufflation distends the stomach and digital pressure is applied to the abdominal wall, which can be visualized indenting on the stomach by the endoscopist.

The PEG tube consists of a silicone tube and a 2cm disc-shaped ‘bumper’, which abuts the gastric wall. A fine-bore needle is introduced and can be seen entering the stomach on endoscopy; a feeding suture is then passed in through this needle and pulled up through the oesophagus and out through the mouth. The gastrostomy catheter is attached to the feeding suture and pulled down into the stomach. This catheter is passed through the stomach and abdominal wall under direct vision (Fig. 8.6).

 PEG tube placement.
Fig. 8.6

PEG tube placement.

None

To maintain or supplement nutrition

Conservative: nasogastric and nasojejunal feeding. Parenteral nutrition via a CVC is a further method of feeding, however, it should be used only when enteral feeding is not an option

Surgical: jejunostomy. A feeding gastrostomy tube may be inserted at mini-laparotomy if there is obstruction of the oesophagus

Early: bleeding (the gastrostomy tube when inserted can damage to vascular supply surrounding the stomach), pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis, infection at abdominal wall entry site, food/feed leakage into peritoneal cavity, risk associated with sedation

Late: gastric ulcer around site of PEG bumper, tube blockage, migration of tube into gastric wall

None/group and save

Local/general anaesthesia (especially for children/learning difficulties)

Regular district nurse/home care and education in use and flushing of tube

Once the PEG is no longer required it can be removed endoscopically

1. Zopf Y, Rabe C, Bruckmoser T, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy and jejunal extension tube through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective analysis of success, complications and outcome. Digestion 2009;79(2):92–7.reference
2. Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2007;16(4):407–18.reference
3. Figueiredo FA, da Costa MC, Pelosi AD, et al. Predicting outcomes and complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Endoscopy 2007;39(4):333–8.reference

Perforated peptic ulcer is a common cause of peritonitis requiring emergency surgery. Operation is usually via a midline laparotomy, however, surgery can be carried out laparoscopically.1,2 Small acute duodenal perforations may be closed primarily, but more commonly an omental patch is used to plug the defect.

Perforated gastric ulcers may be malignant so it is important to obtain biopsies. If small, the ulcer may be excised or an omental patch applied. For larger gastric lesions, some form of gastrectomy may be required.

Conversion to an open procedure

Total/subtotal gastrectomy

Therapeutic: prevention of further sepsis

A potentially life-saving procedure

Conservative: nasogastric drainage, intravenous antibiotics, and acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors

Conservative management may be employed in selected patients with minimal symptoms or signs of sepsis. The diagnosis must be confirmed radiologically

General: bleeding, infection (chest, intra-abdominal, systemic), death

Specific:

Early: leak from site of repair

Late: recurrent ulceration at site of repair or elsewhere, duodenal stricturing, gastroparesis

Group and save/cross-match 2–6 units depending on starting haemoglobin

General anaesthesia

Gastric ulcers may prove to be malignant and patients may require further surgery for definitive management of their cancer

Further endoscopy will be needed to ensure ulcer healing

Duodenal ulcers will require proton pump inhibition and H. pylori eradication

1. Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg 2009;33(7):1368–73.reference
2. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 1996;224:131–8.reference
3. Kocer B, Surmeli S, Solak C, et al. Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22(4):565–70.reference

Bariatric surgical procedures are divided into malabsorptive procedures and restrictive procedures. Restrictive procedures primarily reduce stomach size and malabsorptive procedures, while they may also reduce the size of the stomach, primarily act to reduce absorption of ingested food. Sleeve gastrectomy is an example of a restrictive procedure. It is often used as a bridge procedure in high-risk patients prior to definitive weight loss procedures such as a duodenal switch.

Sleeve gastrectomy is a partial longitudinal gastrectomy. It removes the entire greater curvature of the stomach leaving a gastric volume of approximately 100mL, which drains directly into the duodenum without need for anastomosis. It can be performed laparoscopically or via an upper midline incision.

If performed laparoscopically—conversion to open procedure

Primary: weight loss

Secondary: resolution of obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension

Conservative: diet and exercise

Medical: lipid binders (e.g. orlistat)

Surgical: malabsorptive surgical procedures, intragastric balloon

General: bleeding, infection (chest/wound/systemic), DVT/pulmonary embolism/CVA/myocardial infarction

Specific:

Early: staple line leak, splenic injury

Late: gastric stenosis, gastro-oesophageal reflux, dilatation of the gastric pouch (leading to weight gain), vitamin B12 and iron deficiency, port site hernia

Group and save

General anaesthesia

Patients require close monitoring by a multidisciplinary team in the initial postoperative period

This includes monitoring and treatment of any psychological sequelae

Long-term weight loss follow-up may be managed in the community by primary care teams

1. Akkary, E., A. Duffy, and R. Bell. Deciphering the sleeve: technique, indications, efficacy, and safety of sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg, 2008. 18(10): p. 1323-9.reference
2. Gumbs, A.A., et al. Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg, 2007. 17(7): p. 962–9.reference

Splenectomy may be required in the treatment of haematological disorders, trauma, or in the case of massive splenomegaly to control symptoms and prevent injury.

Splenectomy is associated with long-term risk of infection so patients require preoperative immunizations where possible and will require lifelong antibiotics prophylaxis.1 In traumatic splenic injury, splenic conservation should be considered at the time of laparotomy. Splenectomy may be performed laparoscopically or via a left subcostal or upper midline incision.2

In the case of massive splenomegaly—a long oblique incision, bilateral subcostal incision, or a roof-top incision may be necessary

Diagnostic: identify pathological cause of splenic enlargement (lymphoma etc.)

Therapeutic: haematological benefit, control bleeding

• This is dependent on the indication for the surgery; medical treatment for haematological conditions is usually exhausted prior to consideration of surgery. In the case of trauma, spleen-preserving procedures are preferred where possible

Early: bleeding, pancreatic injury (the tail of the pancreas can be damaged during the ligation of the hilar vessels), colonic injury

Late: overwhelming infection (OPSI). This is caused by encapsulated bacteria, including Streptococcus pneumoniae. The lifetime risk is approximately 5% with the majority of cases occurring in the first few years post-splenectomy, thromboembolic complications (increased following removal of the spleen due to a rise in the platelet count)

Group and save, cross-matched blood (2–6 units) should be available in cases of massive splenomegaly. In certain haematological conditions, additional blood products (e.g. platelets) should be made available

General anaesthesia

In elective splenectomy patients should receive immunizations for S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and Neisseria meningitidis 2 weeks prior to surgery

In the emergency setting, immunizations should be delayed to 2 weeks postoperatively to ensure an adequate immune response

Patients will require lifelong prophylactic antibiotics (oral phenoxymethylpenicillin or erythromycin)

1. Habermalz B, Sauerland S, Decker G, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 2008;22(4):821–48.reference
2. Working Party of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology Clinical Haematology Task Force. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen. BMJ 1996;312(7028):430–4.reference
3. Cadili A, de Gara C. Complications of splenectomy. Am J Med 2008;121(5):371–5.reference

Vagotomies are used in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and their purpose is to abolish vagal stimulation of the parietal cells, thereby decreasing gastric acid secretion.1 Highly selective vagotomy is rarely performed today as proton pump inhibition can virtually obliterate all gastric acid secretion. Indications for highly selective vagotomy include treatment of complications of increased acid secretion despite proton pump inhibitor treatment and non-compliant patients. This procedure can be performed laparoscopically or via an upper midline incision.

None

Therapeutic: symptomatic relief, prevention of the complications of peptic ulcer disease, allow for ulcer healing and prevention of further ulceration

Conservative: dietary and lifestyle modification (e.g. smoking)

Medical: proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists

Surgical: subtotal gastrectomy—for excision of any concurrent ulcers

Early: bleeding, infection (wound/chest/systemic), lesser curve necrosis with perforation, gastroparesis

Late: dumping syndrome, delayed gastric emptying, recurrent ulceration, increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal infection

Group and save

General anaesthesia

Patients require close follow-up and repeat endoscopy to assess the success of the surgery and monitor for further ulceration or malignancy

1. Gilliam AD, Speake WJ, Lobo DN, et al. Current practice of emergency vagotomy and Helicobacter pylori eradication for complicated peptic ulcer in the United Kingdom. Br J Surg 2003;90(1):88–90.reference
2. Jordan PH, Thornby J. Twenty years after parietal cell vagotomy or selective vagotomy antrectomy for treatment of duodenal ulcer. Final report. Ann Surg 1994;220(3):283–96.reference
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close